CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04259658CAEP-BUpdated Oct 3, 2023

Histopathologic Effect of Calcium Electroporation on Cancer in the Skin

A Phase 2 interventional study of Calcium electroporation in Cancer, sponsored by Zealand University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-03.

Sponsored by Zealand University Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this phase II study we investigate the effect of calcium electroporation on cancer in the skin investigated by histopathology.

Read the detailed description

In this non randomized phase II study, we will explore histopathological tumour cell death mechanisms in 24 patients with breast cancer metastases or other cutaneous or subcutaneous malignancy. The primary endpoint of the biopsy study is to evaluate differences in tumour infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) population in tissue samples from treated cancer tumours two days after calcium electroporation treatment compared to samples taken on the day of treatment before the calcium electroporation procedure. TIL content in biopsies will be evaluated by pathological examination and specified in percent of cells. Patients will be followed up to 3 months and depending on number of treated tumors, biopsies will be taken at different timepoints after one or two treatments with calcium electroporation. Other analyses will include differences regarding tumour type, immune marker expression levels over time, vascular effects and regressive changes as well as examining changes in systemic immunological markers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer

Keywords

  • calcium
  • electroporation
  • tumor infiltrating lymphocytes
  • cancer
  • metastases
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Zealand University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 234 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Trial subject must be able to understand the participant information.
  • Histologically verified cutaneous or subcutaneous, primary or secondary cancer of any histology.
  • The patient can undergo any simultaneous medical treatment (endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy etc.).
  • The patient can undergo radiation therapy during the study period, provided that the treatment field does not involve the treated area.
  • Performance status ECOG/WHO ≤2
  • At least one cutaneous or subcutaneous tumour measuring at least 5 mm.
  • Both men and women who are sexually active must use safe contraception (contraceptive coil, deposit injection of gestagen, subdermal implantation, hormonal vaginal ring or transdermal patch.)
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Allergy to local anaesthesia
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Calcium electroporation treatment

    Experimental treatment with calcium electroporation for cutaneous metastases.

    Combination Product: Calcium electroporation

Interventions

  • Combination productCalcium electroporation

    Patients with cutaneous metastases will be treated with calcium electroporation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The effect of calcium electroporation on tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) population.

    The primary endpoint of this study is to evaluate differences in TIL population in tissue samples from treated cancer tumours two days after calcium electroporation treatment compared to before treatment (biopsy taken on the day of treatment before the calcium electroporation procedure). TIL content in biopsies will be evaluated by pathological examination and expressed as percent of cells.

    Time frame: 2 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in immune markers

    Protein expression levels of immune markers e.g. markers for the innate and adaptive immune system and markers of the STING pathway compared from before treatment and at different timepoints up to 3 months.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Tumour inflammation signature (TIS)

    Gene expression signatures including the 18-gene TIS will be calculated as a weighted linear average of the constituent genes.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Molecular subtype classification

    Gene expression profiling according to tumour histology.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Size of lesion

    To clinically measure changes in lesion size 1, 2 and 3 months after treatment using caliper measurement. Changes in size due to biopsies will be accounted for.

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. TIL population and tumour type

    To describe any relation between change in TIL population (percentage of cells) and tumour type before and after calcium electroporation.

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Tumour regression

    To describe presence of regressive changes including necrosis at different timepoints (percentage of tissue).

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Residual tumour

    To describe presence of residual tumour (yes/no) and description of topographical location.

    Time frame: 3 months

  8. Vascular effects

    To investigate vascular effects of calcium electroporation including changes in capillary structures by histochemical staining for endothelial biomarkers CD31 and/or CD34.

    Time frame: 3 months

  9. Clinical response to intervention

    To document evolution of tumours before and after treatment using digital photography including a ruler.

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Complete response at patient level

    To sum number of patients with complete response after one or two treatments, respectively. Complete response will be defined as disappearance of all target lesions.

    Time frame: 3 months

  11. Complete disappearance of treated lesions (in relation to all lesions treated)

    To sum number of lesions across all patients with complete remission after one or two treatments, respectively (expressed at percentage of all treated lesions).

    Time frame: 3 months

  12. Tumour type

    To establish number of treated tumours with complete response depending on tumour type.

    Time frame: 3 months

  13. Systemic immunologic response

    To detect signs of systemic immunologic response from any routine scans before and after treatment in the inclusion period.

    Time frame: 3 months

  14. Importance of previous irradiation

    To investigate differences in effect depending whether the treated tumour was in a previously irradiated area.

    Time frame: 3 months

  15. Adjacent non-tumour tissue

    To evaluate effect on adjacent non-tumour tissue.

    Time frame: 3 months

  16. PD-L1 expression over time

    To assess PD-L1 expression over time by biopsy.

    Time frame: 3 months

  17. Relation between change in PD-L1 expression and response

    To investigate any relation between change in PD-L1 expression and tumour response.

    Time frame: 3 months

  18. PD-L1 expression in relation to cell types

    To describe PD-L1 expression in relation to cell types found in the tumour environment

    Time frame: 3 months

  19. PD-L1 expression of different tumour histologies

    To describe PD-L1 expression on different cell types of the different tumour histologies investigated.

    Time frame: 3 months

  20. Western blotting

    To examine frozen tissues samples by western blotting in order to support any of the above mentioned endpoints.

    Time frame: 3 months

  21. Systemic immune factors after calcium electroporation

    Blood samples may be analyzed for NK cell- and T-cell gene expression levels. Levels before and after treatment will be compared.

    Time frame: 3 months

  22. Current measurement

    To measure current during treatment as indicated by the pulse generator.

    Time frame: 1 month

  23. PCR

    To examine frozen tissues samples by PCR. Relevant gene expression will be compared before and after treatment in breast cancer and non breast cancer samples.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dept. of Clinical oncology and Palliative Care
    Næstved, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04259658
Lead sponsor
Zealand University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 6, 2020
Start date
Apr 20, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 19, 2022
Completion
Jul 27, 2023
Last update
Oct 3, 2023

Study contacts

Julie Gehl, MD
principal investigator · Zealand University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion