CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04376827ORCHID-LNUpdated Mar 30, 2025Results posted

A Study of Guselkumab in Participants With Active Lupus Nephritis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Guselkumab Dose 1 and Placebo in Lupus Nephritis, sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Terminated at 60 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-30.

Sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Due to enrollment challenges, J\&J Innovative Medicine decided to stop screening and terminate the study early. This decision was not based on a safety concern.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
33
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab in participants with active lupus nephritis (LN).

Read the detailed description

Guselkumab is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds to human interleukin (IL)-23 with high affinity and blocks binding of extracellular IL-23 to cell surface IL-23 receptor, inhibiting IL 23 specific intracellular signaling and subsequent activation and cytokine production. It is used in treatment of plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, generalized pustular psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis. Lupus is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with lesions confined to skin (cutaneous lupus erythematosus [CLE]) to others that involve 1 or more vital internal organs (systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]). Renal involvement due to SLE is termed lupus nephritis (LN). There is a high unmet need for new treatment options in LN that are safe and effective, especially new therapies that can provide improved long-term efficacy over currently available therapies. This study will evaluate safety and efficacy of guselkumab added to standard-of-care compared to placebo added to standard-of-care. Total duration of study is up to 68 weeks: a less than or equal to 8 week screening period, a 48 week double-blind treatment period, a 12 week safety follow-up period after last dose. Participants who complete the assessments at Week 52 and have achieved complete renal response (CRR) may have the option to participate in the long-term extension (LTE) of study through Week 152 and the 12-week safety follow-up visit. Hypothesis of this study is that guselkumab plus standard-of-care is superior to placebo plus standard-of-care in participants with active LN as measured by the proportion of participants inducing at least a 50 percentage reduction of proteinuria with protocol specified steroid tapering regimen at Week 24. Safety assessments include Adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory tests (hematology and chemistry), systolic and diastolic blood pressures over time, monitoring for hypersensitivity reactions, AEs temporally associated with infusion, injection-site reactions, suicidality assessment, and early detection of active tuberculosis (TB).

02

Conditions studied

  • Lupus Nephritis
03

In context

Nephritis

245 studies on the registry are indexed under Nephritis; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 33 is below the median of 49 across 156 interventional studies indexed under Nephritis.

Browse Nephritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC is the lead sponsor of 912 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 278 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 131 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • At screening and randomization, must be receiving oral glucocorticoids at minimum prednisone equivalent dose of 10 milligrams per day (mg/day) and maximum 1 mg/kg/day or less than or equal to (\<=) 60 mg/day, whichever is lower. Treated for greater than or equal to (>=) 6 weeks with stable dosing >=2 weeks before randomization
  • If receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), a stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to randomization
  • Positive antinuclear antibody (ANA; >= 1:80 titer by central laboratory test) or anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (dsDNA) antibodies (>=30 international units per milliliter ([U/mL] by central laboratory test) detected at screening
  • Kidney biopsy documentation of active International Society of Nephrology (ISN)/Renal Pathology Society (RPS) proliferative nephritis: Class III-IV (with or without class V membranous nephritis) within the last 6 months prior to screening or performed during screening
  • Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) >= 1.0 milligram/milligram (mg/mg) assessed on 2 first morning urine void specimens during screening. These 2 specimens do not need to be on consecutive days, however, 2 samples must be tested with UPCR >= 1.0 mg/mg in a row. The UPCR requirement must be met after at least 8 weeks of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) treatment, and after stable glucocorticoid dosing is achieved at the dose intended at time of randomization

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Comorbidities (other than lupus nephritis [LN], example, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) which have required 3 or more courses of systemic glucocorticoids within the previous 12 months
  • Has other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of efficacy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), RA/lupus overlap, psoriasis, Crohn's disease, or active Lyme disease
  • Received PO (orally) or intravenously (IV) cyclophosphamide within 3 months prior to randomization
  • History of latent or active granulomatous infection, including histoplasmosis or coccidioidomycosis, before screening
  • History of being human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody-positive, or tests positive for HIV at screening
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Guselkumab+Standard of Care

    Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 intravenously (IV) at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and guselkumab Dose 2 subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52 and have completed the Week 52 assessment may have the option to participate in the long-term extension (LTE).

    Drug: Guselkumab Dose 1 · Drug: Guselkumab Dose 2 · Drug: Standard-of-care treatment

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo+Standard of Care

    Participants will receive placebo IV at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo SC q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52 and have completed the Week 52 assessment may have the option to participate in the LTE of the study.

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Standard-of-care treatment

Interventions

  • DrugGuselkumab Dose 1

    Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 1 via IV administration.

    Also known as: CNTO 1959

  • DrugPlacebo

    Participants will receive placebo IV at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 (that is, 3 IV doses) and placebo SC q4w from Week 12 through Week 48.

  • DrugGuselkumab Dose 2

    Participants will receive guselkumab Dose 2 via SC route.

    Also known as: CNTO1959

  • DrugStandard-of-care treatment

    Participants will receive standard of care treatment including MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids from Week 12 through Week 48.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50 Percent (%) Decrease From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24

    Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 24 was reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.

    Time frame: Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Renal Response (CRR) at Week 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved CRR at Week 24 were reported. CRR was defined as UPCR less than (\<) 0.5 milligrams per milligrams (mg/mg), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to (\>=) 60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73m\^2) or no confirmed decrease \>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose less than or equal to (\<=) 10 milligrams per day (mg/d). Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure (OM) time point (Week 24) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the endpoint time point (Week 24).

    Time frame: Week 24

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR at Week 52

    Percentage of participants who achieved CRR at Week 52 were reported. CRR was defined as UPCR less than (\<) 0.5 mg/mg, eGFR \>= 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 or no confirmed decrease \>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose \<= 10 mg/d. Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52).

    Time frame: Week 52

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Sustained Reduction in Steroid Dose <=10 mg/d of Prednisone or Equivalent From Week 16 Through Week 24

    Percentage of participants achieving a sustained reduction in steroid dose less than or equal to (\<=) 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent from week 16 through Week 24were reported.

    Time frame: From Week 16 through Week 24

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Decrease in Proteinuria From Baseline at Week 52

    Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 52 were reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.

    Time frame: Week 52

  5. Percentage of Participants With Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) < 0.5 mg/mg at Week 24

    Percentage of participants with UPCR \<0.5 mg/mg at Week 24 were reported.

    Time frame: Week 24

  6. Percentage of Participants With UPCR < 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24

    Percentage of participants with UPCR less than 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24 were reported.

    Time frame: Week 24

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR Through Week 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved CRR through Week 24 was reported. CRR was defined as UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg, eGFR \>= 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 or no confirmed decrease\>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose \<= 10 mg/d. Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to lupus nephritis (LN) or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 24) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 24).

    Time frame: Up to Week 24

  8. Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure (TF) Through Week 52

    Percentage of participants with TF through Week 52 was reported. TF was defined as time to the first occurrence of TF from baseline. Participant was considered to have treatment failure, who did not continue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52).

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  9. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Number of participants with AEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.

    Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

  10. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Number of Participants with SAEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, or was medically important.

    Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

  11. Number of Participants With Related AEs

    Number of participants with related AEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. Related AE was defined as the AE assessed by the investigator related to study agent.

    Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

  12. Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention

    Number of participants with AEs leading to discontinuation of study intervention were reported.

    Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

  13. Number of Participants With Infections

    Number of participants with infections as assessed by the investigator were reported.

    Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

  14. Number of Participants With Serious Infections

    Number of participants with serious infections as assessed by the investigator were reported.

    Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

  15. Number of Participants With Infections Requiring Oral or Parenteral Antimicrobial Treatment

    Number of participants with infections requiring oral or parenteral antimicrobial treatment planned to be were reported.

    Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

  16. Number of Participants With AEs Temporally Associated With an Infusion

    Number of participants with AEs temporally (a reaction that occurred during or within 1 hour after infusion) associated with an infusion were reported. AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.

    Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

  17. Number of Participants With AEs With Injection-site Reactions

    Number of participants with injection-site reactions as assessed by the investigator were reported. An injection-site reaction is any adverse reaction at a SC study intervention injection-site.

    Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

  18. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: activated partial thromboplastin time was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  19. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Basophils

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: basophils was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  20. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Eosinophils

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: eosinophils was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  21. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  22. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  23. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  24. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematocrit

    Change from baseline in clinical Laboratory parameter: hematocrit was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  25. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hemoglobin

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: hemoglobin was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  26. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter Leukocytes

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: leukocytes was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  27. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Lymphocytes

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: lymphocytes was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  28. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Monocytes

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: monocytes was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  29. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematology Parameter: Segmented Neutrophils

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: segmented neutrophils was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  30. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Platelets

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: platelets was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  31. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: prothrombin international normalized ratio was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  32. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin Time

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: prothrombin time was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  33. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory hematology parameter:reticulocytes/erythrocytes was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  34. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alanine Aminotransferase

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: alanine aminotransferase was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  35. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Albumin

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: albumin was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  36. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: alkaline phosphatase was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  37. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Aspartate Aminotransferase

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: aspartate aminotransferase was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  38. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bicarbonate

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: bicarbonate was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  39. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bilirubin

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: bilirubin was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  40. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Calcium

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: calcium was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  41. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Chloride

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: chloride was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  42. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Cholesterol

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: cholesterol was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  43. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatine Kinase

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: creatine kinase was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  44. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatinine

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: creatinine was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  45. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: protein was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  46. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Phosphate

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: phosphate was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  47. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Sodium

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: sodium was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  48. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Potassium

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: potassium was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  49. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urea Nitrogen

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urea nitrogen was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52

  50. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted for Body Surface Area (BSA)

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: GFR from Creatinine Adjusted for BSA was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52

  51. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenase

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: gamma glutamyl transferase and lactate dehydrogenase were reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52

  52. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and Magnesium

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: glucose and magnesium were reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 52

  53. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: protein was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52

  54. Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Protein/Creatinine

    Change from baseline in chemistry parameter: protein/creatinine was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52

  55. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urate

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urate was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 52

  56. Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urine Protein

    Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urine protein was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52

  57. Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry

    Number of participants with maximum US NCI-CTCAE toxicity grade (Grade 4) in clinical laboratory parameters: hematology and chemistry were reported. Toxicity were graded as Grade 1: Mild, Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe. Grade 4: Life-threatening and Grade 5: Death.

    Time frame: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

  58. Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Percentage of participants with abnormal vital signs: Systolic and Diastolic blood pressure were reported.

    Time frame: Up to Week 60

  59. Serum Concentration of Guselkumab

    Serum Concentration of guselkumab were reported.

    Time frame: Predose: Weeks 0,4,8,12,16,20,24, 36; Post-dose: Week 0 (1 hour after intravenous administration), Day 2, Week 52 and 60

  60. Number of Participants With Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response

    Treatment-boosted ADA positive participants: participants who were positive at baseline and whose titers increased 2-fold at any time after treatment. Titer values were categorized as\<=1:10, 10 to 100, 100 to 1000, \>1000.

    Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) through Week 24 and Week 60

07

Results

Posted Apr 16, 2024
Limitations and caveats
Due to enrollment challenges, the Sponsor decided to stop screening of new participants and stop the study early. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, some of the planned safety analyses were not performed for the LTE phase participants.

Participant flow

Double Blind Period: Week 0 to Week 52
Participant flow — Double Blind Period: Week 0 to Week 52
MilestonePlaceboGuselkumab
Started1617
Completed98
Not completed79
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor68
LTE Phase:Week 52 to 96(LTE Termination)
Participant flow — LTE Phase:Week 52 to 96(LTE Termination)
MilestonePlaceboGuselkumab
Started41
Completed00
Not completed41
Withdrew: Protocol-specified withdrawal criterion met10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor30

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50 Percent (%) Decrease From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24

Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 24 was reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50 Percent (%) Decrease From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24
percentage of participantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50 Percent (%) Decrease From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 2456.335.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Renal Response (CRR) at Week 24

Percentage of participants who achieved CRR at Week 24 were reported. CRR was defined as UPCR less than (\<) 0.5 milligrams per milligrams (mg/mg), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to (\>=) 60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73m\^2) or no confirmed decrease \>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose less than or equal to (\<=) 10 milligrams per day (mg/d). Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure (OM) time point (Week 24) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the endpoint time point (Week 24).

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Renal Response (CRR) at Week 24
percentage of participantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Renal Response (CRR) at Week 2418.817.6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR at Week 52

Percentage of participants who achieved CRR at Week 52 were reported. CRR was defined as UPCR less than (\<) 0.5 mg/mg, eGFR \>= 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 or no confirmed decrease \>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose \<= 10 mg/d. Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52).

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR at Week 52
percentage of participantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR at Week 5225.09.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a Sustained Reduction in Steroid Dose <=10 mg/d of Prednisone or Equivalent From Week 16 Through Week 24

Percentage of participants achieving a sustained reduction in steroid dose less than or equal to (\<=) 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent from week 16 through Week 24were reported.

Time frame:
From Week 16 through Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Sustained Reduction in Steroid Dose <=10 mg/d of Prednisone or Equivalent From Week 16 Through Week 24
percentage of participantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Sustained Reduction in Steroid Dose <=10 mg/d of Prednisone or Equivalent From Week 16 Through Week 2487.594.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Decrease in Proteinuria From Baseline at Week 52

Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 52 were reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Decrease in Proteinuria From Baseline at Week 52
percentage of participantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Decrease in Proteinuria From Baseline at Week 5225.027.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) < 0.5 mg/mg at Week 24

Percentage of participants with UPCR \<0.5 mg/mg at Week 24 were reported.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) < 0.5 mg/mg at Week 24
percentage of participantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Percentage of Participants With Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) < 0.5 mg/mg at Week 2425.029.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With UPCR < 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24

Percentage of participants with UPCR less than 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24 were reported.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With UPCR < 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24
percentage of participantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Percentage of Participants With UPCR < 0.75 mg/mg at Week 2437.535.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR Through Week 24

Percentage of participants who achieved CRR through Week 24 was reported. CRR was defined as UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg, eGFR \>= 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 or no confirmed decrease\>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose \<= 10 mg/d. Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to lupus nephritis (LN) or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 24) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 24).

Time frame:
Up to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR Through Week 24
Percentage of participantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR Through Week 2437.523.5
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Guselkumab · log-rank test · p = 0.7807 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.62 · 80% CI 0.27 to 1.41Hazard ratio and 80% CI: estimated by Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for baseline UPCR level (\<3 mg/mg and \>=3 mg/mg).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Treatment Failure (TF) Through Week 52

Percentage of participants with TF through Week 52 was reported. TF was defined as time to the first occurrence of TF from baseline. Participant was considered to have treatment failure, who did not continue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52).

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure (TF) Through Week 52
Percentage of participantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure (TF) Through Week 5218.835.3
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Guselkumab · long-rank test · p = 0.4654 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.52 · 80% CI 0.62 to 3.85Hazard ratio and 80% CI: estimated by Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for baseline UPCR level (\<3 mg/mg and \>=3 mg/mg).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Number of participants with AEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.

Time frame:
DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
ParticipantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)1212
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Number of Participants with SAEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, or was medically important.

Time frame:
DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
ParticipantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)11
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Related AEs

Number of participants with related AEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. Related AE was defined as the AE assessed by the investigator related to study agent.

Time frame:
DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Related AEs
ParticipantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Number of Participants With Related AEs22
SecondaryNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention

Number of participants with AEs leading to discontinuation of study intervention were reported.

Time frame:
DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention
ParticipantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention12
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Infections

Number of participants with infections as assessed by the investigator were reported.

Time frame:
DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Infections
ParticipantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Number of Participants With Infections56
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Serious Infections

Number of participants with serious infections as assessed by the investigator were reported.

Time frame:
DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Serious Infections
ParticipantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Number of Participants With Serious Infections00
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Infections Requiring Oral or Parenteral Antimicrobial Treatment

Number of participants with infections requiring oral or parenteral antimicrobial treatment planned to be were reported.

Time frame:
DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With AEs Temporally Associated With an Infusion

Number of participants with AEs temporally (a reaction that occurred during or within 1 hour after infusion) associated with an infusion were reported. AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.

Time frame:
DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With AEs Temporally Associated With an Infusion
ParticipantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Number of Participants With AEs Temporally Associated With an Infusion10
SecondaryNumber of Participants With AEs With Injection-site Reactions

Number of participants with injection-site reactions as assessed by the investigator were reported. An injection-site reaction is any adverse reaction at a SC study intervention injection-site.

Time frame:
DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With AEs With Injection-site Reactions
ParticipantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Number of Participants With AEs With Injection-site Reactions10
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: activated partial thromboplastin time was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Seconds
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time
SecondsPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.78 ± 1.7340.96 ± 3.869
Week 520.88 ± 1.387—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Basophils

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: basophils was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Basophils
10^9 cells per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-0.009 ± 0.0512-0.009 ± 0.0502
Week 52-0.070 ± 0.0990—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Eosinophils

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: eosinophils was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Eosinophils
10^9 cells per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.022 ± 0.0472-0.041 ± 0.1620
Week 520.000 ± 0.0283—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · petagram (pg)
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
petagram (pg)PlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.1 ± 1.38-0.8 ± 1.06
Week 52-1.5 ± 2.12—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · femtoliter (fL)
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume
femtoliter (fL)PlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.5 ± 6.35-3.3 ± 5.37
Week 52-4.0 ± 0.00—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^12 cells per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes
10^12 cells per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-0.16 ± 0.5820.12 ± 0.577
Week 52-0.40 ± 0.566—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematocrit

Change from baseline in clinical Laboratory parameter: hematocrit was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of blood cells
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematocrit
percentage of blood cellsPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-0.013 ± 0.0411-0.004 ± 0.0356
Week 52-0.055 ± 0.0495—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hemoglobin

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: hemoglobin was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · grams per liter (g/L)
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hemoglobin
grams per liter (g/L)PlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-5.2 ± 15.57-0.3 ± 14.82
Week 52-17.0 ± 22.63—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter Leukocytes

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: leukocytes was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter Leukocytes
10^9 cells per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-0.622 ± 3.8729-1.157 ± 3.1246
Week 52-5.120 ± 7.7499—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Lymphocytes

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: lymphocytes was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per Liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Lymphocytes
10^9 cells per LiterPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.006 ± 0.5213-0.032 ± 0.3860
Week 52-0.545 ± 1.0960—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Monocytes

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: monocytes was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Monocytes
10^9 cells per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-0.014 ± 0.3277-0.002 ± 0.1268
Week 52-0.510 ± 0.7354—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematology Parameter: Segmented Neutrophils

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: segmented neutrophils was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematology Parameter: Segmented Neutrophils
10^9 cells per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-0.630 ± 3.2494-1.074 ± 2.9652
Week 52-3.990 ± 5.8548—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Platelets

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: platelets was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Platelets
10^9 cells per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-36.7 ± 61.43-17.8 ± 61.89
Week 52-70.5 ± 67.18—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: prothrombin international normalized ratio was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio
RatioPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.02 ± 0.0900.01 ± 0.064
Week 520.00 ± 0.000—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin Time

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: prothrombin time was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · second
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin Time
secondPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.18 ± 0.7660.16 ± 0.425
Week 52-0.03 ± 0.359—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory hematology parameter:reticulocytes/erythrocytes was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of blood cells
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes
percentage of blood cellsPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-0.0007 ± 0.00485-0.0001 ± 0.00541
Week 520.0000 ± 0.01414—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alanine Aminotransferase

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: alanine aminotransferase was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Enzyme units per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alanine Aminotransferase
Enzyme units per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 242.6 ± 10.98-3.1 ± 6.57
Week 522.3 ± 4.92—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Albumin

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: albumin was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Grams per Liter (g/L)
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Albumin
Grams per Liter (g/L)PlaceboGuselkumab
Week 242.4 ± 5.571.9 ± 4.58
Week 523.5 ± 5.32-3.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: alkaline phosphatase was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Enzyme units per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase
Enzyme units per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 241.9 ± 16.751.7 ± 8.07
Week 526.5 ± 5.006.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Aspartate Aminotransferase

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: aspartate aminotransferase was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Enzyme units per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Aspartate Aminotransferase
Enzyme units per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.0 ± 4.97-0.7 ± 5.41
Week 521.5 ± 2.381.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bicarbonate

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: bicarbonate was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bicarbonate
mmol/LPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-0.78 ± 4.970.21 ± 5.41
Week 52-2.20 ± 2.38—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bilirubin

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: bilirubin was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · micromole per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bilirubin
micromole per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.1 ± 1.980.3 ± 2.46
Week 52-0.3 ± 2.064.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Calcium

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: calcium was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Calcium
mmol/LPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.039 ± 0.11720.073 ± 0.0958
Week 520.000 ± 0.18710.010 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Chloride

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: chloride was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Chloride
mmol/LPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.1 ± 4.500.7 ± 0.0958
Week 522.0 ± 4.832.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Cholesterol

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: cholesterol was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Cholesterol
mmol/LPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-1.325 ± 1.30260.017 ± 0.7818
Week 52-2.235 ± 1.65880.210 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatine Kinase

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: creatine kinase was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Enzyme units per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatine Kinase
Enzyme units per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 243.3 ± 42.22-0.5 ± 53.94
Week 52-8.8 ± 36.65-2.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatinine

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: creatinine was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · micromole per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatinine
micromole per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.6 ± 18.306.7 ± 16.78
Week 52-3.3 ± 7.54-5.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: protein was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · g/L
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein
g/LPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 243.0 ± 8.832.9 ± 16.78
Week 527.0 ± 7.391.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Phosphate

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: phosphate was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Phosphate
mmol/LPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.060 ± 0.14980.030 ± 0.2916
Week 52-0.035 ± 0.22130.220 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Sodium

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: sodium was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Sodium
mmol/LPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-0.7 ± 2.300.4 ± 4.24
Week 521.0 ± 1.413.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Potassium

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: potassium was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Potassium
mmol/LPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.19 ± 0.7040.13 ± 0.402
Week 520.03 ± 0.4570.00 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urea Nitrogen

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urea nitrogen was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urea Nitrogen
mmol/LPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-1.23 ± 3.1060.71 ± 2.177
Week 52-1.60 ± 1.5640.50 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted for Body Surface Area (BSA)

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: GFR from Creatinine Adjusted for BSA was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · milliliter/minute/1.73 meter square
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted for Body Surface Area (BSA)
milliliter/minute/1.73 meter squarePlaceboGuselkumab
Week 240.44 ± 21.639-5.87 ± 17.150
Week 526.75 ± 22.5885.60 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenase

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: gamma glutamyl transferase and lactate dehydrogenase were reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · Enzyme units per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenase
Enzyme units per literPlaceboGuselkumab
gamma glutamyl transferase: Week 24-0.6 ± 15.01-3.0 ± 9.70
gamma glutamyl transferase: Week 521.0 ± 8.60-2.0 ± NA
Lactate dehydogenase: Week 24-14.5 ± 47.90-2.5 ± 17.52
Lactate dehydogenase: Week 52-62.5 ± 40.317.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and Magnesium

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: glucose and magnesium were reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 24, 52
Reported as:
Mean · millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and Magnesium
millimoles per liter (mmol/L)PlaceboGuselkumab
Glucose: Week 24-0.23 ± 1.041-0.04 ± 0.908
Glucose:: Week 52-0.03 ± 0.1260.20 ± NA
Magnesium: Week 24-0.024 ± 0.0696-0.022 ± 0.0607
Magnesium: Week 52-0.068 ± 0.0842-0.010 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: protein was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · gram per Liter (g/L)
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein
gram per Liter (g/L)PlaceboGuselkumab
Week 243.0 ± 8.832.9 ± 6.55
Week 527.0 ± 7.391.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Protein/Creatinine

Change from baseline in chemistry parameter: protein/creatinine was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · mg/mg
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Protein/Creatinine
mg/mgPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-1.509 ± 1.9494-0.821 ± 2.4250
Week 52-1.586 ± 1.7966-0.352 ± 1.6960
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urate

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urate was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 24, 52
Reported as:
Mean · micromole per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urate
micromole per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-73.4 ± 104.118.4 ± 48.61
Week 52-79.5 ± 79.38-2.0 ± NA
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urine Protein

Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urine protein was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52
Reported as:
Mean · milligram per liter
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urine Protein
milligram per literPlaceboGuselkumab
Week 24-1322.1 ± 1865.82-310.3 ± 1494.58
Week 52-1821.7 ± 2334.78-166.4 ± 1099.54
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry

Number of participants with maximum US NCI-CTCAE toxicity grade (Grade 4) in clinical laboratory parameters: hematology and chemistry were reported. Toxicity were graded as Grade 1: Mild, Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe. Grade 4: Life-threatening and Grade 5: Death.

Time frame:
DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
ParticipantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased00
Alkaline Phosphatase Increased00
Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased00
Blood Bilirubin Increased00
CPK Increased00
Cholesterol High00
Creatinine Increase00
GGT Increased00
Hypermagnesemia00
Hypernatremia00
Hypertriglyceridemia00
Hypoalbuminemia00
Hypoglycemia00
Hypokalemia00
Hypomagnesemia00
Hyponatremia00
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Prolonged00
Anemia00
Hemoglobin Increased00
Leukocytosis00
Lymphocyte Count Decreased00
Lymphocyte Count Increased00
Neutrophil Count Decreased00
Platelet Count Decreased00
White Blood Cell Decreased00
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Percentage of participants with abnormal vital signs: Systolic and Diastolic blood pressure were reported.

Time frame:
Up to Week 60
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
percentage of participantsPlaceboGuselkumab
Systolic Blood Pressure: <85 mmHg00
Systolic Blood Pressure::>180 mmHg6.35.9
Diastolic Blood Pressure: <55 mmHg6.30
Diastolic Blood Pressure: >115 mmHg6.30
SecondarySerum Concentration of Guselkumab

Serum Concentration of guselkumab were reported.

Time frame:
Predose: Weeks 0,4,8,12,16,20,24, 36; Post-dose: Week 0 (1 hour after intravenous administration), Day 2, Week 52 and 60
Reported as:
Mean · microgram/milliliter
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
microgram/milliliterGuselkumab
Week 0, predose0.00 ± 0.000
Week 0, 1h after IV administration146.20 ± 41.273
Day 2, post-dose96.55 ± 33.805
Week 4, predose11.20 ± 7.175
Week 8, predose12.85 ± 9.549
Week 12, predose18.17 ± 11.784
Week 16, pre-dose9.89 ± 5.016
Week 20, predose7.63 ± 4.689
Week 24, predose6.42 ± 3.447
Week 36, predose6.57 ± 1.827
Week 52, post-dose6.13 ± 3.262
Week 60, post-dose0.39 ± 0.641
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response

Treatment-boosted ADA positive participants: participants who were positive at baseline and whose titers increased 2-fold at any time after treatment. Titer values were categorized as\<=1:10, 10 to 100, 100 to 1000, \>1000.

Time frame:
From Baseline (Week 0) through Week 24 and Week 60
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response
ParticipantsGuselkumab
Week 241
Week 601

Adverse events

Collected over DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/16 (0%)1/16 (6.3%)12/16 (75%)
Guselkumab0/17 (0%)1/17 (5.9%)12/17 (70.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboGuselkumab
Basal Ganglia StrokeNervous system disorders1/160/17
Lupus NephritisRenal and urinary disorders0/161/17
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 60
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboGuselkumab
Lupus NephritisRenal and urinary disorders2/165/17
LymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/160/17
Covid-19Infections and infestations3/160/17
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/163/17
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/160/17
Abdominal Pain UpperGastrointestinal disorders2/160/17
Herpes ZosterInfections and infestations2/161/17
Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations2/162/17
HyperuricaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/161/17
HypertensionVascular disorders2/162/17

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboGuselkumabTotal
Mean38.8 ± 11.6935.3 ± 10.0737 ± 10.86
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)PlaceboGuselkumabTotal
>= 55 years112
< 55 years151631
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboGuselkumabTotal
Female141529
Male224
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboGuselkumabTotal
Hispanic or Latino4711
Not Hispanic or Latino121022
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboGuselkumabTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native123
Asian314
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White121426
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)PlaceboGuselkumabTotal
ARGENTINA549
MEXICO134
RUSSIAN FEDERATION213
TAIWAN303
THAILAND011
UKRAINE5712
UNITED STATES011
08

Study locations

60 sites
  • Medvin Clinical Research
    Covina, California 91722, United States
  • UC San Diego
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • Academic Medical Research Institute
    Los Angeles, California 90022, United States
  • University of Colorado Denver
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • University of Florida College of Medicine
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
  • NYU Langone Ambulatory Care Brooklyn Heights
    Brooklyn, New York 11201, United States
  • The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
    Manhasset, New York 11030, United States
  • Med Research, Inc.
    El Paso, Texas 79902, United States
  • Centro Médico Reumatológico (OMI)
    Buenos Aires, C1015ABO, Argentina
  • Hospital Ramos Mejia
    Caba, 1221, Argentina
  • ARCIS Salud SRL Aprillus asistencia e investigacion
    Caba, C1406AGA, Argentina
  • Instituto Medico Strusberg SA
    Cordoba, 05000, Argentina
  • Clinica Privada Velez Sarsfield
    Córdoba, X5016LIG, Argentina
  • Instituto de Reumatologia - Ir Medical Center S.A.
    Mendoza, 5000, Argentina
  • Instituto Médico de la Fundación de Estudios Clínicos (ECLIN)
    Rosario, S2000DEJ, Argentina
  • Centro de Investigaciones Medicas Tucuman
    San Miguel De Tucuman, T4000AXL, Argentina
  • Centro de Investigacion y Tratamiento Reumatologico S C
    Ciudad de Mexico, 11850, Mexico
  • Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde
    Guadalajara, 44280, Mexico
  • Unidad Reumatologica las Americas S.C.P.
    Merida, 97000, Mexico
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
    Mexico City, 14080, Mexico
  • Consultorio de Reumatologia
    Mexico, 07760, Mexico
  • Unidad de Investigaciones Reumatologicas A.C
    San Luis Potosi, 78290, Mexico
  • Uniwersyteckie Centrum Medyczne Klinika Nefrologii Transplantologii i Chorob Wewnetrznych
    Gdansk, 80 952, Poland
  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 im. N. Barlickiego
    Lodz, 90-153, Poland
  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny we Wroclawiu
    Wroclaw, 50 556, Poland
  • LLL Medical Center Revma-Med
    Kemerovo, 650070, Russian Federation
  • Orenburg State Medical University
    Orenburg, 460000, Russian Federation
  • LLC Medical Sanitary Part No. 157
    Saint-Petersburg, 196066, Russian Federation
  • Saratov Regional Clinical Hospital
    Saratov, 410053, Russian Federation
  • LLC German Clinic
    St. Petersburg, 196070, Russian Federation
  • Hosp Univ A Coruna
    A Coruna, 15006, Spain
  • Hosp Univ Vall D Hebron
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hosp. Univ. de Basurto
    Bilbao, 48013, Spain
  • Hosp. Univ. Infanta Leonor
    Madrid, 28031, Spain
  • Hosp. Univ. Ramon Y Cajal
    Madrid, 28034, Spain
  • Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre
    Madrid, 28041, Spain
  • Hosp. Univ. Fuenlabrada
    Madrid, 28942, Spain
  • Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Valencia
    Valencia, 46010, Spain
  • Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital
    Kaohsiung, 81362, Taiwan
  • China Medical University Hospital
    Taichung, 40447, Taiwan
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan
  • Phramongkutklao Hospital and Medical College
    Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
  • Ramathibodi Hospital
    Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
  • Maharaj Nakorn Chiangmai Hospital
    Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
  • Songklanagarind hospital
    Hat Yai, 90110, Thailand
  • Communal Noncommercial Enterprise Cherkasy Regional Hospital of Cherkasy Regional Council
    Cherkasy, 18009, Ukraine
  • Municipal non-commercial enterprise of Kharkiv Regional Council Regional Clinical Hospital
    Kharkiv, 61058, Ukraine
  • City Clinical Hospital No. 2
    Kryvyi Rih, 50056, Ukraine
  • Medical Center 'Ok Clinic' of International Institute of Clinical Research LLC
    Kyiv, 02000, Ukraine
  • Kyiv Railway Clinical Hospital #2 Of Branch 'Health Center' Of The Company 'Ukrainian Railway'
    Kyiv, 03049, Ukraine
  • SI National Scientific Center Institute of Cardiology of M.D. Strazhesko of NAMS of Ukraine
    Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine
  • Medical Center 'Consylium Medical'
    Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
  • State Institution 'Institute of Nephrology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine'
    Kyiv, 04050, Ukraine
  • Municipal Non-profit Enterprise 'Odesa Regional Clinical Hospital' Odesa Regional Council
    Odessa, 65025, Ukraine
  • Multidisciplinary Medical Center of Odessa National Medical University
    Odessa, 65026, Ukraine
  • Municipal Non-commercial Enterprise Ternopil University Hospital of Ternopil Regional Council
    Ternopil, 46002, Ukraine
  • MNPE 'Vinnytsia Regional Clinical Hospital named after M.I. Pyrogov of Vinnytsia Regional Council'
    Vinnytsia, 21018, Ukraine
  • Medical Center LTD Health Clinic Department of Cardiology and Rheumatology
    Vinnytsya, 21009, Ukraine
  • Medical Center LLC 'Modern Clinic'
    Zaporizhzhya, 69600, Ukraine
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · May 24, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Aug 16, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04376827
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 6, 2020
Start date
Sep 15, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2023
Completion
Feb 1, 2023
Results posted
Apr 16, 2024
Last update
Mar 30, 2025

Study contacts

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion