CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04279314LILAC™Updated Apr 11, 2024Results posted

Open-Label Extension Study of Trofinetide for the Treatment of Girls and Women With Rett Syndrome

A Phase 3 interventional study of Trofinetide in Rett Syndrome, sponsored by ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Completed at 21 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 5 Years to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-11.

Sponsored by ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
154
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
5 Years to 21 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

To investigate the safety and tolerability of long-term treatment with oral trofinetide in girls and women with Rett syndrome

02

Conditions studied

  • Rett Syndrome
03

In context

Rett Syndrome

98 studies on the registry are indexed under Rett Syndrome; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 154 is above the median of 30 across 64 interventional studies indexed under Rett Syndrome.

Browse Rett Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Has completed the Week 12/End-of-treatment visit of the antecedent study, Study ACP-2566-003
  2. Met all entry criteria for the antecedent study
  3. May benefit from long-term treatment with open-label trofinetide in the judgment of the Investigator
  4. Can still swallow the study medication provided as a liquid solution or can take it by gastrostomy tube
  5. The subject's caregiver is English-speaking and has sufficient language skills to complete the caregiver assessments
  6. Subject and caregiver(s) must reside at a location to which study drug can be delivered and have been at their present residence for at least 3 months prior to Baseline

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Began treatment with growth hormone during the antecedent study
  2. Began treatment with IGF-1 during the antecedent study
  3. Began treatment with insulin during the antecedent study
  4. Has developed a clinically significant cardiovascular, endocrine (such as hypo- or hyperthyroidism, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, or uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes mellitus), renal, hepatic, respiratory, or gastrointestinal disease (such as celiac disease or inflammatory bowel disease) or has major surgery planned during the study
  5. Subject is judged by the Investigator or the Medical Monitor to be inappropriate for the study due to AEs, medical condition, or noncompliance with investigational product or study procedures in the antecedent study
  6. Has a clinically significant abnormality in vital signs at Baseline
  7. Has a QTcF interval of >450 ms on the Baseline ECG performed before the first dose of trofinetide is given in the present study
  8. Has developed a clinically significant ECG finding during the antecedent study

Additional inclusion/exclusion criteria apply. Patients will be evaluated at baseline to ensure that all criteria for study participation are met. Patients may be excluded from the study based on these assessments (and specifically, if it is determined that their baseline health and condition do not meet all prespecified entry criteria).

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
154 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Trofinetide

    Drug: Trofinetide

Interventions

  • DrugTrofinetide

    Trofinetide solution of 30-60 mL based on subject's weight at Baseline, administered twice daily by mouth or gastrostomy tube (G-tube)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Percentage of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Percentage of Subjects With Withdrawals Due to AEs

    Percentage of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), percentage of subjects with serious adverse events (SAEs), and percentage of subjects with withdrawals due to AEs

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  2. Subjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes in ECG

    Potentially clinically important ECG changes were defined in the study protocol as absolute QTcF interval \>500 ms or QTcF interval change from the baseline value of previous study ACP-2566-003 of \>60 ms

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  3. Subjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes in Vital Signs

    Potentially clinically important changes in vital signs were defined in the study protocol as: systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥180 mmHg and increased ≥20 mmHg from baseline; SBP ≤90 mmHg and decreased ≥20 mmHg from baseline; diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 105 mmHg and increased ≥15 mmHg from baseline; DBP ≤50 mmHg and decreased ≥15 mmHg from baseline; Pulse ≥120 bpm and increased ≥15 bpm from baseline; Pulse ≤50 bpm and decreased ≥15 bpm from baseline

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  4. Subjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes in Body Weight

    Potentially clinically important changes in body weight were defined in the study protocol as: Weight increase ≥7% from baseline; Weight decrease ≥7% from baseline

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  5. Subjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes

    Potentially clinically important changes in laboratory parameters were defined in the study protocol as: Sodium ≤125 mmol/L; Sodium ≥155 mmol/L; Potassium ≤3.0 mmol/L; Potassium ≥5.5 mmol/L; Chloride ≤85 mmol/L; Chloride ≥120 mmol/L; Calcium \<2.0 mmol/L; Calcium \>2.0 mmol/L; Blood urea nitrogen ≥10.71 mmol/L; Creatinine \>1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN); Uric acid ≥505.75 μmol/L; Lactate dehydrogenase ≥3 x ULN; Glucose ≤2.48 mmol/L; Glucose ≥11 mmol/L; Albumin ≤26 g/L; Albumin ≥60 g/L; Protein ≤50 g/L; Protein ≥100 g/L; Alanine aminotransferase ≥3 x ULN; Aspartate aminotransferase ≥3 x ULN; Gamma glutamyl transpeptidase ≥3 x ULN; Alkaline phosphatase ≥3 x ULN; Bilirubin ≥1.5 x ULN

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ) Total Score Change From Baseline to Week 40

    The RSBQ is a 45-item caregiver-completed rating scalescale includes 45 items, 39 of them grouped into 8 subscales, whose ratings reflect the severity and frequency of symptoms. Items are rated as 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat or sometimes true), or 2 (very true). The 8 subscales are general mood, breathing problems, hand behavior, face movements, body rocking/expressionless face, night-time behaviors, fear/anxiety, and walking/standing. Scores for item 31 are reversed in the calculation of the total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 90 and is calculated as the sum of the item scores. Higher scores mean worse behaviour.

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  2. Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 40

    To rate how much the subject's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state, a 7-point scale is used from 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, 7=very much worse. Higher CGI-I scores denote more severe illness and less improvement in the illness.

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  3. Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist - Social Composite Score (CSBS-DP-IT Social) Change From Baseline to Week 40

    Scale to assess communication and pre-linguistic skills in children 12-24 months (or older children with developmental delay). The Checklist consists of 24 questions ranging from 0 to 4 points within each of 7 Clusters. 0 points are given for"Not Yet", 1 point for "Sometimes", or 2 points for "Often". For items describing a series of numbers or ranges, 0 points are given for "None" and 1 to 4 points for items containing numbered choices. The Social Composite score is one of 3 composite scores. It comprises 13 items in skill areas "Emotion and Eye Gaze" (items 1 to 4), "Communication" (items 5 to 8), and "Gestures" (items 9 to 13). The Social Composite raw score (items 1 to 13), ranging from 0 to 26, is calculated as the sum of the item scores. Higher Social Composite raw scores indicate better social communication development.

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  4. Overall Quality of Life Rating of the Impact of Childhood Neurologic Disability Scale (ICND) Change From Baseline to Week 40

    The overall quality of life score rating of the ICND ranges from 1 ("Poor") to 6 ("Excellent"); lower overall quality of life scores indicate lower quality of life.

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  5. Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Hand Function (RTT-HF) Change From Baseline to Week 40

    The RTT-HF is a clinician completed clinical assessment of the subject's ability to use her hands for functional purposes. The assessment is made on an 8-point Likert scale (0-7) with 0 denoting normal functioning and 7 the most severe impairment

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  6. Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Ambulation and Gross Motor Skills (RTT-AMB) Change From Baseline to Week 40

    The RTT-AMB is a clinician completed clinical assessment of the subject's ability to sit, stand, and ambulate. The assessment is made on an 8-point Likert scale (0-7) with 0 denoting normal functioning and 7 the most severe impairment.

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  7. Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Ability to Communicate Choices (RTT-COMC) Change From Baseline to Week 40

    The RTT-COMC is a clinician completed clinical assessment of the subject's ability to communicate her choices or preferences, which can include the use of nonverbal means such as eye contact or gestures. The assessment is made on an 8-point Likert scale (0-7) with 0 denoting normal functioning and 7 the most severe impairment.

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  8. Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Verbal Communication (RTT-VCOM) Change From Baseline to Week 40

    The RTT-VCOM is a clinician completed clinical assessment of the subject's ability to communicate verbally. The assessment is made on an 8-point Likert scale (0-7) with 0 denoting normal functioning and 7 the most severe impairment.

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 40 in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S)

    The CGI-S is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the subject's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's experience with subjects who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a subject is assessed on severity of illness at the time of rating: 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline ill; 3=mildly ill; 4= moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; or 7=extremely ill. Higher CGI-S scores denote more severe illness and less improvement in the illness.

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  10. Rett Syndrome Caregiver Burden Inventory (RTT-CBI) Total Score (Items 1-24) Change From Baseline to Week 40

    The RTT-CBI consists of 24 negatively worded items (Items 1 through 24). Frequency ratings are on a 5-point Likert scale including: 0-never; 1-rarely; 2-sometimes; 3-frequently and 4-nearly always. The RTT-CBI also includes 2 positively worded items (items 25 and 26) that comprise the Optimism Index; this index will not be used for analysis. The total score ranging from 0 to 96 is calculated as the sum of the scores for Items 1-24.Higher scores signify higher caregiver burden.

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

  11. Impact of Childhood Neurologic Disability Scale (ICND) Total Score Change From Baseline to Week 40

    The ICND scale evaluates the effect of 4 health problems on 11 aspects of the child's or the family's life scored 0 ("Not at all"), 1 ("A little"), 2 ("Some"), 3 ("A lot"), or "Does not apply". The 4 health problems are 1) inattentiveness, impulsivity, or mood, 2) ability to think and remember, 3) neurologic or physical limitations, and 4) epilepsy. For each health problem, the score is calculated as the sum of the item scores. The ICND total score will be calculated as the sum of the average of each problem score multiplied by 11. The ICND total score ranges from 0 to 132. Higher ICND total scores indicate worse health problems. The ICND total score does not include the Overall Quality of Life Rating.

    Time frame: 40 Weeks Treatment Duration

07

Results

Posted Apr 11, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTrofinetide
Started154
Completed84
Not completed70
Withdrew: Adverse event55
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject5
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy5
Withdrew: Protocol violation3
Withdrew: Other (not covid-19 related)2

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Percentage of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Percentage of Subjects With Withdrawals Due to AEs

Percentage of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), percentage of subjects with serious adverse events (SAEs), and percentage of subjects with withdrawals due to AEs

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Percentage of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Percentage of Subjects With Withdrawals Due to AEs
ParticipantsTrofinetide
Percentage of subjects with TEAEs132
percentage of subjects with SAEs19
Percentage of subjects withdrawals due to AEs48
PrimarySubjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes in ECG

Potentially clinically important ECG changes were defined in the study protocol as absolute QTcF interval \>500 ms or QTcF interval change from the baseline value of previous study ACP-2566-003 of \>60 ms

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes in ECG
ParticipantsTrofinetide
Subjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes in ECG2
PrimarySubjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes in Vital Signs

Potentially clinically important changes in vital signs were defined in the study protocol as: systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥180 mmHg and increased ≥20 mmHg from baseline; SBP ≤90 mmHg and decreased ≥20 mmHg from baseline; diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 105 mmHg and increased ≥15 mmHg from baseline; DBP ≤50 mmHg and decreased ≥15 mmHg from baseline; Pulse ≥120 bpm and increased ≥15 bpm from baseline; Pulse ≤50 bpm and decreased ≥15 bpm from baseline

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes in Vital Signs
ParticipantsTrofinetide
SBP ≥180 mmHg and increased ≥20 mmHg from baseline0
SBP ≤90 mmHg and decreased ≥20 mmHg from baseline11
DBP ≥ 105 mmHg and increased ≥15 mmHg from baseline0
DBP ≤50 mmHg and decreased ≥15 mmHg from baseline13
Pulse ≥120 bpm and increased ≥15 bpm from baseline14
Pulse ≤50 bpm and decreased ≥15 bpm from baseline0
PrimarySubjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes in Body Weight

Potentially clinically important changes in body weight were defined in the study protocol as: Weight increase ≥7% from baseline; Weight decrease ≥7% from baseline

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes in Body Weight
ParticipantsTrofinetide
Weight increase ≥7% from baseline44
Weight decrease ≥7% from baseline20
PrimarySubjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes

Potentially clinically important changes in laboratory parameters were defined in the study protocol as: Sodium ≤125 mmol/L; Sodium ≥155 mmol/L; Potassium ≤3.0 mmol/L; Potassium ≥5.5 mmol/L; Chloride ≤85 mmol/L; Chloride ≥120 mmol/L; Calcium \<2.0 mmol/L; Calcium \>2.0 mmol/L; Blood urea nitrogen ≥10.71 mmol/L; Creatinine \>1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN); Uric acid ≥505.75 μmol/L; Lactate dehydrogenase ≥3 x ULN; Glucose ≤2.48 mmol/L; Glucose ≥11 mmol/L; Albumin ≤26 g/L; Albumin ≥60 g/L; Protein ≤50 g/L; Protein ≥100 g/L; Alanine aminotransferase ≥3 x ULN; Aspartate aminotransferase ≥3 x ULN; Gamma glutamyl transpeptidase ≥3 x ULN; Alkaline phosphatase ≥3 x ULN; Bilirubin ≥1.5 x ULN

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subjects (N, %) With Post-baseline Potentially Clinically Important Changes
ParticipantsTrofinetide
Sodium ≤125 mmol/L0
Sodium ≥155 mmol/L1
Potassium ≤3.0 mmol/L0
Potassium ≥5.5 mmol/L0
Chloride ≤85 mmol/L0
Chloride ≥120 mmol/L1
Calcium <2.0 mmol/L0
Calcium >2.0 mmol/L0
BUN ≥10.71 mmol/L0
Creatinine >1.5 x ULN0
Uric acid ≥505.75 μmol/L0
Lactate dehydrogenase ≥3× ULN0
Glucose ≤2.48 mmol/L4
Glucose ≥11 mmol/L1
Albumin ≤26 g/L2
Albumin ≥60 g/L0
Protein ≤50 g/L1
Protein ≥100 g/L0
ALT ≥3× ULN14
AST ≥3× ULN0
GGT ≥3× ULN4
ALP ≥3× ULN0
Bilirubin ≥1.5× ULN0
SecondaryRett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ) Total Score Change From Baseline to Week 40

The RSBQ is a 45-item caregiver-completed rating scalescale includes 45 items, 39 of them grouped into 8 subscales, whose ratings reflect the severity and frequency of symptoms. Items are rated as 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat or sometimes true), or 2 (very true). The 8 subscales are general mood, breathing problems, hand behavior, face movements, body rocking/expressionless face, night-time behaviors, fear/anxiety, and walking/standing. Scores for item 31 are reversed in the calculation of the total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 90 and is calculated as the sum of the item scores. Higher scores mean worse behaviour.

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ) Total Score Change From Baseline to Week 40
score on a scaleTrofinetide
Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ) Total Score Change From Baseline to Week 40-2.9 ± 1.17
SecondaryClinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 40

To rate how much the subject's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state, a 7-point scale is used from 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, 7=very much worse. Higher CGI-I scores denote more severe illness and less improvement in the illness.

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 40
score on a scalePlacebo/TrofinetideTrofinetide/Trofinetide
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 403.2 ± 0.143.1 ± 0.11
SecondaryCommunication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist - Social Composite Score (CSBS-DP-IT Social) Change From Baseline to Week 40

Scale to assess communication and pre-linguistic skills in children 12-24 months (or older children with developmental delay). The Checklist consists of 24 questions ranging from 0 to 4 points within each of 7 Clusters. 0 points are given for"Not Yet", 1 point for "Sometimes", or 2 points for "Often". For items describing a series of numbers or ranges, 0 points are given for "None" and 1 to 4 points for items containing numbered choices. The Social Composite score is one of 3 composite scores. It comprises 13 items in skill areas "Emotion and Eye Gaze" (items 1 to 4), "Communication" (items 5 to 8), and "Gestures" (items 9 to 13). The Social Composite raw score (items 1 to 13), ranging from 0 to 26, is calculated as the sum of the item scores. Higher Social Composite raw scores indicate better social communication development.

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist - Social Composite Score (CSBS-DP-IT Social) Change From Baseline to Week 40
score on a scaleTrofinetide
Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile™ Infant-Toddler Checklist - Social Composite Score (CSBS-DP-IT Social) Change From Baseline to Week 400.5 ± 0.26
SecondaryOverall Quality of Life Rating of the Impact of Childhood Neurologic Disability Scale (ICND) Change From Baseline to Week 40

The overall quality of life score rating of the ICND ranges from 1 ("Poor") to 6 ("Excellent"); lower overall quality of life scores indicate lower quality of life.

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Quality of Life Rating of the Impact of Childhood Neurologic Disability Scale (ICND) Change From Baseline to Week 40
score on a scaleTrofinetide
Overall Quality of Life Rating of the Impact of Childhood Neurologic Disability Scale (ICND) Change From Baseline to Week 400.2 ± 0.09
SecondaryRett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Hand Function (RTT-HF) Change From Baseline to Week 40

The RTT-HF is a clinician completed clinical assessment of the subject's ability to use her hands for functional purposes. The assessment is made on an 8-point Likert scale (0-7) with 0 denoting normal functioning and 7 the most severe impairment

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Hand Function (RTT-HF) Change From Baseline to Week 40
score on a scaleTrofinetide
Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Hand Function (RTT-HF) Change From Baseline to Week 40-0.1 ± 0.09
SecondaryRett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Ambulation and Gross Motor Skills (RTT-AMB) Change From Baseline to Week 40

The RTT-AMB is a clinician completed clinical assessment of the subject's ability to sit, stand, and ambulate. The assessment is made on an 8-point Likert scale (0-7) with 0 denoting normal functioning and 7 the most severe impairment.

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Ambulation and Gross Motor Skills (RTT-AMB) Change From Baseline to Week 40
score on a scaleTrofinetide
Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Ambulation and Gross Motor Skills (RTT-AMB) Change From Baseline to Week 40-0.2 ± 0.09
SecondaryRett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Ability to Communicate Choices (RTT-COMC) Change From Baseline to Week 40

The RTT-COMC is a clinician completed clinical assessment of the subject's ability to communicate her choices or preferences, which can include the use of nonverbal means such as eye contact or gestures. The assessment is made on an 8-point Likert scale (0-7) with 0 denoting normal functioning and 7 the most severe impairment.

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Ability to Communicate Choices (RTT-COMC) Change From Baseline to Week 40
score on a scaleTrofinetide
Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Ability to Communicate Choices (RTT-COMC) Change From Baseline to Week 40-0.4 ± 0.13
SecondaryRett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Verbal Communication (RTT-VCOM) Change From Baseline to Week 40

The RTT-VCOM is a clinician completed clinical assessment of the subject's ability to communicate verbally. The assessment is made on an 8-point Likert scale (0-7) with 0 denoting normal functioning and 7 the most severe impairment.

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Verbal Communication (RTT-VCOM) Change From Baseline to Week 40
score on a scaleTrofinetide
Rett Syndrome Clinician Rating of Verbal Communication (RTT-VCOM) Change From Baseline to Week 40-0.2 ± 0.07
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 40 in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S)

The CGI-S is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the subject's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's experience with subjects who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a subject is assessed on severity of illness at the time of rating: 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline ill; 3=mildly ill; 4= moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; or 7=extremely ill. Higher CGI-S scores denote more severe illness and less improvement in the illness.

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 40 in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S)
score on a scaleTrofinetide
Change From Baseline to Week 40 in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S)-0.1 ± 0.04
SecondaryRett Syndrome Caregiver Burden Inventory (RTT-CBI) Total Score (Items 1-24) Change From Baseline to Week 40

The RTT-CBI consists of 24 negatively worded items (Items 1 through 24). Frequency ratings are on a 5-point Likert scale including: 0-never; 1-rarely; 2-sometimes; 3-frequently and 4-nearly always. The RTT-CBI also includes 2 positively worded items (items 25 and 26) that comprise the Optimism Index; this index will not be used for analysis. The total score ranging from 0 to 96 is calculated as the sum of the scores for Items 1-24.Higher scores signify higher caregiver burden.

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Rett Syndrome Caregiver Burden Inventory (RTT-CBI) Total Score (Items 1-24) Change From Baseline to Week 40
score on a scaleTrofinetide
Rett Syndrome Caregiver Burden Inventory (RTT-CBI) Total Score (Items 1-24) Change From Baseline to Week 40-1.9 ± 1.05
SecondaryImpact of Childhood Neurologic Disability Scale (ICND) Total Score Change From Baseline to Week 40

The ICND scale evaluates the effect of 4 health problems on 11 aspects of the child's or the family's life scored 0 ("Not at all"), 1 ("A little"), 2 ("Some"), 3 ("A lot"), or "Does not apply". The 4 health problems are 1) inattentiveness, impulsivity, or mood, 2) ability to think and remember, 3) neurologic or physical limitations, and 4) epilepsy. For each health problem, the score is calculated as the sum of the item scores. The ICND total score will be calculated as the sum of the average of each problem score multiplied by 11. The ICND total score ranges from 0 to 132. Higher ICND total scores indicate worse health problems. The ICND total score does not include the Overall Quality of Life Rating.

Time frame:
40 Weeks Treatment Duration
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Impact of Childhood Neurologic Disability Scale (ICND) Total Score Change From Baseline to Week 40
score on a scaleTrofinetide
Impact of Childhood Neurologic Disability Scale (ICND) Total Score Change From Baseline to Week 40-5.8 ± 3.91

Adverse events

Collected over 44 weeks (including 40-week open-label treatment period and 30-day safety follow-up period). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Trofinetide0/154 (0%)19/154 (12.3%)114/154 (74%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent serious events
EventTrofinetide
SeizureNervous system disorders5/154
PneumoniaInfections and infestations4/154
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/154
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/154
Rhinovirus infectionInfections and infestations2/154
Viral infectionInfections and infestations2/154
Status epilepticusNervous system disorders2/154
Acute respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/154
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/154
Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders1/154
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTrofinetide
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders91/154
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders39/154
COVID-19Infections and infestations16/154
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations12/154
PyrexiaGeneral disorders11/154
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders10/154
SeizureNervous system disorders10/154
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations9/154
Weight decreasedInvestigations9/154

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Trofinetide
Mean11.0 ± 4.55
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Trofinetide
Female154
Male0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Trofinetide
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian5
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1
Black or African American1
White143
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported4
Height
Height(cm)Trofinetide
Mean128.60 ± 1.229
Weight
Weight(kg)Trofinetide
Mean29.28 ± 0.869
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index(kg/m2)Trofinetide
Mean17.03 ± 0.285
08

Study locations

21 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35223, United States
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen)
    Phoenix, Arizona 85012, United States
  • University of California, San Diego
    La Jolla, California 92093, United States
  • UC Davis MIND Institute
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Children Medical Services
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Emory Genetics Clinical Trial Center
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute - Clinical Trials Unit
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
  • Boston Children's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
    Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Montefiore Medical Center, Children's Hospital at Montefiore
    Bronx, New York 10467, United States
  • The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Greenwood Genetic Center
    Greenwood, South Carolina 29626, United States
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Texas Children's Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Seattle Children's
    Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Aug 7, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 20, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 11, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04279314
Lead sponsor
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 21, 2020
Start date
Jan 29, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 19, 2022
Completion
Aug 19, 2022
Results posted
Apr 11, 2024
Last update
Apr 11, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion