CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04410991GEMINI 2Updated Jul 2, 2025Results posted

Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) Study of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor Tolebrutinib (SAR442168) (GEMINI 2)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Tolebrutinib and Teriflunomide HMR1726 in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Sanofi. Completed at 186 sites in 28 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-02.

Sponsored by Sanofi · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
899
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary Objective:

To assess efficacy of daily SAR442168 compared to a daily dose of 14 mg teriflunomide (Aubagio) measured by annualized adjudicated relapse rate (ARR) in participants with relapsing forms of MS

Secondary Objective:

To assess efficacy of SAR442168 compared to teriflunomide (Aubagio) on disability progression, MRI lesions, cognitive performance and quality of life To evaluate the safety and tolerability of daily SAR442168 To evaluate pharmacodynamics (PD) of SAR442168

Read the detailed description

Study duration varied per participant in this event driven trial with a treatment duration of approximately 18 to 36 months. Participants completing the study were offered to participate in a long term safety study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Sanofi is the lead sponsor of 1,508 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 198 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The participant must be 18 to 55 years of age, inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent
  • The participant must have been diagnosed with RMS according to the 2017 revision of the McDonald diagnostic criteria
  • The participant has an expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score ≤5.5 at the first Screening Visit
  • The participant must have at least 1 of the following prior to screening:

    • ≥1 documented relapse within the previous year OR
    • ≥2 documented relapses within the previous 2 years, OR
    • ≥1 documented Gd enhancing lesion on an MRI scan within the previous year
  • Contraceptive use by men or women should be consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies
  • Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following during the intervention period and until accelerated elimination procedure:

    • Refrain from donating sperm

Plus either:

  • Be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse as their preferred and usual lifestyle (abstinent on a long term and persistent basis) and agree to remain abstinent OR
  • Must agree to use contraception/barrier as detailed below
  • Agree to use a male condom and should also be advised of the benefit for a female partner to use a highly effective method of contraception as a condom may break or leak when having sexual intercourse with a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) who is not currently pregnant

    - A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions apply:

  • Is not a WOCBP OR
  • Is a WOCBP and agrees to use a contraceptive method that is highly effective (with a failure rate of \<1% per year), preferably with low user dependency during the intervention period and until accelerated elimination procedure is completed (or for at least 10 days after the last dose of SAR442168, if the case was unblinded) and agrees not to donate eggs (ova, oocytes) for the purpose of reproduction during the study and for the same period of time.

    • A WOCBP must have a negative highly sensitive pregnancy test at screening and within 24hours before the first dose of study intervention.
    • If a urine test cannot be confirmed as negative (eg, an ambiguous result), a serum pregnancy test is required. In such cases, the participant must be excluded from participation if the serum pregnancy result is positive.
    • The Investigator is responsible for review of medical history, menstrual history, and recent sexual activity to decrease the risk for inclusion of a woman with an early undetected pregnancy.
    • The participant must have given written informed consent prior to undertaking any study related procedure. This includes consent to comply with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol. In countries where the legal age of maturity is greater than 18 years, a specific ICF for such legally minor participants must also be signed by the participant's legally authorized representative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • The participant has been diagnosed with primary progressive multiplesclerosis (PPMS) according to the 2017 revision of the McDonald diagnostic criteria or with nonrelapsing secondary progressive multiplesclerosis (SPMS)
  • The participant has a history of infection or may be at risk for infection including but not limited to: HIV, transplantation, live attenuated vaccines, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, tuberculosis, hepatitis B or C, any persistent chronic or active recurring infection
  • Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities (including evidence of liver injury) or electrocardiogram abnormalities at Screening.
  • The participant has conditions or situations that would adversely affect participation in this study, including but not limited to:

    • A short life expectancy due to pre-existing health condition(s) as determined by their treating neurologist
    • Medical condition(s) or concomitant disease(s) making them nonevaluable for the primary efficacy endpoint or that would adversely affect participation in this study, as judged by the Investigator
    • A requirement for concomitant treatment that could bias the primary evaluation
  • The participant has a history of or currently has concomitant medical or clinical conditions that would adversely affect participation in this study
  • At screening, the participant is positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and/or hepatitis B core antibody and/or is positive for hepatitis C antibody
  • The participant has any of the following:

    • A bleeding disorder or known platelet dysfunction at any time prior to the screening visit
    • A platelet count \<150 000/μL at the screening visit
  • The participant has a lymphocyte count below the lower limit of normal (LLN) at the screening visit
  • The presence of psychiatric disturbance or substance abuse
  • Prior/concomitant therapy
  • The participant is receiving potent and moderate inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A or potent inhibitors of CYP2C8 hepatic enzymes
  • The participant is receiving anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapies
  • The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
899 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SAR442168

    Dose 1 of oral SAR442168 daily + placebo to match the teriflunomide tablet once daily

    Drug: Tolebrutinib · Drug: Placebo to match Teriflunomide

  • Active comparator
    Teriflunomide

    Oral 14 mg oral teriflunomide + placebo to match the SAR442168 tablet once daily

    Drug: Teriflunomide HMR1726 · Drug: Placebo to match Tolebrutinib

Interventions

  • DrugTolebrutinib

    Pharmaceutical form: Tablet Route of administration: Oral

    Also known as: SAR442168

  • DrugTeriflunomide HMR1726

    Pharmaceutical form: Tablet Route of administration: Oral

  • DrugPlacebo to match Tolebrutinib

    Pharmaceutical form: Tablet Route of administration: Oral

  • DrugPlacebo to match Teriflunomide

    Pharmaceutical form: Tablet Route of administration: Oral

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) as Assessed by Confirmed Protocol-defined Adjudicated Relapses

    Multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse was defined as a monophasic, acute or subacute onset of new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination. Symptoms were attributable to MS, lasted for \>=24 hours with or without recovery, present at normal body temperature, and preceded by \>=30 days of clinical stability.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale

    The EDSS was a disability scale that assessed the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS score ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), increasing in increments of 0.5 points. Higher scores indicated increased disability. Time to onset of 6-month CDW was defined as the time from randomization to the onset of a confirmed, sustained increase from baseline in EDSS score (of \>=1.5 points when the baseline score was 0, of \>=1.0 point when the baseline score was 0.5 to \<=5.5, of \>=0.5 points when the baseline EDSS score was \>5.5) over at least 6 months that was not attributable to another etiology.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months

  2. Time to Onset of 3-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale

    The EDSS was a disability scale that assessed the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS score ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), increasing in increments of 0.5 points. Higher scores indicated increased disability. Time to onset of 3-month CDW was defined as the time from randomization to the onset of a confirmed, sustained increase from baseline in EDSS score (of \>=1.5 points when the baseline score was 0, of \>=1.0 point when the baseline score was 0.5 to \<=5.5, of \>=0.5 points when the baseline EDSS score was \>5.5) over at least 3 months that was not attributable to another etiology.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months

  3. Mean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2-Hyperintense Lesions Per Year

    Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was performed to identify number of new and/or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions defined as the sum of the individual number of new and/or enlarging T2 lesions starting from baseline up to and including the EOS visit.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months

  4. Mean Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1-Hyperintense Lesions Per Scan

    MRI of the brain was performed to identify number of new Gd-enhancing T1-hyperintense lesions defined as the sum of the individual number of new Gd- enhancing T1-hyperintense lesions starting from baseline up to and including the EOS visit.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months

  5. Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at EOS

    The SDMT was used to assess processing speed, divided attention, visual scanning, tracking and motor speed. It involved a simple substitution task using a reference key. The number of correct substitutions and number of items completed within a 90 second interval (maximum 110 seconds) were recorded. A decrease of 4 points from baseline on the SDMT was considered meaningful worsening. The score was the number of correctly coded items from 0-110 in 90 seconds; higher scores indicating a better outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)

  6. Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT-II) at EOS

    The CVLT-II was a verbal learning and memory test consisting of recall and recognition of a list of 16 words. For each assessment, 5 trials were completed. Total Correct Recall Trials 1-5 was scaled to a normalized T-score metric, which had a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, the maximum possible score was 80 and a minimum was 0. Higher values indicated improved cognitive function. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)

  7. Time to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale

    The EDSS was a disability scale that assessed the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS score ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), increasing in increments of 0.5 points. Higher scores indicated increased disability. CDI was defined as a decrease of \>=1 point from baseline in the EDSS score lasting at least 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months

  8. Percent Change in Brain Volume Loss at EOS Compared to Month 6

    MRI of the brain was performed at the specified timepoints to detect the changes in brain volume loss.

    Time frame: Month 6 to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)

  9. Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life 54 (MSQoL-54) Questionnaire Score at EOS

    MSQoL-54 was standardized instrument comprising generic and MS-specific items. This 54-item instrument generated 12 subscales and 2 single-item measures (satisfaction with sexual function \[1 item\]; change in health \[1 item\]). 12 subscales were: a: physical health (10 items), b: health perceptions (5 items), c: energy (5 items), d: role limit physical (4 items), e: sexual function (4 items), f: pain (3 items), g: social function (3 items), h: health distress (4 items), i: overall quality of life (2 items), j: emotional well-being (5 items), k: role limitations emotional (3 items) and l: cognitive function (4 items). Physical and mental health composite score were calculated as weighted sum of 'a to h' and 'i to l' subscales respectively. Each composite score was transformed linearly to common 0 (worst) to 100 (best) score range; higher score indicated improved quality of life. Baseline was defined as last available value prior to first dose of study intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)

  10. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), TEAEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. An AESI was an AE (serious or nonserious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment period.

    Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to the earliest of either 10 days post last dose, death or last contact; up to approximately 48 months

  11. Change From Baseline in Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) and Serum Chitinase-3 Like Protein-1 (Chi3L1) Levels at EOS

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess change from baseline in NfL and Chi3L1. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)

  12. Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels at EOS

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess change from baseline in IgG and IgM levels. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)

07

Results

Posted Jun 18, 2025

Participant flow

This study was conducted at 154 sites in 25 countries. A total of 1093 participants were screened from 11-Jun-2020 to 08-Aug-2022, of which 194 were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to not meeting eligibility criteria.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Started452447
Randomized and treated451447
Completed378384
Not completed7463
Withdrew: Poor compliance to protocol54
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject5955
Withdrew: Other104

Outcome measures

PrimaryAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) as Assessed by Confirmed Protocol-defined Adjudicated Relapses

Multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse was defined as a monophasic, acute or subacute onset of new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination. Symptoms were attributable to MS, lasted for \>=24 hours with or without recovery, present at normal body temperature, and preceded by \>=30 days of clinical stability.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months
Reported as:
Number · relapses per participant year
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) as Assessed by Confirmed Protocol-defined Adjudicated Relapses
relapses per participant yearTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) as Assessed by Confirmed Protocol-defined Adjudicated Relapses0.109 (0.088 to 0.134)0.108 (0.089 to 0.131)
Statistical analysis
  • Teriflunomide 14 mg vs Tolebrutinib 60 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.9758 (Threshold for significance at 2-sided 0.05 level.) · Relative risk: 0.996 · 95% CI 0.754 to 1.315
SecondaryTime to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale

The EDSS was a disability scale that assessed the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS score ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), increasing in increments of 0.5 points. Higher scores indicated increased disability. Time to onset of 6-month CDW was defined as the time from randomization to the onset of a confirmed, sustained increase from baseline in EDSS score (of \>=1.5 points when the baseline score was 0, of \>=1.0 point when the baseline score was 0.5 to \<=5.5, of \>=0.5 points when the baseline EDSS score was \>5.5) over at least 6 months that was not attributable to another etiology.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale
monthsTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Time to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale12.14 (1.4 to 38.9)15.12 (2.0 to 37.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Teriflunomide 14 mg vs Tolebrutinib 60 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.0114 (Derived from log-rank test with stratification of EDSS strata (\<4, \>=4), geographic region (US, non-US).) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.582 · 95% CI 0.380 to 0.891
SecondaryTime to Onset of 3-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale

The EDSS was a disability scale that assessed the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS score ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), increasing in increments of 0.5 points. Higher scores indicated increased disability. Time to onset of 3-month CDW was defined as the time from randomization to the onset of a confirmed, sustained increase from baseline in EDSS score (of \>=1.5 points when the baseline score was 0, of \>=1.0 point when the baseline score was 0.5 to \<=5.5, of \>=0.5 points when the baseline EDSS score was \>5.5) over at least 3 months that was not attributable to another etiology.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Onset of 3-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale
monthsTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Time to Onset of 3-Month Confirmed Disability Worsening as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale12.11 (1.4 to 39.1)12.11 (2.0 to 42.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Teriflunomide 14 mg vs Tolebrutinib 60 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.0181 (Derived from log-rank test with stratification of EDSS strata (\<4, \>=4), geographic region (US, non-US).) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.641 · 95% CI 0.444 to 0.925
SecondaryMean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2-Hyperintense Lesions Per Year

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was performed to identify number of new and/or enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions defined as the sum of the individual number of new and/or enlarging T2 lesions starting from baseline up to and including the EOS visit.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months
Reported as:
Mean · number of new and/or enlarging T2lesions
Mean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2-Hyperintense Lesions Per Year
number of new and/or enlarging T2lesionsTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Mean Number of New and/or Enlarging T2-Hyperintense Lesions Per Year4.369 (3.587 to 5.322)5.092 (4.340 to 5.975)
Statistical analysis
  • Teriflunomide 14 mg vs Tolebrutinib 60 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.2362 · Relative risk: 1.165 · 95% CI 0.905 to 1.502
SecondaryMean Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1-Hyperintense Lesions Per Scan

MRI of the brain was performed to identify number of new Gd-enhancing T1-hyperintense lesions defined as the sum of the individual number of new Gd- enhancing T1-hyperintense lesions starting from baseline up to and including the EOS visit.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months
Reported as:
Mean · number of new Gd-enhancing T1 lesions
Mean Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1-Hyperintense Lesions Per Scan
number of new Gd-enhancing T1 lesionsTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Mean Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1-Hyperintense Lesions Per Scan0.217 (0.169 to 0.280)0.460 (0.365 to 0.581)
Statistical analysis
  • Teriflunomide 14 mg vs Tolebrutinib 60 mg · Chi-squared · p = <0.0001 · Relative risk: 2.118 · 95% CI 1.502 to 2.987
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at EOS

The SDMT was used to assess processing speed, divided attention, visual scanning, tracking and motor speed. It involved a simple substitution task using a reference key. The number of correct substitutions and number of items completed within a 90 second interval (maximum 110 seconds) were recorded. A decrease of 4 points from baseline on the SDMT was considered meaningful worsening. The score was the number of correctly coded items from 0-110 in 90 seconds; higher scores indicating a better outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at EOS
score on a scaleTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at EOS0.428 ± 0.03730.374 ± 0.0370
Statistical analysis
  • Teriflunomide 14 mg vs Tolebrutinib 60 mg · MMRM · p = 0.3100 · Least square (ls) mean difference: -0.053 · 95% CI -0.156 to 0.050
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT-II) at EOS

The CVLT-II was a verbal learning and memory test consisting of recall and recognition of a list of 16 words. For each assessment, 5 trials were completed. Total Correct Recall Trials 1-5 was scaled to a normalized T-score metric, which had a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, the maximum possible score was 80 and a minimum was 0. Higher values indicated improved cognitive function. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · T-score
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT-II) at EOS
T-scoreTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT-II) at EOS16.431 ± 0.682515.819 ± 0.6740
Statistical analysis
  • Teriflunomide 14 mg vs Tolebrutinib 60 mg · MMRM · p = 0.5235 · Ls mean difference: -0.612 · 95% CI -2.493 to 1.269
SecondaryTime to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale

The EDSS was a disability scale that assessed the following 7 functional domains: visual, brainstem, pyramidal \[motor\], cerebellar \[coordination\], sensory, cerebral, and bowel/bladder. The total EDSS score ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), increasing in increments of 0.5 points. Higher scores indicated increased disability. CDI was defined as a decrease of \>=1 point from baseline in the EDSS score lasting at least 6 months.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to approximately 48 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale
monthsTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Time to Onset of 6-Month Confirmed Disability Improvement (CDI) as Assessed by Expanded Disability Status Scale12.05 (2.8 to 30.6)9.04 (2.6 to 33.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Teriflunomide 14 mg vs Tolebrutinib 60 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.0079 (Derived from log-rank test with stratification of EDSS strata (\<4, \>=4), geographic region (US, non-US).) · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.652 · 95% CI 1.145 to 2.383
SecondaryPercent Change in Brain Volume Loss at EOS Compared to Month 6

MRI of the brain was performed at the specified timepoints to detect the changes in brain volume loss.

Time frame:
Month 6 to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percent Change in Brain Volume Loss at EOS Compared to Month 6
percent changeTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Percent Change in Brain Volume Loss at EOS Compared to Month 6-0.740 ± 0.0394-0.696 ± 0.0387
Statistical analysis
  • Teriflunomide 14 mg vs Tolebrutinib 60 mg · MMRM · p = 0.4266 · Ls mean difference: 0.044 · 95% CI -0.065 to 0.153
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life 54 (MSQoL-54) Questionnaire Score at EOS

MSQoL-54 was standardized instrument comprising generic and MS-specific items. This 54-item instrument generated 12 subscales and 2 single-item measures (satisfaction with sexual function \[1 item\]; change in health \[1 item\]). 12 subscales were: a: physical health (10 items), b: health perceptions (5 items), c: energy (5 items), d: role limit physical (4 items), e: sexual function (4 items), f: pain (3 items), g: social function (3 items), h: health distress (4 items), i: overall quality of life (2 items), j: emotional well-being (5 items), k: role limitations emotional (3 items) and l: cognitive function (4 items). Physical and mental health composite score were calculated as weighted sum of 'a to h' and 'i to l' subscales respectively. Each composite score was transformed linearly to common 0 (worst) to 100 (best) score range; higher score indicated improved quality of life. Baseline was defined as last available value prior to first dose of study intervention.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life 54 (MSQoL-54) Questionnaire Score at EOS
score on a scaleTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Physical health composite score-1.040 ± 0.7404-1.199 ± 0.7304
Mental health composite score-1.657 ± 0.8709-1.390 ± 0.8581
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), TEAEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. An AESI was an AE (serious or nonserious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment period.

Time frame:
From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to the earliest of either 10 days post last dose, death or last contact; up to approximately 48 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), TEAEs Leading to Permanent Study Intervention Discontinuation and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
ParticipantsTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
TEAEs387385
TESAEs3749
TEAEs leading to permanent study intervention discontinuation1719
TEAESIs4046
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) and Serum Chitinase-3 Like Protein-1 (Chi3L1) Levels at EOS

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess change from baseline in NfL and Chi3L1. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
Reported as:
Median · picogram/milliliter
Change From Baseline in Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) and Serum Chitinase-3 Like Protein-1 (Chi3L1) Levels at EOS
picogram/milliliterTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
NfL-0.900 (-4.390 to 0.770)-0.150 (-3.560 to 2.750)
Chi3L1-281.100 (-6148.400 to 5647.000)1462.500 (-4578.600 to 7002.700)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels at EOS

Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess change from baseline in IgG and IgM levels. Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study intervention.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) to EOS (up to approximately 48 months)
Reported as:
Median · gram per liter
Change From Baseline in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels at EOS
gram per literTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
IgG-0.590 (-1.330 to 0.230)0.140 (-0.720 to 1.060)
IgM-0.160 (-0.320 to -0.020)-0.320 (-0.530 to -0.150)

Adverse events

Collected over From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to the earliest of either 10 days post last dose, death or last contact; up to approximately 48 months. Deaths were collected from baseline (Day 1) up to end of follow-up, approximately 48 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Teriflunomide 14 mg2/452 (0.4%)37/451 (8.2%)313/451 (69.4%)
Tolebrutinib 60 mg1/447 (0.2%)49/447 (11%)279/447 (62.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 79
Most frequent serious events
EventTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Suicide AttemptPsychiatric disorders0/4514/447
AppendicitisInfections and infestations3/4511/447
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations3/4510/447
Covid-19Infections and infestations1/4512/447
Covid-19 PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/4512/447
Uterine LeiomyomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/4512/447
Relapsing-Remitting Multiple SclerosisNervous system disorders0/4512/447
Escherichia PyelonephritisInfections and infestations2/4510/447
Breast CancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)2/4511/447
Acute SinusitisInfections and infestations0/4511/447
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent other events
EventTeriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mg
Covid-19Infections and infestations115/451106/447
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders73/45137/447
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations64/45160/447
HeadacheNervous system disorders54/45161/447
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders49/45122/447
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations36/45131/447
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders34/45110/447
HypertensionVascular disorders34/45113/447
FatigueGeneral disorders21/45130/447
Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations30/45125/447

Baseline characteristics

Analysis was performed on the randomized population.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Teriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mgTotal
Mean36.1 ± 9.336.6 ± 9.336.4 ± 9.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Teriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mgTotal
Female293300593
Male159147306
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Teriflunomide 14 mgTolebrutinib 60 mgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian192342
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American11718
White417411828
More than one race336
Unknown or Not Reported235
08

Study locations

186 sites
  • North Central Neurology Associates, PC-Site Number:8400009
    Cullman, Alabama 35058, United States
  • Center for Neurology and Spine-Site Number:8400089
    Phoenix, Arizona 84018, United States
  • Arcadia Neurology Center-Site Number:8400070
    Arcadia, California 91006, United States
  • Multiple Sclerosis Center of California-Site Number:8400135
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • Harbor UCLA-Site Number:8400088
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
  • Mountain Neurological Research Center, Inc.-Site Number:8400128
    Basalt, Colorado 81621, United States
  • Advanced Neurosciences Research-Site Number:8400025
    Fort Collins, Colorado 80528, United States
  • South Florida Neurology Associates-Site Number:8400029
    Boca Raton, Florida 33487, United States
  • University of Florida Health-Site Number:8400159
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
  • Neurology Associates, PA-Site Number:8400004
    Maitland, Florida 32761, United States
  • University of Miami-Site Number:8400063
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Infinity Clinical Research-Site Number:8400008
    Sunrise, Florida 33351, United States
  • University of South Florida-Site Number:8400006
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Meridian Clinical Research-Site Number:8400003
    Savannah, Georgia 31406, United States
  • Consultants In Neurology-Site Number:8400011
    Northbrook, Illinois 60062, United States
  • Prairie Education and Research Cooperative-Site Number:8400071
    Springfield, Illinois 62701, United States
  • Fort Wayne Neurological Center-Site Number:8400039
    Fort Wayne, Indiana 46804, United States
  • CHI Saint Joseph Medical Group Neurology-Site Number:8400110
    Lexington, Kentucky 40509, United States
  • University of Kentucky-Site Number:8400106
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States
  • Norton Neurology MS Services-Site Number:8400127
    Louisville, Kentucky 40207, United States
  • The NeuroMedical Center-Site Number:8400057
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70810, United States
  • International Neurorehabilitation Institute-Site Number:8400034
    Lutherville-Timonium, Maryland 21093, United States
  • Wayne State University-Site Number:8400046
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology-Site Number:8400051
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422, United States
  • Saint Luke's Hospital-Site Number:8400153
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • West Omaha Family Physicians-Site Number:8400139
    Omaha, Nebraska 68130, United States
  • University Of Nebraska-Site Number:8400129
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
  • Hackensack University Hospital-Site Number:8400047
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • University of New Mexico-Site Number:8400032
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States
  • South Shore Neurologic Associates-Site Number:8400100
    Patchogue, New York 11772, United States
  • Novant Health Multiple Sclerosis Care Center - South Park-Site Number:8400120
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28210, United States
  • Meridian Clinical Research, LLC-Site Number:8400005
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States
  • Sanford Brain & Spine Center-Site Number:8400126
    Fargo, North Dakota 58103, United States
  • Dayton Center for Neurological Disorders-Site Number:8400081
    Centerville, Ohio 45459, United States
  • Jefferson Neurology Associates-Site Number:8400016
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Premier Neurology-Site Number:8400069
    Greer, South Carolina 29650, United States
  • Advanced Neuroscience Center-Site Number:8400035
    Franklin, Tennessee 37064, United States
  • Sibyl Wray, MD, Neurology, PC-Site Number:8400007
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37922, United States
  • Mt Olympus Medical Research-Site Number:8400163
    Katy, Texas 77450, United States
  • Neurology Center of San Antonio-Site Number:8400036
    San Antonio, Texas 78258, United States
  • Texas Institute for Neuroogical Disorders-Sherman-Site Number:8400151
    Sherman, Texas 75092, United States
  • Neurological Associates-Site Number:8400097
    Richmond, Virginia 23229, United States
  • Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare-Site Number:8400022
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53215, United States
  • Investigational Site Number :0320004
    CABA, Buenos Aires C1023AAB, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number :0320002
    Capital Federal, Buenos Aires 1012, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number :0320001
    CABA, Buenos Aires F.D. C1061, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number :0320003
    Rosario, Santa Fe Province 2000, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number :0320005
    San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000AXL, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number :0560005
    Bruges, B-8000, Belgium
  • Investigational Site Number :0560004
    Ghent, 9000, Belgium
  • Investigational Site Number :0560002
    Mons, 7000, Belgium
  • Investigational Site Number :0560001
    Overpelt, 3900, Belgium
  • Investigational Site Number :0760001
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90610-000, Brazil
  • Investigational Site Number :0760002
    Curitiba, 81210-310, Brazil
  • Investigational Site Number :0760007
    São Paulo, 01228-000, Brazil
  • Investigational Site Number :1240002
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2C8, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240012
    Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number :1240014
    London, Ontario N6A 5A5, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number :1240005
    Greenfield Park, Quebec J4V 2J2, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number :1240006
    Gatineau, J8Y1W2, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number :1240021
    Québec, G1W 4R4, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number :1520002
    Santiago, Reg Metropolitana de Santiago 7650568, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number :1520005
    Santiago, Reg Metropolitana de Santiago 833-0024, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number :1520001
    Santiago, Reg Metropolitana de Santiago 8380456, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number :1520003
    Santiago, Reg Metropolitana de Santiago 8431657, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number :1520006
    Concepción, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number :1520004
    Valdivia, 5110683, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number :1910001
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • Investigational Site Number :1910002
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • Investigational Site Number :1910003
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • Investigational Site Number :2030002
    Brno, 65691, Czechia
  • Investigational Site Number :2030011
    Hradec Králové, 50005, Czechia
  • Investigational Site Number :2030001
    Jihlava, 58633, Czechia
  • Investigational Site Number :2030008
    Prague, 10034, Czechia
  • Investigational Site Number :2030005
    Praha 5 - Motol, 15006, Czechia
  • Investigational Site Number :2500019
    Besançon, 25000, France
  • Investigational Site Number :2500018
    Bordeaux, France
  • Investigational Site Number :2500011
    Bron, 69500, France
  • Investigational Site Number :2500005
    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
  • Investigational Site Number :2500006
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Investigational Site Number :2500010
    Nantes, 44093, France
  • Investigational Site Number :2500002
    Nice, 06002, France
  • Investigational Site Number :2500017
    Nîmes, 30029, France
  • Investigational Site Number :2500007
    Paris, 75019, France
  • Investigational Site Number :2500004
    Poissy, 78300, France
  • Investigational Site Number :2500003
    Rennes, 35033, France
  • Investigational Site Number :2500001
    Strasbourg, 67098, France
  • Investigational Site Number :2760005
    Bayreuth, 95445, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number :2760015
    Berlin, 10713, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number :2760014
    Berlin, 12099, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number :2760020
    Bochum, 44791, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number :2760012
    Essen, 45147, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number :2760003
    Würzburg, 97070, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number :3000001
    Athens, 115 28, Greece
  • Investigational Site Number :3000006
    Athens, 11535, Greece
  • Investigational Site Number :3000002
    Athens, 12462, Greece
  • Investigational Site Number :3000007
    Athens, 15125, Greece
  • Investigational Site Number :3000009
    Athens, Greece
  • Investigational Site Number :3000004
    Larissa, 41110, Greece
  • Investigational Site Number :3000003
    Thessaloniki, 546 36, Greece

Showing the first 100 of 186 sites across 28 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Oh J, Arnold DL, Cree BAC, Ionete C, Kim HJ, Sormani MP, Syed S, Chen Y, Maxwell CR, Benoit P, Turner TJ, Wallstroem E, Wiendl H; Tolebrutinib Phase 3 GEMINI 1 and 2 Trial Group. Tolebrutinib versus Teriflunomide in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2025 May 15;392(19):1893-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2415985. Epub 2025 Apr 8. PubMed 40202623 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 20, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 10, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04410991
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 1, 2020
Start date
Jun 11, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 16, 2024
Completion
Jul 16, 2024
Results posted
Jun 18, 2025
Last update
Jul 2, 2025

Study contacts

Clinical Sciences & Operations
study director · Sanofi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion