CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04265170BlastVac-001Updated Mar 14, 2022

Evaluating Blast-X® in Combination With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

An interventional study of BlastX with negative pressure therapy in Pressure Ulcer, sponsored by SerenaGroup, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-14.

Sponsored by SerenaGroup, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jul 2021, 5 years 2 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2019, registered Jan 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Multi-center, Prospective Clinical Trial Evaluating the Combination of BlastX and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (VAC).To evaluate the 4-week healing trajectory/wound area reduction with BlastX/VAC as compared with historical pre-study 4-week healing trajectory data and data from the US Wound Registry.

Read the detailed description

The study is a prospective, clinical trial designed to evaluate the combination of BlastX™ and VAC® in facilitating healing and reduction in bio-burden in pressure ulcers. After consenting, the ulcers of eligible subjects are treated with BlastX. After a 5 minute dwell time the wound VAC® is applied as per manufacturers guidelines. The subjects return to the center three times per week for dressing changes and application of BlastX. The duration of the trial is four weeks. Subjects undergo study procedures (biopsy for quantitative tissue culture, photography, fluorescence imaging and swabbing for protease testing) on a weekly basis. The standard of care for pressure ulcers will be continued including debridement, off-loading, and nutritional supplementation when appropriate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pressure Ulcer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pressure Ulcer

518 studies on the registry are indexed under Pressure Ulcer; 116 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 70 across 394 interventional studies indexed under Pressure Ulcer.

Browse Pressure Ulcer studies →

Lead sponsor

SerenaGroup, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult patients with a Full Thickness Pressure Ulcer Stage 3 through Stage 4 without exposed bone of greater than or equal to one month in duration located on the trunk (Sacral, trochanteric, ischial or posterior heel).
  2. A signed and dated informed consent form.
  3. Subject is able to comply with instructions and scheduled visits.
  4. Ulcer surface area >2cm2 and \< 100cm2.
  5. The patient is a candidate for negative pressure wound therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

1.Subject or caregiver is unable to manage VAC®device OR the patient cannot return for VAC dressing changes OR the patient does not qualify for home health visits. 2.Subject has major uncontrolled medical disorders such as serious cardiovascular, renal, liver or pulmonary disease, lupus, palliative care or sickle cell anemia.

3.Subject currently being treated for an active malignant disease or subjects with history of malignancy within the wound.

4.The Subject has other concurrent conditions that in the opinion of the Investigator may compromise subject safety.

5.Known contraindications to VAC® or Blast-X® 6.Known allergies to any of the Blast-X®components 7.Concurrent participation in another clinical trial that involves an investigation drug or device that would interfere with this study.

8.Subject is pregnant or breast feeding. 9.Subjects with a history of more than two weeks treatment with immunosuppressants (including systemic corticosteroids >10mg daily dose), cytotoxic chemotherapy, or application of topical steroids to the ulcer surface within one month prior to first Screening Visit, or who receive such medications during the screening period, or who are anticipated to require such medications during the course of the study.

10.Index ulcer has been previously treated with tissue engineered materials (e.g. Apligraf® or Dermagraft®) or other scaffold materials (e.g. Oasis, Matristem) within the last 30 days preceding the first treatment visit.

11.Mini-nutritional assessment Malnutrition Indication score \<17. 12.Patient does not have adequate 4-week historical data on comparison in change of wound measurements, photos, costs and supplies used.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single-arm

    Eligible patients are treated with BlastX and VAC. The subjects return to the center three times per week for dressing changes and application of BlastX. The duration of the trial is four weeks and 8 weeks for larger wounds (2 subjects only). Subjects undergo study procedures (biopsy for quantitative tissue culture, photography, fluorescence imaging and swabbing for protease testing) on a weekly basis. The standard of care for pressure ulcers will be continued including debridement, off-loading, and nutritional supplementation when appropriate.

    Device: BlastX with negative pressure therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceBlastX with negative pressure therapy

    Blast-X in combination with NPWT on,bacterial bio-burden in pressure ulcers assessed by Fluorescence imaging and quantitative biopsy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wound reduction in surface area

    The number of subjects whose wounds reduce in surface area by more than 40% in four weeks

    Time frame: 4 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Wounds have a reduction in bacterial load

    The number of subjects whose wounds have a reduction in bacterial load to below 10\^4 as measured by fluorescence imaging

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Wounds have a reduction in inflammatory proteases

    The number of subjects whose wounds have a reduction in inflammatory proteases (matrixmetalloproteases 2,8 and 9 and Human Neutrophil elastase as measured with a standardized point-of-care test

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Reduction in wound-related pain

    The number of subjects who report a reduction in wound-related pain as measured on a Numerical Rating Scale

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Incidence of device-related adverse events

    The incidence of device-related adverse events (Safety and Tolerability)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Armstrong County Memorial Hospital
    Kittanning, Pennsylvania 16201, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04265170
Lead sponsor
SerenaGroup, Inc.
Collaborators
Next Science TM
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 11, 2020
Start date
Oct 24, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2021
Completion
Feb 1, 2022
Last update
Mar 14, 2022

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion