ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04177979SRMCUpdated Nov 26, 2019

Efficacy of Near-Assisted Learning (NAL) in Improving Students' Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Grades

An interventional study of Near-assisted learning through trained peers in Cost, Problem-based Learning and Peer Group, sponsored by Sulaiman AlRajhi Colleges. Completed at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to male participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-26.

Sponsored by Sulaiman AlRajhi Colleges · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2019, registered Nov 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the impact of near-assisted learning (NAL) on first-year medical students' objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) grades in a problem-based learning (PBL) environment.

Read the detailed description

In this randomized controlled trial, 1st year medical students were recruited in the study along with selected highly-performing, trained peer-instructors. The participants were randomly allocated to two groups, an intervention group supervised by the instructors and the control group that had to practice independently. They would attend OSCE sessions and had their performance evaluated, later on, in an exam. In addition to comparing their performance with each other, scores of the previous batch were considered in the comparison.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cost
  • Problem-based Learning
  • Peer Group

Keywords

  • Near-assisted learning
  • Cost
  • Education environment
  • OSCE
  • Problem-based learning
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Sulaiman AlRajhi Colleges is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1st year medical students.
  • Medical students of Sulaiman Alrajhi Colleges.
  • Males.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students of other academic levels.
  • 1st year medical students of other universities.
  • Females.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Near assisted learning group

    Participants in this arm were supervised by the trained peer-instructors.

    Behavioral: Near-assisted learning through trained peers

  • No intervention
    Self directed learning group

    Participants in this arm were practicing independently. They were not supervised by any instructors.

Interventions

  • BehavioralNear-assisted learning through trained peers

    Students randomly allocated to this group were overseen during sessions by trained peer instructors.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) Score

    After the sessions, the study sample participated in the final osce exam. Their scores were compared. The minimum value was 0 while the maximum value was 100. The higher the score the better students had performed

    Time frame: Less than a month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sulaiman AlRajhi Colleges
    Al Bukairiyah, Qassim 51941, PO Box 777, Saudi Arabia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tolsgaard MG, Gustafsson A, Rasmussen MB, Hoiby P, Muller CG, Ringsted C. Student teachers can be as good as associate professors in teaching clinical skills. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):553-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590701682550. PubMed 17978968 ↗
  • Shah I, Mahboob U, Shah S. Effectiveness Of Horizontal Peer-Assisted Learning In Physical Examination Performance. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):559-565. PubMed 29330977 ↗
  • Blank WA, Blankenfeld H, Vogelmann R, Linde K, Schneider A. Can near-peer medical students effectively teach a new curriculum in physical examination? BMC Med Educ. 2013 Dec 11;13:165. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-165. PubMed 24325639 ↗
  • Riaz I. Peer assisted versus expert assisted learning: a comparison of effectiveness in terms of academic scores. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Nov;24(11):825-9. PubMed 25404441 ↗
  • Haist SA, Wilson JF, Brigham NL, Fosson SE, Blue AV. Comparing fourth-year medical students with faculty in the teaching of physical examination skills to first-year students. Acad Med. 1998 Feb;73(2):198-200. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199802000-00020. PubMed 9484194 ↗
  • Field M, Burke JM, McAllister D, Lloyd DM. Peer-assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students. Med Educ. 2007 Apr;41(4):411-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2007.02713.x. PubMed 17430287 ↗
  • Tai JH, Canny BJ, Haines TP, Molloy EK. The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: opportunities in clinical medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Aug;21(3):659-76. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9659-0. Epub 2015 Dec 12. PubMed 26662035 ↗
  • Liew SC, Sow CF, Sidhu J, Nadarajah VD. The near-peer tutoring programme: embracing the 'doctors-to-teach' philosophy--a comparison of the effects of participation between the senior and junior near-peer tutors. Med Educ Online. 2015 Sep 8;20:27959. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.27959. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26356229 ↗
  • Tai J, Molloy E, Haines T, Canny B. Same-level peer-assisted learning in medical clinical placements: a narrative systematic review. Med Educ. 2016 Apr;50(4):469-84. doi: 10.1111/medu.12898. PubMed 26995485 ↗
  • Khaw C, Raw L. The outcomes and acceptability of near-peer teaching among medical students in clinical skills. Int J Med Educ. 2016 Jun 12;7:188-94. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5749.7b8b. PubMed 27295403 ↗
  • Cole JD, Ruble MJ, Donnelly J, Groves B. Peer-assisted Learning: Clinical Skills Training for Pharmacy Students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Aug;82(6):6511. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6511. PubMed 30181672 ↗
  • Burke J, Fayaz S, Graham K, Matthew R, Field M. Peer-assisted learning in the acquisition of clinical skills: a supplementary approach to musculoskeletal system training. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):577-82. doi: 10.1080/01421590701469867. PubMed 17978969 ↗
  • Silbert BI, Lake FR. Peer-assisted learning in teaching clinical examination to junior medical students. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):392-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668240. Epub 2012 Apr 3. PubMed 22471912 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Might be shared through the university webpage.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2019 to primary completion in Apr 2019, 0 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 16, 2019
First posted
Nov 26, 2019
StartActual
Apr 6, 2019
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2019
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2019
Last update
Nov 26, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04177979
Lead sponsor
Sulaiman AlRajhi Colleges
Responsible party
Abdulaziz Alothman (Head of medical education department, Sulaiman AlRajhi Colleges) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 26, 2019
Start date
Apr 6, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2019
Completion
Apr 30, 2019
Last update
Nov 26, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion