ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04152447Updated Feb 15, 2022Results posted

Virtual Reality for Pain Management in Orthopaedic Patients

An interventional study of VR device in Pain, Musculoskeletal, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-15.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
35
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  1. Investigators will determine the feasibility of a virtual reality pain control program (VR-PCP) as a non-pharmacologic adjunct for pain management while in the hospital (i.e. patient ability and willingness to use the system measured by average time spent on the device).
  2. Investigators will evaluate if there is a difference between the average daily use of opioid medications taken by patients who received usual care pain management versus patients using a VR-PCP.
  3. Investigators will assess for differences in short-term postoperative patient-reported pain intensity (PROMIS Patient Intensity v1.0) for patients who received usual care pain management versus those who also have access to a VR-PCP.
Read the detailed description

Orthopedic surgeons rank third amongst physician prescribers of opioids to adults in the United States4. The deleterious effects of the opioid epidemic have been well studied at both the individual and population level.2 3 Orthopaedic trauma patients in particular have high rates of psychological stress and disability related to protracted narcotic usage 5. However, opioid medications may not need to be the mainstay of pharmacologic pain management for patients with orthopaedic injuries. For example, one recent study from the Netherlands showed that 82% of patients with ankle fractures treated in the United States were prescribed opioids at discharge, whereas only 6% of Dutch patients were given narcotics. 6

Non-pharmacologic interventions for pain management in the acute orthopaedic injury setting deserve full investigation. Virtual reality for pain management has been used in burn patients, pediatric patients, for procedures under local anesthesia and in the chronic pain setting. Results of these investigations are promising and demonstrate reduced narcotic usage and improved pain scores.7 8 9 Currently, there are no published reports on the use of virtual reality for pain management in the orthopaedic literature. By investigating VR as a non-pharmacologic intervention for pain, orthopaedic trauma patients may be able to avoid the known risks of narcotic medication while still controlling their pain and regaining function after their injury. Our study will lay groundwork for longer-term studies to evaluate the impact of virtual reality on functional outcomes, opioid usage after hospital discharge and patient satisfaction scores. VR can also be investigated for post-operative pain control across other orthopedic subspecialties.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Musculoskeletal

Browse trials for

03

In context

Musculoskeletal Pain

511 studies on the registry are indexed under Musculoskeletal Pain; 113 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 35 is below the median of 66 across 358 interventional studies indexed under Musculoskeletal Pain.

Browse Musculoskeletal Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,582 studies on the registry; 451 are open to participants now.

Of its 221 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 168 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 and older
  • Patients who sustained factures treated with open reduction internal fixation. Polytrauma patients whose fractures are definitively fixed in one discrete operating room visit will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment
  • Injuries requiring staged surgical fixation (i.e. ex-fix to ORIF)
  • Seizure disorder or other contraindication to VR usage
  • Significant medical complications during hospitalization precluding use of a VR headset
  • Significant surgical complication during hospitalization requiring unanticipated return to the operating room during index admission.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
35 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of care

    This arm describes the standard protocol used to aid in orthopedic recovery.

  • Active comparator
    VR device

    Patients randomly assigned to the experimental arm of the study were provided an Oculus Go™ device for the duration of their hospitalization. The device featured a headset with a 1280 x 1440, 60 Hz refresh rate LCD display, spatial audio (via built-in speakers; headphones were not provided or used to our knowledge, despite compatibility) and the ability to track 3 degrees of rotational freedom; it was compatible with glasses and included a soft, adjustable strap for optimal, user-based fit. A single controller, capable of recognizing hand motion, pointing, and clicking was also included.

    Device: VR device

Interventions

  • DeviceVR device

    Patients use a VR device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Opioid Usage During the Postoperative Hospitalization

    Opioid usage during the postoperative hospitalization measured in average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Higher number is a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Post-operative period, an average of 3 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Stay

    Length of Stay is measured as days following surgery and before discharge.

    Time frame: Post-operative period, an average of 3 days

  2. Patient-reported Pain Scores

    Patients had to answer a series of questionnaires regarding their pain level at baseline, and daily during hospitalization. The scores were tallied up. This scale is referred to as the PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale v1.0, which tracks patient reported outcomes on a scale where 3 is the minimum and 15 is the maximum. PROMIS scores are taken daily post-operation, and the score reported is the reflection of the average PROMIS score of the post-operative days, since patients did not stay for the same length following surgery. Higher score is a worse outcome. Minimum value is 0, Maximum value is 100.

    Time frame: Post-operative period, an average of 3 days

07

Results

Posted Feb 15, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard of CareVR Device
Started1619
Completed1314
Not completed35
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Treatment plan switched to an ineligible criteria11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01
Withdrew: Found ineligible after enrolling11
Withdrew: Did not receive vr headset in time.02

Outcome measures

PrimaryOpioid Usage During the Postoperative Hospitalization

Opioid usage during the postoperative hospitalization measured in average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Higher number is a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Post-operative period, an average of 3 days
Reported as:
Mean · Morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day
Opioid Usage During the Postoperative Hospitalization
Morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/dayStandard of CareVR Device
Opioid Usage During the Postoperative Hospitalization30.3 (12.7 to 42.2)30.8 (18.7 to 47.2)
SecondaryLength of Stay

Length of Stay is measured as days following surgery and before discharge.

Time frame:
Post-operative period, an average of 3 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Stay
daysStandard of CareVR Device
Length of Stay2.5 (2 to 4)2 (1 to 4)
SecondaryPatient-reported Pain Scores

Patients had to answer a series of questionnaires regarding their pain level at baseline, and daily during hospitalization. The scores were tallied up. This scale is referred to as the PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale v1.0, which tracks patient reported outcomes on a scale where 3 is the minimum and 15 is the maximum. PROMIS scores are taken daily post-operation, and the score reported is the reflection of the average PROMIS score of the post-operative days, since patients did not stay for the same length following surgery. Higher score is a worse outcome. Minimum value is 0, Maximum value is 100.

Time frame:
Post-operative period, an average of 3 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Patient-reported Pain Scores
score on a scaleStandard of CareVR Device
Patient-reported Pain Scores9.62 (9.0 to 11.3)9.0 (7.0 to 11.5)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data was collected over the span of 1 year and 2 months, from the consent of the first patient through the discharge of the final patient from the hospital. For each patient, Adverse events were tracked on the period from baseline to discharge from the hospital, which differed per patient but averaged to around 3 days following surgery.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard of Care0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)
VR Device0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Standard of CareVR DeviceTotal
<=18 years011
Between 18 and 65 years6814
>=65 years7512
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standard of CareVR DeviceTotal
Female10717
Male3710
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Standard of CareVR DeviceTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White121325
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Standard of CareVR DeviceTotal
United States131427
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Aug 13, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 29, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 15, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04152447
Collaborators
Orthopaedic Trauma Association
Responsible party
Marilyn Heng (Principal Investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 5, 2019
Start date
Aug 29, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 13, 2020
Completion
Nov 13, 2020
Results posted
Feb 15, 2022
Last update
Feb 15, 2022

Study contacts

Marilyn Heng, MD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion