An observational study in Pathology, sponsored by Dr. Ersin Arslan Education and Training Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-12.
Sponsored by Dr. Ersin Arslan Education and Training Hospital · Observational
Routine microscopic examination of the hernia sac is controversial. While some centers do not recommend a routine microscopic examination in inguinal hernias in adult patients, they recommend them in abdominal wall hernias. The investigators aimed to discuss the pathology results and unexpected histopathological findings who underwent abdominal wall and inguinal hernia operation in the light of the literature.
The hernia is defined as the passage of an organ or tissue from one anatomical region to another. Hernia sacs are sent to the pathology department, although there is a difference between clinics. Routine microscopic examination of the hernia sac is controversial. While some centers do not recommend a routine microscopic examination in inguinal hernias in adult patients, they recommend them in abdominal wall hernias. Here, the investigators aimed to discuss the pathology results and unexpected histopathological findings who underwent abdominal wall and inguinal hernia operation in the light of the literature. Patients who have operated hernia and sent hernia sac for histopathological examination were retrospectively screened. Emergency and elective operated patients were included. Hernia repairs without pathology were excluded from the study. Patients' gender, age, operation notes, and pathology results were analyzed. Pathology results were analyzed in two groups as expected findings and unexpected findings. In our study, the probability of encountering an unexpected pathological result was found to be quite low in the pathological evaluation of the hernia sac. Although it may cause additional workload and cost, all hernia sacs should be sent to routine pathological examination. The investigators believe that making savings in these areas through further investigation after the decision of the pathologist.
561 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Inguinal; 76 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 437 is above the median of 150 across 137 observational studies indexed under Hernia, Inguinal.
Browse Hernia, Inguinal studies →Dr. Ersin Arslan Education and Training Hospital is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients who have operated hernia and sent hernia sac for histopathological examination.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Pathology result of the hernia sac
Diagnostic Test: Pathology result
Pathology result of the hernia sac
unexpected finding
rate of unexpected result
Time frame: 2 or 3 week
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Dr. Ersin Arslan Education and Training Hospital