CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04353414Updated Mar 2, 2022

Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block Plus Pericapsular Injection vs Pericapsular Injection

A Phase 4 interventional study of Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block and Pericapsular injection in Hip Pain Chronic, sponsored by NYU Langone Health. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-02.

Sponsored by NYU Langone Health · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to compare two different treatment options on their effectiveness to reduce post-operative pain, narcotic (opioid pain medication) usage and recovery time in patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy surgery.

The first treatment option is a Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum (TQL) block plus hip incision site (Pericapsular) Injection. The TQL block is an ultrasound guided injection between the quadratus lumborum and the psoas muscles in the back. The anesthesiologist will perform the TQL block The second treatment option is only a hip incision site (Pericapsular) Injection. In this group, the surgeon will inject local anesthetic into the incision or hip portal sites to decrease sensation.

Read the detailed description

This is a phase IV, randomized, single-blind, single-center study comparing postoperative pain, opioid usage and Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) recovery time for patients who receive a Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum block (TQLB) plus pericapsular injection versus pericapsular injection (PCI) undergoing primary hip arthroscopy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Pain Chronic
03

In context

Lead sponsor

NYU Langone Health is the lead sponsor of 1,391 studies on the registry; 254 are open to participants now.

Of its 227 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 191 (84%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients between 18 and 65 years of age
  • Patients undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy
  • Patients diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)
  • Patients who consent to be randomized.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients younger than 18 and older than 65;
  • Patients with a history of chronic pain that have used opioids for pain management for 3 months or longer;
  • Patients with diagnosed or self-reported cognitive dysfunction;
  • Patients with a history of neurologic disorder that can interfere with pain sensation;
  • Patients with a history of drug or recorded alcohol abuse;
  • Patients who are unable to understand or follow instructions;
  • Patients with severe liver disease, renal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, and/or significant heart disease;
  • Patients with an allergy or contraindication to any of the medications used in the study, or patients with a contraindication to any study procedures;
  • Patients with BMI over 40;
  • Any patient that the investigators feel cannot comply with all study related procedures.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
104 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pericapsular Injection (PCI) group

    Subjects in PCI group will receive the injection through both hip portals administered by the surgeon. 10 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine Hydrochloride (HCL) will be injected through the anterolateral portal while the additional 10 mL will be injected through the mid-anterior portal.

    Procedure: Pericapsular injection · Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

  • Active comparator
    Transmuscular QL Block + Pericapsular Injection (PCI) group

    Subjects in the TQLB group will receive the TQLB containing 30mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine Hydrochloride (HCL) plus PCI containing 20 mL of 0.25% of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride (HCL). For PCI, subjects will receive the injection through both hip portals administered by the surgeon. 10 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine Hydrochloride (HCL) will be injected through the anterolateral portal while the additional 10 mL will be injected through the mid-anterior portal.

    Procedure: Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block · Procedure: Pericapsular injection · Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

Interventions

  • ProcedureTransmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block

    Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block (TQLB) is a relatively new block that targets thoracic and lumbar nerves. The decrease in sensation means a decrease in pain. The TQL block will be preformed in addition to an incision-site injection (on hip), called pericapsular injection. The potential risks associated with the Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block (TQLB) include nerve damage and infection at injection site. In addition, there can be temporary sensory and motor loss, depending on the dosage, site of injection and duration of the nerve block. However, the amount (30mL) used in this study meets FDA dosage-regulations for this medication.

  • ProcedurePericapsular injection

    Pericapsular injection (PCI) of 20 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine HCL (numbing medication) into the incision-site (hip portal sites) to decrease sensation. The potential risks associated with the pericapsular injection include bleeding, infection at injection site and local anesthetic toxicity however, the likelihood is low due to the expertise of the surgeon preforming the injection and the sterile environment and good clinical practice from clinicians, which reduces the likelihood of infection.

  • DrugBupivacaine Hydrochloride

    Bupivacaine used for this study is the standard of care for both TQLB and PCI. Pericapsular injection (PCI) contains 10 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine HCL which will be injected through the anterolateral portal while the additional 10 mL will be injected through the mid-anterior portal.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of post-operative pain as per the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    This will be measured by using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores and compared between the 2 treatment groups after surgery. The distribution of pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores in post- surgical patients will describe their postoperative pain intensity as none, mild, moderate, or severe, the following cut points on the pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain(5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm).

    Time frame: 1 Day of surgery

  2. Comparison of post-operative pain as per the McGill pain scores

    This will be determined by the McGill Pain questionnaire (MPQ) scores and compared between the 2 treatment groups during the post-operative period. The MPQ assesses three separate components of the pain experience: the sensory intensity, the emotional impact and the cognitive evaluation of pain. Each descriptor is ranked on a 0 ("none") to 3 ("severe") intensity scale.

    Time frame: 1 Day of surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Use of Opioids by participants

    This will be assessed by the pain medications given to the participants depending on their pain level.

    Time frame: 1 Day of surgery

  2. Comparison in Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Phase 1 recovery time by treatment group

    This will be an observation of the time it takes the patient in the immediate post op period to transition to Phase II. Factors such as severe pain and post op nausea and vomiting may affect a patient's Phase I recovery time so the study want to compare this parameter between both treatment groups.

    Time frame: 1 Day of surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • NYU Langone Health
    New York, New York 10016, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 2, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04353414
Lead sponsor
NYU Langone Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 20, 2020
Start date
Aug 1, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 17, 2022
Completion
Feb 23, 2022
Last update
Mar 2, 2022

Study contacts

Uchenna Umeh, MD
principal investigator · NYU Langone Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion