CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04134988Updated Dec 19, 2019

Effects of an Adapted Physical Activity With an Interactive Gaming Platform on Fear of Falling and Risk of Falling

An interventional study of Medimoov and Standard psychomotor therapy in Falls (Accidents) in Old Age, sponsored by Joel Belmin. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-19.

Sponsored by Joel Belmin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the effects of an adapted physical activity with an interactive gaming platform on fall apprehension and risks. Half of the participants will receive a rehabilitation program using the Medimoov gaming program, the other half will receive the standard rehabilitation program.

Read the detailed description

Medimoov is an innovative interactive gaming platform offering adapted physical activity. Like most serious games, it targets both physical and cognitive components. Studies that evaluate serious games lack an appropriate control group, thus this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of serious games played with the Medimoov platform on fear of falling and fall risks. This pilot study is an open randomized controlled trial in parallel groups with blind data collection for the primary outcome.

The intervention group will follow bi-weekly sessions with Medimoov. The control group will follow the usual rehabilitation program: the standard psychomotor therapy program.

Both interventions will be consistent with rehabilitation programs prescribed by participants' physicians. Each intervention, guided by a psychomotor therapist, will last eight weeks with bi-weekly sessions of 35 minutes.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Three assessments will be conducted focusing on physical and cognitive capacities. The first assessment will be conducted five or fewer days before the beginning of the rehabilitation program, the second will occur during week 4 and the third one during week 8, at the end of the rehabilitation program. Assessments will be blinded: assessors will not know the assigned group of each participant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Falls (Accidents) in Old Age

Keywords

  • Fall
  • Older adults
  • Fear of falling
  • Serious games
  • Technology
  • Randomized controlled trial
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Joel Belmin as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • To be at least 65 years old,
  • To be able to give consent,
  • French-speaking,
  • To be able to stand upright in a bipedal position, feet together for a time greater than 10 seconds with/without an assistive device,
  • To have a score ≥13 on the Short Fall Efficacy Scale (FES-I) (moderate fear of falling).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not being able to answer the questionnaires,
  • Not being able to correctly distinguish the elements on the screen,
  • To be in palliative care,
  • To be under a legal protection measure,
  • To score under 16 at the Mini Mental State Examination,
  • To have an acute pathology,
  • To have had recent hip surgery (\<2 months).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Medimoov

    Bi-weekly 35-minute sessions of an adaptated physical activity administered by a psychomotor therapist for 8 weeks.

    Other: Medimoov

  • Active comparator
    Standard rehabilitation

    Bi-weekly 35-minute sessions of the standard psychomotor therapy for 8 weeks.

    Other: Standard psychomotor therapy

Interventions

  • OtherMedimoov

    The Medimoov game platform (created by NaturalPad©) is a physio-gaming medical device, which comes in the form of functional and postural rehabilitation software. Associating movement capture and videogames, Medimoov contributes to the older adults' motivation and engagement and offers adapted physical activities.

  • OtherStandard psychomotor therapy

    Psychomotor therapists are among the professionals recommended by the French national health authority. They intervene on psychomotor dimensions of falls, namely the motor, sensory and cognitive aspects.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the Score Physical Performance Battery

    This 5-minute test focuses on the static balance, walks, lower limb strength and fall risk. The score varies between 0 and 12, a score under 6 indicates a low performance and a high fall risk. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Before, at mid-term (Week 4) and at the end of the program (Week 8).

  2. Change in the Fall Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)

    This five-minute questionnaire is composed of seven questions on daily activities and focus on the fear of falling. Each question can be scored between 1 (" Not at all concerned ") to 4 points (" Very concerned "). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Before, at mid-term (Week 4) and at the end of the program (Week 8).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the Victoria Stroop test

    This 5-minute test to evaluate inhibition and selective attention is scored according to the realization time and errors in realization. The test includes three parts, the time of realization and the number or error are compared to a standard for each part of the test. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Before, at mid-term (Week 4) and at the end of the program (Week 8)

  2. Change in the Trail Making Test A and B

    This evaluation focuses on executive functions including number and letter recognition, cognitive flexibility, visual scan, and motor functions. This evaluation lasts 10 minutes. The score of each test (A and B) is the number of seconds required to complete the task and is compared to a standard: for the Test A a score above 78 indicates a deficiency, for the Test B a score above 273 indicates a deficiency. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Before, at mid-term (Week 4) and at the end of the program (Week 8)

  3. Change in the Timed Up And Go

    This test consists in standing up from a chair with armrest, walking three meters, turning around and coming back to sit. The test lasts less than one minute, fall risk is identified if the score is inferior than one and the duration of the test superior to 20 seconds.

    Time frame: Before, at mid-term (Week 4) and at the end of the program (Week 8)

  4. Change in the One-Leg Stand test

    Standing in one leg as long as possible on each foot. This time is compared to a standard. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Time frame: Before, at mid-term (Week 4) and at the end of the program (Week 8)

  5. Satisfaction questionnaire

    Composed of 10 questions, its aim is to evaluate the participants' experience and the self-confidence after the rehabilitation program. The questionnaire lasts approximately 2 minutes.

    Time frame: At the end of the program (Week 8)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix et Sorbonne Université
    Ivry-sur-Seine, Val De Marne 94200, France
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dargent-Molina P, Cassou B. Prévention des chutes chez les personnes âgées de plus de 75 ans vivant à leur domicile: analyse des interventions efficaces et perspectives de santé publique. Bull Épidémiologique Hebd. 2017;16-17:336-43.
  • Tallon G, Seilles A, Melia G, et al. Intérêt du serious game Medimoov pour améliorer l'autonomie fonctionnelle chez la personne âgée institutionnalisée. Montpellier, 2015.
  • Lister C, West JH, Cannon B, Sax T, Brodegard D. Just a fad? Gamification in health and fitness apps. JMIR Serious Games. 2014 Aug 4;2(2):e9. doi: 10.2196/games.3413. PubMed 25654660 ↗
  • Skjaeret N, Nawaz A, Morat T, Schoene D, Helbostad JL, Vereijken B. Exercise and rehabilitation delivered through exergames in older adults: An integrative review of technologies, safety and efficacy. Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jan;85(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 28. PubMed 26559887 ↗
  • Melia G, Seilles A, Tallon G. Évaluation d'un jeu sérieux thérapeutique. 2025; 4.
  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available. PubMed 1202204 ↗
  • Siegrist M. Test-Retest Reliability of Different Versions of the Stroop Test. J Psychol. 1997; 131: 299-306.
  • Hauer KA, Kempen GI, Schwenk M, Yardley L, Beyer N, Todd C, Oster P, Zijlstra GA. Validity and sensitivity to change of the falls efficacy scales international to assess fear of falling in older adults with and without cognitive impairment. Gerontology. 2011;57(5):462-72. doi: 10.1159/000320054. Epub 2010 Oct 22. PubMed 20975251 ↗
  • Freire AN, Guerra RO, Alvarado B, Guralnik JM, Zunzunegui MV. Validity and reliability of the short physical performance battery in two diverse older adult populations in Quebec and Brazil. J Aging Health. 2012 Aug;24(5):863-78. doi: 10.1177/0898264312438551. Epub 2012 Mar 15. PubMed 22422762 ↗
  • Wagner S, Helmreich I, Dahmen N, Lieb K, Tadic A. Reliability of three alternate forms of the trail making tests a and B. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Jun;26(4):314-21. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr024. Epub 2011 May 15. PubMed 21576092 ↗
  • Lapierre N, Um Din N, Igout M, Chevrier J, Belmin J. Effects of a Rehabilitation Program Using a Patient-Personalized Exergame on Fear of Falling and Risk of Falls in Vulnerable Older Adults: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Group Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Aug 26;10(8):e24665. doi: 10.2196/24665. PubMed 34435968 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 19, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04134988
Lead sponsor
Joel Belmin
Responsible party
Joel Belmin (Professor, RIVAGES) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 22, 2019
Start date
Dec 9, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 19, 2019

Study contacts

Nolwenn Lapierre, PhD
Contact
nolwennlapierre@gmail.com
+33766673212
Joël Belmin, MD, PhD
Contact
j.belmin@aphp.fr
+33149594565
Joël Belmin, MD, PhD
principal investigator · RIVAGES

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion