A Phase 2 interventional study of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy and Radiation Boost in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer, Stage II and Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Stage III, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-05.
Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this research study is to find out what effects (good or bad) may come from a new way of doing radiation therapy for lung cancer. This study is for patients who are not able to get surgery or chemotherapy with their radiation. The way of doing radiation therapy in this trial is called hypofractionated radiation therapy which is a standard approach, but this study allows the actual tumor to get an extra radiation dose while still protecting the organs that are near the tumor.
Primary Objective:
Secondary Objective(s):
7,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,557 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 60 across 5,295 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.
Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,320 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.
Of its 323 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 243 (75%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Hypofractionated radiation therapy will be delivered to all participants. The radiation will be planned in a special way to give the biggest parts of the tumors that are the most difficult to control a little more radiation every day than the lower risk areas.
Drug: Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy · Radiation: Radiation Boost
The prescribed dose will be 70 Gy in 25 fractions. Participants will radiation therapy once a day for 25 days, Monday through Friday (around 5 weeks).
Undergo simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to treat both planned target volumes with daily image guidance. This approach allows daily confirmation of target localization and simultaneous delivery of lower dose per fraction to low risk areas while maintaining a high dose per fraction to the highest risk areas.
Presence or Absence of In-Field Progression
In-field progression is defined as growth of the targeted lesions beyond the treated volume. The treated volume will be defined as the 28.75 Gy isodose line (50% of 57.5 Gy). Pathologic confirmation of tumor progression is preferred, but can be determined radiographically by Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program consensus if biopsy of the lesion in question is not feasible or safe. Investigators will compare the proportion of the sample with any in-field progression at 2 years to the historical control proportion of 0.5, using a one-sample z-test.
Time frame: At 2 years
Proportion of Participants Experiencing Grade 2 or Higher Toxicities
Toxicities will be evaluated per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 constructed with a 95% confidence interval.
Time frame: 25 months
Proportion of Participants That Experienced Local Progression
Participants who have experienced local progression by 13 months (1 year following first post-radiotherapy scan) and by 25 months (2 years following first post-radiotherapy scan), and will also compute the same two proportions considering regional progression, distant progression, and any (of the 3 categories) progression. A 95% confidence intervals around these proportions will be constructed. Participants for whom investigators are unable to determine progression status at 1 and 2 years (e.g., because they do not return for the necessary scans, or because they die without evidence of progression) will be left out of these analyses.
Time frame: At 1 and 2 years after first post-radiotherapy scan
Progression-Free Survival
Progression-free survival will be evaluated by considering the time from registration to progression of disease or death; those who do not experience either outcome will be censored at date of last visit. Using the Kaplan-Meier lifetable method, and will estimate median survival and corresponding 95% confidence intervals; investigators will also explore simple Cox proportional hazards models of this survival outcomes, to examine the predictive influence of variables such as age, gender, ECOG performance status, stage at diagnosis, planning target volume (PTV) 7000 volume, and planning target volume (PTV) 5750 volume.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Overall Survival
Overall survival will be evaluated by considering the time from registration to death from any cause; those who do not die will be censored at date of last visit. Using the Kaplan-Meier lifetable method, and will estimate median survival and corresponding 95% confidence intervals; investigators will also explore simple Cox proportional hazards models of this survival outcomes, to examine the predictive influence of variables such as age, gender, ECOG performance status, stage at diagnosis, planning target volume (PTV) 7000 volume, and planning target volume (PTV) 5750 volume.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
| Milestone | Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy |
|---|---|
| Started | 1 |
| Completed | 1 |
| Not completed | 0 |
In-field progression is defined as growth of the targeted lesions beyond the treated volume. The treated volume will be defined as the 28.75 Gy isodose line (50% of 57.5 Gy). Pathologic confirmation of tumor progression is preferred, but can be determined radiographically by Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program consensus if biopsy of the lesion in question is not feasible or safe. Investigators will compare the proportion of the sample with any in-field progression at 2 years to the historical control proportion of 0.5, using a one-sample z-test.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Toxicities will be evaluated per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 constructed with a 95% confidence interval.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Participants who have experienced local progression by 13 months (1 year following first post-radiotherapy scan) and by 25 months (2 years following first post-radiotherapy scan), and will also compute the same two proportions considering regional progression, distant progression, and any (of the 3 categories) progression. A 95% confidence intervals around these proportions will be constructed. Participants for whom investigators are unable to determine progression status at 1 and 2 years (e.g., because they do not return for the necessary scans, or because they die without evidence of progression) will be left out of these analyses.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Progression-free survival will be evaluated by considering the time from registration to progression of disease or death; those who do not experience either outcome will be censored at date of last visit. Using the Kaplan-Meier lifetable method, and will estimate median survival and corresponding 95% confidence intervals; investigators will also explore simple Cox proportional hazards models of this survival outcomes, to examine the predictive influence of variables such as age, gender, ECOG performance status, stage at diagnosis, planning target volume (PTV) 7000 volume, and planning target volume (PTV) 5750 volume.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Overall survival will be evaluated by considering the time from registration to death from any cause; those who do not die will be censored at date of last visit. Using the Kaplan-Meier lifetable method, and will estimate median survival and corresponding 95% confidence intervals; investigators will also explore simple Cox proportional hazards models of this survival outcomes, to examine the predictive influence of variables such as age, gender, ECOG performance status, stage at diagnosis, planning target volume (PTV) 7000 volume, and planning target volume (PTV) 5750 volume.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Collected over Up to 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy | 1/1 (100%) | 1/1 (100%) | 1/1 (100%) |
| Event | Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy |
|---|---|
| Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders | 1/1 |
| HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 1/1 |
| Event | Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy |
|---|---|
| Skin ulcerationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 1/1 |
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 1/1 |
| FeverGeneral disorders | 1/1 |
| SepsisInfections and infestations | 1/1 |
| Hip fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/1 |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 1/1 |
| DyspneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 1/1 |
| Gastrointestinal disorder, otherGastrointestinal disorders | 1/1 |
| Blood and lymphatic disorders, otherBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 1/1 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy |
|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 1 |
| >=65 years | 0 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy |
|---|---|
| Female | 0 |
| Male | 1 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy |
|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 0 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 1 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy |
|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 |
| Asian | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 |
| Black or African American | 0 |
| White | 1 |
| More than one race | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy |
|---|---|
| United States | 1 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences