CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04310618Updated Oct 1, 2021

Mucus Solids Concentration in Patients With Bronchiectasis

An observational study in Bronchiectasis, sponsored by Universidad San Jorge. Status unknown at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-01.

Sponsored by Universidad San Jorge · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
36
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There is a need for biomarkers that can rapidly and sensitively detect therapeutic benefits of therapies designed to "rehydrate" airways and monitor disease severity and progression. In this study the investigators will evaluate the stability of mucus concentration in patients with bronquiectasis (CF and NCBF) and its ability to respond to acute exacerbations in order to assess whether it can be a good candidate for biomarker.

Read the detailed description

Prospective cross-sectional study of repeated measurements. The recruitment will be performed in 3 different cities of Spain: Zaragoza, Barcelona and Murcia.

Subjects will be asked to repeatedly collect spontaneous and induced sputum samples in both stable and exacerbated conditions. All samples will be collected autonomously by patients in their homes after they have been instructed and supervised. Hypertonic saline nebulization will be used for sputum induction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bronchiectasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Mucus concentration
03

In context

Bronchiectasis

368 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchiectasis; 104 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36 is below the median of 160 across 132 observational studies indexed under Bronchiectasis.

Browse Bronchiectasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad San Jorge is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults with bronchiectasis

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of CF (confirmed genetics) or diagnosis of non-CF bronchiectasis through high resolution computed tomography.
  • Aged ≥ 18 years.
  • Clinically stable at the time of recruitment.
  • Chronic sputum production (able to produce spontaneous sputum daily).
  • Current hypertonic saline user.
  • Able to provide written informed consent and perform the trial.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current smoker or >10 pack-year history of tobacco use.
  • Patient in transplantation or retransplantation list.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Adults with bronchiectasis

    Adult subjets diagnosed with bronchiectasis by high-resolution computed tomography with symptomatology in stable phase

    Other: No intervention

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention

    No intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Inter-sample variability of sputum concentration (% solids)

    % solids will be calculated by measuring the wet to dry sputum weight ratio

    Time frame: 2 stable weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inter-sample variability of sputum concentration (% solids)

    % solids will be calculated by measuring the wet to dry sputum weight ratio

    Time frame: 1 stable day (at 9:00 am, 12:00 am and 17:00 pm)

  2. Sputum concentration (% solids) during the first exacerbation after recruitment

    % solids will be calculated by measuring the wet to dry sputum weight ratio

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Sputum concentration (% solids) one month after the first exacerbation after recruitment

    % solids will be calculated by measuring the wet to dry sputum weight ratio

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. Forced expiratory volume at 1 second

    Simple spirometry

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Forced vital capacity

    Simple spirometry:

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Forced expiratory flow 25-75

    Simple spirometry

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Quality of life related to cough

    Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Self-administered questionnaire that evaluates the impact of cough in three domains: physical, psychological, and social (each one ranged 1 to 7). It is composed of 19 questions and the "total score (range 3 to 21) is calculated by adding the domain scores together". The lower the score, the greater the severity.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Impact of cough and sputum symptoms of everyday life

    Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASA-Q). Self-administered questionnaire that consists of 20 questions organized in four domains (cough symptoms, cough impact, sputum symptoms, and sputum impact). Each domain is ranged from 0 to 100. The total score is expressed over 100 and calculated doing an average of the four domains. The lower the score, the greater the severity.

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Breathlessness

    Modified Medical Research Council breathlessness scale: self-rating tool to measure the degree of disability that breathlessness poses on day-to-day activities on a scale from 0 to 4: 0, no breathlessness except on strenuous exercise; 1, shortness of breath when hurrying on the level or walking up a slight hill; 2, walks slower than people of same age on the level because of breathlessness or has to stop to catch breath when walking at their own pace on the level; 3, stops for breath after walking ∼100 m or after few minutes on the level; and 4, too breathless to leave the house, or breathless when dressing or undressing.

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Ease of coughing up

    Visual analog scales are 10-cm lines anchored at the ends by words that define the bounds of ease of coughing up options; corresponding 0 to "expectorate is very easy" and 10 to "expectorate is very difficult".

    Time frame: Baseline

  11. Ease of coughing up

    Visual analog scales are 10-cm lines anchored at the ends by words that define the bounds of ease of coughing up options; corresponding 0 to "expectorate is very easy" and 10 to "expectorate is very difficult".

    Time frame: During the first exacerbation after recruitment

  12. Sputum colour

    Sputum colour chart (Murray MP et al.)

    Time frame: Baseline

  13. Sputum colour

    Sputum colour chart (Murray MP et al.)

    Time frame: During the first exacerbation after recruitment

  14. Exacerbation frequency

    Number of exacerbations

    Time frame: 12 months before enrollement

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04310618
Lead sponsor
Universidad San Jorge
Collaborators
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Asociación Murciana de Fibrosis Quistica, University of North Carolina
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 17, 2020
Start date
Dec 21, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2021

Study contacts

Marta San Miguel Pagola, PhD
Contact
msanmiguel@usj.es
34617086431
Marta San Miguel Pagola
principal investigator · Universidad San Jorge

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion