ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04335409PARALUCUpdated Jun 24, 2024

Pneumonitis After Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer

An interventional study of Questionnaire and Mobile Application in Lung Cancer, sponsored by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-24.

Sponsored by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Major goals of radiotherapy include local disease control and improvement of the patients' prognoses. One possible side effect of radiotherapy for lung cancer is radiation pneumonitis. Severe (grade ≥3) radiation pneumonitis can even be fatal in approximately 2% of the patients. It would be important to identify patients developing radiation pneumonitis and requiring medical treatment early.

In the present study, the patients are asked to complete a questionnaire (paper version) once a week during the period of radiotherapy and up to 24 weeks following radiotherapy. In this questionnaire, the patients are asked to state and rate their symptoms potentially associated with pneumonitis. Scoring points are assigned to the severity of the symptoms (symptom scores), and the resulting sum score (patient score) will be used for identification of radiation pneumonitis.

The main goal of this trial is to evaluate the usefulness of a new symptom-based scoring system with respect to the identification of patients developing pneumonitis after radiotherapy of breast or lung cancer. The discriminative power of the symptom-based scoring system will be assessed by calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Taking into account that 5% of patients will not qualify for Full Analysis Set, a total of 78 patients should be recruited.

If statistical significance of the AUC is reached, the most-informative (optimal) scoring point to identify radiation pneumonitis will be derived. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to further investigate the performance of the symptom-based scoring system.

In 10 patients, the paper version of the symptom-based scoring system (questionnaire) will be supplemented by a mobile application (app) asking the same questions regarding symptoms potentially associated with radiation pneumonitis.

Read the detailed description

Background Most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) receive radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy as definitive treatment. Also, a considerable number of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are treated with radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy. Radiation pneumonitis is a possible side effect of radiotherapy for lung cancer. Severe pneumonitis was reported to be fatal in approximately 2% of patients. In our centre, the prevalence of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis was 7.6% in patients irradiated for lung cancer. The prevalence of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis in patients with risk factors was 18.8%.

Pneumonitis can occur up to 23 weeks following radiotherapy. Therefore, the symptoms may not be associated with previous radiotherapy, and pneumonitis may be missed. It would be important to identify patients developing radiation pneumonitis and requiring medical treatment more early.

This study aims to develop a symptom-based scoring system that contributes to an earlier detection of radiation pneumonitis requiring medical intervention (grade ≥2) after radiotherapy for lung cancer. This scoring system is a prerequisite for a mobile application, which can be used by the patients at home to rate their symptoms possibly related to pneumonitis.

Patients are asked to complete a questionnaire (paper version) once a week during the period of radiotherapy and up to 24 weeks following radiotherapy. In this questionnaire, the patients are asked to state and rate their symptoms potentially associated with pneumonitis. Scoring points are assigned to the severity of the symptoms (symptom scores), and the resulting sum score (patient score) will be used for identification of radiation pneumonitis.

Primary endpoint To assess the performance characteristics of the symptom-based scoring system for detection of radiation pneumonitis the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is used to show the connection between sensitivity and specificity for every possible cut-off for the scoring system and to select the optimal scoring point for detection of radiation pneumonitis- The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is calculated to prove the diagnostic ability of the scoring system.

General trial design and duration This is a single-center prospective study, which aims to assess the performance of a new symptom-based score and to identify its optimal scoring point with respect to the detection of patients developing pneumonitis following radiotherapy of breast cancer or lung cancer. The recruitment of all 98 patients (93 patients plus drop-outs) should be completed within 33 months. The treatment period will be 6-7 weeks, and the follow up period 24 weeks. This equals a total running time for the trial of approximately 40 months.

Symptom-Based Scoring System (Paper Version) The patients are asked to complete a paper-based questionnaire (symptom-based scoring system, paper version) once a week during the period of radiotherapy and up to 24 weeks following radiotherapy. The patients are asked to state and score their symptoms that are potentially associated with pneumonitis, namely cough, shortness of breath and fever. Scoring points are assigned to the severity of the symptoms (= symptom scores), and the resulting sum score (patient score) will be used to identify radiation pneumonitis.

During the time of radiotherapy, the patients will complete the paper-based questionnaire directly prior to their appointment with a physician who will perform a physical examination once a week. Following radiotherapy, the patients will be contacted by phone once a week and asked to answer the questions of the questionnaire.

In case of an increase of the total score compared to baseline, patients receive either a follow-up telephone call after 3 days, are asked to come to the hospital as outpatients or are admitted to hospital. In case of suspected pneumonitis, patients undergo lung function tests. If the suspected diagnosis of pneumonitis is substantiated, patients receive a chest x-ray plus/minus computed tomography. If the diagnosis symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (grade ≥2) has been confirmed, patients receive medical intervention. The vast majority of the patients receive prednisolone, which is considered the mainstay of the treatment for radiation pneumonitis.

The symptom-based sum score is correlated to pneumonitis (yes vs. no). At the end of radiotherapy, patients are asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their satisfaction with the score. In case of a dissatisfaction rate >20%, the score needs modifications before it can be used in future studies. In case of a dissatisfaction rate >40%, it will be considered not useful.

Subgroup Analysis: Symptom-Based Scoring System (Mobile Application) In 10 patients, the paper version of the symptom-based scoring system (questionnaire) will be supplemented by a mobile application (app) asking the same questions regarding cough, shortness of breath and fever. The symptoms collected by the app will not be evaluated or analyzed. With regard to the app, only its functionality will be tested in this study. The patients will be asked to complete the questionnaire of the app directly after completing the questionnaire of the paper version.

Statistics / Sample size calculation The main goal of this trial is to evaluate the usefulness of a new symptom-based scoring system with respect to the identification of patients developing pneumonitis after radiotherapy for lung cancer. The discriminative power of the symptom-based scoring system will be assessed by calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Assuming a ratio between patients without and with radiation pneumonitis of 3.63, a sample size of 93 patients is required in the full analysis set to yield statistical significance at the significance level of 5% with a power of 90% if the AUC under the alternative hypothesis is in fact at least 0.9. Taking into account that 5% of patients will not qualify for Full Analysis Set, a total of 98 patients should be recruited.

If statistical significance of the AUC is reached, the most-informative (optimal) scoring point to identify radiation pneumonitis will be derived. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to further investigate the performance of the symptom-based scoring system.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

7,333 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,554 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 57 is close to the median of 60 across 5,345 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein is the lead sponsor of 163 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Histologically proven lung cancer
  2. Indication for radiotherapy
  3. Risk factors for developing radiation pneumonitis
  4. Age ≥18 years
  5. Written informed consent
  6. Capacity of the patient to contract

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy, Lactation
  2. Expected non-compliance
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
57 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Participants irradiated for lung cancer

    Participants who receive radiotherapy for lung cancer and have risk factors for developing radiation pneumonitis. Risk factors include mean dose to the ipsilateral lung \>13 Gy plus at least one other factor (significant cardiovascular disease, history of heavy smoking (≥40 pack years), previous/concurrent chemotherapy or previous/adjuvant immunotherapy) or mean dose to the ipsilateral lung \>20 Gy without other factors.

    Diagnostic Test: Questionnaire · Other: Mobile Application

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testQuestionnaire

    The patients are asked to complete a questionnaire (paper version) once a week during the period of radiotherapy and up to 24 weeks following radiotherapy. In this questionnaire, the patients are asked to state and rate their symptoms potentially associated with pneumonitis. Scoring points are assigned to the severity of the symptoms (symptom scores), and the resulting sum score (patient score) will be used for identification of radiation pneumonitis.

  • OtherMobile Application

    In 10 patients, the paper version of the symptom-based scoring system (questionnaire) will be supplemented by a mobile application (app) asking the same questions regarding symptoms potentially associated with pneumonitis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Grade ≥2 Radiation Pneumonitis

    Radiation pneumonitis will been assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0.

    Time frame: 24 weeks following radiotherapy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
    Lübeck, 23562, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rades D, Werner EM, Glatzel E, Eggert MC, Olbrich D, Tvilsted S, Bohnet S. Pneumonitis after radiotherapy for lung cancer (PARALUC): an interventional study to create a symptom-based scoring system for identification of patients developing radiation pneumonitis. BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07291-5. PubMed 32819311 ↗

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · Jul 2, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2020 to primary completion in Jun 2022, 21 months.

Of 774 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Lung Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 41 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 71. This study's 21 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 818 studies reached it within 39 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 71.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 2, 2020
First posted
Apr 6, 2020
StartActual
Sep 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Jun 20, 2022
CompletionActual
Dec 5, 2022
Last update
Jun 24, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04335409
Responsible party
Prof Dirk Rades (Professor and Chair, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 6, 2020
Start date
Sep 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 20, 2022
Completion
Dec 5, 2022
Last update
Jun 24, 2024

Study contacts

Dirk Rades, MD
principal investigator · Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion