ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04406545Updated Jan 27, 2022

Microvascular Flow and Reactivity in Patients Presenting in the Acute Phase of COVID-19.

An observational study in Coronavirus Infection, Endothelial Dysfunction and Microvascular Rarefaction, sponsored by National Institute of Cardiology, Laranjeiras, Brazil. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-27.

Sponsored by National Institute of Cardiology, Laranjeiras, Brazil · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
25
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Considering that the intensity of systemic microvascular changes in patients in the acute phase of COVID-19 could be related to disease progression and prognosis, the present cross-sectional and observational study aims to investigate the presence of endothelial dysfunction in these patients, also looking for to evaluate associations between the presence of endothelial dysfunction and demographic, clinical and laboratory variables.

Read the detailed description

An association between the presence of previous cardiovascular disease and adverse prognosis has been demonstrated in patients with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease-19), presenting increases of up to 5-10 times in mortality.

As an initial process, the SARS-CoV-2 virus, anchored in the transmembrane angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ECA2), penetrates host cells, including endothelial cells, pericytes and macrophages, in addition to type II pneumocytes.

Cellular invasion results in massive release of several pro-inflammatory cytokines ("cytokine storm"), such as IL-1β, IFN-1 and IL-6, by the cells of the immune system. In turn, cytokines increase the process of vascular inflammation and the expression of leukocyte-vascular endothelium adhesion proteins, which results in endothelial activation accompanied by a pro-coagulant and pro-adhesive phenotype - between leukocytes, platelets, red blood cells and vascular endothelium - characteristic of the dysfunctional endothelium in the microcirculation, which results in severe changes in the microvascular flow and, as a result, in tissue perfusion.

It is also worth noting that the patients most vulnerable to the development of complications are those with pre-existing endothelial dysfunction, associated with several risk factors such as male gender and smoking, and comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes and obesity, all of which are associated with poor prognosis in COVID -19.

Considering that the intensity of systemic microvascular changes in patients in the acute phase of COVID-19 could be related to disease progression and prognosis, the present cross-sectional and observational study aims to investigate the presence of endothelial dysfunction in these patients, also evaluating associations between the presence of endothelial dysfunction and demographic, clinical and laboratory variables.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronavirus Infection
  • Endothelial Dysfunction
  • Microvascular Rarefaction
03

In context

Coronavirus Infections

952 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronavirus Infections; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 300 across 348 observational studies indexed under Coronavirus Infections.

Browse Coronavirus Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Cardiology, Laranjeiras, Brazil is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

- We will include adult patients will with SARS-CoV-2 positive RT-PCR, admitted to the hospital in a ward or intensive care unit.

Eligibility criteria

  • Age> 18 years admitted to the hospital
  • SARS-CoV-2 positive real-time PCR molecular test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of non-COVID infection with systemic and microbiologically documented repercussions.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • healthy volunteers

    skin laser Doppler perfusion monitoring before and after local thermal hyperemia

    Other: evaluation of skin microvascular flow and reactivity

  • cardiovascular disease and COVID-19 infection

    skin laser Doppler perfusion monitoring before and after local thermal hyperemia

    Other: evaluation of skin microvascular flow and reactivity

  • cardiovascular disease without COVID-19 infection

    skin laser Doppler perfusion monitoring before and after local thermal hyperemia

Interventions

  • Otherevaluation of skin microvascular flow and reactivity

    evaluation of skin microvascular flow and reactivity using laser Doppler perfusion monitoring

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate, through laser doppler, the presence of changes in systemic microvascular endothelial function in patients in the acute phase of COVID-19.

    skin laser Doppler perfusion monitoring before and after local thermal hyperemia

    Time frame: Microvascular reactivity will be evaluated after a 20-minute rest in the supine position in a temperature-controlled room.

Secondary outcomes

  1. To evaluate, using laser Doppler perfusion monitoring, the presence of changes in systemic microvascular endothelial function in patients twelve months after COVID-19 recovery.

    Skin laser Doppler perfusion monitoring before and after local thermal hyperemia

    Time frame: Microvascular reactivity will be evaluated after a 20-minute rest in the supine position in a temperature-controlled room

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Institute of Cardiology
    Rio de Janeiro, 21040-360, Brazil
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2020 to primary completion in Jan 2022, 19 months.

Of 200 non-industry observational studies under Coronavirus Infections, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37. This study's 19 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 218 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 23, 2020
First posted
May 28, 2020
StartActual
May 15, 2020
Primary completionActual
Jan 10, 2022
CompletionActual
Jan 10, 2022
Last update
Jan 27, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04406545
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Cardiology, Laranjeiras, Brazil
Responsible party
Eduardo Tibirica, MD, PhD (Senior Researcher, National Institute of Cardiology, Laranjeiras, Brazil) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 28, 2020
Start date
May 15, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 10, 2022
Completion
Jan 10, 2022
Last update
Jan 27, 2022

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion