CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04273035Updated May 4, 2021

Handheld-multimedia Versus Oral Midazolam in Pediatric on Perioperative Anxiety

A Phase 4 interventional study of Midazolam oral solution and IPAD in Perioperative Anxiety, Preanesthetic Medication and Inhalation Anesthesia, sponsored by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel. Status unknown at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 8 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-04.

Sponsored by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year to 8 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The first goal of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety between anxiolysis by multimedia-distraction with an IPAD versus anxiolysis by premedication with midazolam prior to the induction. Secondly to evaluate the need for midazolam-premedication in pediatric day-care patients induced by inhalational anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

Perioperative anxiety in children is a common multifactorial influenced and triggered entity with an incidence as high as 50%. Especially (mask)induction of anesthesia is considered one of the most stressful experiences for a child undergoing surgery. A common practice worldwide to diminish the level of anxiety prior to anesthesia is premedication with the benzodiazepine midazolam in order to improve cooperation during induction.

Premedication with midazolam has a primary purpose to reduce preoperative anxiety and has inherent to a benzodiazepine its sedative effects. Although these effects are implied, negative effects of premedication: respiratory complications, paradoxical negative behavior has been reported. Although alternative medications have been studied, studies for non-pharmacological anxiety-reduction remain limited.

Non-pharmacological anxiety-reduction by distraction including Tablet or IPAD-multimedia might be a readily available alternative for midazolam premedication. Potentially limiting the use of psychoactive agents, limiting the need for preoperative sedation and therefore possibly decrease secondary respiratory complications in pediatric surgical day-care.

Objective:

The first goal of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety between anxiolysis by multimedia-distraction with an IPAD versus anxiolysis by premedication with midazolam prior to the mask-induction of anesthesia. Secondly to evaluate the need for midazolam premedication in pediatric day-care surgery patients induced by inhalational anesthesia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Perioperative Anxiety
  • Preanesthetic Medication
  • Inhalation Anesthesia
  • Ambulatory Surgery
  • Tonsillectomy
  • Circumcision
  • Dental Care

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Preanesthetic medication
  • Handheld computer
  • Midazolam
  • Multimedia
  • Anxiety
  • Mask induction
  • Day Care Surgery
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders

4,868 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,390 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 80 across 4,174 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel is the lead sponsor of 362 studies on the registry; 103 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 8 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 1 year and \<8 years old
  • ASA class 1 or 2 (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System)
  • Elective circumcision, tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy, dental care procedure in day-care
  • Written informed consent by the legal parents or caretaker

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Parents of the patient wish not to participate with the study
  • Parents are not able to give informed consent (language barrier, legally incapable)
  • A contraindication for the use of premedication with midazolam
  • A known allergy to midazolam
  • A contraindication for premedication in general
  • A contraindication for the use of a gas-induction/gas-anesthesia
  • A contraindication for the use of sevoflurane
  • A known mental retardation of the child
  • Preoperative behavioral disturbances and psychiatric disorders
  • Any use of psychoactive medication
  • A known photosensitive epilepsy
  • A previous operation within 3 months of the time of scheduled operation
  • Any other contraindication for the use of the study medication
  • Previous history of multiple surgery (>3)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Midazolam Group

    * Midazolam(Buccolam 5mg/ml) * 0.5mg/kg oral, max 12mg * one time * given 30 min prior to going to holding

    Drug: Midazolam oral solution

  • Active comparator
    IPAD group

    * No premedication * IPAD when arriving at the holding * any games, movies, clips, puzzles

    Device: IPAD

Interventions

  • DrugMidazolam oral solution

    Oral Buccolam

    Also known as: Buccolam

  • DeviceIPAD

    Playing any game, film, clip or puzzle on a tablet till after induction of anesthesia

    Also known as: Handheld multimedia, tablet

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anxiety level at induction

    Measured bij Short version modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale(mYPAS-SF), scoring activity 1-4/4, vocalizations 1-6/6, emotional expressivity 1-4/4, state of apparent arousal 1-4/4, parental use 1-4/4, subtotal is the sum of all the individual scores divided by their number of choices, mYpas-SF total score is subtotal/5 \* 100 and therefore a score between 23,3-100 Scored prior moment of mask induction (T2)

    Time frame: Directly prior to induction of anesthesia, 20 minutes

  2. Anesthesiologist Satisfaction Induction

    Satisfactory Score for Induction/Anesthesia: 5 point scale: Very satisfactory, Satisfactory, Neutral, Unsatisfactory and Very satisfactory Scored in the OR directly post induction

    Time frame: During induction of anesthesia 10 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anxiety level at Daycare

    Measured bij Short version modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale(mYPAS-SF), scoring activity 1-4/4, vocalizations 1-6/6, emotional expressivity 1-4/4, state of apparent arousal 1-4/4, parental use 1-4/4, subtotal is the sum of all the individual scores divided by their number of choices, mYpas-SF total score is subtotal/5 \* 100 and therefore a score between 23,3-100 Scored at Daycare (T0) when leaving to holding

    Time frame: Leaving daycare, 10 minutes

  2. Anxiety level at holding

    Measured bij Short version modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale(mYPAS-SF), scoring activity 1-4/4, vocalizations 1-6/6, emotional expressivity 1-4/4, state of apparent arousal 1-4/4, parental use 1-4/4, subtotal is the sum of all the individual scores divided by their number of choices, mYpas-SF total score is subtotal/5 \* 100 and therefore a score between 23,3-100 Scored at holding (T1) 10 minutes after arrival

    Time frame: On holding, 20 minutes

  3. Anxiety level at recovery

    Measured bij Short version modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale(mYPAS-SF), scoring activity 1-4/4, vocalizations 1-6/6, emotional expressivity 1-4/4, state of apparent arousal 1-4/4, parental use 1-4/4, subtotal is the sum of all the individual scores divided by their number of choices, mYpas-SF total score is subtotal/5 \* 100 and therefore a score between 23,3-100 Scored at recovery (T3) 15 minutes after awake

    Time frame: 15 minutes after awake, 30 minutes

  4. Anxiety level Change Daycare vs OR

    Measured bij Short version modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale(mYPAS-SF), scoring activity 1-4/4, vocalizations 1-6/6, emotional expressivity 1-4/4, state of apparent arousal 1-4/4, parental use 1-4/4, subtotal is the sum of all the individual scores divided by their number of choices, mYpas-SF total score is subtotal/4 \* 100 and therefore a score between 23,3-100

    Time frame: change during daycare (T0) and induction(T2) in the OR, average 1 hour

  5. Sedation level at Daycare

    Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, RASS-score between -5 till + 4 Scored at Daycare (T0) when leaving to holding

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  6. Sedation level at holding

    Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, RASS-score between -5 till + 4 Scored (T1) 10 minutes after arrival holding

    Time frame: 20 minutes

  7. Sedation level at induction

    Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, RASS-score between -5 till + 4 Scored at moment of mask induction (T2)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  8. Sedation level at recovery

    Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, RASS-score between -5 till + 4 Scored 15 minutes after arrival recovery (T3)

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  9. Laryngospasm at induction

    Laryngospasm by Four-point scale: 1. No Laryngospasm 2. Mild laryngospasm (relieved by jaw thrust and 100% oxygen), 3. Moderate laryngospasm (relieved by 100% oxygen and positive pressure ventilation) 4. Severe laryngospasm (relieved by succinylcholine and intubation) Scored in the OR post-induction

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  10. Laryngospasm post extubation/post laryngeal mask

    Laryngospasm by Four-point scale: 1. No Laryngospasm 2. Mild laryngospasm (relieved by jaw thrust and 100% oxygen), 3. Moderate laryngospasm (relieved by 100% oxygen and positive pressure ventilation) 4. Severe laryngospasm (relieved by succinylcholine and intubation) Scored in the OR post detubation/post laryngeal mask

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  11. Bronchospasm postinduction

    Bronchospasm/wheezing 1. Yes 2. No • In absence of scale Scored in the OR postinduction

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  12. Bronchospasm post detubation/laryngeal mask

    Bronchospasm/wheezing 1. Yes 2. No • In absence of scale Scored in the OR post detonation/laryngeal mask

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  13. Postoperative Pain

    The pain observation scale for young children (POCIS-Score) score 0-7, scoring 0 or1 for • face-expression: frowning/grimaces = 1, sound crying/moan =1, breathing: irregular/gasping/holding=1, body tonus: tense/shiver/restless =1, movement of arms: tense/fist/restless =1, movement of legs: tense/pulled up/flexed = 1, mood: agitation/restless = 1 Scored on the recovery 30 minutes after arrival

    Time frame: 40 minutes

  14. Parental Satisfaction on the anxiety-management at daycare

    1. Very satisfied 2. Satisfied 3. Neutral 4. Unsatisfactory 5. Very Unsatisfactory Scored at daycare-surgery (T0)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  15. Parental Satisfaction on the anxiety-management at holding

    1. Very satisfied 2. Satisfied 3. Neutral 4. Unsatisfactory 5. Very Unsatisfactory Scored at holding (T1)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  16. Parental Satisfaction on the anxiety-management at OR

    1. Very satisfied 2. Satisfied 3. Neutral 4. Unsatisfactory 5. Very Unsatisfactory Scored after induction and parent has left the OR (T2)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  17. Parental Satisfaction on the anxiety-management at recovery

    1. Very satisfied 2. Satisfied 3. Neutral 4. Unsatisfactory 5. Very Unsatisfactory Scored at the recovery (T3)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  18. Parental Stress level at day care

    Parental Stress level in 5 - point scale- ´I feel': 1. Extremely Stressed 2. Very stressed 3. moderate stressed 4. Low stressed 5. Very low stressed scored at day care (T0)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  19. Parental Stress level at holding

    Parental Stress level in 5 - point scale- ´I feel': 1. Extremely Stressed 2. Very stressed 3. moderate stressed 4. Low stressed 5. Very low stressed Scored at holding (T1)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  20. Parental Stress level at OR

    Parental Stress level in 5 - point scale- ´I feel': 1. Extremely Stressed 2. Very stressed 3. moderate stressed 4. Low stressed 5. Very low stressed Scored at OR (T2)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  21. Parental Stress level at recovery

    Parental Stress level in 5 - point scale- ´I feel': 1. Extremely Stressed 2. Very stressed 3. moderate stressed 4. Low stressed 5. Very low stressed Scored at recovery (T3)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  22. Overall Parental Satisfaction

    5- Point scale 1. Very satisfied 2. Satisfied 3. Neutral 4. Unsatisfactory 5. Very Unsatisfactory Scored when leaving recovery

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  23. Child Stress level by parent at daycare

    Child Stress level by parent, 5- Point scale 1. Happy, plays 2. Slightly worried 3. Worried, stops playing 4. Fears, crying 5. Hysterical Scored at daycare-surgery (T0)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  24. Child Stress level by parent at holding

    Child Stress level by parent, 5- Point scale 1. Happy, plays 2. Slightly worried 3. Worried, stops playing 4. Fears, crying 5. Hysterical Scored at holding (T1)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  25. Child Stress level by parent at OR

    Child Stress level by parent, 5- Point scale 1. happy, plays 2. slightly worried 3. worried, stops playing 4. fear, crying 5. hysterical Scored at OR after induction (T2)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  26. Child Stress level by parent at Recovery

    Child Stress level by parent, 5- Point scale 1. Happy, plays 2. Slightly worried 3. Worried, stops playing 4. Fear, crying 5. Hysterical Scored at recovery (T3)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

Other outcomes

  1. Postoperative need for pain medication

    Postoperative need for pain medication, indicated as yes or no, and description of medication with given dose Noted on the recovery

    Time frame: 1 hour

  2. Postoperative need for anti-nausea/vomiting medication

    Postoperative need for anti-nausea/vomiting medication, indicated as yes or no, and description of product with given dose Noted on the recovery

    Time frame: 1 hour

  3. Time arrival recovery to time leaving recovery

    Time arrival recovery to time leaving recovery, time notation on arrival and leaving Noted on the recovery

    Time frame: 2 hour

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel)
    Jette, 1090, Belgium
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — * Individual participant data will be available after deidentification * For researchers who provide a methodological proposal * Achieving aims in the proposal * Proposals needs to be directed to the principal investigators

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04273035
Lead sponsor
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 17, 2020
Start date
Feb 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
May 4, 2021

Study contacts

Alex Van Hoorn, MD
Contact
Alex.VanHoorn@uzbrussel.be
+32468187852
Panagiotis Flamée, MD
Contact
Panagiotis.Flamee@uzbrussel.be
+3224773143
Alex Van Hoorn, MD
principal investigator · Resident of department of Anesthesiology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion