CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04358757Updated Mar 21, 2024

Immune and Physical Recovery Following Cesarean Delivery

An observational study in Cesarean Delivery, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-21.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Pregnancy results in an altered immune state compared to the nonpregnant population. A significant proportion of women undergoing cesarean delivery recover poorly. The first step to determining whether this is an immune driven / associated process is to characterise what effects this surgery has on maternal immune function. "Normal" changes will be evaluated in maternal immune function and activity precipitated by surgery and delivery of the neonate. Immune response to surgery will be compared to historical immune data from patients undergoing non-obstetric surgery (orthopaedic patients).

Read the detailed description

Variations will be evaluated in baseline and postpartum leukocyte subset distribution and singling pathways within leukocyte subsets (including response to surgery) in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery compare to patients undergoing nonobstetric surgery (orthopaedic data from a completed study). This will help to determine whether baseline immune function and response to trauma (surgery) is the same in the pregnant and non-pregnant states. Women will also be evaluated for clinical recovery parameters using validated scoring measures and objective measurement of physical activity through use of a smartwatch (actigraph) around the peripartum period. This information is of significant importance as it brings us one step closer to identifying immune mechanisms that may be involved in or associated with poorer postpartum recovery.

Aim- to determine whether perioperative immune function can predict women who are likely to have delayed physical recovery or recover poorly as demonstrated by lower scores on subjective clinical questionnaires and collected via watch actigraphy. This will help to determine whether a pre-existing deficient immune state is responsible for a worse recovery profile, which could be identified preoperatively. Similarly whether an impairment in response to surgery is demonstrable, which predisposes women to worse recovery profiles will be evaluated.

Ultimately, earlier identification of at-risk parturients (for example, through a preoperative bedside test) may lead to earlier interventions / patient centred care, in an attempt to improve their recovery trajectory and patient experience.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cesarean Delivery

Keywords

  • elective cesarean delivery
  • predictors
  • recovery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,117 studies on the registry; 425 are open to participants now.

Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

women delivering via scheduled cesarean delivery

Inclusion criteria

  • elective cesarean delivery at Lucile Packard Hospital
  • age >20 to \<50 years old,
  • single pregnancy term
  • gestational age 37-41 weeks pregnancy,
  • elective cesarean delivery,
  • spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia as primary anesthesia mode,
  • multimodal analgesia regimen (including intrathecal morphine and regular acetaminophen and NSAIDs), single center at Stanford.
  • ASA grade 1 or 2.
  • gestational diabetes (not requiring insulin or diabetes medications and pre-eclampsia (without severe features) will be included.
  • ethnic background: all ethnic backgrounds will be included gender: pregnant women only

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal to participate
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Cesarean patients

    participants undergoing elective cesarean will have measures of recovery assessed (patient-reported outcome measures and activity data from watch)

    Procedure: Elective cesarean delivery

Interventions

  • ProcedureElective cesarean delivery

    scheduled cesarean delivery for maternal / obstetric indications

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of immune changes from preoperative to day 1 postoperative

    immune changes include: leukocyte subset distribution, intracellular signaling pathway activity within leukocyte subsets and cytokine-induced responses to ex-vivo stimulation in leukocyte subsets

    Time frame: immediately prior to surgery versus morning following surgery (approximately 24 hrs apart)

  2. change in activity (measured by actigraphy) before and after cesarean

    Actigraph smartwatch data will be used to assess how activity changes around the time of delivery and determine physical recovery profiles following elective cesarean delivery. Time to baseline and time to plateau of maximal physical activity will be assessed in the postpartum period up to 6 weeks postoperatively.

    Time frame: 2 weeks pre to 6 weeks postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. perioperative response to cytokine stimulation

    cytokine stimulation of leucocytes from parturients will be assessed using mass cytometry. blood samples will be taken from all participants preoperatively and on morning following surgery. 10 women will also have: postanesthetic care unit blood, umbilical vein blood and day 2 blood samples taken

    Time frame: preoperative, day 1 (and in a subset PACU, umbilical vein, and day 2)

  2. ex-vivo leucocyte response

    Leucocytes will be chemically stimulated ex-vivo for each leukocyte subset, plot stimulated and unstimulated levels and delta (change) in levels at each time point 10 women will also have: postanesthetic care unit blood, umbilical vein blood and day 2 blood samples taken

    Time frame: preoperative, day 1 (and in a subset PACU, umbilical vein, and day 2)

  3. immune predictors of delayed physical recovery

    phenotype (immune profile) associated with delayed physical recovery. determine whether any preoperative immune phenotype (preoperative changes in immune response to chemical stressors) can predict worse activity profiles analysed using actigraph data.

    Time frame: preoperative to 6 weeks postoperative

  4. Change in ObsQoR-10

    relationship between immune markers, actigraphy data using ObsQoR-10 (obstetric quality of recovery -10 item score- validated overall quality of recovery measure)

    Time frame: postoperatively on day 1 and day 2

  5. Change in PROMIS-29 score

    relationship between immune markers, actigraphy data using PROMIS-29 (validated overall global health measure; patient-reported outcome measure instrument - 29 item survey)

    Time frame: postoperatively on week 3 and 6 and 3 months

  6. Change in EQ5D3L

    relationship between immune markers, actigraphy data using a validated measure of global health state (EQ5D3L)

    Time frame: preoperatively, postoperatively on day 1 and day 2, week 3 and 6 and 3 months

  7. Change in Edinburgh postnatal depression score (EPDS)

    relationship between immune markers, actigraphy data using a validated measure of depression (EPDS)

    Time frame: postoperatively on day 2, week 3 and 6 and 3 months

  8. Change in Pittsburgh sleep quality index

    relationship between immune markers, actigraphy data using a validated measure of sleep (Pittsburgh sleep index)

    Time frame: postoperatively on day 2, week 3 and 6 and 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University
    Palo Alto, California 94305, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04358757
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Responsible party
PSultan (Associate Professor, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 24, 2020
Start date
Nov 22, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 23, 2023
Completion
Dec 23, 2023
Last update
Mar 21, 2024

Study contacts

Pervez Sultan, MBChB, FRCA, MD(Res)
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion