ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04400604SALVEUpdated May 22, 2026

Study of Alcohol-related Liver Disease in Europe

An observational study in Alcoholic Liver Disease, sponsored by University Hospital, Lille. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-22.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Lille · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2021; still recruiting 5 years 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
7,500
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Alcohol-induced liver injury is made up of fatty liver, fibrosis and alcoholic hepatitis (AH), elementary lesions that may occur separately, simultaneously or sequentially in a same patient. Among these histological features, alcoholic hepatitis, a necro-inflammatory process is associated with the fastest fibrosis progression leading to cirrhosis in 40% of cases and a pivotal lesion driving increased risk of liver decompensation.

The non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of fibrosis open new perspectives for a better understanding of the natural history of disease-progression from early injury to the cirrhotic stage, for the identification of subgroup patients at risk of developing cirrhosis at medium term and for proposing a strategy of screening of patients with extensive cirrhosis at risk of liver-threatening events. There is an urgent need to perform studies in asymptomatic heavy drinkers in order to identify cut-offs associated with significant risk of development of cirrhosis at medium term. Such objectives require large-scale screening of heavy drinkers. Each of non-invasive methods have been tested to predict with of extensive fibrosis with a high predictive performance as shown below.

A screening policy cannot be accepted without answering the following questions: a) are the requirements of public health screening fulfilled? b) Is the group of patients undergoing screening defined? c) is there a reliable method for of testing? Indeed, the detection of a disease is subject to certain public health requirements and may be proposed to health authorities only if it modifies the management of subjects screened. In the specific case of mass screening of liver fibrosis in heavy drinkers, only the detection of extensive fibrosis could fulfill this criterion because of the potential survival benefit resulting from the screening of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with extensive fibrosis. Indeed, recent studies have found that the probability of receiving curative treatment of HCC was significantly higher in patients who received a six-month surveillance ultrasound. Therefore, the detection of extensive fibrosis seems reasonable in the light of these studies when considering that the yearly risk of development of HCC in the subgroup of heavy drinkers with extensive fibrosis is approximately 3%.

Taking into account the above scientific arguments, the most recent EASL clinical practical guidelines on ALD recommend longitudinal studies using non-invasive tools to evaluate screening of extensive fibrosis and disease progression in heavy drinkers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcoholic Liver Disease
03

In context

Liver Diseases, Alcoholic

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Diseases, Alcoholic; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 7,500 is above the median of 439 across 28 observational studies indexed under Liver Diseases, Alcoholic.

Browse Liver Diseases, Alcoholic studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Lille is the lead sponsor of 631 studies on the registry; 142 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study will be conducted in adults patients with active alcohol excessive consumption defined as > 210 g per week for men and> 140 g per week for women during the previous year.

Patients with high risk of alcoholic-related liver disease.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Active alcohol excessive consumption defined as > 210 g per week for men and> 140 g per week for women during the previous year.
  • Patients with high risk of alcoholic-related liver disease can be included only if the following assessment were available: Abdominal Ultrasound / Ultrasound elastography pulse (FibroScan®) / FibroTest®, AshTest® and LCR1-LCR2® (cost will be supported by Biopredictive) / Non-patented methods: Forns Index; Fib-4, Hepascore®/ Absolute values should be provided for all these methods.

For patient in whom liver stiffness measurements were uninterpretable (unavailable results) only those with FibroTest® and LCR1 and LCR2 measurements can be included.

Results of FibroScan® were considered unavailable based on following criteria: When no value was obtained after at least 10 shots (valid shot=0) OR If SR (Success Rate), the ratio of valid shots to the total number of shots at least 60% OR IQR (InterQuartil Range reflecting variability of measurements) less than 30% of the median LSM (Liver Stiffness Measure) value (IQR≤LSM≤30%).

  • Patients must provide written and agree to have blood stored for the study and tissue stored for those in whom physicians performed liver according their clinical practice.
  • Patients should agree to participate for at least 5-year follow-up.
  • Patients with social insurance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

For all study groups, the following exclusion criteria will be applied:

  • Evidence of other forms of known chronic liver disease including:Positive test result at baseline for surface antigen or positive serology of virus infection (regardless PCR results)/ liver disease / Known or suspected HCC
  • Any previous episode of decompensated liver disease, including ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding before current hospitalization and/or inclusion in the study
  • Known positivity for infection.
  • Terminal extrahepatic illness defined as: All conditions evolved into a clinical stage to limit the patient's functional status (e.g.: heart failure, renal failure, neurological or respiratory diseases, or any other disabling diseases etc. …).
  • Other medical conditions that may diminish to \<2 years.
  • Known extra-hepatic cancers with the exception of basal cell skin cancer.
  • Any other condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would impede completion of the study (eg: Homeless, non-compliant patients…).
  • Mental instability or incompetence, such that the validity of is uncertain.
  • Lack of informed consent or refusal to participate for follow up evaluation.
  • A condition in which repeated blood draws pose more than minimal risk for the subject such as hemophilia, other severe coagulation disorders or significantly impaired venous access.
  • Pregnant or lactating women
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
7,500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • 1: Patients with minimal risk of extensive fibrosis

    TE \< 5.8kPa; rule out cut-off value)

  • 2: Patients with intermediate risk of fibrosis
  • Patients with high risk of extensive fibrosis
  • Patients with compensated cirrhosis biopsy-proven
  • Patients with a first decompensation

    patients with a first decompensation event of cirrhosis after exclusion of HCC.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A first occurrence of clinical diagnosis of cirrhosis and/or its complications(for patients of group 1 and 2)

    The primary endpoint is a composite criterion defined as a first occurrence of clinical diagnosis of cirrhosis and/or its complications. The primary endpoint will be held in the presence of any of the following criteria: Clinical cirrhosis Or Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) Or Histological diagnosis of cirrhosis on liver biopsy Or Biological features of liver dysfunction: INR≥1.5 in the presence of one of the following features: platelet count \<100 000, albumin \<35g, bilirubin \> 2\* ULN it will assess the risk of clinical diagnosis of cirrhosis and/or its complications in heavy drinkers classified according to non-invasive methods at minimal or intermediate risk of extensive fibrosis (groups 1,2).

    Time frame: at five years

Secondary outcomes

  1. cumulative incidence of cirrhosis and/or complications by treating death as competing risk.(for patients of group 3)

    measure the risk of clinical diagnosis of cirrhosis and/or its complications in heavy drinkers classified according to non-invasive methods at high risk of extensive fibrosis (group 3).

    Time frame: at five years

  2. All-cause of death

    all-cause mortality in groups of heavy drinkers (Groups 1,2,3) and cirrhotic groups (Groups 4 et 5)

    Time frame: at five years

  3. Biobanking of liver tissue and blood samples for further analyses such as cirrhosis disease studies

    A multi-national registry of liver tissue and blood samples (bio-bank collection) to get more insights in risk of development of cirrhosis and disease-progression of cirrhosis

    Time frame: at five years

  4. LCR1/LCR2 test

    Measure the performance of LCR1 and LCR2 to predict risk of development of hepatocellular carcinoma (All Groups) LCR1 test combines (using Cox model) hepatoprotective proteins (apolipoproteinA1, haptoglobin) with known risk factors (gender, age, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase), and a marker of fibrosis (alpha2-macroglobulin). To increase the specificity, the LCR2 test was developed by combining the components of LCR1 to alpha-fetoprotein. The predetermined cutoffs are \<0.015 for low-LCR1, and \<0.044 for low-LCR2 will be tested as the rule-out values to exclude a risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Time frame: at five years

  5. Brief Drinking Questionnaire (Audit-C)

    The AUDIT-C (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test) quantifies alcohol misuse, based on 3 questions posed to patients about their consumption habits. It was adapted from the first three questions of the AUDIT. The AUDIT-C is scored on a scale of 0-12 (scores of 0 reflect no alcohol use). Each question has 5 answer choice. In men, a score of 4 or more is considered positive; in women, a score of 3 or more is considered positive. Generally, the higher the AUDIT-C score, the more likely it is that the patient's drinking is affecting his/her health and safety.

    Time frame: at five years

  6. Alcohol consumption according to the WHO category

    Patterns of alcohol consumption will be classified according the 5 risks levels (Abstinence, Low risk, Medium risk, high risk, very high risk).

    Time frame: at five years

  7. The occurrence of decompensation of cirrhosis

    To determine the 5-year risk of first decompensation in patients with biopsy-proven compensated cirrhosis at inclusion (Group 4)

    Time frame: at five years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2032, 132 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 14, 2020
First posted
May 22, 2020
StartActual
Mar 3, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2032
CompletionEst.
Mar 2032
Last update
May 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04400604
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 22, 2020
Start date
Mar 3, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 2032 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2032 (estimated)
Last update
May 22, 2026

Study contacts

Philippe Mathurin, MD,PhD
Contact
philippe.mathurin@chru-lille.fr
3 20 44 55 97 ext. +33
Philippe Mathurin, MD,PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Lille

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion