CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04243421Updated Nov 2, 2021Results posted

Marginal Bone and Soft Tissue Alterations After Use of OsseoSpeed EV Profile Implants

An interventional study of Implantation in Alveolar Process Atrophy, sponsored by Medical University of Bialystok. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-02.

Sponsored by Medical University of Bialystok · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2016, registered Jan 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evaluation of the marginal bone and soft tissue alterations after the OsseoSpeed™ EV Profile implants placement in anterior maxilla.

The following parameters will be tested:

  • pink esthetic score - at the temporary crown delivery, at the final crown delivery, 6 months post final crown delivery
  • papilla index - at the temporary crown delivery, at the final crown delivery, 6 months post final crown delivery
  • changes in radiographic marginal bone levels and width at buccal and palatal aspects: differences between baseline (the day of surgery) and 1-year post-op measurements on CBCT will be made.
Read the detailed description

Surgical procedures

Flap will be elevated following the crestal and releasing incisions (if necessary).

After having completed the cleaning, the surgeon will perform the osteotomy. After the use of the final drill ᴓ3.2 the surgeon will take the measurement of the buccal and palatal/lingual walls height.

If wall discrepancy is 1.5-2mm the site will be included in the study. Clinical photographs of probe within the osteotomy have to be taken. The osteotomy will be prepared with the conical drill, therefore the implant will be inserted in a special manner - lower part of the sloped collar will be located at the buccal aspect of the osteotomy preparation. At the buccal aspect the implant will positioned at the crestal bone level, while at the palatal aspect it will be either at the level of the bone crest or 0.5 mm below.

The flap will be sutured with 5/0 or 6/0 non-absorbable Ethilon sutures using the mattress and single interrupted sutures. Clinical photographs of the treated site after flap suturing will be taken.

Post-surgical instructions and follow-up

  • Ibuprofen 400 mg 2-4 times per day will be prescribed in case of pain. In case of gastric problems it will be replaced by Paracetamol 1 g (max 4 g per day).
  • Patient will be reminded to go on with the antibiotic prophylactic therapy as previously described.
  • Chlorhexidine mouthwash 0.12% for 1 minute twice a day for 3 weeks will be provided.
  • Suture removal after 2 weeks.

Check-ups and maintenance Appointments will be scheduled at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6. Clinical photographs will be taken. During these appointments the presence of suppuration and flap dehiscence will be recorded dichotomously as presence/absence.

Uncovering procedure will be scheduled at 8 weeks post-op. After crestal incision and gentle flap elevation the height of denudated buccal implant surface (if present) will be measured using a periodontal probe. Then the healing abutment will be screwed in and single interrupted sutures will be placed with the use 5/0 or 6/0 non-absorbable Ethilon sutures (if necessary). Suture removal is planned 7 days after procedure. Clinical photographs will be taken.

Temporary crown will be delivered 3 months post implant placement. Clinical examination (PES, PI) will be performed. Photographs and control CBCT will be taken.

Final prosthetic reconstruction will be delivered 6 months post-op. Clinical examination (PES, PI) will be performed as well as clinical photographs will be taken.

1 year evaluation Clinical examination (PES, PI) will be performed. Clinical photographs of the study site will be taken. Control CBCT will be taken.

In case of any complication observed during any of the scheduled visit or during an emergency visit, intraoral radiographs and clinical photographs will be taken and the CRF will be filled in.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alveolar Process Atrophy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • implant
  • soft tissue
03

In context

Alveolar Bone Loss

297 studies on the registry are indexed under Alveolar Bone Loss; 76 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is above the median of 25 across 254 interventional studies indexed under Alveolar Bone Loss.

Browse Alveolar Bone Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Bialystok is the lead sponsor of 68 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • lack of tooth in position of central incisors, canines and premolars

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoking
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Poor oral hygiene
  • Compromised dentition neighboring to edentulous site
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group with implants

    Flap will be elevated following the crestal and releasing incisions (if necessary). After having completed the cleaning, the surgeon will perform the osteotomy. After the use of the final drill ᴓ3.2 the surgeon will take the measurement of the buccal and palatal/lingual walls height. If wall discrepancy is 1.5-2mm the site will be included in the study. Clinical photographs of probe within the osteotomy have to be taken. The osteotomy will be prepared with the conical drill, therefore the implant will be inserted in a special manner - lower part of the sloped collar will be located at the buccal aspect of the osteotomy preparation. At the buccal aspect the implant will positioned at the crestal bone level, while at the palatal aspect it will be either at the level of the bone crest or 0.5 mm below.

    Device: Implantation

Interventions

  • DeviceImplantation

    Soft tissue aesthetics, marginal bone level on CBCT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pink Esthetic Score (PES) at Temporary Crown Delivery.

    Pink Esthetic Score (PES): 0-10; minimum - 0, maximum - 10; the best outcome: 10 PES subscores: mesial papilla, distal papilla, curvature of the facial mucosa, level of the facial mucosa, root convexity/soft tissue color and texture at the facial aspect of the implant site. Minimum 0, maximum - 2; the best outcome: 2

    Time frame: value changes between examination carried out 3 and 9 months post-op

  2. Papilla Index (PI) at Temporary Crown Delivery.

    Papilla Index score: 0-4; the best outcome: 3; minimum: 0, maximum: 4 0 - no papilla present; 1 - less than half of the height of papilla present; 2 - half or more of the height of papilla is present but does not extend all the way up to the contact point between of the crowns; 3 - the papilla fill up the entire proximal space and is in good harmony with the adjacent palillae; 4 - the papilla is hyperplastic and covers too much of the implant restoration and/or the adjacent tooth

    Time frame: value changes between examination carried out 3 and 9 months post-op

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Examination Taken Right After Implant Installation.

    Distance between implant collar and bone margin at buccal and palatal aspect of the crest evaluated on Cone Beam Computed Tomography examination (Pax-i3D Green; Vatech, South Korea). The change was calculated from two time points as the value at 12 months minus value at baseline.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately after implantation and 12 months post-op

07

Results

Posted Jan 13, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup With Implants
Started30
Completed30
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryPink Esthetic Score (PES) at Temporary Crown Delivery.

Pink Esthetic Score (PES): 0-10; minimum - 0, maximum - 10; the best outcome: 10 PES subscores: mesial papilla, distal papilla, curvature of the facial mucosa, level of the facial mucosa, root convexity/soft tissue color and texture at the facial aspect of the implant site. Minimum 0, maximum - 2; the best outcome: 2

Time frame:
value changes between examination carried out 3 and 9 months post-op
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Pink Esthetic Score (PES) at Temporary Crown Delivery.
score on a scaleGroup With Implants
Mesial papilla1 (0 to 1)
Distal papilla1 (0 to 1)
Curvature of the facial mucosa1 (0.5 to 2)
Level of the facial mucosa1 (0.5 to 2)
Root convexity/soft tissue color and texture1 (1 to 2)
Pink Esthetic Score5 (3 to 8)
Statistical analysis
  • Group With Implants · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0007 · Median difference (final values): 6
PrimaryPapilla Index (PI) at Temporary Crown Delivery.

Papilla Index score: 0-4; the best outcome: 3; minimum: 0, maximum: 4 0 - no papilla present; 1 - less than half of the height of papilla present; 2 - half or more of the height of papilla is present but does not extend all the way up to the contact point between of the crowns; 3 - the papilla fill up the entire proximal space and is in good harmony with the adjacent palillae; 4 - the papilla is hyperplastic and covers too much of the implant restoration and/or the adjacent tooth

Time frame:
value changes between examination carried out 3 and 9 months post-op
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Papilla Index (PI) at Temporary Crown Delivery.
score on a scaleGroup With Implants
Mesial papilla1 (0 to 2)
Distal papilla1 (0 to 2)
Statistical analysis
  • Group With Implants · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0005 · Median difference (final values): 1.25
  • Group With Implants · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.0034 · Median difference (final values): 1
SecondaryCone Beam Computed Tomography Examination Taken Right After Implant Installation.

Distance between implant collar and bone margin at buccal and palatal aspect of the crest evaluated on Cone Beam Computed Tomography examination (Pax-i3D Green; Vatech, South Korea). The change was calculated from two time points as the value at 12 months minus value at baseline.

Time frame:
Assessed immediately after implantation and 12 months post-op
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Cone Beam Computed Tomography Examination Taken Right After Implant Installation.
mmGroup With Implants
Cone Beam Computed Tomography Examination Taken Right After Implant Installation.1.99 ± 1.05
Statistical analysis
  • Group With Implants · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.39

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group With Implants0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Group With Implants
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years29
>=65 years1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group With Implants
Female19
Male11
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Group With Implants
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Group With Implants
Poland30
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Małgorzata Pietruska
    Białystok, Podlaskie 15-269, Poland
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997 Aug;17(4):326-33. PubMed 9497723 ↗
  • Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):140-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435. PubMed 19228100 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 26, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 2, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04243421
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Bialystok
Collaborators
Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables, Dental Practice, Malgorzata Pietruska, Jan Pietruski
Responsible party
Małgorzata Pietruska (professor, Medical University of Bialystok) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 28, 2020
Start date
Feb 1, 2016
Primary completion
Aug 19, 2019
Completion
Nov 15, 2020
Results posted
Jan 13, 2021
Last update
Nov 2, 2021

Study contacts

Jan Pietruski
study chair · Praktyka Stomatologiczna M. J. Pietruscy

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion