CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04114968Updated Nov 6, 2020

Offering Cervical Cancer Screening to Older Women

An observational study in Uterine Cervical Neoplasm, Uterine Neoplasm and Uterine Cervical Disease, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to female participants aged 65 Years to 69 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-06.

Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2019; still recruiting 7 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20,000
Ages
65 Years to 69 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the effect and feasibility of expanding the target population in the Danish cervical cancer screening program to include women aged 65 to 69 years. The study also evaluates if HPV self-sampling constitutes an appropriate screening method among older women.

Read the detailed description

The study is a nationwide population-based prospective cohort study embedded in the routine cervical cancer screening program in the Central Denmark Region. The study includes all 65 to 69 years old Danish women with no record of a cervical cytology sample or screening invitation within the last five years. Furthermore, the women are not registered as ineligible for screening, eg due hysterectomy. Eligible women residing in the Central Denmark Region are allocated to the intervention group (n=20,000), while women residing in the other four Danish regions are allocated to the control group receiving standard care (n=71,500), which for this group is low-level opportunistic screening at the general practitioner (GP). The intervention group are invited for HPV-based screening by the GP or to request a self-sampling kit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasm
  • Uterine Neoplasm
  • Uterine Cervical Disease
  • Mass Screening

Keywords

  • HPV self-sampling, cervical cancer screening in older women
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20,000 is above the median of 204 across 1,683 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus is the lead sponsor of 1,274 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 69 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study population will include women who had their last cervical cytology sample or screening invitation recorded 5 years or more ago

Inclusion criteria

  • 65 to 69 years;
  • Resident in Denmark
  • No record of a cervical cytology or screening invitation in the past 5 years
  • Not registered as ineligible for screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Death
  • Migration to or from Denmark
  • Moving to or from the CDR
  • Residing in the CDR, but having GP in another region
  • A record of hysterectomy
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Intervention group

    Eligible women residing in the Central Denmark Region will be assigned to intervention group. Women in the intervention group receive an invitation for HPV-based cervical cancer screening by attending either 1) GP-based screening or 2) HPV self-sampling. The self-sampling kit includes the dry Evalyn brush self-sampling device (Rovers Medical Devices B.V, Oss, Netherlands), written and picture-based user instructions on how to collect and mail the self-sample, and a prestamped return envelope addressed to the Department of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital.

    Other: GP-based screening or HPV self-sampling

  • Control group

    Eligible women residing in the other five Danish regions (North, Central, South, Zealand and Capital ) will be assigned to control group. Women in the control group will receive usual care, which for 65-69 year-old women is opportunistic cervical cancer screening at the GP

Interventions

  • OtherGP-based screening or HPV self-sampling

    Women in the intervention group will receive an invitation for HPV-based cervical cancer screening by either 1) scheduling an appointment for a cervical cytology by the GP or 2) collect a cervico-vaginal sample themselves in their own home using a self-sampling kit.

    Also known as: Opportunistics GP-based screening

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Participation rate in the intervention group:

    Participation rate, eg the roportion of targeted women participating by GP-based screening or self-sampling

    Time frame: 1 year post invitation

  2. HPV prevalence

    Number of women tested positive for HPV

    Time frame: 1 year post invitation

  3. Compliance to follow-up among HPV-positive self-samplers

    The proportion of HPV-positive self-samplers who attend appropriate follow-up by their GP for onward referral

    Time frame: 90 days post test results

  4. Screening history

    Screening history of participants and non-participants in the intervention group

    Time frame: Average of 10 years

  5. Intervention versus control group:

    Participation rate

    Time frame: 1 year post invitation

  6. Cytological findings

    Proportion of abnormal cytological findings between the intervention and control group is compared

    Time frame: 1 year post invitation

  7. Histological findings

    Proportion of abnormal histological findings between the intervention and control group is compared

    Time frame: 1 year post invitation

  8. Incidence

    The incidence rate of cervical cancer developed within 5 year is compared between the intervention and control group

    Time frame: 5 year post invitation

  9. Mortality

    The mortality rate of cervical cancer developed within 5 year is compared between the intervention and control group

    Time frame: 5 year post invitation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Mette Tranberg Nielsen
    Randers, Randers NØ 8930, Denmark
    • Mette tranberg Nielsen, phd · Contact · mettrani@rm.dk · 40113676
    • Berit Andersen, MD, PhD · Contact · berand@rm.dk · 784 20171
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tranberg M, Petersen LK, Elfstrom KM, Hammer A, Blaakaer J, Bennetsen MH, Jensen JS, Andersen B. Expanding the upper age limit for cervical cancer screening: a protocol for a nationwide non-randomised intervention study. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e039636. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039636. PubMed 33154056 ↗
  • Hammer A, Gustafson LW, Christensen PN, Brondum R, Andersen B, Andersen RH, Tranberg M. Implementation of p16/Ki67 dual stain cytology in a Danish routine screening laboratory: Importance of adequate training and experience. Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(21):8235-8242. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3399. Epub 2020 Sep 7. PubMed 32894896 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 6, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04114968
Lead sponsor
University of Aarhus
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 3, 2019
Start date
Sep 30, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2020

Study contacts

Mette Tranberg, Post doc PhD
Contact
mettrani@rm.dk
+45 784 20264
Mette T Tranberg, post doc phd
principal investigator · Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion