An interventional study of handgrip strength and Door handle device in Hand Injuries and Disorders, sponsored by University of Mogi das Cruzes. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 39 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-03.
Sponsored by University of Mogi das Cruzes · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
This study developed a system to quantify the functional strength of young adults without motor impairment during grip and pinch movement. Making it possible to know the accuracy of the value of these strength, the range of motion performed and whether the grip force was maintained throughout the range of motion. In addition to checking the functionality, reliability and reproducibility of the system.
Quantifying grip and grip movement is essential as it allows for a basis in upper limb functionality. However, when there is access, it causes changes in the hands and changes the motor in relation to the force and range of motion, or generates changes in activities of daily living. Thus, a system with 5 devices, where each one the devices were prints in three-dimensional, and instrumented with force sensor for static-dynamic force analysis e potentiometer for analysis range of motion, during the execution of movements cylindrical grip, spherical grip, hook grip, pulp-pulp pinch, and pulp- side pinch in different activities of daily living. Elaborated a data storage interface through MATLAB® software that allows recording the data of each device. For the system functionality tests, 30 volunteers were selected for both sexes, young adults between 20 and 39 years old, students of the Physiotherapy and Graduate courses of the University of Mogi das Cruzes. The tests are divided into two sessions and are repeated after 7 days of the first test
108 studies on the registry are indexed under Hand Injuries; 31 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 56 across 84 interventional studies indexed under Hand Injuries.
Browse Hand Injuries studies →University of Mogi das Cruzes is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The tests were performed in two sessions lasting 1 hour each. The volunteers used the devices: door handle, tap, door pull handle, switch and door key to quantify hand strength. The tests were performed in two sessions lasting 1 hour each. The volunteers used the devices: door handle, tap, door pull handle, switch and door key to quantify hand strength. In the first session, the volunteers performed the movements 3 times in each device of daily living activities with the right limb, with a 1-minute rest interval between the 3 measurements. The entire procedure performed in the session was repeated again after 30 minutes to verify the reliability and reproducibility of the Intra-evaluator test. The Inter-rater test was repeated after 7 days by the second rater to analyze reliability between the rater.
Device: handgrip strength · Device: Door handle device · Device: Tap device · Device: Door pull handle · Device: Linear Switch device · Device: Door Key device
First, the hand measurements of each volunteer were evaluated, followed by the measurement of handgrip strength using the Jamar® dynamometer. And later the tests were performed using the system that contains the 5 devices to quantify the hand strength.
Also known as: Jamar dynamometer
To evaluate the cylindrical grip movement, a door handle was used, which evaluated the full force in the range of motion.
To evaluate the spherical grip movement, a tap was used, which evaluated the full force in the range of motion.
To assess the hook grip movement, a door pull handle was used, which assessed the full force in the range of motion
To evaluate the pulp-pulp pinch movement, a switch was used, which evaluated the full force in the movement of the movement.
To assess the pulp-side pinch movement, a door key was used, which evaluated the full force in the range of motion.
Strength device
The strength of the cylindrical grip movement was quantified through the door handle device, the spherical grip strength through the tap device, the hook grip strength through the vertical door pull handle, the pulp-pulp pinch strength through the linear switch device and the pulp-side pinch strength through the key device. The test was quantified 3 times with a 1 minute interval between each test and the force throughout the range of motion. Unit of measure: newton (N).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Range of motion in angle
The test measured the range of motion of the door handle device, the tap device, door pull handle device and the door key device, 3 times with 1 minute interval for each test, in which all range of motion was measured from its start until its end. Unit of measure: Angle (º).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Range of motion millimeter
The test measured the range of motion in a linear switch device 3 times with a 1 minute interval for each test, in which all of the range of motion was measured from its start until its end. Unit measurement: millimeter (mm).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Anthropometric variables
The anthropometric measurement of the right hand was performed using an analog caliper, as it is an important parameter for functional evaluation, as it was of the following anatomical parts: total length of the hand (wrist crease to middle finger tip), longitudinal length of the palm from the hand (wrist crease to the proximal crease of the middle finger) and transverse length of the palm (lateral to medial line of the metacarpophalangeal muscles). Unit of measure: millimeter (mm)
Time frame: 5 minutes
Dynamometer Jamar Strength
To make the sample more homogeneous, the Jamar ® dynamometer was used to measure grip strength maximum contraction for 3 seconds. A single measurement was performed. Unit of measure: kilogram - force (kgf).
Time frame: 1 minute
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Mogi das Cruzes