CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04324632Updated Mar 27, 2020

Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

An observational study in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-27.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2020), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance-enterography in predicting the extension, location and characteristics of the small bowel segments affected by Crohn's disease\& determine the diagnostic performance of standard MR enterography in detecting colonic inflammation and investigate MR enterography's ability to grade inflammatory activity and detect intestinal extra intestinal manifestations

Read the detailed description

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic disorders of the gastrointestinal tract with a remitting-relapsing disease pattern. Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) represent the two main forms of IBD.

In CD inflammation affects various parts of the bowel, separated by unchanged intestinal segments, while in ulcerative colitis enteric involvement is continuous, extending from the rectum throughout the colon. Additionally, in Crohn's disease the inflammatory process spreads through all layers of the intestinal wall, while in UC only the mucosa and sub mucosa are affected.

Imaging findings, endoscopic studies and histological data together with clinical assessment, can be used to help distinguish these two forms, determine prognosis, assess disease activity and to inform treatment decision-making.

A "treat-to-target" strategy with close monitoring of intestinal inflammation is recommended in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Ileocolonoscopy (CS) remains the gold-standard for assessing disease activity in IBD but is a relatively invasive procedure and is impossible to repeat in the context of tight monitoring strategies.

MRE is preferred over computed tomography enterography by most radiologists and gastroenterologists because of the potential for differentiating active inflammation from fibrotic strictures, and due to the lack of exposure to ionizing radiation. This is especially true in children, as the onset of IBD in childhood is a known risk factor for high cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from imaging.

MRE furthermore provides a transmural study of bowel loops (oedema, wall thickening, and enhancement post contrast). These features make MRE ideally suitable to the IBD population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Keywords

  • MRE
03

In context

Intestinal Diseases

963 studies on the registry are indexed under Intestinal Diseases; 174 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 140 across 377 observational studies indexed under Intestinal Diseases.

Browse Intestinal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

subjects of both sexes with different age groups diagnosed to have inflammatory bowel disease

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with different age groups and both sex are eligible for our prospective study

    1. Either they had undergone colonoscopy or colonoscopy was planned, and they have been recently diagnosed with IBD.
    2. Suspected to have disease relapse.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants are not eligible for our prospective study if they:

  1. Have evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease that rendered the individual unsuitable for participation.
  2. Have contraindications to MRE (e.g. allergy to all suitable contrast agents, cardiac pacemaker, severe claustrophobia, an inability to lie flat).
  3. Had a final diagnosis other than IBD.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. comparison of magnetic resonance enterography findings with colonoscopic findings and clinical activity scores of IBD

    To investigate MR enterography's ability to detect to the extension, location and characteristics of intestinal segments affected by IBD and grade inflammatory activity in correlation with endoscopic findings.

    Time frame: two years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04324632
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Hayam Yahia Hmed Khalil (principal invistigator, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2020
Start date
Apr 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2020

Study contacts

Hayam Yahia Hamed Khalil, assisstant lecturer
Contact
hayamyahia1989@gmail.com
01067949776

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion