CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04128566MechSensUpdated Dec 27, 2024

MechSens - Dose-response Relationship of in Vivo Ambulatory Load and Mechanosensitive Cartilage Biomarkers

An interventional study of walking stress test in Articular Cartilage Degeneration, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-27.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
87
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is to investigate the effects of age, tissue status and the presence of inflammation on the in vivo dose-response relationship of ambulatory load and mechanosensitive blood markers of articular cartilage.

Read the detailed description

Articular cartilage is an avascular and aneural tissue that facilitates joint motion with minimal friction. Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disease that affects the whole joint resulting in severe articular cartilage degeneration with a prevalence worldwide of more than 10%. Although the molecular mechanisms that trigger the pathological changes in OA are largely unknown, the ability of chondrocytes to respond to load is believed to play a critical role in maintaining healthy tissue and in the initiation of OA. Different modes of ambulation have resulted in increases of specific blood markers, and immobilization during bed-rest lead to reductions in the same blood markers. However, the dose-response relationship between ambulatory load and mechanosensitive blood markers, its biological variation in healthy persons and in patients with a high risk of developing OA (e.g. with increasing age or after joint injury), and its relevance for cartilage degeneration are unknown. Based on reported differences in the magnitude of load-induced changes in blood markers of articular cartilage depending on the type of physical activity,an experimental framework of a systematic and controlled modulation of weight bearing during a walking stress test was previously tested and will be employed in this study. The following specific aims will be addressed:

Specific Aim 1: Investigate the in vivo dose-response relationship between ambulatory load and mechanosensitive blood markers of articular cartilage using controlled weight bearing during a walking stress test and age, tissue status and the presence of inflammation as experimental paradigms.

Specific Aim 2: Investigate the prognostic ability of the individual in vivo dose-response relationship between ambulatory load and mechanosensitive blood markers of articular cartilage for articular cartilage degeneration.

Healthy subjects and subjects with previous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury aged 20 to 50 years will be clinically assessed, undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of both knees, and complete questionnaires on physical function and physical activity. Participants will wear an activity monitor for the 7 days before and during the experiment to record their physical activity level. Each participant will complete three walking stress tests (30 minutes walking) on separate days with repeated blood sampling to assess load-induced changes in levels of mechanosensitive blood markers (COMP, MMP-3, PRG-4, ADAMTS-4). In each test, one of three different ambulatory loads will be applied (80, 100 and 120% body weight (BW)). Inflammation will be assessed as IL-6 serum concentration. Tissue status of articular knee cartilage will be assessed as MRI T2 relaxation time and cartilage thickness at baseline and at 24-month follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Articular Cartilage Degeneration

Keywords

  • articular cartilage
  • mechanosensitive blood markers of articular cartilage
  • walking stress test
  • ambulatory load
  • articular cartilage thinning
  • anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury
  • articular cartilage quality
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland is the lead sponsor of 968 studies on the registry; 191 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria for group 1 and 3:

  • Being physically active (>2hours/week)
  • No previous known knee injury:

Inclusion Criteria for group 2 and 4:

  • Being physically active (>2hours/week)
  • ACL rupture between 2 to 10 years prior to the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Age \< 20 years (before maturation) or age > 60 years
  • Advanced general sarcopenia (degenerative loss of muscle mass in aging) and high likelihood of osteoarthritic changes
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2:
  • Excessive skin movement that influences the gait analysis
  • Inability to walk for 30 minutes
  • Contraindications for a knee MRI
  • Active rheumatic disorder
  • Prior neuromuscular impairment (e.g. stroke)
  • Conditions other than knee injury that could cause abnormal patterns of locomotion
  • Prior hip, knee, and ankle prosthesis
  • Osteotomy of the lower extremities - Prior spine surgery
  • Other major medical problems
  • Pregnancy
  • Investigators and their immediate families are not permitted to be subjects
  • Persons who have previously completed or withdrawn from this study
  • Patients currently enrolled in another experimental (interventional) protocol
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
87 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1: healthy subjects aged between 20 and 30 years

    healthy subjects aged between 20 and 30 years

    Procedure: walking stress test

  • Experimental
    Group 2: previous ACL injury aged between 20 and 30 years

    subjects with previous Anterior cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury aged between 20 and 30 years

    Procedure: walking stress test

  • Experimental
    Group 3: healthy subjects aged between 40 and 60 years

    healthy subjects aged between 40 and 60 years

    Procedure: walking stress test

  • Experimental
    previous ACL injury aged between 40 and 60 years

    subjects with previous ACL injury aged between 40 and 60 years

    Procedure: walking stress test

Interventions

  • Procedurewalking stress test

    walk for 30 minutes on a treadmill with either one of the three loading conditions (reduced load = 80% Bodyweight (BW), normal load = 100% BW, increased load = 120% BW). The order of experimental condition will be applied in randomized order determined by block randomization, and the same self-selected walking speed will be used for all conditions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in serum levels of Interleukin 6 (IL-6), ( mechanosensitive blood marker of articular cartilage) in pg/ml

    Change in serum level of Interleukin 6 (IL-6), (mechanosensitive blood marker of articular cartilage) in pg/ml

    Time frame: Before walking stress test (t0= Baseline), immediately after walking stress test (t1), 30-minutes after walking stress test (t2) and after two additional 90-minute resting intervals after walking stress test (t3 and t4)

  2. Change in serum levels of Cartilage oligomeric matrix Protein (COMP) (mechanosensitive blood marker of articular cartilage) in U/l

    Change in serum levels of Cartilage oligomeric matrix Protein (COMP) (mechanosensitive blood marker of articular cartilage) in U/l

    Time frame: Before walking stress test (t0= Baseline), immediately after walking stress test (t1), 30-minutes after walking stress test (t2) and after two additional 90-minute resting intervals after walking stress test (t3 and t4)

  3. Change in serum levels of Matrix metallopeptidase (MMP)-3 (mechanosensitive blood marker of articular cartilage) in ng/ml

    Change in serum levels of Matrix metallopeptidase (MMP)-3 (mechanosensitive blood marker of articular cartilage) in ng/ml

    Time frame: Before walking stress test (t0= Baseline), immediately after walking stress test (t1), 30-minutes after walking stress test (t2) and after two additional 90-minute resting intervals after walking stress test (t3 and t4)

  4. Change in serum levels of Matrix metallopeptidase (MMP)-9 (mechanosensitive blood marker of articular cartilage) in ng/ml

    Change in serum levels of Matrix metallopeptidase (MMP)-9 (mechanosensitive blood marker of articular cartilage) in ng/ml

    Time frame: Before walking stress test (t0= Baseline), immediately after walking stress test (t1), 30-minutes after walking stress test (t2) and after two additional 90-minute resting intervals after walking stress test (t3 and t4)

  5. Change in serum levels of Proteoglycan (PGR)-4 (mechanosensitive blood marker of articular cartilage) in mg/ml

    Change in serum levels of Proteoglycan (PGR)-4 (mechanosensitive blood marker of articular cartilage) in mg/ml

    Time frame: Before walking stress test (t0= Baseline), immediately after walking stress test (t1), 30-minutes after walking stress test (t2) and after two additional 90-minute resting intervals after walking stress test (t3 and t4)

  6. Change in serum levels of A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS-4) (mechanosensitive blood marker of articular cartilage) in ng/mL

    Change in serum levels of A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS-4) (mechanosensitive blood marker of articular cartilage) in ng/mL

    Time frame: Before walking stress test (t0= Baseline), immediately after walking stress test (t1), 30-minutes after walking stress test (t2) and after two additional 90-minute resting intervals after walking stress test (t3 and t4)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in modified Knee Society Score (KSS) score

    KSS consists of a total of 34 questions divided into four subscales which are rated separately. It consists of a Knee Score, which only rates the knee joint itself (e.g. pain, range of motion, stability and radiographic alignment), and a Function Score (patient's walking distance, climbing stairs and use of walking aids). The higher the score, the better the outcome in all subscales.

    Time frame: Before walking stress test (t0= Baseline), at 12-month follow-up, at 24-month follow-up

  2. Change in modified Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) score

    The KOOS evaluates both short-term and long-term consequences of knee injury. It holds 42 items in 5 separately scored subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). The five KOOS subscales rate on a 5-point Likert-scale as extremely important, very important, moderately important, somewhat important, or not important at all.

    Time frame: Before walking stress test (t0= Baseline), at 12-month follow-up, at 24-month follow-up

  3. Change in Physical activity (PA) level

    PA level ( number of steps taken, PA intensity) will be recorded using an activity monitor (ActiGraph GT3X+, Pensacola, FL, USA)

    Time frame: during the 7 days prior to Baseline and during the Walking stress test (t0= Baseline)

  4. Joint kinematics and kinetics

    For the the three loading conditions at the Walking stress test, an inertial sensor system (RehaGait®, Hasomed GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany) will be used to collect joint angle curves at the ankle, knee and hip.

    Time frame: during the Walking stress test (t0= Baseline)

  5. Change in heart rate (beats per minute)

    To assess and compare the cardiovascular stress subjects experience during the walking stress tests the heart rate will be measured.

    Time frame: During the walking stress test until 10 minutes after the stress test

  6. Change in T2 relaxation time from baseline to follow-up

    Tissue status will be determined by the T2 relaxation time of weight bearing knee cartilage analyzed by Magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI) of both knees

    Time frame: MRI at least 7 days prior to the Walking stress test (t0= Baseline) and MRI 24 months after baseline

  7. Change in cartilage thickness from baseline to follow-up

    Tissue status will be determined by the thickness of weight bearing knee cartilage analyzed by Magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI) of both knees

    Time frame: MRI at least 7 days prior to the Walking stress test (t0= Baseline) and MRI 24 months after baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel
    Basel, 4031, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Herger S, Vach W, Nuesch C, Liphardt AM, Egloff C, Mundermann A. Dose-response relationship of in vivo ambulatory load and mechanosensitive cartilage biomarkers-The role of age, tissue health and inflammation: A study protocol. PLoS One. 2022 Aug 19;17(8):e0272694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272694. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35984848 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 27, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04128566
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Collaborators
Swiss National Science Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 16, 2019
Start date
Jan 8, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 7, 2024
Completion
Jul 7, 2024
Last update
Dec 27, 2024

Study contacts

Annegret Muendermann, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion