An observational study in Incisional Hernia and Incision Infection, sponsored by Inonu University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-20.
Sponsored by Inonu University · Observational
In the development of surgical technique, laparoscopic surgery has created a major breaking point. Although laparoscopy (decreased hospital stay, decreased incisional hernia and wound infection rate...) provides a remarkable advantage compared to open surgery, the need for the extraction site incision could not bring the incision-related morbidity rates to the desired level. That's why SILS and natural hole surgery came to the fore. Colorectal surgery was also affected by this process, and the laparoscopic colectomy procedure combined with transrectal colon extraction was first performed in 1993 (1). Although its use increased gradually after this period, it could not reach the expected levels and this could not resolve the concerns on natural hole surgery.
In this article, our aim is to present the single center results of the patients who performed the extraction with the NOSE method after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
670 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound Infection; 141 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 102 is below the median of 237 across 128 observational studies indexed under Surgical Wound Infection.
Browse Surgical Wound Infection studies →Inonu University is the lead sponsor of 375 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
patients who underwent laparoscopic-natural orifice colectomy at General Surgery Clinic in Inonu University between January 2013 and July 2018
Exclusion Criteria:
complications due to incision and aesthetic score
Hernia, infection, hospital stay and aesthetic score
Time frame: 6 months
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Inonu University