CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04316234PASVAPUpdated Mar 20, 2020

Acute Health Effects of Passive Vape Among COPD Patients

An interventional study of Passive vape in Electronic Cigarette Use, Second Hand Smoke and Lung Function, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-20.

Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2017, registered Feb 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The use of e-cigarettes is often permitted in otherwise smoke-free areas causing passive vape exposure for present individuals. Little is known about the potential adverse health effects of passive vape, and people with respiratory diseases may be more susceptible.

The aim of the present study was to investigate local and systemic effects of short-term passive exposure to vape from e-cigarettes among patients with mild or moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease COPD in a randomized controlled double-blinded cross-over study.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: The use of e-cigarettes is often permitted in otherwise smoke-free areas causing passive vape exposure for present individuals. Little is known about the potential adverse health effects of passive vape, and people with respiratory diseases may be more susceptible.

Aim: to investigate local and systemic effects of short-term passive exposure to vape from e-cigarettes among patients with mild or moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Design: In a randomised double-blinded cross-over study non-smoking COPD patients were exposed for four hours at two different exposure conditions separated by 14 days; A) clean filtered air and B) passive vaping under controlled environmental conditions.

Measurements: TSI P-TRAK Ultrafine Particle Counter was used for particle counts. Health effects, including lung function (FEV1/FVC) and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were evaluated in relation to local and systemic effects prior to, right after and 24 h. after exposure.

Analysis: Mixed methods approach taking both time and exposure into account.

02

Conditions studied

  • Electronic Cigarette Use
  • Second Hand Smoke
  • Lung Function

Keywords

  • Electronic cigarettes
  • Secondhand vape
  • Health effects
  • Lung function
  • Biomarkers
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus is the lead sponsor of 1,274 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Never smoker or ex-smokers ≥ 6 months
  • Aged 18+
  • A known diagnosis of COPD (FEV1/FVC \< lower limit of normal, app. 70%)
  • MRC ≥ 2 or CAT score ≥ 10

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exposure to smoking more than 30 min./day
  • Treatment with inhaled or oral corticosteroids
  • Known hypersensitivity to constituents in e-cigarettes
  • Any other disease that could influence the study parameters
  • Conditions that prevent safe access to the climate chambers (such as claustrophobia)
  • Perennial rhinitis
  • Deformed nasal airways
  • Not being able to change from long-acting medication to short-acting medication
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    A. Clean Air

    Clean air - no vaping was done.

  • Experimental
    B. Passive vaping

    E-cigarette users were present in an adjacent chamber during both exposures, but only in situation B they were vaping and the vape-polluted air was passed on to the exposure chamber.

    Other: Passive vape

Interventions

  • OtherPassive vape

    On days with passive vape, 2-3 vapers in an adjacent chamber were vaping by turn, and vape was passed on to the exposure chamber continuously .

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Particles in Exhaled Air (Surfactant Protein A & Albumin)

    PExA: Subjects performed repeated breath maneuvers allowing for airway closure and re-opening, and exhaled particles were optically counted and collected on a membrane using the (novel) PExA® instrument set-up.

    Time frame: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (4 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Lung Function (FEV1 & FVC)

    Spirometry

    Time frame: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (4 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  2. Change in Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO)

    NIOX system; Aerocrine AB, Sweden

    Time frame: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (4 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  3. Change in Blood samples

    IL-8, Nightingale analyses for biomarkers

    Time frame: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (4 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  4. Change in nasal volume (using Acoustic rhinometry)

    Is used to assess the nasal cross sectional area and volume. The left and right nasal cavity were studied alternatively until three reproducible measurements were obtained. The minimum cross sectional cavity area was calculated from the means of the measurements. By integration of the area-distance curve, the sum of the volume 2 to 4 (vol2-4) from the nostril was determined on both sides.

    Time frame: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (4 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  5. Change in Symptom questionnaire

    In the exposure chamber participants were asked to fill out a symptom questionnaire every 30 min. regarding their well-being and experienced symptoms in eyes, nose and mouth.

    Time frame: Every 30 min during 4 hours of exposure.

  6. Change in biomarkers in Saliva Sample

    An oral svap from Salivette was placed in the mouth of the participant to collect saliva by gently chewing the swab for one minute. Afterwards the saturated swab was removed to the suspended insert and closed firmly with a lid. Then the sample was transferred to a freezer and stored for -80 C until further analysis. The sample will be analyzed for biomarkers (amylase, cortisol, substance P, lysozyme and secretory IgA.)

    Time frame: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (4 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Aarhus University
    Aarhus, Central Region Denmark 8000, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04316234
Lead sponsor
University of Aarhus
Collaborators
Aarhus University Hospital
Responsible party
Torben Sigsgaard (Professor, Doctor, University of Aarhus) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 20, 2020
Start date
Mar 1, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2017
Completion
Nov 30, 2017
Last update
Mar 20, 2020

Study contacts

Karin R Laursen, MSc
principal investigator · University of Aarhus

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion