CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04117815Updated Jan 20, 2022

Hair-Safe Study: Scalp Cooling for Hair Saving in Women Undergoing Chemotherapy

An observational study in Breast Cancer Female and Alopecia, sponsored by Medical University Innsbruck. Completed at 1 site in Austria. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-20.

Sponsored by Medical University Innsbruck · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
128
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Chemotherapy (CT) is a frequent and well established treatment in women with breast and gynecological tumors. Alopecia is one of the most common side effects of CT seriously impairing patient quality of life and body image. While other CT associated side effects can be controlled by supportive treatment strategy, adequate preventive measures for alopecia have been lacking. New evidence supports the efficacy of scalp cooling for alopecia prevention during CT.

Read the detailed description

Scalp cooling using cooling caps has been identified as an effective treatment option against CT-induced alopecia in numerous European countries. Originally, crashed ice was used to cause vasoconstriction and consequently diminish CT uptake to hair follicles during CT. Soon, this method turned out impractically and has been displaced by cooling caps which allow a constant cooling of the scalp while easy handling.

However, effectiveness of scalp cooling depends on different factors such as hair texture, chemotherapy regimen, dose of chemotherapy, cooling time, and compliance of the patient.

Recent studies focused on alopecia prevention more than on patients' quality of life and satisfaction. Therefore, data on routine use of cool caps with a focus on efficiency in daily routine and patients' acceptability are missing.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide results assessed by the use of a patient's report about his or her own health condition "without amendment or interpretation by a clinician or anyone else" and are a valuable source of information when evaluating clinical interventions or treatment toxicity in intervention studies in oncology. PROs can be perfectly used to evaluate the implication of scalp cooling regarding hair preservation but also quality of life outcome which seems even more important.

Women with breast- or gynecological cancer receiving taxane- or anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy are included in the study. Chemotherapy can be neoadjuvant, adjuvant or palliative. Up to two lines of chemotherapy are allowed. Scalp cooling with a maintenance temperature of 17°C will be initiated 30 minutes prior to each chemotherapy cycle and stopped 90 minutes after CT. Patients are assessed for alopecia and qualitiy of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer Female
  • Alopecia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Alopecia

609 studies on the registry are indexed under Alopecia; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 128 is above the median of 100 across 63 observational studies indexed under Alopecia.

Browse Alopecia studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University Innsbruck is the lead sponsor of 182 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study is designed as a clinical trial for women with breast or gyneological cancer, planning to undergo taxane- or anthracyline-based CT in a routine clinical setting.

For the purpose of comparison, a reference sample is included in the study.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with breast or gynecological cancer planning to undergo CT
  • CT can be neoadjuvant, adjuvant or palliative
  • Up to two lines of CT are allowed. Adjuvant therapy counts as one line
  • CT regime is associated with alopecia
  • CT must be planned for at least 4 cycles of taxane or anthracyline-based CT regimen
  • written informed consent age 18 and older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Migraine
  • Cold allergy/Cold Agglutinins/Morbus Raynaud
  • Hematological malignancies (Leukemia, non Hodgkins and other generalized lymphomas)
  • Manifest scalp metastases
  • Overt cognitive impairment
  • Insufficient knowledge of German language

Reference Population:

  • Patients with breast or gynecological cancer planning to undergo CT
  • CT can be adjuvant, neoadjuvant or palliative
  • up to two lines of CT are allowed. Adjuvant therapy counts as one line.
  • CT regime is associated with alopecia
  • CT must be planned for at least 4 cycles of taxane or anthracycline-based CT regime
  • Refuse to undergo scalp cooling
  • Patients who have been excluded for the study group for the reason of migraine
  • written informed consent
  • age 18 and older
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
128 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • study group

    Patients with breast or gynecological cancer planning to undergo chemotherapy Chemotherapy can be neoadjuvant, adjuvant or palliative Up to two lines of chemotherapy are allowed. Adjuvant therapy counts as one line. Chemotherapy regime is associated with alopecia. Chemotherapy must be planned for at least 4 cycles of taxane or antracycline- based chemotherapy regimen No alopecia of any reason (up-front) No overt cognitive impairment and fluent in German Written informed consent Age 18 and older

    Device: Paxman Scalp Cooling System · Other: Alopecia Assessments

  • reference group

    For the purpose of comparison, a reference sample will be included in the study applying to the following inclusion criteria: Patients with breast or gynecological cancer planning to undergo chemotherapy Chemotherapy can be neoadjuvant, adjuvant or palliative Up to two lines of chemotherapy are allowed. Adjuvant therapy counts as one line. Chemotherapy regime is associated with alopecia. Chemotherapy must be planned for at least 4 cycles of taxane or antracycline- based chemotherapy regimen Refuse to undergo scalp cooling Patients who have been excluded for the study group for the reason of migraine Written informed consent Age 18 and older Patients from the reference group complete the same survey as the study group. Group comparisons will be adjusted for baseline body image and reasons for refusal.

    Other: Alopecia Assessments

Interventions

  • DevicePaxman Scalp Cooling System

    All patients who accomplish inclusion criteria and do not exhibit any contraindication undergo scalp cooling with the following conditions: * Minimum 30 minutes pre-infusion cooling * Cooling for the duration of chemotherapy infusion * Minimum 90 minutes post-infusion cooling Scalp cooling is performed within the study group at each CT session.

  • OtherAlopecia Assessments

    Patients (study group and reference group) will be assessed at the following time Points: * Baseline * at the half-way Point of the cyles * at the last CT cycle * 3 months after completion of Treatment * 6-9 months after treatment completion The assesments include the following * Photographs of the head, which are evaluated using the CTCAEv4.0 * Questionnaire including the NCI- PRO-CTCAE-ITEMS, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-B23, Body Image Scale, PRO-CTACAEs and Hairdex questionnaire

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Extent of hair preservation

    Hair preservation assessed by photo documentation using VAS (Visual Analogue Scale (Grade 1: \< 25% hair loss; Grade 2: 25-50% of hair loss; Grade 3: 50-75%)

    Time frame: on average of 15 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Adverse Events (CTCAE 4.03)

    CTCAE are descriptive terminology for reporting adverse events including a grading for each of these adverse events. This 5-point grading has a range from mild symptoms requiring no intervention (grade 1) to life-threatening consequences (grade 4) and finally death (grade 5)

    Time frame: on average of 15 month

  2. Assessment of patient satisfaction (HAIRDEX)

    The Hairdex questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for the evaluation of quality of life in patients with hair diseases (i.e. validated in patients with alopecia diffusa and androgenica). Using a five-point Likert Scale (never=0 to always =4), the questionnaire encompasses 48 items composing the 5 subscales symptoms, functioning, emotionals, self-confidence and stigmatization. All scales range from 0-100, higher values indicate higher impairment.

    Time frame: on average of 15 month

  3. Assessment of quality of life (EORTC) QLQ-C30

    he EORTC QLQ-C30 Aaronson is a self-report measure consisting of 30 items with a 4 point Likert Scale response format. It targets on functioning (physical, role emotional, cognitive, and social functioning and global health/QoL scale) and symptoms (fatigue, nausea and emesis, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea, financial difficulties). All scales and single items range from 0-100.

    Time frame: on average of 15 month

  4. Assessment of quality of life (EORTC) BR23

    The 23-item EORTC QLQ BR23 contains two breast cancer specific functional scales (body image and sexuality) and three symptom scales evaluating arm symptoms, breast symptoms, and systemic therapy symptoms. In addition, we include EORTC single items for hair loss.

    Time frame: on average of 15 month

  5. Assessment of quality of life (Body Image Scale BIS)

    It is a 10 items short instrument suitable for use in clinical trials. The BIS has a single sumscore; the response format is a 4-point Likert scale with high values indicating good body image.

    Time frame: on average of 15 month

  6. Patient reported-outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO- CTCAE)

    The PRO-CTCAE allow the assessment of those symptoms listed in the CTCAE that can be perceived by a patient him/herself. For most items PRO-CTCAE assesses symptom severity, but for some it covers also symptom frequency and interference with daily activities. In total, this PRO instrument covers 81 symptoms with 126 items using a 5-point Likert scale for grading. For the purpose of this study, we use the PRO-CTCAE-ITEMS (Item Library Version 1.0; Version date: 3/24/2016) Symptom Term: Hair loss.

    Time frame: on average of 15 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University Innsbruck, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
    Innsbruck, Tyrol 6020, Austria
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04117815
Lead sponsor
Medical University Innsbruck
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 7, 2019
Start date
May 18, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2020
Completion
Feb 28, 2021
Last update
Jan 20, 2022

Study contacts

Christian Marth, Prof Dr
study chair · Medical University Innsbruck

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion