CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04183504Updated May 18, 2023

Screening for Therapy and Empowering Parents: A Pilot Study

An interventional study of Brief parenting intervention in Primary Health Care, sponsored by University of Tennessee. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 7 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-18.

Sponsored by University of Tennessee · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2015, registered Nov 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 7 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is expand on the Early STEPs project goal of identifying early developmental delays in infants and young children in a health disparate population and to collect preliminary data to lay the groundwork for a future NIH grant proposal. Individuals with less education have poor health and shorter life expectancies than well-educated individuals, and research reveals that poverty is directly related to limited education. An innovative approach is needed to overcome barriers, improve health literacy, and educate parents on effective parenting strategies for this population. Technology may be the part of the solution to this issue. Through Early STEPs, the occupational therapists will continue to refer families to early intervention and therapy services as appropriate and follow-up to ensure that services are initiated. The Occupational Therapist will also determine if the parents are utilizing the Word Gap App and other provided resources to support their child's development and to manage their stress. By increasing parental awareness and knowledge of language and motor skill development, the environments of underserved children will be enriched and parental stress will be reduced so that these children can have improved health and reach their full potential.

Read the detailed description
  1. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of developmental screening to identify developmental delays in order to make appropriate referrals for early intervention services.
  2. Rationale: Research has consistently shown that providing timely early intervention (EI) services for young children identified as developmentally delayed improves both short-term and long-term outcomes. It is critical that children with delays be identified as early as possible because intervention programs are more effective when initiated at a young age. In fact, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) advocates identifying delays before children reach 2 years of age.

    There is evidence that primary care providers tend to under-detect developmental delays among infants and young children. In addition, in high poverty areas, transportation, finances and other logistical challenges often prevent parents of young children from regularly visiting a physician, which further contributes to limited opportunities for intervention.

    Under-enrollment in intervention programs has been identified as a national problem, one that is recognized as a critical issue in the Mid-South due to the lower percentage of young children being identified and referred for services. Nationally, it is estimated that 16-18% of children have disabilities; however, less than one-third of these cases are referred for intervention before kindergarten age. Besides the issue of under-identification of developmental problems in young children, research suggests that many children who are referred for Early Intervention services do not end up receiving therapy due to poor follow-through by caregivers. It is likely that families need support and guidance regarding the importance of Early Intervention services.

    Unaddressed developmental delays can negatively impact the future health and educational attainment of our nation's infants. Families benefit from screening through an increased awareness of appropriate developmental and behavioral expectations. For example, screening can lead to positive outcomes in family interaction and decreased parental stress levels when developmental information and recommendations for activities are provided, even for children who do not fully meet the criteria to be referred. In the Memphis area, enrollment of children under the age of 3 in EI programs has actually decreased over the past five years, despite strong evidence that the incidence of disabilities such as autism is on the rise. Nationally, 2.52% of young children receive EI services; in Tennessee, 1.8% of children are receiving services needed.

  3. Study/Project Population: Through the Early STEPs Project, licensed occupational therapists will provide free developmental and autism screenings to children ages birth to and 6 years 11 months 29 days in a pediatric medical practice.
  4. Research Design: To determine the effectiveness of the Early STEPs project, investigators will compare pre- and post-project referrals for EI services, follow through by families, and pre and post parental satisfaction qualitative data. The participating pediatric practices will provide documentation of their prior average number of monthly early intervention referrals and this information will be compared to the monthly number of referrals at the end of the study period. The investigators will follow-up with the parent of the referred child at 6- and 12-months to determine if early intervention services were initiated by the parent and to determine if the parents perceived that the developmental app and online support group were helpful and improved confidence with their parenting skills.

    The data collection will begin on February 3, 2014 and end in approximately 2 years.

  5. Procedures The developmental screenings will be offered two to four days per month. Informational flyers will be posted locally and in the pediatrician's offices. Investigators will obtain parental consent. If parental consent is obtained, the screenings will be conducted with the parent present. The process will involve the parents providing qualitative information regarding the confidence with their parenting skills, and the occupational therapy investigators will complete The Ages \& Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) on each participant and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, if age appropriate to the particular child. All information for the screenings will be collected from the parent. Researchers will not be accessing the subjects' medical records. Additionally, early intervention/parental coaching sessions will be provided by occupational therapists as needed. Caregivers will utilize skills training, free online resources and an online social support network to develop and maintain nurturing parenting skills. Follow-up phone calls will take place at 6-months and 12-months after a positive screening to determine if therapy services were indicated and to determine if the use of online resources or the social support network were perceived to be helpful. During the 6 and 12-month follow-up phone call, study personnel will collect information regarding parenting confidence using the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSCO). Parents or caregivers will receive a free t-shirt as available and a developmental flyer for participating. (Courtesy of The Urban Child Institute). Parents or caregivers will receive free first year milestone applications for their cellular devices (courtesy of Aimee's Babies).
  6. Outcome Measures: The PI will monitor and report on:

    1. number of children identified for further assessment,
    2. common developmental concerns/delays,
    3. specific services referred to,
    4. Caregiver follow-up
    5. The investigators will collect data using the PSCO regarding parenting confidence at the initial visit and during the 6 and 12-month follow-up phone call.
02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Health Care

Keywords

  • Primary Health Care
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Child Development
  • Early Intervention
  • Parenting
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Tennessee is the lead sponsor of 139 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (29%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 7 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • parent provides written informed consent to take part in the study
  • child has no congenital malformations or genetic syndromes
  • child is not enrolled in Early Intervention Services.
  • child is not in foster care
  • Parent agrees to attend parent training session
  • Parent agrees to complete pre- and post- Parenting Sense of Competence scale
  • Child is between birth and 6 years 11 months 29 days

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Parent will not signed informed consent.
  • child has congenital malformations or genetic syndrome
  • child is not enrolled in Early Intervention Services.
  • child is in foster care
  • child is 7 years or older
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early Steps Coaching

    Coaching session on positive parenting practices and promoting child development.

    Behavioral: Brief parenting intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralBrief parenting intervention

    Coaching session on positive parenting practices and promoting child development

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Parenting Sense of Competence Scale

    Parenting Sense of Competence Scale- Scores range from 9 to 54, with higher scores indicating greater parenting satisfaction.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Developmental screening results

    Ages \& Stages Questionniare03 (ASQ-3TM), parental report questionnaire that provides scores for each of the following domains: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem- solving, and personal/social skills. Every version of the screening includes specific cutoff scores to indicate if child's development is on schedule or not. The cutoff scores vary from one age level to the next, ranging from 0 to 60, with 60 indicating a higher developmental level.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  2. Number of referrals for early intervention or therapy services

    Actual number of referrals made to early intervention services or therapy.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  3. Follow through in obtaining early intervention or therapy services

    Counts for each type of service obtained: early intervention, occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech therapy, or comprehensive developmental evaluation

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Memphis Children's Clinic
    Memphis, Tennessee 38116, United States
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
    Memphis, Tennessee 38163, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Berry AD, Garzon DL, Mack P, Kanwischer KZ, Beck DG. Implementing an early childhood developmental screening and surveillance program in primary care settings: lessons learned from a project in Illinois. J Pediatr Health Care. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):516-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 Jun 11. PubMed 24929846 ↗
  • Council on Children With Disabilities; Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics; Bright Futures Steering Committee; Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):405-20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1231. Erratum In: Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):1808-9. PubMed 16818591 ↗
  • Dobrez D, Sasso AL, Holl J, Shalowitz M, Leon S, Budetti P. Estimating the cost of developmental and behavioral screening of preschool children in general pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2001 Oct;108(4):913-22. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.4.913. PubMed 11581444 ↗
  • Earls MF, Hay SS. Setting the stage for success: implementation of developmental and behavioral screening and surveillance in primary care practice--the North Carolina Assuring Better Child Health and Development (ABCD) Project. Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):e183-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0475. PubMed 16818532 ↗
  • Frankenburg WK. Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children. Pediatrics. 2002 Jan;109(1):144-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.1.144. No abstract available. PubMed 11773555 ↗
  • Guevara JP, Gerdes M, Localio R, Huang YV, Pinto-Martin J, Minkovitz CS, Hsu D, Kyriakou L, Baglivo S, Kavanagh J, Pati S. Effectiveness of developmental screening in an urban setting. Pediatrics. 2013 Jan;131(1):30-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0765. Epub 2012 Dec 17. PubMed 23248223 ↗
  • Rosenberg SA, Zhang D, Robinson CC. Prevalence of developmental delays and participation in early intervention services for young children. Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):e1503-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1680. Epub 2008 May 26. PubMed 18504295 ↗
  • Rydz D, Srour M, Oskoui M, Marget N, Shiller M, Birnbaum R, Majnemer A, Shevell MI. Screening for developmental delay in the setting of a community pediatric clinic: a prospective assessment of parent-report questionnaires. Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):e1178-86. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0466. PubMed 17015506 ↗
  • Schonwald A, Huntington N, Chan E, Risko W, Bridgemohan C. Routine developmental screening implemented in urban primary care settings: more evidence of feasibility and effectiveness. Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):660-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2798. PubMed 19171635 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, Informed Consent Form

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04183504
Lead sponsor
University of Tennessee
Responsible party
Anne Zachry (Chair, Department of Occupational Therapy, Principle Investigator, Associate Professor, University of Tennessee) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 3, 2019
Start date
Nov 1, 2015
Primary completion
May 7, 2018
Completion
May 7, 2018
Last update
May 18, 2023

Study contacts

Anne H Zachry, PhD
principal investigator · University of Tennessee

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion