An observational study in Health Care Utilization and Caregiver Burnout, sponsored by National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan. Status unknown at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-31.
Sponsored by National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan · Observational
Some research found the effectiveness of implementation of home health care on patients' physical function, quality of life (QoL) and decreased the risk of hospitalization and medical costs. However, little was known about the longitudinal change of comprehensive assessments of physical and mental health, QoL, well-being, and medical resource utilization of patients receiving home health care and their caregivers. Furthermore, the evaluation of advance care planning, palliative care need, and the quality of dying and death were also insufficient among the aforementioned population. Therefore, this cohort study aims to investigate the longitudinal change of health-related outcomes and utilization of resource utilization, and explore their trajectories in two years for patients who receive home health care and their caregivers in Taiwan.
This is a prospective longitudinal cohort study in Taiwan. Data will be collected by trained interviewers at the baseline (T0), 3-month follow-up (T1), 6-month follow-up (T2), 12-month follow-up (T3), 18-month follow-up (T4), and 24-month follow-up (T5). Via home visits, interviewer-administered questionnaires (informed consent, contact/follow-up information, background information, health condition, physical functioning, cognitive function, etc.) will be used. It estimates that the home visit will take up to 2 hours.
The investigators will recruit at least 1200 eligible patients and caregivers (600 dyads) from at least 15 institutions (e.g., home clinics and hospitals) which provide home health care. Trained research assistants will touch based with eligible participants recommended by institution staff and invite them to take part in the study. To ensure the study are achieving the target sample the investigators will examine the distribution of living area and number of participants in each type of home health care unit during recruiting. Moreover, the investigators have estimated an attrition rate of 20% over the study. Higher drop-off rates in certain sub-groups may be problematic, so the investigators will monitor participants' attrition.
In addition, the cohort the investigators enrolled will be linked to their data in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database to analyze the medical resource utilization of participants in our study. The results will show the health status and resource utilization as well as quality of home health care in Taiwan for clinical practices, research and future policy making.
422 studies on the registry are indexed under Caregiver Burden; 151 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1,200 is above the median of 90 across 80 observational studies indexed under Caregiver Burden.
Browse Caregiver Burden studies →National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan is the lead sponsor of 125 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
patients with home health care and their caregivers
Exclusion Criteria:
patients who receive home health care
caregivers who take care of patients with home health care
Change from ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) at two years
The Barthel Index will be adapted to assess ADL. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating full independence in doing daily activities.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Change from frailty at two years
It will be measured by the 9-point Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). The total score ranges from 1 to 9, with 7 or higher indicating severe frailty, even being terminally ill.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Change from cognitive function/memory at two years
It will be measured by the Brain Health Test (Chinese version) via testing the orientation to time, immediate and delayed recall of five items, categorical verbal fluency test. The total score ranges from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating worse cognitive impairment.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Change from percentage of participants with Dementia at two years
The Functional Assessment Staging Test (FAST) will be adapted to assess an individual's stage of Alzheimer's disease. It includes seven stages from normal aging to sever Dementia.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Change from mean score of depression at two years
It will be measured by the 5-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). The total score ranges from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating more depression.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Change from neuropsychiatric status at two years
It will be measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. The 10 sub-domains of behavioral functioning are examined, including delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, dysphoria, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability/lability, and aberrant motor activity syndrome.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Change from quality of life (QOL) at two years
We will adapt the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD) scale for patients with cognitive impairment, and Quality of Life Survey for Home Care (QOL-HC) scale for those without cognitive impairment. The total score of QOL-AD ranges from 13 to 52, with higher values indicating a higher QoL. The total score of QOL-HC ranges from 0 to 8, with higher values indicating a higher QoL.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Change from mental wellbeing at two years
It will be measured by the World Health Organization- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5). The raw score ranges from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Shared decision making (SDM)
It will be measured by the Decision-making Participation Self-Efficacy Scale (DEPS). The total score ranges from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy.
Time frame: Two years
Advance Care Planning (ACP)
It will be measured by the 4-question version of UCSF-ACP with the Process Measures (knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy, and readiness, 5-point Likert scales) and Action Measures (yes/no whether an ACP behavior is completed).
Time frame: Two years
Change from Nutrition status at two years
It will include the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA). The total score of MNA ranges from 0-14, with more than 11 indicating normal nutrition status.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Change from risk for pressure injury at two years
It will be measured by the sale of Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. The scale is composed of six subscales that reflect sensory perception, skin moisture, activity, mobility, friction and shear, and nutritional status. The total score ranges from 6 to 23, with higher scores indicating lower risk for forming pressure sores.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Needs assessment for supportive & palliative care
It will be measured by the Supportive \& Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT). Following the guideline, the Chinese version will be developed before the cohort study starts.
Time frame: Two years
Change from medical resource utilization at two years
Assessments include medical costs and out-of-pocket costs regarding utilization of medical resource and home health care. The used scales are developed by our research team.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Change from caregiving burden at two years
It will be measured by the revised version of Zarit Burden interview containing 22 items, with higher scores indicating greater burden.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Change from number of used chronic disease drug at two years
It will be measured by two items which are developed by our research team. Based on patients' prescriptions, they will be required to answer the number of chronic disease drug they used and these drugs' information, including the names, administrations and dosages.
Time frame: Baseline, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 18-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan