CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04215094Updated Oct 23, 2020

Early Diagnosis of Intracranial Infection After Craniotomy

An observational study in Intracranial; Infection, Psychosis, Acute or Subacute, sponsored by Pan Jun. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 68 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-23.

Sponsored by Pan Jun · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500
Ages
18 Years to 68 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intracranial infection are serious complications postoperatively in neurosurgical patients. Early identification of these complications is essential to minimize the mortality and moribidy. The aim of this study is observe the postoperative dynamic changes of body temperature (BT), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cell (WBC) count, and evaluate whether the use of two or more of these markers may improve the diagnostic accuracy of intracranial infection.

Read the detailed description

Intracranial infection is a serious complications after neurosurgical operation. Early identification of intracranial infection is important so that, first, optimal treatment is initiated which may improves outcome, second, inappropriate antibiotic treatment and subsequent resistance are prevented, and third, it will promote shorter hospitalization and less cost. In several previous studies, the values of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in predicting intracranial infection have been evaluated in neurosurgical patients. However, due to the limited number of studies, the results are not convincing enough and more investigations seems warranted to clarify their dynamic changes in neurosurgical patients without intracranial infection and their role in confirming the suspicion of intracranial infection or excluding intracranial infection from the differential diagnosis.

The aim of the investigator's study is to observe the postoperative dynamic changes of BT, PCT, CRP, and white blood cell (WBC) count, and evaluate whether the use of two or more of these markers may improve the diagnostic accuracy for rational decisions about antibiotic treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intracranial; Infection, Psychosis, Acute or Subacute

Keywords

  • Procalcitonin
  • C-reactive protein
  • white blood cell count
  • intracranial infection
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 240 across 2,136 observational studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Pan Jun as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 68 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Postoperative intracranial infection is one of the most serious complications after neurosurgery. At present, there is no prospective study or recognized effective method for its early diagnosis. It is of great significance for a study about early diagnosis of postoperative intracranial infection,

In this study, the best diagnostic points of ROC curve will be constructed based on two statistical principles through retrospective study, and then the diagnostic value will be determined through prospective multicenter randomized controlled study. In the research, we will establish quality control system, risk control system and dynamic design to ensure the safety of research subjects and the quality of research results.

Inclusion criteria

  1. craniotomy of brain tumor;
  2. no clinical manifestations of infection before operation;
  3. no other infection such as respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection and deep vein catheter infection before the definite diagnosis of intracranial infection ;
  4. the patients had informed consent to enter the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. blood system diseases,respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection and deep vein catheter infection;
  2. malignant tumors with neuroendocrine characteristicsr;
  3. aspiration, pancreatitis, etc.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • infected group

    Intracranial infection were diagnosed according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definitions

    Diagnostic Test: postoperative fever, serum procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell coun

  • non-infected group

    the postoperative recovery was uneventful with no infection

    Diagnostic Test: postoperative fever, serum procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell coun

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testpostoperative fever, serum procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell coun

    All patients in Intracranial Infection group were cured with antibiotic treatment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the diagnosis of intracranial infection after craniotomy

    Intracranial infection are serious complications postoperatively in neurosurgical patients. Early identification of these complications is essential to minimize the mortality and moribidy. The aim of this study is observe the postoperative dynamic changes of body temperature (BT), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cell (WBC) count, and evaluate whether the use of two or more of these markers may improve the diagnostic accuracy of intracranial infection

    Time frame: up to 100 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Neurosurgery department, Nanfang hospital
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sughrue ME, Bonney PA, Choi L, Teo C. Early Discharge After Surgery for Intra-Axial Brain Tumors. World Neurosurg. 2015 Aug;84(2):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.019. Epub 2015 Apr 17. PubMed 25892244 ↗
  • Dubey A, Sung WS, Shaya M, Patwardhan R, Willis B, Smith D, Nanda A. Complications of posterior cranial fossa surgery--an institutional experience of 500 patients. Surg Neurol. 2009 Oct;72(4):369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 Jul 14. PubMed 19604553 ↗
  • Chidambaram S, Nair MN, Krishnan SS, Cai L, Gu W, Vasudevan MC. Postoperative Central Nervous System Infection After Neurosurgery in a Modernized, Resource-Limited Tertiary Neurosurgical Center in South Asia. World Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;84(6):1668-73. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Jul 11. PubMed 26171888 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 23, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04215094
Lead sponsor
Pan Jun
Responsible party
Pan Jun (PHD, MD,Deputy director of Neurosurgery department, Southern Medical University, China) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 9, 2020
Start date
Jan 12, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 12, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2020

Study contacts

Xi'an Zhang, doctor
Contact
48831443@qq.com
+86-020-61641815
Junxiang Peng, doctor
Contact
pjxlaozong@126.com
+86-020-616418006

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion