An interventional study of Stenting in Coronary Stenosis and Stent Stenosis, sponsored by University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen. Status unknown at 13 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-05.
Sponsored by University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Randomised comparison of Culotte technique versus "Double Kissing" - Crush technique (DK-Crush) for the percutaneous treatment of de novo non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions with modern everolimus-eluting stents (DES) - German multicenter study
Aim of study This prospective randomized multicenter study will compare the long-term safety and efficacy of Culotte stenting versus "Double Kissing" - Crush (DK-Crush) stenting in the treatment of the de-novo non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions with new generation everolimus-eluting stents.
Study hypothesis In large coronary bifurcation lesions (main vessel > 2.5mm, side branch > 2.25mm) including significant ostial side branch disease, Culotte stenting compared with DKcrush stenting reduces maximal percent diameter stenosis at the bifurcation at 9-month follow-up by 25 %.
Study design Prospective, randomized, German multicenter study.
Methods Four-hundred patients, in whom a double-stenting technique is intended for the treatment of a non-left main de-novo coronary bifurcation lesion will be randomly assigned to Culotte stenting or to DK-crush stenting with an approved drug-eluting stent (SYNERGY-Stent). As a part of usual care, patients will undergo 9-month angiographic follow-up with quantitative coronary angiography. Clinical follow-up is planned at 1 year if no angiographic follow-up is obtained.
302 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Stenosis; 63 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 200 across 160 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Stenosis.
Browse Coronary Stenosis studies →University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Both vessels have to be wired. Lesion preparation in the main vessel and side branch may be undertaken according to operator preference. After lesion preparation, the side branch has to be stented first. The first stent is placed from main branch into the side branch, covering the entire diseased segment with a wire jailed in the main vessel. The main vessel is rewired through the stent struts, and after removal of the jailed wire, is dilated with a balloon to separate stent struts. The side branch wire is then removed and the main vessel is stented covering the proximal and distal segment. The side-branch is re-wired and high pressure individual inflations are made in each vessel at the bifurcation point to ensure good stent strut separation. Afterwards, a lower pressure kissing inflation is made. Balloon sizing should be in accordance with the diameter of the vessel itself. Finally, a proximal optimization (POT) procedure is performed.
Procedure: Stenting
Both vessels have to be wired first. Lesion preparation in the main vessel and side branch may be undertaken according to operator preference (rotablation, if needed). After lesion preparation, the side branch is stented first. Side branch stent should have a small protrusion into the main branch. Before stent implantation in the side branch, an adequately sized balloon should be placed in the main branch, just opposite to the side branch ostium. After stent implantation in the side branch, stent balloon and wire are removed and the balloon in the main branch must be inflated, to crush the struts into the vessel wall. In next step, the new wire should be crossed into the ostium of the side branch and first kissing balloon dilatation will follow. The next step is to implant the second stent into the main branch, followed by second re-wiring, a second kissing balloon-dilatation and final proximal optimization (POT) procedure (single short balloon inflation in proximal segment).
Procedure: Stenting
Comparison of two technical approaches in the interventional treatment on de-novo non-left main coronary lesions
Angiographic restenosis in the bifurcation lesion by quantitative coronary analysis (QCA)
For quantitative coronary angiography, changes between result at the completion of the index intervention and at 9 months follow-up will be analysed using a computer based system dedicated to bifurcation analysis, according to the standard operating procedure of the angiographic core laboratory. Quantitative angiographic measurements will be obtained of the three segments of the bifurcation lesion: the proximal and distal segment of the main branch and the side branch. We will perform measurements in the stented portion of the vessel (in-stent) and in the distal or proximal 5 mm margin (edge). In-segment analyses will comprise the in-stent and the edge area. In addition, the bifurcation angle from the analysis system will be estimated.
Time frame: 9 months post index percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Incidence of target lesion revascularisation (TLR)
Any revascularisation (Re-PCI or CABG) at segments treated during index procedure
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE)
MACE defined as death, Myocardial infarction (Q wave and Non-Q wave), emergent cardiac bypass surgery, or TLR
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of binary restenosis at any segment of the bifurcation lesion
≥ 50% diameter stenosis in the main and side branch
Time frame: 9 months
Incidence of binary restenosis in the main and side branch
≥ 50% diameter stenosis in main and side branch
Time frame: 9 months
Incidence of stent thrombosis (ST)
Post-procedure thrombotic stent occlusion according to the Academic Research Consortium-criteria
Time frame: 1 year
Rate of device success
Attainment of \< 30% residual stenosis of the target lesion in the main and side branch
Time frame: 9 months
Mean procedure time
Procedure time measured in minutes
Time frame: Index Intervention
Mean radiation exposure
Radiation exposure measured in cGym²
Time frame: Index Intervention
Mean volume of used contrast medium
Contrast medium measured in milliliters
Time frame: Index Intervention
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Heart Center Freiburg - Bad Krozingen