CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04219332Updated Oct 10, 2023

Randomized Controlled Trial on Effect of Lymph Node Mapping by Indocyanine Green Via Submucosal or Subserosal Injection

A Phase 3 interventional study of Subserosa injection of indocyanine green and submucosal injection of indocyanine green in Indocyanine Green, Gastric Cancer and Injection Site, sponsored by Fujian Medical University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-10.

Sponsored by Fujian Medical University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
266
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether submucosal or subserous injection of indocyanine green during laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for patients with gastric cancer was different. The patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4a, N0/+, M0) were studied.

Read the detailed description

In recent years, with the successful application of ICG (indocyanine green) fluorescence imaging technology in laparoscopic equipment, scholars have found that ICG near-infrared imaging has better tissue penetration and can better identify lymph nodes in hypertrophic adipose tissue than other dyes under visible light, which makes ICG fluorescence imaging guide laparoscopic radical resection of gastric cancer lymph node dissection has become a new exploration direction. ICG near-infrared imaging technology has important research value, good application prospects, and broad development space in laparoscopic radical resection of gastric cancer. However, at present, the application of ICG near-infrared imaging technology in laparoscopic radical resection of gastric cancer is still in the exploratory stage, and there is no unified standard. Therefore, in the world, there is still a lack of high-level evidence-based evidence of large-sample prospective randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of submucosal or subserous injection of ICG in guiding laparoscopic D2 resection of gastric cancer. The investigator first carried out this study in the world to evaluate the lymph node dissection and perioperative safety of gastric cancer patients who received a submucosal injection of ICG and subserous injection of ICG during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in the same period, to promote the standardized development of ICG near-infrared imaging in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Indocyanine Green
  • Gastric Cancer
  • Injection Site

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stomach Neoplasms

2,851 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 864 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 266 is above the median of 67 across 2,096 interventional studies indexed under Stomach Neoplasms.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Fujian Medical University is the lead sponsor of 144 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age from 18 to 75 years
  2. Primary gastric adenocarcinoma (papillary, tubular, mucinous, signet ring cell, or poorly differentiated) confirmed pathologically by endoscopic biopsy
  3. Clinical stage tumor T1-4a (cT1-4a), N0/+, M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual Eighth Edition. Preoperative staging was made by conducting mandatory computed tomography (CT) scans and an optional endoscopic ultrasound
  4. No distant metastasis, no direct invasion of pancreas, spleen or other organs nearby in the preoperative examinations
  5. Performance status of 0 or 1 on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale (ECOG)
  6. American Society of Anesthesiology score (ASA) class I, II, or III
  7. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Women during pregnancy or breast-feeding
  2. Severe mental disorder
  3. History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except laparoscopic cholecystectomy)
  4. History of previous gastrectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection
  5. Rejection of laparoscopic resection
  6. History of allergy to iodine agents
  7. Enlarged or bulky regional lymph node diameter over 3cm by preoperative imaging
  8. History of other malignant disease within past five years
  9. History of previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  10. History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within past six months
  11. History of cerebrovascular accident within past six months
  12. History of continuous systematic administration of corticosteroids within one month
  13. Requirement of simultaneous surgery for other disease
  14. Emergency surgery due to complication (bleeding, obstruction or perforation) caused by gastric cancer
  15. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)\<50% of predicted values
  16. Linitis plastica, Widespread
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
266 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Subserosal injection of indocyanine green tracer group

    Subserosal injection of indocyanine green, with a concentration of 0.5 mg /ml, 6 points along the lesser and greater curvature of the stomach, 1.5 ml for each point.

    Drug: Subserosa injection of indocyanine green

  • Active comparator
    Submucosal injection of indocyanine green tracer group

    Submucosal injection of indocyanine green, with a concentration of 1.25mg /ml, four points around the primary tumor, each point 0.5 ml.

    Drug: submucosal injection of indocyanine green

Interventions

  • DrugSubserosa injection of indocyanine green

    After preoperative exploration, the indocyanine green powder (Dandong Yichuang Pharmaceutical Co) is dissolved in 0.5 mg/ml of sterile water and the prepared solution (1.5 ml for each point) is injected along the subserosal of the stomach at 6 specific points along the lesser and greater curvature of the stomach.

    Also known as: No other intervention

  • Drugsubmucosal injection of indocyanine green

    One day before surgery, 1.25 mg/ml indocyanine green (Dandong Yichuang Pharmaceutical Co) was prepared in sterile water and 0.5 ml of the solution was injected into the submucosal layer at 4 quadrants around the primary tumor, amounting to 2.5 mg of indocyanine green.

    Also known as: No other intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes

    Total Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes

    Time frame: One month after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total number of fluorescent lymph nodes in groups A and B

    Total number of fluorescent lymph nodes in groups A and B

    Time frame: One month after surgery

  2. Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes in groups A and B (true positive rate)

    Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes in groups A and B (true positive rate)

    Time frame: One month after surgery

  3. Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes and negative lymph nodes in groups A and B (false positive rate)

    Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes and negative lymph nodes in groups A and B (false positive rate)

    Time frame: One month after surgery

  4. Relationship between non-fluorescent and negative lymph nodes in groups A and B (true negative rate)

    Relationship between non-fluorescent and negative lymph nodes in groups A and B (true negative rate)

    Time frame: One month after surgery

  5. Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes in groups A and B (false negative rate)

    Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes in groups A and B (false negative rate)

    Time frame: One month after surgery

  6. Number of Metastasis Lymph Nodes

    Number of Metastasis Lymph Nodes

    Time frame: One month after surgery

  7. Metastasis rate of lymph node

    Metastasis rate of lymph node

    Time frame: One month after surgery

  8. Mortality rates

    This is for the early mortality, which defined as the event observed within 30 days after surgery.

    Time frame: 30 days

  9. Morbidity rates

    This is for the incidence of early postoperative complications, which defined as the event observed within 30 days after surgery.

    Time frame: 30 days

  10. 3-year disease free survival rate

    Disease-free survival is calculated from the day of surgery to the day of recurrence or death (When the specific date of recurrence of the tumor is unknown, the endpoint is the date of death due to tumor causes). If neither death nor recurrence of the tumor is observed, the endpoint is the final date that a patient is confirmed as relapse-free. (The final date of DFS: The last date of the outpatient visit day or the date of acceptance of the examination).

    Time frame: 36 months

  11. 3-year recurrence pattern

    Recurrence patterns are classified into five categories at the time of first diagnosis: locoregional, hematogenous, peritoneal, distant lymph node, and mixed type.

    Time frame: 36 months

  12. Time to first ambulation

    Time to first ambulation in hours is used to assess the postoperative recovery course.

    Time frame: 30 days

  13. Time to first flatus

    Time to first flatus in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course.

    Time frame: 30 days

  14. Time to first liquid diet

    Time to first liquid diet in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course.

    Time frame: 30 days

  15. Time to first soft diet

    Time to first soft diet in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course.

    Time frame: 30 days

  16. Duration of postoperative hospital stay

    Duration of postoperative hospital stay in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course.

    Time frame: 30 days

  17. The variation of weight

    The variation of weight on postoperative 3, 6, 9 and 12 months are used to access the postoperative nutritional status and quality of life.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

  18. The variation of BMI in kg/m^2

    The variation of BMI in kg/m\^2 on postoperative 3, 6, 9 and 12 months are used to access the postoperative nutritional status and quality of life.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

  19. Intraoperative morbidity rates

    The intraoperative postoperative morbidity rates are defined as the rates of event observed within operation.

    Time frame: 1 day

  20. The variation of white blood cell count

    The values of white blood cell count from peripheral blood before operation and on postoperative day 1, 3, 5 are recorded to access the inflammatory and immune response.

    Time frame: Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days

  21. The variation of hemoglobin

    The values of hemoglobin in gram/liter from peripheral blood before operation and on postoperative day 1, 3, 5 are recorded to access the inflammatory and immune response.

    Time frame: Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days

  22. The variation of C-reactive protein

    The values of C-reactive protein IN milligram/liter from peripheral blood before operation and on postoperative day 1, 3, 5 are recorded to access the inflammatory and immune response.

    Time frame: Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days

  23. Lymph node noncompliance rate

    Lymph node noncompliance was defined as the absence of lymph nodes that should have been excised from more than 1 lymph node station. Major lymph node noncompliance was defined as more than 2 intended lymph node stations that were not removed.

    Time frame: 1 day

  24. Modified EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT14)

    Participants were asked to complete one modified European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) IN-PATSAT14 questionnaire before their discharge from hospital.

    Time frame: 30 days

  25. The Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX)

    Surgeons were required to complete one modified SURG-TLX questionnaire for each procedure.

    Time frame: 1 day

  26. 3-year overall survival rate

    The overall survival is calculated from the day of surgery until death or until the final follow-up date, whichever occurs first. For survival cases, the endpoint is the last date that survival was confirmed. If the loss to follow-up occurred, the endpoint is the final date that survival could be confirmed.

    Time frame: 36 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Gastric Surgery
    Fuzhou, Fujian, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee JH, Ryu KW, Kim CG, Kim SK, Choi IJ, Kim YW, Chang HJ, Bae JM, Hong EK. Comparative study of the subserosal versus submucosal dye injection method for sentinel node biopsy in gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Nov;31(9):965-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.03.006. PubMed 15908163 ↗
  • Kwon IG, Son T, Kim HI, Hyung WJ. Fluorescent Lymphography-Guided Lymphadenectomy During Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2019 Feb 1;154(2):150-158. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4267. PubMed 30427990 ↗
  • Cianchi F, Indennitate G, Paoli B, Ortolani M, Lami G, Manetti N, Tarantino O, Messeri S, Foppa C, Badii B, Novelli L, Skalamera I, Nelli T, Coratti F, Perigli G, Staderini F. The Clinical Value of Fluorescent Lymphography with Indocyanine Green During Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: a Matched Cohort Study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Oct;24(10):2197-2203. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04382-y. Epub 2019 Sep 4. PubMed 31485904 ↗
  • Herrera-Almario G, Patane M, Sarkaria I, Strong VE. Initial report of near-infrared fluorescence imaging as an intraoperative adjunct for lymph node harvesting during robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;113(7):768-70. doi: 10.1002/jso.24226. Epub 2016 Mar 29. PubMed 27021142 ↗
  • Chen QY, Zhong Q, Liu ZY, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Lin JL, Li P, Zheng CH, Huang CM. Does Noncompliance in Lymph Node Dissection Affect Oncological Efficacy in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1759-1771. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07217-x. Epub 2019 Feb 12. PubMed 30756329 ↗
  • Bredart A, Bottomley A, Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Coens C, D'Haese S, Chie WC, Hammerlid E, Arraras JI, Efficace F, Rodary C, Schraub S, Costantini M, Costantini A, Joly F, Sezer O, Razavi D, Mehlitz M, Bielska-Lasota M, Aaronson NK; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group and Quality of Life Unit. An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Eur J Cancer. 2005 Sep;41(14):2120-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.041. PubMed 16182120 ↗
  • Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RS. Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg. 2011 Sep;35(9):1961-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1141-4. PubMed 21597890 ↗
  • Tajima Y, Yamazaki K, Masuda Y, Kato M, Yasuda D, Aoki T, Kato T, Murakami M, Miwa M, Kusano M. Sentinel node mapping guided by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):58-62. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181927267. PubMed 19106676 ↗
  • Chen QY, Xie JW, Zhong Q, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Lin JL, Zheng HL, Li P, Zheng CH, Huang CM. Safety and Efficacy of Indocyanine Green Tracer-Guided Lymph Node Dissection During Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy in Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2020 Apr 1;155(4):300-311. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6033. PubMed 32101269 ↗
  • Chen QY, Zhong Q, Li P, Xie JW, Liu ZY, Huang XB, Lin GT, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Zheng QL, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Zheng CH, Huang CM. Comparison of submucosal and subserosal approaches toward optimized indocyanine green tracer-guided laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for patients with gastric cancer (FUGES-019): a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2021 Oct 27;19(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02125-y. PubMed 34702260 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Sep 30, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04219332
Lead sponsor
Fujian Medical University
Responsible party
Chang-Ming Huang, Prof. (Director, Head of Department of Gastric Surgery, Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor, Fujian Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 7, 2020
Start date
Dec 31, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 27, 2020
Completion
Oct 28, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 10, 2023

Study contacts

Chang-Ming Huang, MD
study chair · Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion