ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04165746EI-3Updated Mar 18, 2026

Early Institutionalization Intervention Impact Project

An interventional study of Foster Care and Caregiving Intervention in Socioemotional Development, Cognitive Ability and Behavioral and Neural Patterns of Attention, sponsored by Boston Children's Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged Up to 24 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-18.

Sponsored by Boston Children's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2023; still recruiting 3 years 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
220
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 24 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of early intervention (placement into foster care, and a caregiving training) on physical, cognitive, social and brain development and psychiatric symptomatology in children place in out-of-home care.

Read the detailed description

The Early Institutionalization Intervention Impact (EI-3) Project will document and compare the impact of enhanced institutional care on early childhood development to that of high-quality foster care. We will recruit a large (n= 220) samples of young children who have been identified as having to be removed from their families and we will randomize these children to two groups: enhanced institutional care (Group 1) or to enhanced foster care (Group 2). Institutional caregivers and Foster Parents will participate in a caregiving training, along with the child, that includes 8-1.5 hour sessions over 8-9 weeks.

In this Randomized Control Trial (RCT), we will assess the children in Groups 1 and 2 at the time they come into care and then at several follow-up time points (12 months, 24 months, 36 months of age). We hypothesize that children placed into foster/family care (FCG) will display enhanced socioemotional development, and enhanced behavioral and neural patterns of attention, cognition and social cognition, compared to children placed in enhanced institutional care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Socioemotional Development
  • Cognitive Ability
  • Behavioral and Neural Patterns of Attention
  • Brain Function
  • Psychopathology

Keywords

  • Brazil
  • children
  • foster care
  • institutionalization
  • attachment
  • brain function
  • language
  • growth
  • Intelligence Quotient (IQ)
  • early intervention
03

In context

Behavior

1,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Behavior; 313 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 220 is above the median of 120 across 1,197 interventional studies indexed under Behavior.

Browse Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Children's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 608 studies on the registry; 147 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (59%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 24 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • newly entering the institution system in and near São Paulo, Brazil, and the institution director or foster parent is the guardian at the time of baseline,
  • at the time of baseline assessment the child is less than 24 months old,
  • the child's birth weight must be at or above 2500 grams; none should be small or large for dates.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the child does not have a neurological or other genetic condition that severely impairs typical development (e.g. Cerebral Palsy, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, Down Syndrome)
  • the child is below 2500 grams.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
220 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Enhanced Institutional Care

    Caregivers at institutions will participate in a caregiving training, called Attachment VideoFeedback Intervention (AVI). During AVI a trained interventionist meets with a caregiver and child in the home environment. The AVI Interventionist will meet with caregivers and children for 8, 1.5-hours sessions over 8-9 weeks to discuss recordings of children and their caregivers. As described above, the sessions will focus on creating a positive atmosphere by reinforcing positive interactions.

    Behavioral: Caregiving Intervention

  • Experimental
    Enhanced Foster Care

    Foster parents will be recruited, consented to background checks, and trained in Portuguese. Hired foster parents will supported and monitored by project social workers and psychologists from local Foster Care programs. Foster parents will received frequent visits from the social workers, with visits occurring weekly for several months after placement of the child, then biweekly and later monthly. Project social workers will consult weekly with US staff experienced in dealing with young children in foster care. Additionally, foster parents will participate in the VIPP caregiving training, in the same format as that described in the Enhanced Institutional Care Arm: the VIPP Interventionist will meet with caregivers and children for 5, 2-hours sessions over 6-8 weeks to discuss recordings of children and their caregivers. As described above, the sessions will focus on creating a positive atmosphere by reinforcing positive interactions.

    Other: Foster Care · Behavioral: Caregiving Intervention

Interventions

  • OtherFoster Care

    Upon entry into the Child Protection System, if the child is assigned to one of the districts participating in the RCT, the court will notify the study team. Children that have been randomly assigned to Foster Care will be placed in a foster home within 48 hours of referral to the Family Court/Child Protection System. Children and Foster Parents will receive biweekly visits from Social Workers. Children and Foster parents will also participate in the caregiving intervention described below. Children will remain in the placement until such time as the social workers, psychologists and Family Court Judge determine that one of the following outcomes is appropriate: reunification with biological family or adoption.

  • BehavioralCaregiving Intervention

    During AVI an intervenor meets with a caregiver (foster parent or caregiver at the institution) and child in the home environment. During each session, the intervenor videotapes the caregiver and child doing play-based activities. During that meeting, the intervenor reviews the videos with the caregiver and provides positive, constructive feedback to the caregiver. AVI is aimed at increasing sensitivity in parents/caregivers in order to encourage positive interactions. The guiding principles are to create a positive environment and to convey that the caregiver is the expert on their own child. The AVI methodology was selected to be used as a method of caregiving intervention with the study participants due to its demonstrated results in its use with children in contexts of social vulnerability, as well as families included in the child protection system. This will be the first time that AVI is being used in foster and institutional care in Brazil.

    Also known as: Attachment Video Feedback intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Differences in security of attachment

    Strange Situation Procedure

    Time frame: baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos

  2. Differences in Alpha Electroencephalogram (EEG) Power, Coherence and Functional Connectivity

    EEG power

    Time frame: baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos

Secondary outcomes

  1. Differences in Cognition in early Childhood

    Mullen Scales of Early Learning, AGS Edition. For the subscales (Visual Receptions, Fine Motor, Gross Motor, Receptive, and Expressive Language), the minimum T-score is 20 and the maximum is 80. A higher score indicates a better outcome. The Composite Standard Score goes from 49 to 155; 155 is the best outcome.

    Time frame: baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos

  2. Differences in Attachment Disturbances and Disorders

    Disturbances of Attachment Interview

    Time frame: baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos

  3. Differences in Competence

    Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessments- Revised. Range for competence is 0-66. Ratings are 0, 1, 2 on 33 items. Higher scores are better outcomes. T-scores of 35 or lower on the Competence scale are also termed "of concern."

    Time frame: baseline, 12 mos, 24 mos, 36 mos

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04165746
Collaborators
University of Maryland, College Park, Tulane University, Instituto PENSI, Harvard University, Inter-American Development Bank, Lumos Foundation, Two Lilies Fund, Fundação Maria Cecilia Souto Vidigal
Responsible party
Charles Alexander Nelson III (Richard David Scott Chair in Pediatric Developmental Medicine Research, Professor of Pediatrics and Neuroscience, Boston Children's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 18, 2019
Start date
Mar 16, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 18, 2026

Study contacts

Charles A Nelson, PhD
Contact
charles.nelson@childrens.harvard.edu
617-355-0401
Nathan A Fox, PhD
principal investigator · University of Maryland
Charles A Nelson, PhD
principal investigator · BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL/ Harvard University
Charles H Zeanah, PhD
principal investigator · Tulane University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion