ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT04260269CardioSwitchUpdated Dec 12, 2024

Feasibility of Switching Fluoropyrimidine Due to Cardiotoxicity Study

An observational study in Solid Tumor, sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 13 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-12.

Sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate cardiotoxicity during re-challenge of a different modality of fluoropyrimidine (primary end-point S-1 and secondary any other fluoropyrimidine) after having perceived cardiotoxicity with a fluoropyrimidine based regimen previously. The patient population is being treated for solid tumors.

Read the detailed description

Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy agents, such as 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, are occasionally associated with cardiotoxicity that may manifest as chest pain, ECG alterations, cardiac arrhythmia, and rarely myocardial infarction and sudden death. Clinical fluoropyrimidine cardiotoxicity is infrequent (1-8% of patients), but subclinical toxicity may be much more common (up to one third of patients). The underlying mechanisms are not well understood, but they may include abnormal coronary artery contractility or spasm, and myocardial toxicity. Cardiotoxicity may be less frequent with S-1 (a combination of tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil at a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1) as compared with 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, but head-to-head comparisons are lacking.

Anecdotal evidence suggests that patients who have cardiotoxicity on other fluoropyrimidines may be successfully treated with S-1. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare different 5-fluorouracil-based dosing modalities and S-1, and compare cardiotoxicity during these treatments.

The patient population was treated for solid tumors with a 5-fluorouracil based regimen and had a cardiac event grade 1-4. All patients were re-challenged with a different fluoropyrimidine or S-1 and assessed for cardiotoxicity during re-challenge.

02

Conditions studied

  • Solid Tumor
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Helsinki University Central Hospital is the lead sponsor of 311 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All consecutive patients who fulfil the following inclusion criteria will be included in the database until the target number of patients has been included:

  • Solid tumor
  • Cardiotoxicity grade 1-4 during fluoropyrimidine-based treatment
  • Re-challenge with a different fluoropyrimidine-based treatment. Primary endpoint is switch to S-1 and secondary any fluoropyrimidine population.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Solid tumor
  • Cardiotoxicity grade 1-4 during fluoropyrimidine-based treatment
  • Re-challenge with a different fluoropyrimidine-based therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in a trial with experimental drugs
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • This is the assessment of a specific evaluation of cardiac safety for patients with solid tumors who have experienced cardiotoxicity grade 1-4 during treatment with a fluoropyrimidine based treatment and are re-challenged with a different fluoropyrimidine. This multicentre, retrospective database is built to assess the impact on the cardiac and global safety of two different fluoropyrimidine based treatment regimens, of which the first has caused cardiotoxicity grade 1-4. Cardiac data will be collected by medical record review from initiation of first fluoropyrimidine-based treatment and switch to second fluoropyrimidine-based treatment until death or last follow-up. Basic demographics, cancer and treatment information from the whole course of cancer until death or last follow-up.

    Also known as: S-1 / Teysuno, capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, tegafur, trifluridine-tipiracil / Lonsurf

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of fluoropyrimidine related cardiac toxicity after switch to S-1 based treatment

    Cardiac tolerability according to NCI-CTCAE following cardiotoxicity initiated switch of fluoropyrimidine to S-1

    Time frame: After switch to and during one line of S-1 based chemotherapy (average 6 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of fluoropyrimidine related cardiac toxicity after switch to any fluoropyrimidine

    Cardiac tolerability according to NCI-CTCAE following cardiotoxicity initiated switch of fluoropyrimidine to another fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy

    Time frame: After switch to and during one line of another fluoropyrimidine regimen (average 6 months)

  2. Cardiac symptoms during fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy

    Frequency and severity according to NCI-CTCAE of cardiac symptoms during different fluoropyrimidines and the correlation with other added cytotoxics or biologics

    Time frame: During one line of fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy (average 6 months)

  3. Diagnostic work-up

    Diagnostic work-up for cardiotoxicity in real world data

    Time frame: During one line of fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy (average 6 months)

  4. Time-lines for cardiotoxicity

    Time-lines for appearance of cardiotoxicity during fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy

    Time frame: During one line of fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy (average 6 months)

  5. Dose-intensity

    Dose-intensity of the therapy at the cycle causing cardiotoxicity

    Time frame: During one cycle (average 3 weeks) of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy causing cardiac toxicity

  6. Alteration in cardiac functional parameters during fluoropyrimidine treatment induced cardiotoxicity

    The alterations of (if evaluated), graded as normal, non-significant abnormalities or significant abnormalities.: * ECG abnormalities * Ejection fraction in % * Coronary artery status on angiogram * Cardiac arrhythmias in ECG, Holter or cardiac monitor registration * Plasma troponin concentration and other cardiac enzymes and other laboratory tests as within reference range ro abnormal * Serum alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL) concentration

    Time frame: During one cycle (average 3 weeks) of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy causing cardiac toxicity

07

Study locations

13 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kwakman JJM, Baars A, van Zweeden AA, de Mol P, Koopman M, Kok WEM, Punt CJA. Case series of patients treated with the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 after capecitabine-induced coronary artery vasospasm. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Aug;81:130-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 Jun 15. No abstract available. PubMed 28623776 ↗
  • Kwakman JJ, Simkens LH, Mol L, Kok WE, Koopman M, Punt CJ. Incidence of capecitabine-related cardiotoxicity in different treatment schedules of metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis of the CAIRO studies of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Eur J Cancer. 2017 May;76:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 10. PubMed 28286287 ↗
  • Winther SB, Zubcevic K, Qvortrup C, Vestermark LW, Jensen HA, Krogh M, Sorbye H, Pfeiffer P; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare). Experience with S-1 in older Caucasian patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Findings from an observational chart review. Acta Oncol. 2016 Jul;55(7):881-5. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2016.1161825. Epub 2016 May 16. PubMed 27181284 ↗
  • Ye JX, Liu AQ, Ge LY, Zhou SZ, Liang ZG. Effectiveness and safety profile of S-1-based chemotherapy compared with capecitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced gastric and colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2014 May;7(5):1271-1278. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1576. Epub 2014 Feb 24. PubMed 24940424 ↗
  • Yeh ET, Bickford CL. Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: incidence, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 16;53(24):2231-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.050. PubMed 19520246 ↗
  • Deboever G, Hiltrop N, Cool M, Lambrecht G. Alternative treatment options in colorectal cancer patients with 5-fluorouracil- or capecitabine-induced cardiotoxicity. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2013 Mar;12(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 26. PubMed 23102544 ↗
  • Polk A, Vaage-Nilsen M, Vistisen K, Nielsen DL. Cardiotoxicity in cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine: a systematic review of incidence, manifestations and predisposing factors. Cancer Treat Rev. 2013 Dec;39(8):974-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Apr 10. PubMed 23582737 ↗
  • Osterlund P, Kinos S, Pfeiffer P, Salminen T, Kwakman JJM, Frodin JE, Shah CH, Sorbye H, Ristamaki R, Halonen P, Soveri LM, Heerva E, Algars A, Barlund M, Hagman H, McDermott R, O'Reilly M, Rockert R, Liposits G, Kallio R, Flygare P, Teske AJ, van Werkhoven E, Punt CJA, Glimelius B. Continuation of fluoropyrimidine treatment with S-1 after cardiotoxicity on capecitabine- or 5-fluorouracil-based therapy in patients with solid tumours: a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study. ESMO Open. 2022 Jun;7(3):100427. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100427. Epub 2022 Mar 30. PubMed 35798468 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04260269
Responsible party
Pia Osterlund (Associate Professor Oncology, Tampere University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 7, 2020
Start date
Jun 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 12, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion