CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04157673Updated May 21, 2024Results posted

Imagine to Remember: Improving Medication Adherence in Pre- and Type 2 Diabetes

An interventional study of Episodic Future Thinking in Medication Adherence, sponsored by State University of New York at Buffalo. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-21.

Sponsored by State University of New York at Buffalo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
7
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Determine if an intervention consisting of future-thinking improves different facets of memory/executive function and/or decision-making.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to determine if a cognitive intervention is an efficacious method for improving medication adherence in adults with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. Participants in this study will complete assessment sessions, as well as intervention sessions over a 15 week period. During this time, medication adherence will be monitored using a MEMS cap. The investigators hypothesize that, following the cognitive intervention, there will be improvements in participants' medication adherence, as well as in facets of memory.

02

Conditions studied

  • Medication Adherence
03

In context

Lead sponsor

State University of New York at Buffalo is the lead sponsor of 287 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Adults over the age of 18 with prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes currently prescribed at least one oral medication for blood glucose regulation, or for related comorbidities e.g., hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and are relatively non-adherent to taking them (\< 80% of prescribed doses taken), but are motivated and/or have the intent to better comply with their medication regimen, will be studied.

Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: Participants must have a diagnosis of prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes within the last 2 years or meet criteria for prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes. The American Diabetes Association guidelines (Group, 2003) defines prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes as Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) 100mg/dl or greater, 2h glucose 140mg/dl or greater after Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT), or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of approximately 5.4% or greater.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant or lactating will be excluded from participation.

Substance use, abuse, or dependence: Individuals that currently have problems with substance dependence, addiction, or problematic substance use that would limit participation (e.g., binge drinkers, alcoholics, daily stimulant/opiate users) will be excluded.

Conditions that affect adherence: Participants should not have a condition that would limit participation which include medical conditions that would affect individuals' ability to use the computer for prolonged period of time; leave the individual unable to ambulate; unmanaged psychiatric disorder (e.g., depression, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia), cognitive impairment that would impact memory (e.g., symptomatic concussion), or an intellectual impairment that would impact study adherence. Additionally, participants should be able to attend to all intervention sessions. If a participant is not able to make most sessions (e.g. participant is out of town during most of the study for work or vacation travel), they may be excluded from the study Prior participation in similar studies: Individuals who have recently participated in a laboratory study using similar methods may also be excluded.

Use of medication adherence aids: individuals who currently use aids to assist with medication adherence (e.g., pill organizers, reminder apps)may be excluded

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
7 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Episodic Future Thinking introduced at 6 weeks

    The intervention being researched is called episodic future thinking (EFT), which consists of imagining specific instances of one's future. In this study, participants will engage in EFT focused on imagining taking one's medication, guided by a research staff member in their intervention sessions in addition to weekly check-in calls across an 8-week period following a 6-week, 8-week or 10-week baseline period. The research staff member will conduct the intervention session using a semi-structured interview format in which they work to identify situations in which the participant encounters challenges with taking their medication and will ask questions to prompt the participant to imagine what successful medication adherence would consist of. Sessions may also involve imagining positive events resulting from successful medication adherence and the details surrounding those events.

    Behavioral: Episodic Future Thinking

Interventions

  • BehavioralEpisodic Future Thinking

    This intervention involves participants engaging in episodic future thinking in order to improve their medication adherence and overall prospective thinking ability. This intervention will be introduced following a 6-week, 8-week or 10-week baseline period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Medication Adherence

    The investigators will measure medication adherence using a medication event monitoring system (MEMS) that measured the frequency and time the medication bottle is opened. Percent adherence was calculated \[(Quantity of pills dispensed - remaining)/(quantity prescribed per day\*days since last refill)\] \*100. Percent change was calculated from the last week of baseline to the first week of EFT and the last week of EFT

    Time frame: 15 weeks

  2. Prospective Memory

    Prospective memory ability will be assessed using an event-based version of the virtual week task. This is a computer-based task in which participants are asked to completed different events at specified times in the style of a board game. For the event-based task, participants were asked to complete an extra mouse click when certain words appeared on the screen. Possible scores ranged from 0 - 8 with higher scores being indicative of better prospective memory.

    Time frame: 15 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Delay Discounting

    Delay Discounting will be assessed using an adjusting amount task where choices will be present between a larger, delayed amount of money ($100) and a smaller, immediate amount. The smaller, immediate amount will begin at $50 on the first trial and will be adjusted following each trial. Participants cues created during treatment will be displayed during the task. To calculate discount rates area under the curve will be used, in which normalized values of delayed reward and normalized values of delay are used, resulting in values from 0.0 (all immediate choices) and 1.0 (all delayed choices) result. Units are proportion of maximum delayed reward x proportion of maximum delay.

    Time frame: 15 weeks

07

Results

Posted May 21, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEpisodic Future Thinking
Started4
Completed4
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryMedication Adherence

The investigators will measure medication adherence using a medication event monitoring system (MEMS) that measured the frequency and time the medication bottle is opened. Percent adherence was calculated \[(Quantity of pills dispensed - remaining)/(quantity prescribed per day\*days since last refill)\] \*100. Percent change was calculated from the last week of baseline to the first week of EFT and the last week of EFT

Time frame:
15 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Medication Adherence
percent changeEpisodic Future Thinking
Last week of Baseline to first week of treatment34 ± 28
Last week of baseline to last week of treatment42 ± 36
Statistical analysis
  • Episodic Future Thinking · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0002 (This is the overall treatment effect from the mixed model. p-value threshold set at p = 0.05.)
PrimaryProspective Memory

Prospective memory ability will be assessed using an event-based version of the virtual week task. This is a computer-based task in which participants are asked to completed different events at specified times in the style of a board game. For the event-based task, participants were asked to complete an extra mouse click when certain words appeared on the screen. Possible scores ranged from 0 - 8 with higher scores being indicative of better prospective memory.

Time frame:
15 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Number correct
Prospective Memory
Number correctEpisodic Future Thinking
Prospective Memory0.083 ± 0.104
Statistical analysis
  • Episodic Future Thinking · Mean difference (final values): 2.75Cohen's d effect size = 0.73
SecondaryDelay Discounting

Delay Discounting will be assessed using an adjusting amount task where choices will be present between a larger, delayed amount of money ($100) and a smaller, immediate amount. The smaller, immediate amount will begin at $50 on the first trial and will be adjusted following each trial. Participants cues created during treatment will be displayed during the task. To calculate discount rates area under the curve will be used, in which normalized values of delayed reward and normalized values of delay are used, resulting in values from 0.0 (all immediate choices) and 1.0 (all delayed choices) result. Units are proportion of maximum delayed reward x proportion of maximum delay.

Time frame:
15 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · proportion max reward x proportion delay
Delay Discounting
proportion max reward x proportion delayEpisodic Future Thinking
Delay Discounting0.355 ± 0.295
Statistical analysis
  • Episodic Future Thinking · Mean difference (final values): 0.355cohen's d effect size for mean differences pre to post-treatment = 1.20

Adverse events

Collected over 15 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Episodic Future Thinking0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Episodic Future Thinking
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years4
>=65 years0
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Episodic Future Thinking
Male1
Female2
Non-binary1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Episodic Future Thinking
American Indian or Alaska Native1
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White2
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Episodic Future Thinking
United States4
Baseline Medication Adherence
Baseline Medication Adherence(Percent)Episodic Future Thinking
Mean57.1 (7.1 to 92.9)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University at Buffalo, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Behavioral Medicine
    Buffalo, New York 14214, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 22, 2020
  • Informed consent form · Jul 22, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04157673
Lead sponsor
State University of New York at Buffalo
Responsible party
Leonard Epstein (SUNY Distinguished Professor and Division Chief, Behavioral Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 8, 2019
Start date
Sep 1, 2019
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2021
Completion
Aug 1, 2021
Results posted
May 21, 2024
Last update
May 21, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion