CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04167800Updated Nov 20, 2019

Effects of Exercise Therapy on Pectus Carinatum

An interventional study of Exercise in Pectus Carinatum, sponsored by Acibadem University. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey. Open to male participants aged 10 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-20.

Sponsored by Acibadem University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years to 18 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Pectus Carinatum (PC); deformity in which the front wall of the chest protrudes forward. Non-invasive treatment approaches for PC include compression orthosis and exercises that target the deformity itself and concurrent postural impairment and scoliosis. In addition, the formation of muscles can help close the deformity. Although exercise training is recommended, there is no randomized study showing its effectiveness in the literature. Therefore, in our study, the investigators aimed to investigate the effectiveness of exercise therapy in addition to compression orthotics.

Read the detailed description

A chest wall deformity is a structural abnormality of the chest that can range from mild to severe. Chest wall deformities occur when the cartilage that connects the ribs grows unevenly. It is not clear why this happens, but the condition tends to run in families. The two most common types of chest wall deformity are Pectus excavatum and Pectus carinatum, Pectus carinatum goes far beyond a simple esthetical problem. It can be responsible of physical signs and symptoms and also has significant psychological impact. Defects tend to worsen during pubertal growth spurts and even during adult life. Recent evidence shows that these patients are at risk for a disturbed body image and reduced quality of life and many patients refer feelings of discomfort, shame, shyness, anxiety, anguish, and even depression, which can lead to social isolation. Chest pain or discomfort, especially when lying in prone position, intolerance to physical exercise, scoliosis, impaired shoulders and kyphotic position are some of the physical signs and symptoms.Non-invasive treatment approaches for PC include compression orthosis and exercises that target the deformity itself and concurrent postural impairment and scoliosis. In addition, the formation of muscles can help close the deformity. Most evidence of non-invasive treatment is retrospective or prospective case series. In a prospective case series, patients were instructed to perform chest wall strengthening exercises, but the effects of the exercises were not investigated . Although, exercise training is recommended, there is no randomized study showing its effectiveness in the literature. Therefore, in our study, the investigators aimed to investigate the effectiveness of exercise therapy in addition to compression orthotics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pectus Carinatum

Keywords

  • Pectus Carinatum
  • orthosis
  • exercise
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Acibadem University is the lead sponsor of 210 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with PC by doctor and indicated for the first time orthotic use
  • A correction pressure of less than 10 pounds per square inch in the compression test
  • 10-18 years old,
  • Discontented with this deformity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous orthosis use
  • Severe scoliosis (Cobb angle above 20 degrees)
  • Having chronic systemic disease
  • Having serious psychiatric illness
  • Having complex mixed pectus deformity
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control group

    All patients will be instructed to wear the device for 23 weeks for 12 weeks after being instructed on how to use the appropriate compression orthosis. The patient's relatives will be asked to keep a book in order to monitor their use. Patients who have not used the device for 5 consecutive days will be excluded from the study. The first group will be given awareness training on using one session orthosis and posture correction.

  • Active comparator
    Exercise Group

    In addition to the applications to the first group, mobilization, strengthening, posture and segmental breathing exercises will be given . All of these exercises will be combined with segmental breathing exercises depending on the location of the PC. Exercise therapy will be administered by a physiotherapist with 20 years of experience once a week and will be designed as a home program on the remaining days and will be asked to do 45 minutes twice a day (at least 4 times a week). The patient's relatives will be asked to keep a book to monitor the exercise. Patients who do not perform 5 consecutive exercise sessions will be excluded from the study. All treatments will be given for 12 weeks.

    Other: Exercise

Interventions

  • OtherExercise

    Orthosis, mobilization, strengthening, posture and segmental breathing exercises

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pectus severity index

    Thorax-caliper measurement: Pectus severity index (T.I.): (T3/T1) \* 100 (%), T1: upper edge of the manubrium, T2: Angulus Ludovici, T3: deepest point of the funnel chest, Pectus carinatum: T.I. \> 140.

    Time frame: Change from Pectus severity index at 12 weeks

  2. patient's perception of deformity

    patient's perception of deformity (0-10): The subject's self-perception of pectus carinatum was obtained through self-report using a scale from 0 (worst self-perception of pectus carinatum) to 10 (best self-perception of pectus carinatum).

    Time frame: Change from patient's perception of deformity at 12 weeks

  3. Global Rating of Change Score

    The responses for the Global Rating of Change Score is"much better (2)"; "slightly better(1)"; "stayed the same (0)";"slightly worse (-1)" or "much worse (-2)".

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 12 weeks

  4. Chest anthropometric measurement-1

    The extent of maximal protrusion:distance from the point of maximum protrusion to the estimated normal level of chest wall (milimeter).

    Time frame: Change from baseline the extent of maximal protrusion at 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. New York Posture Rating Chart for posture assessment

    The scores of the remaining 10 body alignment segments are summed, allowing a range ofoverall score between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing ideal posture

    Time frame: Change from baseline score of New York Posture Rating Chart at 12 weeks

  2. The Nuss Questionnaire modified for Adults (Patient Form)

    Disease-specific health-related quality of life assessment tool for patients with pectus The patient version of the NQ-mA includes 12 items, scored 1 to 4. Possible minimum and maximum scores are 12 and 48 in the patient form; higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

    Time frame: Change from baseline score of The Nuss Questionnaire modified for Adults (Patient Form) at 12 weeks

  3. Chest anthropometric measurement-2

    Craniocaudal length: craniocaudal length of protruding zone, measured through the point of maximal protrusion

    Time frame: Change from baseline craniocaudal length at 12 weeks

  4. The Nuss Questionnaire modified for Adults (Parent Form)

    Disease-specific health-related quality of life assessment tool for patients with pectus parent. The parent version of the NQ-mA includes 11 items, scored 1 to 4. Possible minimum and maximum scores are 11 and 44 in the parent form; higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

    Time frame: Change from baseline score of The Nuss Questionnaire modified for Adults (Parent Form) at 12 weeks

  5. Chest anthropometric measurement-3

    Lateral length: length of protruding zone, again measured through the point of maximum protrusion in the transverse direction

    Time frame: Change from baseline lateral length at 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
    Istanbul, Ataşehir 34752, Turkey
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Akkas Y, Gulay Peri N, Kocer B, Gulbahar G, Baran Aksakal FN. The prevalence of chest wall deformity in Turkish children. Turk J Med Sci. 2018 Dec 12;48(6):1200-1206. doi: 10.3906/sag-1807-180. PubMed 30541247 ↗
  • Bahadir AT, Kuru P, Afacan C, Ermerak NO, Bostanci K, Yuksel M. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the nuss questionnaire modified for adults. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;48(2):112-9. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.2.112. Epub 2015 Apr 5. PubMed 25883894 ↗
  • Banever GT, Konefal SH, Gettens K, Moriarty KP. Nonoperative correction of pectus carinatum with orthotic bracing. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006 Apr;16(2):164-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.164. PubMed 16646710 ↗
  • Canavan PK, Cahalin L. Integrated physical therapy intervention for a person with pectus excavatum and bilateral shoulder pain: a single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Nov;89(11):2195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.04.014. PubMed 18996250 ↗
  • Ewert F, Syed J, Wagner S, Besendoerfer M, Carbon RT, Schulz-Drost S. Does an external chest wall measurement correlate with a CT-based measurement in patients with chest wall deformities? J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Oct;52(10):1583-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Apr 27. PubMed 28499711 ↗
  • Haje SA, Bowen JR. Preliminary results of orthotic treatment of pectus deformities in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992 Nov-Dec;12(6):795-800. doi: 10.1097/01241398-199211000-00018. PubMed 1452753 ↗
  • Kravarusic D, Dicken BJ, Dewar R, Harder J, Poncet P, Schneider M, Sigalet DL. The Calgary protocol for bracing of pectus carinatum: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 May;41(5):923-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.01.058. PubMed 16677884 ↗
  • Lee RT, Moorman S, Schneider M, Sigalet DL. Bracing is an effective therapy for pectus carinatum: interim results. J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Jan;48(1):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.10.037. PubMed 23331813 ↗
  • Martinez-Ferro M, Bellia Munzon G, Fraire C, Abdenur C, Chinni E, Strappa B, Ardigo L. Non-surgical treatment of pectus carinatum with the FMF(R) Dynamic Compressor System. J Vis Surg. 2016 Mar 17;2:57. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2016.02.20. eCollection 2016. PubMed 29078485 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study protocol, ICF will be shared with the authors every two months

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04167800
Lead sponsor
Acibadem University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 19, 2019
Start date
Sep 12, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 15, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 20, 2019

Study contacts

Nuray Alaca, PhD
Contact
nuray.alaca@acibadem.edu.tr
+905324251290
Mustafa Yüksel, Prof
Contact
drmustafayuksel@gmail.com
+90216 566 57 79

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion