An interventional study of Well-Being Intervention and Sleep Hygiene in Poor Quality Sleep, sponsored by Columbia University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-27.
Sponsored by Columbia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The overall goal of this project is to evaluate the effect of enhanced psychological well-being on sleep quality. This study will demonstrate whether combining an intervention designed to promote psychological well-being with sleep hygiene education improves sleep quality in a non-clinical population of distressed adults reporting poor sleep in the absence of a diagnosed sleep disorder. The investigators expect an intervention combining elements of psychological well-being and sleep hygiene education to result in significant improvements in sleep quality measures from baseline to post-intervention, and greater improvements in sleep quality measures at post-intervention as compared with sleep hygiene education alone.
Psychological distress is often associated with poor sleep quality. The role of psychological well-being has often been neglected and most interventions for sleep improvement have focused primarily on sleep disorders. This approach is limited to those individuals who have specific conditions and little resources have been directed to the promotion of sleep quality in the general population.
This study will be a pilot parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial to assess the baseline associations between psychological well-being and different measures of sleep outcomes, determine the effect of elements of a psychological well-being promoting intervention on sleep quality, and examine effect size estimates of key sleep-related outcomes (duration, efficiency, quality) to provide essential data to inform a main efficacy trial.
Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,103 studies on the registry; 193 are open to participants now.
Of its 172 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 142 (83%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants in the experimental group will receive an intervention focused on both principles of psychological well-being and sleep hygiene education.
Behavioral: Well-Being Intervention · Behavioral: Sleep Hygiene
Participants in the control group will receive sleep hygiene education alone.
Behavioral: Sleep Hygiene
The main aim of the well-being intervention is to reduce levels of distress through the promotion of psychological well-being. Key components of the intervention are self-monitoring of instances of well-being and what leads to their interruption (i.e., thoughts and behaviors), cognitive restructuring of interfering thoughts, and homework assignments to address dysfunctional behaviors and increase exposure to optimal experiences. Participants will become aware of their functioning based on six different dimensions of psychological well-being (i.e., self-acceptance, positive relations with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth), and will be guided in finding a balance within each dimension.
The main aim of sleep hygiene education is to provide participants with a set of behavioral and environmental recommendations intended to promote healthy sleep. During the intervention, participants will become aware of their own sleep patterns, will learn about healthy sleep habits, and will be encouraged to follow a set of recommendations to improve their sleep. Key components of the intervention are sleep hygiene and education.
Change in sleep quality: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a 19-item self-rating scale for the assessment of sleep quality over a 1-month time interval. The PSQI yields 7 component scores and one global score. The component scores consist of subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each item is given a score from 0-3. The global score is calculated by summing the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0-21, where lower scores indicate a higher sleep quality.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention
Change in insomnia severity: Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), a 7-item self-rated questionnaire to measure insomnia severity in the past 2 weeks. The total score ranges from 0-28, with higher scores indicating greater severity of insomnia. Scores of 8-14, 15-21, and 22-28 are indicative of subthreshold, moderate, and severe clinical insomnia, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention
Changes in total sleep time
Measured by self-reported sleep diary
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention
Changes in sleep onset latency
Measured by self-reported sleep diary
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention
Changes in wake after sleep onset
Measured by self-reported sleep diary
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention
Change in psychological distress
Measured by the Symptom Questionnaire (SQ), a 92-item self-rating scale for the assessment of psychological distress over a 1-week time interval. The SQ yields 4 main scales: anxiety, depression, somatization, and hostility. Each scale can be further divided into 2 sub-scales: one concerned with symptoms (17 items) and the other with well-being (6 items). Answers on each item are dichotomous (i.e., yes/no or true false). Scales and subscales can be scored separately, and the sum of the 4 main scale scores yields a total distress score. A response of yes/true for a symptom item gives 1 point, and a response of no/false for a well-being question gives 1 point for a score ranging from 0-23 for each main scale and 0-17 for each subscale, where a higher score indicates greater distress. If the well-being score is calculated separately the raw score can be subtracted from 6 for a score ranging from 0-6, where a higher score indicates greater well-being.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention
Change in psychological well-being
Measured by the Psychological Well-being scale, a 42-item self-rating scale for the assessment of 6 dimensions of psychological well-being: self-acceptance, positive relations with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth. Each of the 42 six-point response items are given a score from 1-6, with questions phrased in the negative reversed (e.g., 1 to 6, 6 to 1). The total score in each dimension ranges from 7-42, and all the dimensions scores are summed to give a final total ranging from 42-252, with higher scores indicating greater psychological well-being.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention
Plan to share: Yes — Investigators can request de-identified data after the primary outcomes of this research project are published. Requests should be made in writing to the PI.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Columbia University