CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04209205INVIGORATE 2Updated May 16, 2025Results posted

Study to Demonstrate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Intravenous Secukinumab up to 52 Weeks in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis

A Phase 3 interventional study of AIN457 6 mg/kg i.v. and Placebo in Psoriatic Arthritis, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 81 sites in 15 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-16.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
381
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to provide up to 52 weeks of efficacy, safety and tolerability data to support registration of intravenous (i.v.) secukinumab (Initial dose of 6 mg/kg at Baseline (BSL) followed thereafter with 3 mg/kg administered every four weeks) in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) despite current or previous Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and/or anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy.

Read the detailed description

This multicenter study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. A screening (SCR) period running up to 10 weeks before randomization was used to assess subject eligibility followed by a treatment period of 52 weeks.

At baseline, 381 patients with active psoriatic arthritis were randomized to one of the two treatment groups in a 1:1 randomization:

Group 1: Approximately 190 patients with active psoriatic arthritis; These patients received secukinumab 6 mg/kg i.v. at BSL, followed by the administration of secukinumab 3 mg/kg i.v. every four weeks starting at Week 4.

Group 2: Approximately 190 patients with active psoriatic arthritis; These patients received i.v. placebo at BSL and at Weeks 4, 8, and 12, followed by the administration of secukinumab 3 mg/kg i.v. every four weeks starting at Week 16.

Study consisted of 4 periods: a screening period (up to 10 weeks), treatment period 1 (total duration of 16 weeks) and treatment period 2 (total duration of 36 weeks) followed by a safety follow up period of 8 weeks after the end of treatment visit (i.e., Week 52).

Primary endpoint analysis will be performed with Week 16 data (last patient completing Treatment period 1 (Week 16). Long-term efficacy and safety assessments will be performed up to Week 52.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psoriatic Arthritis

Keywords

  • Active Psoriatic Arthritis
  • Intravenous secukinumab
  • PsA
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 381 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,673 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 576 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 431 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Patients eligible for inclusion in this study had to fulfill all of the following criteria:

  • Diagnosis of PsA classified by CASPAR criteria and with symptoms for at least 6 months with moderate to severe PsA who must have at Baseline ≥3 tender joints out of 78 and ≥3 swollen out of 76 (dactylitis of a digit counts as one joint each)
  • Rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP antibodies negative at screening
  • Diagnosis of active plaque psoriasis or nail changes consistent with psoriasis or documented history of plaque psoriasis
  • Subjects with PsA should have taken NSAIDs for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization with inadequate control of symptoms or at least one dose if stopped due to intolerance to NSAIDs
  • Subjects taking corticosteroids must be on a stable dose of ≤10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent for at least 2 weeks before randomization and should remain on a stable dose up to Week 16
  • Subjects taking MTX (≤ 25 mg/week) are allowed to continue their medication if the dose is stable for at least 4 weeks before randomization and should remain on a stable dose up to Week 52.

Patients fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for inclusion in this study:

  • Chest X-ray or chest MRI with evidence of ongoing infectious or malignant process, obtained within 3 months prior to screening and evaluated by a qualified physician
  • Subjects taking high potency opioid analgesics (e.g. methadone, hydromorphone, morphine)
  • Previous exposure to secukinumab or other biologic drug directly targeting IL-17 or IL-17 receptor
  • Ongoing use of prohibited psoriasis treatments / medications (e.g., topical corticosteroids, UV therapy) at randomization. The following wash-out periods need to be observed:
  • Oral or topical retinoids- 4 weeks
  • Photochemotherapy (e.g. PUVA)- 4 weeks
  • Phototherapy (UVA or UVB)- 2 weeks
  • Topical skin treatments (except in face, eyes, scalp and genital area during screening, only corticosteroids with mild to moderate potency)- 2 weeks
  • Any intramuscular or intravenous corticosteroid treatment within 4 weeks before randomization.
  • Any therapy by intra-articular injections (e.g. corticosteroid) within 4 weeks before randomization.
  • Subjects who have previously been treated with more than 3 different TNF inhibitors (investigational or approved).
  • Subjects who have ever received biologic immunomodulating agents, investigational or approved except for those targeting TNFα.
  • Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies including but not limited to anti-CD20 or investigational agents (e.g., CAMPATH, anti-CD4, anti-CD5, anti-CD3, anti-CD19)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
381 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.

    AIN457 6 mg/kg i.v. infusion at baseline, followed by AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v. infusion every 4 weeks starting at Week 4 through Week 48 (exposure through Week 52).

    Drug: AIN457 6 mg/kg i.v. · Drug: AIN457 3 mg/kg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Matching placebo from baseline to Week 16 and switch to AIN457 3mg/kg i.v. infusion every 4 weeks through Week 48 (exposure through Week 52).

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugAIN457 6 mg/kg i.v.

    AIN457 6 mg/kg delivered by i.v. infusion

    Also known as: secukinumab

  • DrugPlacebo

    Matching placebo to AIN457 i.v. infusion

  • DrugAIN457 3 mg/kg

    AIN457 3 mg/kg delivered by i.v. infusion

    Also known as: secukinumab

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Comparison Between Treatment Groups Using Non-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

    Percentage of participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) response The ACR50 is a composite measure defined as both improvement of 50% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 50% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure \[most often Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)\], visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Comparison Between Treatment Groups Using On-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

    Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-Reactive Protein.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity (MDA 5/7) Comparison Between Treatment Groups Using On-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

    MDA is assessed as 5 of the 7 following: ≤ 1 tender and swollen joint; entheseal count, PASI ≤ 1 or BSA ≤3%, PsA ≤ 15 and disease activity ≤ 20 (VAS) and HAQ-DI© ≤ 0.5

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASi90) Score for Patients With a >= 3% Body Surface Area Psoriasis at Baseline Using On-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

    Change from baseline of a 90% reduction in the PASI score for patients with a \>= 3% body surface area psoriasis at baseline. Four body surface areas are evaluated (head, trunk and upper and lower limbs) for plaque, erythema, scaling and thickness. The degree of severity of each sign in each of the 4 body areas was assigned a score of 0 to 4. Scores ranged from 0 to 72 and higher scores represent worsening severity.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  4. Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

    PASDAS is a composite measure developed to assess disease activity in Psoriatic arthritis. It is calculated by utilizing seven measures: Patient reported measures (excluding mental component) (SF-36-PCS), skin, peripheral joint counts (tender and swollen joint counts), dactylitis (LDI), enthesitis (LEI), acute phase response (CRP), and patient and physician global VAS scores. The typical score range is between 0 and 10. Smaller values on PASDAS indicate a better condition; a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  5. Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  6. Short Form 36-Physical Component Summary (SF36-PCS) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

    The SF-36 is used to measure health-related quality of life with acute and chronic conditions. It consists of eight subscales that can be scored individually: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. Range of scoring is 0 -100, with higher scores indicating better health status.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  7. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

    The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13 item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. Response scale ranges from 0-4 and the total score range is 0 - 52. Higher scores indicate better quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  8. Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

    The mNAPSI is an instrument to assess psoriatic nail involvement. Three groups of features (onycholysis and oil-drop dyshromia, pitting and crumbling) were graded on a scale from 0 to 3 for a total subscale of 0 to 9. The next 4 abnormalities (leukonychia, splinter hemorrhages, hyperkeratosis and red spots in the lunula) were graded as absent (0) or present (1) for a total subscale of 0 to 4. The total score was from 0-13 where higher scores represent worse nail disease.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  9. Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Dactylitis at Week 16 Using Non-responder Imputation (Dactylitis Subset)

    Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) measures the ratio of the circumference of the affected (swollen) digit. The ratio of circumference is multiplied by a tenderness score, using a modification of LDI that is a binary score (1 for tender, 0 for non-tender). The LDI requires a finger circumference gauge or a dactylometer to measure digital circumference. Scores range from 0 - 20 and lower score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  10. Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Enthesitis at Week 16 Using Non-responder Imputation (Enthesitis Subset (LEI))

    Enthesitis is inflammation of the enthesis which is where a a tendon or ligament attaches to the bone. The Leeds enthesitis index (LEI) is a validated index that uses 6 sites for evaluation of enthesitis: lateral epicondyle humerus L + R, proximal achilles L + R and medial condyle femur L+R. If enthesitis is present at any of the 6 sites, the subject is counted as a subject with enthesitis.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

07

Results

Posted Apr 26, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.
Started191190
Completed173167
Not completed1823
Withdrew: Adverse event23
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up31
Withdrew: Physician decision11
Withdrew: Subject decision1010
Withdrew: Progressive disease10
Withdrew: Protocol deviation01
Withdrew: New therapy for study indication10
Withdrew: Adverse event - placebo not switched01
Withdrew: Subject decision - placebo not switched05
Withdrew: Death - placebo not switched01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Comparison Between Treatment Groups Using Non-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

Percentage of participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) response The ACR50 is a composite measure defined as both improvement of 50% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 50% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure \[most often Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)\], visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP)

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Comparison Between Treatment Groups Using Non-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)
Percentage of participantsAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) Response Comparison Between Treatment Groups Using Non-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)31.35 (24.80 to 37.90)6.33 (2.87 to 9.79)
Statistical analysis
  • AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v. vs Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v. · Regression, Logistic · p = <.0001 · Marginal difference: 25.02 · 95% CI 17.61 to 32.43
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Comparison Between Treatment Groups Using On-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-Reactive Protein.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Comparison Between Treatment Groups Using On-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)
Percentage of participantsAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response Comparison Between Treatment Groups Using On-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)59.60 (52.67 to 66.52)29.01 (22.57 to 35.44)
Statistical analysis
  • AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v. vs Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v. · Regression, Logistic · p = <.0001 · Marginal difference: 30.59 · 95% CI 21.14 to 40.05
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity (MDA 5/7) Comparison Between Treatment Groups Using On-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

MDA is assessed as 5 of the 7 following: ≤ 1 tender and swollen joint; entheseal count, PASI ≤ 1 or BSA ≤3%, PsA ≤ 15 and disease activity ≤ 20 (VAS) and HAQ-DI© ≤ 0.5

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity (MDA 5/7) Comparison Between Treatment Groups Using On-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)
Percentage of participantsAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.
Percentage of Participants With Minimal Disease Activity (MDA 5/7) Comparison Between Treatment Groups Using On-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)22.45 (16.57 to 28.33)5.28 (2.10 to 8.46)
Statistical analysis
  • AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v. vs Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v. · Regression, Logistic · p = <.0001 · Marginal difference: 17.17 · 95% CI 10.48 to 23.85
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASi90) Score for Patients With a >= 3% Body Surface Area Psoriasis at Baseline Using On-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

Change from baseline of a 90% reduction in the PASI score for patients with a \>= 3% body surface area psoriasis at baseline. Four body surface areas are evaluated (head, trunk and upper and lower limbs) for plaque, erythema, scaling and thickness. The degree of severity of each sign in each of the 4 body areas was assigned a score of 0 to 4. Scores ranged from 0 to 72 and higher scores represent worsening severity.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASi90) Score for Patients With a >= 3% Body Surface Area Psoriasis at Baseline Using On-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)
Percentage of participantsAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90 (PASi90) Score for Patients With a >= 3% Body Surface Area Psoriasis at Baseline Using On-responder Imputation at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)47.85 (38.15 to 57.54)6.46 (1.83 to 11.09)
Statistical analysis
  • AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v. vs Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v. · Regression, Logistic · p = <.0001 · Marginal difference: 41.39 · 95% CI 30.64 to 52.13
SecondaryPsoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

PASDAS is a composite measure developed to assess disease activity in Psoriatic arthritis. It is calculated by utilizing seven measures: Patient reported measures (excluding mental component) (SF-36-PCS), skin, peripheral joint counts (tender and swollen joint counts), dactylitis (LDI), enthesitis (LEI), acute phase response (CRP), and patient and physician global VAS scores. The typical score range is between 0 and 10. Smaller values on PASDAS indicate a better condition; a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)
scores on a scaleAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.
Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)-2.24 ± 0.103-1.11 ± 0.103
Statistical analysis
  • AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v. vs Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v. · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.0001 · Least squares mean: -1.13 · 95% CI -1.38 to 0.87
SecondaryHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)
scores on a scaleAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)-0.39 ± 0.0350.15 ± 0.035
Statistical analysis
  • AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v. vs Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v. · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.0001 · Least squares mean: -0.24 · 95% CI -0.32 to 0.15
SecondaryShort Form 36-Physical Component Summary (SF36-PCS) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

The SF-36 is used to measure health-related quality of life with acute and chronic conditions. It consists of eight subscales that can be scored individually: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. Range of scoring is 0 -100, with higher scores indicating better health status.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Short Form 36-Physical Component Summary (SF36-PCS) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)
scores on a scaleAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.
Short Form 36-Physical Component Summary (SF36-PCS) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)6.47 ± 0.5582.34 ± 0.550
Statistical analysis
  • AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v. vs Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v. · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.0001 · Least squares mean: 4.13 · 95% CI 2.80 to 5.46
SecondaryFunctional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13 item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. Response scale ranges from 0-4 and the total score range is 0 - 52. Higher scores indicate better quality of life

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)
scores on a scaleAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)6.15 ± 0.7593.30 ± 0.750
Statistical analysis
  • AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v. vs Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v. · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0024 · Least squares mean: 2.85 · 95% CI 1.01 to 4.68
SecondaryModified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)

The mNAPSI is an instrument to assess psoriatic nail involvement. Three groups of features (onycholysis and oil-drop dyshromia, pitting and crumbling) were graded on a scale from 0 to 3 for a total subscale of 0 to 9. The next 4 abnormalities (leukonychia, splinter hemorrhages, hyperkeratosis and red spots in the lunula) were graded as absent (0) or present (1) for a total subscale of 0 to 4. The total score was from 0-13 where higher scores represent worse nail disease.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)
scores on a scaleAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.
Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) Score Change From Baseline Using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) at Week 16 (Full Analysis Set)-9.25 ± 1.069-3.14 ± 1.084
Statistical analysis
  • AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v. vs Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v. · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.0001 · Least squares mean: -6.11 · 95% CI -8.96 to -3.26
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Dactylitis at Week 16 Using Non-responder Imputation (Dactylitis Subset)

Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) measures the ratio of the circumference of the affected (swollen) digit. The ratio of circumference is multiplied by a tenderness score, using a modification of LDI that is a binary score (1 for tender, 0 for non-tender). The LDI requires a finger circumference gauge or a dactylometer to measure digital circumference. Scores range from 0 - 20 and lower score indicates better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Dactylitis at Week 16 Using Non-responder Imputation (Dactylitis Subset)
Percentage of participantsAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Dactylitis at Week 16 Using Non-responder Imputation (Dactylitis Subset)59.53 (48.96 to 70.11)32.05 (21.33 to 42.76)
Statistical analysis
  • AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v. vs Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v. · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0003 · Marginal difference: 27.49 · 95% CI 12.43 to 42.55
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Enthesitis at Week 16 Using Non-responder Imputation (Enthesitis Subset (LEI))

Enthesitis is inflammation of the enthesis which is where a a tendon or ligament attaches to the bone. The Leeds enthesitis index (LEI) is a validated index that uses 6 sites for evaluation of enthesitis: lateral epicondyle humerus L + R, proximal achilles L + R and medial condyle femur L+R. If enthesitis is present at any of the 6 sites, the subject is counted as a subject with enthesitis.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Enthesitis at Week 16 Using Non-responder Imputation (Enthesitis Subset (LEI))
Percentage of participantsAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Enthesitis at Week 16 Using Non-responder Imputation (Enthesitis Subset (LEI))55.52 (46.92 to 64.12)39.16 (30.14 to 48.19)
Statistical analysis
  • AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v. vs Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v. · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0102 · Marginal difference: 16.35 · 95% CI 3.88 to 28.82

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment up to a maximum of 481 days which included an approximate follow up period of 8 weeks for AIN457 treatment group.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v0/374 (0%)22/374 (5.9%)136/374 (36.4%)
Placebo up to Week 161/190 (0.5%)4/190 (2.1%)35/190 (18.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 27
Most frequent serious events
EventAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.vPlacebo up to Week 16
COVID-19Infections and infestations6/3740/190
COVID-19 pneumoniaInfections and infestations2/3742/190
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/3740/190
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders0/3741/190
Transient ischaemic attackNervous system disorders0/3741/190
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/3740/190
Angina unstableCardiac disorders1/3740/190
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/3740/190
Ventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders1/3740/190
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders1/3740/190
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent other events
EventAIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.vPlacebo up to Week 16
COVID-19Infections and infestations37/3747/190
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations17/3741/190
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders14/3743/190
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations13/3743/190
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations12/3744/190
SARS-CoV-2 test positiveInvestigations12/3742/190
HeadacheNervous system disorders12/3745/190
HypertensionVascular disorders12/3741/190
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations10/3746/190
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders11/3742/190

Baseline characteristics

Randomized set

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.Total
<65 years170165335
65-74 years172441
>= 75 years415
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.Total
Female104105209
Male8785172
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)AIN457 6 mg/kg - 3 mg/kg i.v.Placebo to AIN457 3 mg/kg i.v.Total
White148153301
Black or African American516
Asian252651
American Indian or Alaska Native10919
More than one race314
08

Study locations

81 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35205, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fountain Valley, California 92708, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fullerton, California 92835, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Upland, California 91786, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Van Nuys, California 91405, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    West Hills, California 91307, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Denver, Colorado 80230, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Clearwater, Florida 33765, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Miami, Florida 33032, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ocoee, Florida 34761, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Plantation, Florida 33324, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tampa, Florida 33624, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Winter Park, Florida 32789, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46256, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bowling Green, Kentucky 42101, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63117, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68516, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Voorhees, New Jersey 08043, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27408, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Middleburg Heights, Ohio 44130, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Duncansville, Pennsylvania 16635, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Jackson, Tennessee 38305, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mesquite, Texas 75150, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Newport News, Virginia 23608, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Salvador, BA 40150 150, Brazil
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sao Paulo, SP 04266 010, Brazil
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Burgas, 8000, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Plovdiv, 4002, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1413, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Barranquilla, Atlantico 080002, Colombia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bucaramanga, Santander 0001, Colombia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bogota, 110221, Colombia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cundinamarca, 111121, Colombia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Prague 2, 128 50, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Praha 4, 140 59, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Praha 5, 150 06, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Uherske Hradiste, 686 01, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Athens, 12462, Greece
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Thessaloniki, 54622, Greece
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Guatemala City, 01010, Guatemala
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Guatemala, 01001, Guatemala
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Guatemala, 01010, Guatemala
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Surat, Gujarat 395009, India
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bangalore, Karnataka 560 079, India
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nashik, Maharashtra 422 101, India
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    New Delhi, 110029, India
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Seremban, Negeri Sembilan 70300, Malaysia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kuching, Sarawak 93586, Malaysia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Selangor Darul Ehsan, 68100, Malaysia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lipa City, Batangas 4217, Philippines
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dasmarinas, Cavite 4114, Philippines
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Manila, 1008, Philippines
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Quezon City, 1102, Philippines
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Krakow, Malopolskie 30-510, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Karwiany, 52-200, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Krakow, 30 002, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sochaczew, 96-500, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Warszawa, 02-962, Poland
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kemerovo, 650029, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nizhny Novgorod, 603018, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rostov On Don, 344022, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    St Petersburg, 190068, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Yaroslavl, 150003, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Yekaterinburg, 620109, Russian Federation
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Panorama, Western Cape 7500, South Africa
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Stellenbosch, 7600, South Africa
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Songkhla, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Khon Kaen, THA 40002, Thailand
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bursa, Gorukle 16059, Turkey
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 24, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 3, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Novartis is committed to sharing access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies with qualified external researchers. Requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to protect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04209205
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 24, 2019
Start date
Jan 29, 2020
Primary completion
May 17, 2022
Completion
May 17, 2022
Results posted
Apr 26, 2024
Last update
May 16, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion