CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04298801DEPISTUpdated Mar 6, 2020

Does the Implementation of Nurse-driven HIV Screening for Key Populations in the Emergency Departments Limit Undiagnosed Infections in the Paris Metropolitan Area? DEPIST Trial (ANRS 14055)

An interventional study of Nurse-driven HIV screening for key populations combined with usual physician-directed diagnostic testing and Physician-directed diagnostic testing in Hiv and Nurse's Role, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-06.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2020), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
487,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In France, 40% of newly diagnosed HIV infections are concentrated in the Paris metropolitan area.

Two key populations are mainly concerned: persons born in a foreign country and men who have sex with men. The randomized trial ANRS DICI-VIH (2014-2015) showed that nurse-driven HIV screening for key populations, supported by research staff, in 8 emergency departments (EDs) of the region, was effective in addition to diagnostic testing. The strategy advocated by the WHO and the recent French recommendations support the proposal of screening for key populations in the EDs. Thus, it is important to evaluate the impact and the feasibility of the implementation of this strategy on a large scale.

The aim is to evaluate the impact of a wide implementation of nurse-driven HIV screening by rapid test in key populations combined with usual physician-directed diagnostic testing (intervention strategy) compared to diagnostic testing alone (control strategy) in the usual practice of the EDs.

The strategies will be compared during two periods in 18 EDs of Paris metropolitan area following a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.

During intervention period, nurses will suggest performing an HIV rapid test to patients belonging to key populations according to the answers to a self-administered questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

Background:

In France, 40% of newly diagnosed HIV infections are concentrated in the Paris metropolitan area.

Two key populations are mainly concerned: persons born in a foreign country and men who have sex with men. The randomized trial ANRS DICI-VIH (2014-2015) showed that nurse-driven HIV screening for key populations, supported by research staff, in 8 emergency departments (EDs) of the region, was effective in addition to diagnostic testing. The strategy advocated by the WHO and the recent French recommendations of the National Health Authority (HAS) and expert group support the proposal of screening for key populations in the EDs. Thus, it is important to evaluate the impact and the feasibility of the implementation of this strategy on a large scale in a context where local institutions are taking initiatives to curb the epidemic ("Pour une Ile-de-France sans sida", "Vers Paris sans sida").

Our hypothesis is that nurse-driven HIV screening for key populations can be integrated to the consultants' care pathway as usual practice of the ED and assured over the long term in the Paris metropolitan area; this strategy combined with physician-directed diagnostic testing could reduce undiagnosed infections and help control the epidemic.

Primary objective:

The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of a wide implementation of nurse-driven HIV screening by rapid test in key populations combined with usual physician-directed diagnostic testing (intervention strategy) compared to diagnostic testing alone (control strategy) in the usual practice of the EDs.

Patients aged 18 to 64 years and visiting a participating ED for reasons other than a potential exposure to HIV within less than 48 hours will be included.

The primary outcome is the proportion of new HIV diagnoses among included patients.

Secondary objectives are to :

  • evaluate the feasibility of nurse-driven screening and its long-term implementation,
  • evaluate the effectiveness of the screening process used by the caregivers, particularly the use of an electronic questionnaire, and by the patients as well as the acceptability,
  • compare newly diagnosed HIV+ patients in the two groups in terms of :

    1. linkage to follow up care,
    2. proportions of patients who had a CD4 cell count greater or equal to 500 or 350 cells/µL and no HIV-related symptoms and proportions of patients with acute HIV infection.
  • estimate through modelling the number of new HIV diagnoses for different levels of coverage of the screening strategy in the Paris metropolitan area.

Methods The strategies will be compared in 18 EDs of Paris metropolitan area during two periods. The start of the intervention strategy will be randomly allocated for each ED following a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.

EDs are selected according to the proportion of patients belonging to key populations in the patients they receive (data from two previous studies).

During intervention period, nurses will suggest performing an HIV rapid test to patients belonging to key populations according to the answers to a self-administered questionnaire.

The intervention period will last 3 to 11 months and the control period 0 to 8 months. Patients will participate up to 1 month if a follow-up is needed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hiv
  • Nurse's Role

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Emergency service, Hospital
  • HIV
  • Mass screening
  • Nurses
  • Prevention and control
  • Key populations
  • Targeted screening
03

In context

Emergencies

1,692 studies on the registry are indexed under Emergencies; 333 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 487,000 is above the median of 145 across 931 interventional studies indexed under Emergencies.

Browse Emergencies studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 to 64 years and visiting a participating ED for reasons other than a potential exposure to HIV within less than 48 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not applicable
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
487,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nurse-driven HIV screening for key populations+UD

    Nurse-driven HIV screening for key populations combined with usual physician-directed diagnostic testing (UD)

    Procedure: Nurse-driven HIV screening for key populations combined with usual physician-directed diagnostic testing · Other: Physician-directed diagnostic testing

  • Active comparator
    Physician-directed diagnostic testing alone

    Other: Physician-directed diagnostic testing

Interventions

  • ProcedureNurse-driven HIV screening for key populations combined with usual physician-directed diagnostic testing

    A self-administered questionnaire on HIV exposure factors will be offered to all patients of ages 18-64 able to complete it. This questionnaire will be available in a paper-based format, electronic format on the patient phone or can be conducted verbally by the nurse. According to the answers, the nurses will suggest performing a rapid test to patients belonging to key populations. A finger-stick rapid HIV test will be performed and results will be disclosed by the nurse assisted by a physician if necessary. If needed, a follow-up visit with an infectious disease specialist will be scheduled within 72 hours.

  • OtherPhysician-directed diagnostic testing

    Throughout the intervention, physicians will prescribe HIV tests to patients with HIV-related symptoms, following usual practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of new HIV diagnoses among included patients.

    Time frame: At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion period: 11 months in each ED

Secondary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of the screening strategy and its implementation

    Feasibility of the screening strategy and its implementation based on: * proportion of distributed and completed self-administered questionnaires among the patients included and among the patients able to participate who were not known to be HIV positive, * the proportion of rapid tests offered by nurses among patients belonging to key populations, * the proportion of patients screened by nurses among patients who were offered a rapid test and among patients belonging to high-risk groups .

    Time frame: At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion period: 11 months in each ED

  2. Effectiveness of the screening processes used by the caregivers, particularly the integration of the electronic questionnaire, and used by the patients as well as acceptability

    Time frame: At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion period: 11 months in each ED

  3. Proportions of patients with a new diagnosis

    Proportions of patients with a new diagnosis who had: * a follow up visit with an infectious disease specialist within 1 month, * a CD4 cell count greater or equal to 500 or 350/µL and no HIV-related symptoms, * an acute HIV infection.

    Time frame: At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion period: 11 months in each ED

  4. Estimation through modelling of the number of new HIV diagnoses for different levels of coverage of the screening strategy in the Paris metropolitan area.

    Time frame: At the end of the expected total duration of the inclusion period: 11 months in each ED

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04298801
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 6, 2020
Start date
Jun 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 6, 2020

Study contacts

Judith LEBLANC, RN, PhD
Contact
judith.leblanc@aphp.fr
00 33 1 49 28 22 02
Anne-Claude CREMIEUX, Md, PhD
Contact
anne-claude.cremieux@aphp.fr
00 33 1 49 28 22 02
judith LEBLANC
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion