CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04285528Updated Mar 3, 2020

Sedation and Analgesia Using PFK Versus General Anesthesia in Urological Procedures

An interventional study of General anesthetia Fentanyl and Propofol and PFK in Anesthesia and Urologic Diseases, sponsored by University of Jordan. Completed at 1 site in Jordan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-03.

Sponsored by University of Jordan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2019, registered Feb 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Anesthesia in urological surgeries might constitute a great challenge to anesthesiologists. Especially that a great proportion of these patients are elderly with a lot of comorbidities. This put these patients at the risk of developing medical adverse events after being anesthetized by general anesthesia. The aim of this study is to compare between intravenous sedation with analgesia versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing urological surgical procedures.

Read the detailed description

Anesthesia in urological surgeries might constitute a great challenge to anesthesiologists. Especially that a great proportion of these patients are elderly with a lot of comorbidities. This put these patients at the risk of developing medical adverse events after being anesthetized by general anesthesia. The aim of this study is to compare between intravenous sedation with analgesia versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing urological surgical procedures.

The first group which underwent general anesthesia, was anesthetized using Fentanyl (2 mcg per kg) and Propofol (1-2 mg per kg). Laryngeal mask airway was then inserted.

The second group underwent intravenous sedation and analgesia by using a mixture of Fentanyl, Propofol and Ketamine (PFK mixture). The mixture consists of 100 mcg Fentanyl, 100 mg Propofol, 100 mg of Ketamine. In addition, 40 mg of Lidocaine were added, this aimed to reduce the pain on injection caused by Propofol. Moreover, 4 ml of water of injection were added to the mixture. This resulted in a mixture of 5 mcg/ml of Fentanyl, 5 mg/ml of Propofol, and 5 mg/ml of Ketamine. By this, each ml of the mixture contained 10 mg (ketamine and propofol) + 5 mcg fentanyl. Each patient received an initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg from the solution, then after waiting for 60 seconds, another 0.5 mg/kg were given. Maintenance was given as boluses of 0.2- 0.33 mg/kg every three to five minutes. No laryngeal mask airway nor endotracheal tube were inserted, and the patients were breathing spontaneously through a simple face mask on support of 3 L/min O2.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia
  • Urologic Diseases

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • General anesthesia
  • Sedation
  • Propofol
  • Fentanyl
  • Ketamine
  • Hypotension
03

In context

Urologic Diseases

193 studies on the registry are indexed under Urologic Diseases; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 80 across 135 interventional studies indexed under Urologic Diseases.

Browse Urologic Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Jordan is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • patients above the age of 30 years
  • patients who were admitted for minor urological surgeries under the care of urology team. Minor urological procedures, included cystoscopy, trans-urethral resection of tumor (TURT), uretroscopy, double J insertion, and double J removal.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal.
  • urgent and emergency cases, which were not elective procedures.
  • Surgeries that were expected to take a long duration (more than 1.5 hour).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    General Anesthesia

    The first group which will undergo general anesthesia, will be anesthetized using Fentanyl (2 mcg per kg) and Propofol (1-2 mg per kg). Laryngeal mask airway will be inserted afterwards.

    Drug: General anesthetia Fentanyl and Propofol

  • Experimental
    PFK group

    The second group will undergo intravenous sedation and analgesia by using a mixture of Fentanyl, Propofol and Ketamine (PFK mixture). The mixture consists of 100 mcg Fentanyl, 100 mg Propofol, 100 mg of Ketamine. In addition, 40 mg of Lidocaine will be added, this aims to reduce the pain on injection caused by Propofol. Moreover, 4 ml of water for injection will be added to the mixture.

    Combination Product: PFK

Interventions

  • DrugGeneral anesthetia Fentanyl and Propofol

    Patients were anesthetized using Fentanyl (2 mcg per kg) and Propofol (1-2 mg per kg). Proper classic laryngeal mask airway was inserted afterwards.

    Also known as: GA

  • Combination productPFK

    A mixture of 5 mcg/ml of Fentanyl, 5 mg/ml of Propofol, and 5 mg/ml of Ketamine was used. Each patient received an initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg from the solution, then after waiting for 60 seconds, another 0.5 mg/kg were given. Maintenance was given as boluses of 0.2- 0.33 mg/kg every three to five minutes. No Laryngeal mask airway nor endotracheal tube were inserted, and the patients were breathing spontaneously through a simple face mask on a support of 3 L/min O2.

    Also known as: propofol-ketamine-fentanyl (PFK) mixture, the mixture of propofol, ketamine, fentanyl, with lidocaine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood pressure stability

    the investigators recorded the changes in blood pressure after induction of anesthesia

    Time frame: 45 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hypoxia

    the investigators recorded any episodes of transient reduction of oxygen saturation.

    Time frame: 45 minutes

  2. nausea and vomiting

    The investigators recorded the occurrence of nausea and vomiting till the discharge of the patients from post anesthesia care unit (PACU).

    Time frame: 2 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Jordan University Hospital
    Amman, 13046, Jordan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • White PF, Kehlet H, Neal JM, Schricker T, Carr DB, Carli F; Fast-Track Surgery Study Group. The role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery: from multimodal analgesia to perioperative medical care. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jun;104(6):1380-96, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000263034.96885.e1. PubMed 17513630 ↗
  • Jalili M, Bahreini M, Doosti-Irani A, Masoomi R, Arbab M, Mirfazaelian H. Ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) vs propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;34(3):558-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.12.074. Epub 2015 Dec 29. PubMed 26809929 ↗
  • Ferguson I, Bell A, Treston G, New L, Ding M, Holdgate A. Propofol or Ketofol for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Emergency Medicine-The POKER Study: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;68(5):574-582.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.05.024. Epub 2016 Jul 22. PubMed 27460905 ↗
  • David H, Shipp J. A randomized controlled trial of ketamine/propofol versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 May;57(5):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.11.025. Epub 2011 Jan 21. PubMed 21256626 ↗
  • Morrison K, Herbst K, Corbett S, Herndon CD. Pain management practice patterns for common pediatric urology procedures. Urology. 2014 Jan;83(1):206-10. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.041. Epub 2013 Oct 16. PubMed 24139358 ↗
  • Borland ML, Bergesio R, Pascoe EM, Turner S, Woodger S. Intranasal fentanyl is an equivalent analgesic to oral morphine in paediatric burns patients for dressing changes: a randomised double blind crossover study. Burns. 2005 Nov;31(7):831-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Jul 6. PubMed 16005154 ↗
  • Tosun Z, Aksu R, Guler G, Esmaoglu A, Akin A, Aslan D, Boyaci A. Propofol-ketamine vs propofol-fentanyl for sedation during pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Oct;17(10):983-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2007.02206.x. PubMed 17767636 ↗
  • Singh Bajwa SJ, Bajwa SK, Kaur J. Comparison of two drug combinations in total intravenous anesthesia: Propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl. Saudi J Anaesth. 2010 May;4(2):72-9. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.65132. PubMed 20927266 ↗
  • Kushikata T, Yatsu Y, Kubota T, Matsuki A. [Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, ketamine, and fentanyl (PFK) for a patient with mitochondrial myopathy]. Masui. 2004 Feb;53(2):178-80. Japanese. PubMed 15011427 ↗
  • Kakinohana M, Saitoh T, Kakinohana O, Okuda Y. [A case of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, fentanyl and ketamine for lateral segmentectomy of the liver under pringle maneuver]. Masui. 1999 May;48(5):523-7. Japanese. PubMed 10380509 ↗
  • Tokumine J, Iha H, Okuda Y, Shimabukuro T, Shimabukuro T, Ishigaki K, Nakamura S, Takara I. Appropriate method of administration of propofol, fentanyl, and ketamine for patient-controlled sedation and analgesia during extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. J Anesth. 2000 Apr 25;14(2):68-72. doi: 10.1007/s005400050069. PubMed 14564593 ↗
  • Lonjaret L, Lairez O, Minville V, Geeraerts T. Optimal perioperative management of arterial blood pressure. Integr Blood Press Control. 2014 Sep 12;7:49-59. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S45292. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25278775 ↗
  • Atashkhoyi S, Negargar S, Hatami-Marandi P. Effects of the addition of low-dose ketamine to propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia during diagnostic gynaecological laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):247-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.026. Epub 2013 Jul 17. PubMed 23870189 ↗
  • Hayakawa-Fujii Y, Takada M, Ohta S, Dohi S. Hemodynamic stability during induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation with propofol plus fentanyl, ketamine, and fentanyl-ketamine. J Anesth. 2001;15(4):191-6. doi: 10.1007/s005400170001. PubMed 14569434 ↗
  • Tang YY, Lin XM, Huang W, Jiang XQ. Addition of low-dose ketamine to propofol-fentanyl sedation for gynecologic diagnostic laparoscopy: randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):325-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.01.017. PubMed 20417423 ↗
  • Saadawy I, Ertok E, Boker A. Painless injection of propofol: pretreatment with ketamine vs thiopental, meperidine, and lidocaine. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Oct;19(3):631-44. Erratum In: Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2008 Feb;19(4):919. PubMed 18044291 ↗
  • Erden IA, Pamuk AG, Akinci SB, Koseoglu A, Aypar U. Comparison of propofol-fentanyl with propofol-fentanyl-ketamine combination in pediatric patients undergoing interventional radiology procedures. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 May;19(5):500-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.02971.x. PubMed 19453582 ↗
  • Sakai T, Mi WD, Komoda Y, Kudo T, Kudo M, Matsuki A. [Clinical indication of propofol for pediatric patients--pharmacokinetics of propofol and ketamine during and after total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, fentanyl and ketamine (PFK) in a neonate]. Masui. 1998 Mar;47(3):314-7. Japanese. PubMed 9560543 ↗
  • Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M. Understanding Costs of Care in the Operating Room. JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 18;153(4):e176233. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6233. Epub 2018 Apr 18. PubMed 29490366 ↗
  • Berning V, Laupheimer M, Nubling M, Heidegger T. Influence of quality of recovery on patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery: a prospective observational cohort study. Anaesthesia. 2017 Sep;72(9):1088-1096. doi: 10.1111/anae.13906. Epub 2017 May 16. PubMed 28510285 ↗
  • Onaka M, Akatsuka M, Takayama R, Mori H, Yamamoto H. [Electroencephalographic characteristics during maintenance and emergence from propofol-ketamine-fentanyl anesthesia]. Masui. 2001 Mar;50(3):265-9. Japanese. PubMed 11296437 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04285528
Lead sponsor
University of Jordan
Responsible party
Abdelkarim Saleh AlOweidi (Principal investigator, University of Jordan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 26, 2020
Start date
Apr 17, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2019
Completion
Feb 1, 2020
Last update
Mar 3, 2020

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion