CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04279977Updated May 3, 2023

Stroke Rehabilitation, Functional Recovery, and Cost-effectiveness

An observational study in Stroke, sponsored by University of Utah. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-03.

Sponsored by University of Utah · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2024, 2 years 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2020; still recruiting 6 years 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators will determine the client and non-client variables associated with discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility vs. skilled nursing facility in individuals' post-stroke. The investigators will determine how these variables are associated with short-term (discharge from facility) and long-term (6-months post-stroke) function and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

This is a K01 award application for Dr. Heather Hayes, a neurologic rehabilitation therapist and a young investigator pursuing rehabilitation health services research to optimize post-acute rehabilitation care for patients after stroke. A K01 award will provide Dr. Hayes with the means to acquire critical skills in three key career development areas: 1) health services and policy research, 2) comparative effectiveness and outcomes research, and 3) cost-effective analyses. By acquiring these skills, Dr. Hayes will fulfill the career goal of becoming an independent rehabilitation scientist in health services research. To pursue this goal, Dr. Hayes has assembled an exceptional mentoring team complemented by a strong statistical advisor and proposes strong research aims that provide experiential learning in support of the career development objectives.

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability in the United States. A large portion of the cost of stroke care is rehabilitation. Providing optimal rehabilitation services aids in mitigating long-term disability for people after stroke. There are a lack of clinical guidelines and poor understanding of long-term outcomes after discharge from acute care to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) or skilled nursing facility (SNF) for individuals poststroke. The current healthcare climate requires faster decision making and early discharge, and the results may be inappropriate discharge to an IRF or SNF, and thus not providing the patient with optimal outcomes. By completing the following specific aims, the applicant aims to inform clinicians in the acute care setting about discharge placement and which rehabilitation service will lead to optimal individual and cost-effective outcomes after stroke. Specific Aim 1 will determine client (e.g., stroke severity, co-morbidities, and sociodemographic) and non-client (e.g., bed availability and insurance) variables identified at the end of the acute hospital stay to determine which of these variables are associated with discharge to an IRF or SNF. Specific Aim 2 will follow the clients to determine which of these client and non-client variables are associated with functional change- based on the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Inpatient "6-Clicks" Basic Mobility, Daily Activity, and Applied Cognitive tools at short-term (after discharge from IRF or SNF) and long-term (6-months poststroke). Specific Aim 3 will identify cost-effective strategies of placement into an IRF, to a SNF, and a tailored approach to IRF vs. SNF placement, based on client characteristics. Markov modeling will be used to predict related costs and quality-adjusted life years using the Health-Related Quality of Life in Stroke Patients.

Understanding the outcomes within these similar post-acute care settings (IRF/SNF) for stroke is important in a rapidly evolving healthcare climate. This study is significant because it will provide data about what initial client and non-client variables predict long-term outcomes after discharge to an IRF or SNF and identify cost-effective strategies based on these variables.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • rehabilitation
  • discharge
  • inpatient rehabilitation
  • skilled nursing
  • activity measure for post-acute care
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 160 across 1,692 observational studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Utah is the lead sponsor of 969 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Of its 107 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 62 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Acute ischemic stroke

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient 18 years of age
  • acute ischemic stroke

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hemorrhagic stroke
  • prior living status was at a long-term care facility.
  • Transient ischemic attack
  • being discharged to home, home with rehab or long term care
  • not able to provide consent.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility

    Individuals post-stroke who are discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility.

  • Skilled Nursing Facility

    Individuals post-stroke who are discharged to a skilled nursing facility.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care, Basic Mobility, change over time

    The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6 Clicks" tools are comprised of six questions. Answers are based on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1-unable or total assistance to 4-no assistance or no difficulty. Scores range from 6 to 24, with lower scores indicating more assistance is required. The AM-PAC has a high degree of consistency between proxy (clinician or family) and client self-report in clients with stroke and has good reliability (ICC = 0.85) and validity (internal consistency = 0.96). The AM-PAC Basic Mobility domain assesses turning over in bed, sitting down and standing up, getting out of bed, transferring, walking, and stair climbing.

    Time frame: baseline (acute care hospital stay) to discharge from IRF / SNF or 60 days max

  2. Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care, Daily Activity

    The AM-PAC Daily Activity domain assesses putting on and off clothing, bathing, toileting, grooming, and eating.Answers are based on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1-unable or total assistance to 4-no assistance or no difficulty. Scores range from 6 to 24, with lower scores indicating more assistance is required. The AM-PAC has a high degree of consistency between proxy (clinician or family) and client self-report in clients with stroke and has good reliability (ICC = 0.85) and validity (internal consistency = 0.96).

    Time frame: baseline (acute care hospital stay) to discharge from IRF / SNF or 60 days max

  3. Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care, Applied Cognition

    The AM-PAC Applied Cognitive domain assesses comprehension and memory.Answers are based on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1-unable or total assistance to 4-no assistance or no difficulty. Scores range from 6 to 24, with lower scores indicating more assistance is required. The AM-PAC has a high degree of consistency between proxy (clinician or family) and client self-report in clients with stroke and has good reliability (ICC = 0.85) and validity (internal consistency = 0.96). .

    Time frame: baseline (acute care hospital stay) to discharge from IRF / SNF or 60 days max

  4. Determination of client and non-client variables associated with discharge to an IRF / SNF

    Client variables will include modified Rankin Scale, Stroke classification, hemiparetic side, presence of neglect, stroke severity, body mass index, comprehensive severity index, length of stay, co-morbidities, depression, age, gender, race, ethnicity, education, socioeconomic status, marital status, family / caregiver support. Non-client variables will include bed availability in facility, insurance, home set up, client / family preference, geographical location to facility and home.

    Time frame: discharge from acute hospital stay or 20 days max.

  5. Identify cost-effective strategies for IRF / SNF placement after stroke based on client and non-client variables.

    Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of three care strategies after stroke; 1) IRF placement; 2) SNF placement; and 3) tailored approach to an IRF vs. SNF placement, based on client characteristics. We will capture health related quality of life in stroke (HRQOLSP) patients to predict quality-adjusted life years and related costs.

    Time frame: Information will be collected on HRQOLSP at 6 months post-stroke.

  6. Identify cost-effective strategies for IRF / SNF placement after stroke based on client and non-client variables.

    Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of three care strategies after stroke; 1) IRF placement; 2) SNF placement; and 3) tailored approach to an IRF vs. SNF placement, based on client characteristics. We will capture EQ-5D to predict quality-adjusted life years and related costs.

    Time frame: Information will be collected on EQ-5D at 6 months post-stroke.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care, Basic Mobility, change over time

    The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6 Clicks" tools are comprised of six questions. Answers are based on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1-unable or total assistance to 4-no assistance or no difficulty. Scores range from 6 to 24, with lower scores indicating more assistance is required. The AM-PAC has a high degree of consistency between proxy (clinician or family) and client self-report in clients with stroke and has good reliability (ICC = 0.85) and validity (internal consistency = 0.96). The AM-PAC Basic Mobility domain assesses turning over in bed, sitting down and standing up, getting out of bed, transferring, walking, and stair climbing.

    Time frame: baseline (acute care hospital stay) to 6 months post-stroke

  2. Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care, Daily Activity

    The AM-PAC Daily Activity domain assesses putting on and off clothing, bathing, toileting, grooming, and eating.The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6 Clicks" tools are comprised of six questions. Answers are based on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1-unable or total assistance to 4-no assistance or no difficulty. Scores range from 6 to 24, with lower scores indicating more assistance is required. The AM-PAC has a high degree of consistency between proxy (clinician or family) and client self-report in clients with stroke and has good reliability (ICC = 0.85) and validity (internal consistency = 0.96).

    Time frame: baseline (acute care hospital stay) to 6 months post-stroke

  3. Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care, Applied Cognition

    The AM-PAC Applied Cognitive domain assesses comprehension and memory.The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6 Clicks" tools are comprised of six questions. Answers are based on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1-unable or total assistance to 4-no assistance or no difficulty. Scores range from 6 to 24, with lower scores indicating more assistance is required. The AM-PAC has a high degree of consistency between proxy (clinician or family) and client self-report in clients with stroke and has good reliability (ICC = 0.85) and validity (internal consistency = 0.96).

    Time frame: baseline (acute care hospital stay) to 6 months post-stroke

  4. Identify cost-effective strategies for IRF / SNF placement after stroke based on client and non-client variables.

    Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of three care strategies after stroke; 1) IRF placement; 2) SNF placement; and 3) tailored approach to an IRF vs. SNF placement, based on client characteristics. We will capture health related quality of life in stroke patients (HRQOLSP).

    Time frame: Information will be collected on HRQOLSP at 12 months post-stroke.

  5. Identify cost-effective strategies for IRF / SNF placement after stroke based on client and non-client variables.

    Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of three care strategies after stroke; 1) IRF placement; 2) SNF placement; and 3) tailored approach to an IRF vs. SNF placement, based on client characteristics. We will capture EQ-5D to predict quality-adjusted life years and related costs.

    Time frame: Information will be collected on EQ-5D at 6 months post-stroke.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, United States
    • Tamara Garff · Contact · tamara.garff@hsc.utah.edu · 801-585-3122
    • Heather A Hayes, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Rachel Hess, MD · Sub investigator
    • Jacob Kean, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Lorie G Richards, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Elissa Ozanne, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Angela Presson, PhD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Looking into resources for where to store.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04279977
Lead sponsor
University of Utah
Responsible party
Heather Hayes (Assistant Professor, University of Utah) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 21, 2020
Start date
Jan 27, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 3, 2023

Study contacts

Tamara Garff
Contact
tamara.garff@hsc.utah.edu
8015818681
Heather A Hayes, PhD
principal investigator · University of Utah

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion