CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04363229Updated Jul 8, 2020

Psychological Impact of COVID19 Among Doctors in Assiut University Hospitals

An observational study in Occupational Stress, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-08.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2020), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
250
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

study aimed to investigate the psychological impact of corona virus among doctor in Assiut University Hospitals, mainly stress and burn out will be assessed

Read the detailed description

Prolonged exposure to stressful working environments resulting in a state of physical and emotional depletion and burnout. Nowadays, while facing corona virus, health care workers are on the front line and directly assist in diagnosis, caring and treatment of patients with COVID, thus keeping them at higher risk developing psychological distress and other mental health symptoms.

According to previous studies, during the outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), frontline medical staff had reported high levels of stress that resulted in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

A lot of factors contribute to increase mental effect among healthcare workers as increasing the suspected cases and workload , depletion of personal protective equipment's , drug shortage and feeling inadequately supported .

In Toronto study(2008), four major risk factors for stress among medical staff during the SARS outbreak were identified; including the perception of the medical of their risk of infection, the impact of SARS on their work, feelings of depression, and working in high-risk medical units. moreover, there are other factors as social stigmatization and contact with infected patients, also has previously been shown to be associated with increased levels of stress and anxiety in medical staff .

02

Conditions studied

  • Occupational Stress

Browse trials for

03

In context

Occupational Stress

236 studies on the registry are indexed under Occupational Stress; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 200 across 64 observational studies indexed under Occupational Stress.

Browse Occupational Stress studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Doctors currently working in Assiut University Hospitals in all titles: resident doctors, assistant lecturer, lecturer, assistant professor and professor

Inclusion criteria

  • all doctors currently working in assiut University hospitals

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no exclusion critiria
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Othermaslach burnout inventory questionnair

    The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) is an introspective psychological inventory consisting of 22 items pertaining to occupational burnout

    Also known as: GHQ-12 questionnair

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The MBI-HSS (MP) addresses three scales:Emotional Exhaustion ,Depersonalization and Personal Accomplishment

    Emotional Exhaustion measures feelings of being emotionally overextended and exhausted by one's work. Depersonalization measures an unfeeling and impersonal response toward patients. Personal Accomplishment measures feelings of competence and successful achievement in one's work. All MBI items are scored using a 7 level frequency scale from "never" to "daily." Initial development had 3 components: emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items) and personal achievement (8 items). Each scale measures its own unique dimension of burnout

    Time frame: baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. GHQ-12 questionnaire for measuring of current mental health

    The scale asks whether the respondent has experienced a particular symptom or behavior recently. Each item is rated on a four-point scale (less than usual, no more than usual, rather more than usual, or much more than usual); and for example when using the GHQ-12 it gives a total score of 36 or 12 based on the selected scoring methods. it measure social dysfunction, anxiety and depression and loss of confidence

    Time frame: baseline

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 8, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04363229
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Mariam Roshdy Elkhayat (lecturer of public health, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 27, 2020
Start date
Jul 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 8, 2020

Study contacts

mariam elkhayat, MD
Contact
mariam.elkhayat@yahoo.com
00201003708261 ext. 00201003708261
shimaa abdelsameaa, MD
Contact
shima_dola@yahoo.com
01000525137

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion