CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04318340Updated Jul 14, 2023

A Novel Tapered Applicator for Vaginal Vault Brachytherapy

An interventional study of Tapered applicator and Standard applicator in Endometrial Cancer, Brachytherapy and Quality of Life, sponsored by Yale University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-14.

Sponsored by Yale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study will assess the comfort and fit of a novel applicator for endometrial cancer patients who are candidates for vaginal brachytherapy. This study is only assessing the applicator fitting. No patients in this study will be treated with the novel applicator.

Read the detailed description

In the treatment of endometrial cancer, adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy is typically performed to deliver radiation dose to the apex of the vagina with a fixed diameter vaginal applicator which extends the full length of the vagina. The largest cylinder which fits at the apex provides the best dosimetry. Smaller diameter cylinders may provide sub-optimal coverage of potential areas of disease. Due to pain or discomfort with a large cylinder, some women may be treated with a smaller diameter cylinder. A novel applicator, with a tapered design and two-step insertion was fabricated to improve the comfort, fit, and patient compliance of this procedure while maintaining optimum geometry and dosimetry at the dome. Our primary aim is to assess patient comfort with the new applicator. Patients will be fit with different applicators (standard of care and novel tapered vaginal applicator) and their comfort will be assessed with a visual analog scale-based survey, comparing the two.

Aim #1: Assess if the 3.0cm diameter novel tapered applicator is more comfortable than the standard 3.0cm diameter applicator among patients fitted with a standard 3.0cm diameter applicator.

Aim #2: Determine what percentage of patients who would otherwise be treated with a standard 2.6cm diameter vaginal cylinder can be up-sized to a 3.0cm diameter cylinder with the novel tapered applicator design.

Aim #3: Assess in vivo dosimetry (optional for all patients). Patients who are prescribed vaginal brachytherapy undergo 3-dimensional cross-sectional imaging (i.e., MRI or CT) prior to treatment, as standard of care. This is done with the standard treatment applicator inserted to assess radiation dose distribution. In this optional aim, patients will undergo a slightly longer MRI, with additional MRI images performed with the novel tapered applicator in place to characterize and assess dosimetry, fit, contact with mucosal surfaces and presence of air gaps in comparison to a standard cylindrical applicator.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometrial Cancer
  • Brachytherapy
  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Endometrial Neoplasms

1,325 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms; 447 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 70 across 941 interventional studies indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms.

Browse Endometrial Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,724 studies on the registry; 298 are open to participants now.

Of its 210 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 126 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Eligibility Criteria

  • Patients with stage I-IV endometrial cancer.
  • Patient must have been treated with hysterectomy.
  • A radiation oncology determined the patient's disease warrants adjuvant treatment with vaginal brachytherapy as sole adjuvant radiotherapy.
  • Patient consented to receive standard of care vaginal brachytherapy treatment.
  • Vaginal cuff deemed healing appropriately by treating radiation oncologist during initial consultation without evidence of infection, pelvic symptoms, or other surgical complications.
  • 18 ≤ Age
  • English speaking.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects meeting any of the criteria below may not participate in the study:
  • Requires premedication with pain medications and/or anxiolytics during applicator fitting.
  • Will receive pelvic EBRT.
  • Prior known diagnosis of lupus, scleroderma, dermatomyositis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, pacemakers, or other contraindications to radiotherapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard Applicators

    All patients will be fitted with the 2.6 cm applicator and sized up to the 3.0 cm applicator if tolerable.

    Other: Standard applicator

  • Experimental
    Tapered Applicator

    All patients will be fitted with the novel tapered 3.0 cm applicator. Patients have the option of having magnetic resonance imaging with the tapered applicator in place.

    Other: Tapered applicator

Interventions

  • OtherTapered applicator

    An applicator inserted in 2 steps that tapers at the distal vagina

  • OtherStandard applicator

    A 2.6 cm standard applicator is inserted and sized up to a standard 3 cm applicator if tolerable.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient comfort

    Patient comfort will be assessed with a visual analog scale-based survey rating 0 (none) to 10 (severe) in each of the following domains: pain, pressure, burning, stress, hardness/roughness, and stretching at both insertion and in final resting positions.

    Time frame: up to 10 minutes

  2. Ability to up-size with tapered applicator

    Determine what percentage of patients who would otherwise be treated with a standard 2.6cm diameter vaginal cylinder can be up-sized to a 3.0cm diameter cylinder with the novel tapered applicator design.

    Time frame: up to 10 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assess in vivo dosimetry (optional for all patients)

    Patients who are prescribed vaginal brachytherapy undergo 3-dimensional cross-sectional imaging (i.e., MRI or CT) prior to treatment, as standard of care. This is done with the standard treatment applicator inserted to assess radiation dose distribution. In this optional aim, patients will undergo a slightly longer MRI, with additional MRI images performed with the novel tapered applicator in place to characterize and assess dosimetry, fit, contact with mucosal surfaces and presence of air gaps in comparison to a standard cylindrical applicator.

    Time frame: up to 10 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Smilow Cancer Hospital
    New Haven, Connecticut 06519, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04318340
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 23, 2020
Start date
Jul 16, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 20, 2023
Completion
Mar 20, 2023
Last update
Jul 14, 2023

Study contacts

Shari Damast, MD
principal investigator · Yale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion