ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04267055DISSECT-NUpdated Jul 3, 2025

DISSECT-N Post Market Data Collection Registry

An observational study in Thoracic Aortic Dissection, sponsored by Medtronic Cardiovascular. Completed at 22 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-03.

Sponsored by Medtronic Cardiovascular (part of Medtronic) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
102
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

DISSECT-N is a post-market registry designed to assess real-world safety and effectiveness of Valiant Navion Thoracic Stent Graft System in the treatment of thoracic aortic dissections in real world practice.

Read the detailed description

DISSECT-N is a prospective, observational, global, multi-center, post-market registry designed to assess real-world safety and effectiveness of Valiant Navion Thoracic Stent Graft System in the treatment of thoracic aortic dissections in real world practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Thoracic Aortic Dissection
03

In context

Dissection, Thoracic Aorta

30 studies on the registry are indexed under Dissection, Thoracic Aorta; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 102 is close to the median of 102 across 17 observational studies indexed under Dissection, Thoracic Aorta.

Browse Dissection, Thoracic Aorta studies →

Lead sponsor

Medtronic Cardiovascular is the lead sponsor of 70 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population shall include all subjects diagnosed with a dissection of the thoracic aorta who have been treated, or are intended to be treated, with the Valiant Navion.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is ≥18 years old
  • Subject was treated in the last 7 days, or is intended to be treated, with the Valiant Navion Thoracic Stent Graft System for a dissection in the thoracic aorta
  • Subject is willing to comply with standard of care clinical follow-up
  • Subject or legal representative or consultee, as applicable has consented for study participation and signed the approved

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is participating in an drug or device study which may bias or interfere with the endpoints and follow-up of this study.
  • Subject is pregnant (not an exclusion if allowed per local regulatory requirements, pregnancy test to be performed where required)
  • Subject has an active COVID-19 infection or relevant history of COVID-19. Relevant history of COVID-19 is defined as availability of a positive COVID-19 test with sequela or hospitalization for treatment of COVID-19. Subjects with a positive COVID-19 test who were asymptomatic or had mild symptoms should be excluded only if the positive test was less than 3 months prior to enrollment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
3 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • DeviceValiant Navion Thoracic Stent Graft System

    Placement of the Valiant Navion for endovascular repair of a dissection in the thoracic aorta.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite safety and effectiveness

    Safety: Major Adverse Events (MAEs) Defined as: all-cause mortality (ACM), retrograde type A dissection (RTAD), aortic rupture, permanent paraplegia and paraparesis, stent induced new entry tear, conversion to open repair, disabling stroke, and non-preexisting renal failure. Effectiveness: Technical success defined as ability to advance, deploy and position the Valiant Navion Thoracic Stent Graft at target site with successful coverage and sealing of the proximal entry tear and removal of the delivery system. The primary endpoint is a dichotomous study outcome and a composite endpoint. A subject who has technical success and no MAE reported within 1-month will be considered a success.

    Time frame: 1-month post index procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Aortic remodeling

    Rate of aortic remodeling based on follow-up imaging.

    Time frame: 1-month, 1, 2 and 3 years

  2. Access related complications

    Rate of access related complications as proportion of evaluable patients.

    Time frame: peri-operative

  3. Stent induced entry tear

    Rate of stent induced entry tear as proportion of evaluable patients.

    Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 years

  4. Stent graft migration

    Rate of stent graft migration (\>10mm) as proportion of evaluable patients.

    Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 years

  5. Stent graft integrity

    Rate of each type of loss of stent graft integrity (kink, twist, fracture, occlusion, or stenosis) as a proportion of evaluable patients based on follow-up imaging.

    Time frame: 1-month, 1, 2 and 3 years

  6. Disease progression

    Extension of dissection.

    Time frame: 1,2 and 3 years

  7. Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)/minor strokes

    Rate of TIA/minor stroke as a proportion of evaluable patients.

    Time frame: 1-month

  8. Transient spinal cord ischemia

    Rate of transient spinal cord ischemia as a proportion of evaluable patients.

    Time frame: 1-month, 1, 2 and 3 years

  9. Unplanned secondary procedures

    Rate of unplanned secondary procedures.

    Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 years

  10. False lumen perfusion

    Rate of each type of false lumen perfusion based on follow-up imaging.

    Time frame: 1-month, 1, 2 and 3 years

  11. Endoleaks

    Rate of each type of endoleak based on follow-up imaging.

    Time frame: 1-month, 1, 2 and 3 years

  12. Major adverse events

    Major adverse events defined as: * All-cause mortality (ACM) * Retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) * Aortic rupture * Permanent paraplegia and paraparesis * Stent induced new entry tear * Conversation to open repair * Disabling stroke * Non-preexisting renal failure

    Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 years

07

Study locations

22 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • University of Florida Health Shands Hospital
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
  • Emory University Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • University of Michigan Health System - University Hospital
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Albany Medical Center
    Albany, New York 12208, United States
  • Northwell Health Lenox Hill Hospital
    New York, New York 10075, United States
  • Atrium Health's Carolinas Medical Center
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, United States
  • UPMC Pinnacle Harrisburg Campus
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101, United States
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Baylor Plano
    Plano, Texas 75903, United States
  • Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
    Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
  • Rigshospitalet
    Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
  • General Hospital of Athens, Evaggelismos
    Athens, 10676, Greece
  • Ospedale San Raffaele - Milano
    Milan, 20132, Italy
  • National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
    Suita, Osaka 564-8565, Japan
  • Keio University Hospital
    Tokyo, 108-8345, Japan
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
    Nieuwegein, 3435 CM, Netherlands
  • Auckland City Hospital
    Grafton, 1023, New Zealand
  • Narodny Ustav Srdcovych a Cievnych Chorob, A.S.
    Bratislava, 83348, Slovakia
  • Severance Hospital
    Seoul, 03722, South Korea
  • Songklanagarind Hospital
    Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla 90110, Thailand
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04267055
Collaborators
NAMSA
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2020
Start date
Jun 25, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 28, 2021
Completion
Jul 5, 2024
Last update
Jul 3, 2025

Study contacts

Ross Milner, MD
principal investigator · The University of Chicago Medicine & Biological Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion