CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04210479Updated Dec 24, 2019

Comparison of Bladder Filling vs. Non-Filling in Cesarean Hysterectomy for Placenta Percreta

An interventional study of Filled-bladder and non filled-bladder in Placenta Accreta, sponsored by Hatem AbuHashim. Status unknown. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 44 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-24.

Sponsored by Hatem AbuHashim · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2019), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 44 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) which includes accreta, increta, and percreta represents a significant obstetric challenge. PAS complicates as many as 1 per 500 pregnancies and this risk is increased with prior cesarean deliveries. Antenatal diagnosis of PAS allows for multidisciplinary planning and delivery before the onset of labor and/or vaginal bleeding. This approach has reduced maternal morbidity rates. including less blood loss, fewer transfusion requirements and, intraoperative urinary tract injury as well as improve fetal outcome.

Ultrasound evaluation is the recommended first-line modality for diagnosing PAS. Ultrasound features suggestive of PAS include loss of the normal retroplacental clear zone, attenuation of the uterine-bladder interface, reduced retroplacental myometrial thickness, presence of intraplacental lacunar spaces, and bridging vessels between the placenta and bladder. A systematic review reported that the antenatal diagnosis of PAS significantly lowered the rate of urinary tract injury (from 63% to 39%) during cesarean hysterectomies in these cases.

Unlike other elective cesarean hysterectomies, cesarean hysterectomy with a placenta previa increta/percreta, is more difficult. There is a greater need to both keep a margin from the vascular cervical-placental mass and simultaneously protect the urinary bladder. Case series reported that bladder filling helps the surgeon to more clearly identify the planes of dissection and secure the engorged aberrant vessels, thereby reduces bladder injury. Accordingly, a prospective randomized study in pregnant patients with placenta previa increta/percreta undergoing elective cesarean hysterectomy will be conducted to address this important issue.

02

Conditions studied

  • Placenta Accreta

Browse trials for

03

In context

Placenta Accreta

147 studies on the registry are indexed under Placenta Accreta; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 64 is close to the median of 62 across 63 interventional studies indexed under Placenta Accreta.

Browse Placenta Accreta studies →

Lead sponsor

Hatem AbuHashim is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 44 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women in their third trimester (35-37 W).
  • Placenta previa accreta spectrum identified by the Ultrasound (low lying anterior or major degree anterior).
  • With at least one prior cesarean section.
  • Elective cesarean hysterectomy.
  • Evidence of gross placental invasion at the time of surgery (FIGO grade 3a.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing conservative treatment.
  • Emergency cesarean hysterectomy.
  • No evidence of gross placental invasion at the time of surgery.
  • Posterior placenta.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Filled-bladder

    Bladder filling with 300ml diluted methylene blue.

    Procedure: Filled-bladder

  • Active comparator
    non filled-bladder

    Procedure: non filled-bladder

Interventions

  • ProcedureFilled-bladder

    Urinary bladder filling with 300 ml diluted methylene blue

  • Procedurenon filled-bladder

    Pull up the empty (non-filled) urinary bladder using Allis forceps

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of urinary bladder injury

    Unintentional bladder injury during elective cesarean hysterectomy

    Time frame: Intra-operative (i.e. during surgery).

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Matsubara S. Caesarean hysterectomy for placenta praevia accreta: filling the bladder technique to identify an appropriate bladder separation site. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Feb;33(2):163-4. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2012.740525. No abstract available. PubMed 23445140 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 24, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04210479
Lead sponsor
Hatem AbuHashim
Responsible party
Hatem AbuHashim (Professor, Mansoura University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 24, 2019
Start date
Jan 15, 2020 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 24, 2019

Study contacts

Hatem Abu Hashim, MD.FRCOG.PhD
Contact
hatem_ah@hotmail.com
+20502300002
Hatem Abu Hashim, MD. FRCOG. PhD
study chair · Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University
Mostafa Aboelenin, MBBCh
principal investigator · Samnoud General Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion