CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04263701Updated Mar 23, 2021

Dual Task Training in Spastic Cerebral Palsy

An interventional study of Therapeutic exercises and Dual Task Training in Cerebral Palsy, sponsored by Kutahya Health Sciences University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-23.

Sponsored by Kutahya Health Sciences University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2019, registered Feb 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
7 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to investigate the effects of dual task training on gait and balance parameters, gross motor function skills, functional mobility skills, functional independence levels and health-related quality of life o in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. The clinical study's hypothesis is the dual task training programs are superior to conventional physiotherapy programs to improve the parameters in spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.

Read the detailed description

In this self-controlled study, children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy, aged 7-16, who were at level 1 or 2 according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System, scored 27 and above from the Modified Mini Mental Test were included.

Children are recruited to the routine physiotherapy program 45 minutes 2 days a week for 8 weeks, and in addition to the routine physiotherapy program dual task training program 45 minutes 2 days a week for the next 8 weeks. The children will evaluate at baseline, after the routine physiotherapy program and after the dual task training program. Children will be evaluate with Gross Motor Function Measurement-88,Modified Ashworth Scale , gait platform, Edinburgh Visual Gait Score, Pediatric Berg Balance Scale,1 Minute Walk Test, Functional Independence Measure, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory TM-Cerebral Palsy Module.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

  • cerebral palsy
  • dual task training
  • gait
  • balance
03

In context

Paralysis

750 studies on the registry are indexed under Paralysis; 133 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 30 across 537 interventional studies indexed under Paralysis.

Browse Paralysis studies →

Lead sponsor

Kutahya Health Sciences University is the lead sponsor of 209 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Having been diagnosed with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy,
  • Being at level 1 or 2 according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System,
  • Being at level 1 according to Communication Function Classification System,
  • To adapt to the evaluations,
  • To get 27 points or above from the Modified Mini Mental Test (MMMT).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having had injuries such as strains, sprains or fractures of the lower extremity in the last six months,
  • Having undergone a surgical intervention or Botulinum toxin in the last six months,
  • Having any known chronic systemic problems,
  • Having uncontrollable seizures,
  • Having vision or hearing problems.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Physiotherapy Group

    45 minutes, 2 days in a week for 8 weeks

    Other: Therapeutic exercises

  • Experimental
    Dual Task Training Group

    45 minutes, 2 days in a week for 8 weeks

    Other: Dual Task Training

Interventions

  • OtherTherapeutic exercises

    Conventional physiotherapy exercises for children with cerebral palsy

  • OtherDual Task Training

    Dual task training in addition to conventional physiotherapy exercises for children with cerebral palsy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gate speed of time-distance gait parameters

    Gate speed will be evaluated using with gait platform. The software gives the outcome as km/h.

    Time frame: Change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8th week and 16th week

  2. Step length of time-distance gait parameters

    Step lengt will be evaluated using with gait platform. The software gives the outcome as cm and calcules for each lower extremity.

    Time frame: Change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8th week and 16th week

  3. Stride length of time-distance gait parameters

    Stride length will be evaluated using with gait platform.The software gives the outcome as cm.

    Time frame: Change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8th week and 16th week

  4. Step time of time-distance gait parameters

    Step time will be evaluated using with gait platform.The software gives the outcome as sec and calcules for each lower extremity.

    Time frame: Change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8th week and 16th week

  5. Stride time of time-distance gait parameters

    Step time will be evaluated using with gait platform.The software gives the outcome as sec.

    Time frame: Change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8th week and 16th week

  6. Cadance of time-distance gait parameters

    Step time will be evaluated using with gait platform.The software gives the outcome as steps/min.

    Time frame: Change from baseline time-distance gait parameters at 8th week and 16th week

  7. Visual gait analysis

    Visual gait analysis will be performed with Edinburgh Visual Gait Score. Edinburg Visual Gait Score is scoring between 0 to 34 for each lower extremity. The higher scores points above 0 means abnormal gate.

    Time frame: Change from baseline visual gait analysis at 8th week and 16th week

  8. Center of Pressure path length of balance parameters

    Center of Pressure path length will be evaluated using with gait platform. The software gives the outcome as mm.

    Time frame: Change from baseline balance parameters at 8th week and 16th week.

  9. Ellipse area of balance parameters

    Ellipse area will be evaluated using with gait platform. The software gives the outcome as mm2.

    Time frame: Change from baseline balance parameters at 8th week and 16th week.

  10. Functional balance

    Functional balance will be evaluate using with Pediatric Berg Balance Scale. The scale is scoring 0-56. The higher scores indicate better functional balance.

    Time frame: Change from baseline functional balance at 8th week and 16th week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gross Motor Function Measurement

    Gross motor function measurement will be evaluate using with Gross Motor Function Measurement-88. The instrument consist of 5 dimensions which names are A- Lying and rolling, B- Sitting, C- Crawling and Kneeling, D- Standing and E- Walking-running-jumping. Each dimension is scoring 0-100. The higher scores indicate better motor function.

    Time frame: Change from baseline Gross Motor Function Measurement at 8th week and 16th week

  2. Muscle Tonus

    Muscle tonus will be evaluate using with Modified Ashworth Scale. This assesment will be performed by a physiotherapist. The Physiotherapist evaluate the muscle tonus of upper and lower extremity muscules. Scoring is between 0-4 and higher scores indicate hypertonus.

    Time frame: Change from baseline Muscle Tonus at 8th week and 16th week

  3. Functional Mobility Skills

    Functional mobility skills will be evaluate using with 1-Minute Walk Test. The test perform on a 20 meters platform. The patient walk on the platform as quick as in 1 munite. The walking distance is recorded.

    Time frame: Change from baseline Functional Mobility Skills at 8th week and 16th week

  4. Functional Independence Levels

    Functional independence levels will be evaluate using with Functional Independence Measurement (WeeFIM). WeeFIM is consist of 6 part, 18 items. It consists of self-care, sphincter control, locomotion, transfers, communication and social cognition subtitles. Scoring is between 18 to 126 and the higher scores indicate better functional indepence levels.

    Time frame: Change from baseline Functional Independence Levels at 8th week and 16th week

  5. Health-related quality of life

    Health-related quality of life will be evaluate using with Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory TM. The inventory include daily activities, school activities, movement and balance, pain and hurt, fatique, eating activities and speech and communication subtitles. Each subtitles is scoring 0 to 100 and the higher scores indicate lower problems.

    Time frame: Change from baseline health-related quality of life at 8th week and 16th week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • KMSU
    Kutahya, 43100, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Okur EO, Arik MI, Okur I, Gokpinar HH, Gunel MK. Dual-task training effect on gait parameters in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy: Preliminary results of a self-controlled study. Gait Posture. 2022 May;94:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.02.020. Epub 2022 Feb 17. PubMed 35247824 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This study aims to investigate the effects of dual task training on gait and balance parameters, gross motor function skills, functional mobility skills, functional independence levels and health-related quality of life o in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. The clinical study's hypothesis is the dual task training programs are superior to conventional physiotherapy programs to improve the parameters in spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 23, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04263701
Lead sponsor
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Responsible party
Eda Ozge OKUR (Principal Investigator, Kutahya Health Sciences University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 11, 2020
Start date
Jul 1, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2020
Completion
Mar 15, 2020
Last update
Mar 23, 2021

Study contacts

Eda Ozge Okur, Msc
principal investigator · KMSU

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion