CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04228224Updated Jul 16, 2020

Stroke Rehabilitation Program Based on a Powered Lower Extremity Exoskeleton in Chile

An interventional study of Robot-assisted training with a lower extremity powered exoskeleton (H3 Exoskeleton, Spain) and Conventional gait rehabilitation in Stroke, sponsored by Corporación de Rehabilitación Club de Leones Cruz del Sur. Completed at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-16.

Sponsored by Corporación de Rehabilitación Club de Leones Cruz del Sur · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2019, registered Jan 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This research will study the effects of a rehabilitation program assisted by a powered lower extremity exoskeleton in patients after stroke. It will compare clinical and biomechanical features of patients at baseline and after intervention. Additionally, it will also examine the use of a brain-computer-interface (BCI) to command movements on the powered lower limb exoskeleton. The findings will be used to improve understanding human-robot interaction, to improve the design of the robotic devices and to improve rehabilitation services.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is one of the leading causes of mortality, morbidity and disability in adults in developed countries. Survivors may suffer several neurological deficits or deficiencies, such as hemiparesis, communication disorders, cognitive deficits and visuospatial perception disorders. Hemiplegia is a par loss of hemi-body voluntary motricity following a brain injury, usually resulting in alterations of the locomotor system with persistent disorders of movement and posture. Hemiplegia significantly affects gait performance. Gait recovery is an important objective in the rehabilitation program for stroke patients.The currently available treatment techniques include classical techniques of gait rehabilitation, functional electrical stimulation, electromechanic devices, robotic devices and brain-computer interfaces, among others.The evidence suggest that the combination of different rehabilitation strategies is more effective than conventional rehabilitation techniques alone. Technology-based rehabilitation methods such as robotic devices need more research to demonstrate their effects on gait recovery.

This study will assess the effects of a rehabilitation program with a powered lower extremity exoskeleton in people with stroke. Additionally, it will also examine the use of a brain-computer-interface (BCI) to command movements on the powered lower limb exoskeleton. The findings will be used to improve understanding human-robot interaction, to improve the design of the robotic devices and to improve rehabilitation services.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Hemiparesis
  • Gait
  • Brain-Computer Interface
  • Rehabilitation
  • Exoskeleton
03

In context

Stroke

7,287 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,006 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 50 across 5,370 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Corporación de Rehabilitación Club de Leones Cruz del Sur is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • unilateral lower extremity paresis
  • haemorrhagic or ischemic stroke
  • a minimum of six months after the acute infarction/onset of the disease
  • full passive range of motion in lower extremity or at least at neutral position
  • be able to stand freely
  • be able to walk with or without aid for at least 20 meters in less than 2 minutes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • peripheral nervous system pathology
  • epilepsy
  • weight over 100 kg
  • no cognitive ability to follow the study instructions
  • pregnancy
  • use of implanted devices
  • instable lower extremity joints or fixed contracture
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Robot-assisted Rehabilitation

    Participants will receive Robot-assisted training with a lower extremity powered exoskeleton (H3 Exoskeleton, Spain). Patients will perform lower limb exercises assisted by the device. Training involve 24 sessions, 2 sessions per week for 12 weeks, each lasting about 1 hour.

    Device: Robot-assisted training with a lower extremity powered exoskeleton (H3 Exoskeleton, Spain)

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Gait Rehabilitation

    Participants in this group will perform conventional gait rehabilitation on a rehabilitation institution with assistance of a physical therapist. Training involve 24 sessions, 2 sessions per week, each session lasting about 1 hour.

    Behavioral: Conventional gait rehabilitation

Interventions

  • DeviceRobot-assisted training with a lower extremity powered exoskeleton (H3 Exoskeleton, Spain)

    The H3 is a powered lower extremity exoskeleton with actuated at hips, knees and ankles joints. A novel control software has been design and implemented in this device, which allows selective joint movement and recording of data from each rehabilitation session.

  • BehavioralConventional gait rehabilitation

    Conventional gait rehabilitation consist in walking and other applicable lower limb exercises performed by participants with assistance of a physical therapist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gait Deviation Index Baseline

    Gait Deviation Index will be calculated for each patient using a 3D VICON infra-red camera system.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Gait Deviation Index Post-Intervention

    Gait Deviation Index will be calculated for each patient using a 3D VICON infra-red camera system.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximal muscle strength Baseline

    Maximal muscle strength (peak torque, Nm) during maximal voluntary unilateral hip extension-flexion, and hip adduction-abduction (standing), knee extension-flexion (seated), respectively. Both the affected (AF) and non-affected (NA) leg. A hand-held dynamometer will be used for the assessment.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Maximal muscle strength Post-Intervention

    Maximal muscle strength (peak torque, Nm) during maximal voluntary unilateral hip extension-flexion, and hip adduction-abduction (standing), knee extension-flexion (seated), respectively. Both the affected (AF) and non-affected (NA) leg. A hand-held dynamometer will be used for the assessment.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Distance in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Baseline

    Measure of the distance a subject covers during an indoor gait on a flat, hard surface in 6 minutes, using assistive devices, as necessary. The test consist in a evaluation of functional exercise capacity and is used as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity and endurance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Distance in 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) Post-Intervention

    Measure of the distance a subject covers during an indoor gait on a flat, hard surface in 6 minutes, using assistive devices, as necessary. The test consist in a evaluation of functional exercise capacity and is used as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity and endurance.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Muscle tone measured using modified ashworth scale (MAS) Baseline

    Tests resistance to passive movement about a joint with varying degrees of velocity. A score of 1 indicates no resistance, and 5 indicates rigidity.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Muscle tone measured using modified ashworth scale (MAS) Post-Intervention

    Tests resistance to passive movement about a joint with varying degrees of velocity. A score of 1 indicates no resistance, and 5 indicates rigidity.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Passive range of motion Baseline

    Passive range of motion in lower extremities. ROM will be assessed by using an universal goniometer

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Passive range of motion Post-Intervention

    Passive range of motion in lower extremities. ROM will be assessed by using an universal goniometer

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  9. 10 meter walk test Baseline

    The 10 Metre Walk Test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in metres per second over a short distance. It can be employed to determine functional mobility, gait, and vestibular function.

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. 10 meter walk test Post-Intervention

    The 10 Metre Walk Test is a performance measure used to assess walking speed in metres per second over a short distance. It can be employed to determine functional mobility, gait, and vestibular function.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  11. Timed Up and Go Baseline

    Measurement of the time in seconds for a person to rise from sitting from a standard arm chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The person wears regular footwear and customary walking aid.

    Time frame: Baseline

  12. Timed Up and Go Post-Intervention

    Measurement of the time in seconds for a person to rise from sitting from a standard arm chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The person wears regular footwear and customary walking aid.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  13. Berg Balance Scale Baseline

    Berg balance scale is used for functional balance. participants are asked to perform 14 tasks frequently used in daily life activities. The highest possible score is 56 points. A higher score indicates better balance.

    Time frame: Baseline

  14. Berg Balance Scale Post-Intervention

    Berg balance scale is used for functional balance. participants are asked to perform 14 tasks frequently used in daily life activities. The highest possible score is 56 points. A higher score indicates better balance.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  15. Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) Baseline

    FAC is a functional walking test that evaluates ambulation ability. This 6-point scale assesses ambulation status by determining how much human support the patient requires when walking, regardless of whether or not they use a personal assistive device.

    Time frame: Baseline

  16. Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) Post-Intervention

    FAC is a functional walking test that evaluates ambulation ability. This 6-point scale assesses ambulation status by determining how much human support the patient requires when walking, regardless of whether or not they use a personal assistive device.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  17. Patient satisfaction with device: Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology

    Measured with QUEST scale. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) is a 12-item outcome measure that assesses user satisfaction with two components, Device and Services. Scores of 1 indicate dissatisfaction and scores of 5 indicate high satisfaction

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  18. Medical Research Council test (MRC) Baseline

    Manual evaluation of muscle strength. This scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. Grade 0 = no movement is observed, grade 5= muscle contracts normally against full resistance. Six muscles groups are tested at both sides of the body: shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, wrist extension, hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion. Maximal total score is 60.

    Time frame: Baseline

  19. Medical Research Council test (MRC) Post-Intervention

    Manual evaluation of muscle strength. This scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. Grade 0 = no movement is observed, grade 5= muscle contracts normally against full resistance. Six muscles groups are tested at both sides of the body: shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, wrist extension, hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion. Maximal total score is 60.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  20. Gait Speed Baseline

    Gait Speed will be calculated for each patient using a 3D VICON infra-red camera system.

    Time frame: Baseline

  21. Gait Speed Post-intervention

    Gait Speed will be calculated for each patient using a 3D VICON infra-red camera system.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Corporación de Rehabilitación Club de Leones Cruz del Sur
    Punta Arenas, XII Región 6211525, Chile
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005 Mar;37(2):75-82. doi: 10.1080/16501970410017215. PubMed 15788341 ↗
  • Belda-Lois JM, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, Moreno JC, Pons JL, Farina D, Iosa M, Molinari M, Tamburella F, Ramos A, Caria A, Solis-Escalante T, Brunner C, Rea M. Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011 Dec 13;8:66. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-66. PubMed 22165907 ↗
  • Bortole M, Venkatakrishnan A, Zhu F, Moreno JC, Francisco GE, Pons JL, Contreras-Vidal JL. The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Jun 17;12:54. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0048-y. PubMed 26076696 ↗
  • Wallard L, Dietrich G, Kerlirzin Y, Bredin J. Effects of robotic gait rehabilitation on biomechanical parameters in the chronic hemiplegic patients. Neurophysiol Clin. 2015 Sep;45(3):215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Sep 14. PubMed 26381192 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04228224
Lead sponsor
Corporación de Rehabilitación Club de Leones Cruz del Sur
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 14, 2020
Start date
Jul 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2020
Completion
Mar 31, 2020
Last update
Jul 16, 2020

Study contacts

Asterio H Andrade Gallardo, MSc.
study chair · Corporación de Rehabilitacion Club de Leones Cruz del Sur

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion