CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04108572CHErIsHUpdated Oct 5, 2021

The Choosing Healthy Eating for Infant Health (CHErIsH) Study

An interventional study of Infant feeding in Pediatric Obesity, sponsored by University College Cork. Completed at 1 site in Ireland. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-05.

Sponsored by University College Cork · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Choosing Healthy Eating for Infant Health (CHErIsH) intervention is a complex infant feeding intervention delivered at infant vaccination visits, alongside a healthcare professional (HCP) level implementation strategy to support delivery. The primary aim of CHErIsH pilot feasibility study is to collect and examine data on the acceptability and feasibility of the delivery of the brief infant-feeding intervention by HCPs to parents at child vaccination visits, and the strategy to support the implementation of this intervention in primary care for HCPs. Furthermore, half of all potential participants will be invited to provide maternal and infant biomarkers and/or take part in SWAT (study within a trial) which includes questions about infant feeding that were put together as part of a Core Outcome Set. These questions are important as they give a better understanding about what works and what doesn't. This will facilitate the refinement of the intervention and its implementation strategy, and inform the next step of the CHErIsH study, such as a definitive trial.

Read the detailed description

The Choosing Healthy Eating for Infant Health (CHErIsH) intervention is a non-randomised feasibility study of an infant feeding intervention and implementation strategy, with embedded process evaluation and economic evaluation.

The CHErIsH feasibility study will address the following research questions:

  1. Are the intervention content, delivery and implementation procedures acceptable to parents who will receive the intervention, and HCPs who will deliver the intervention?
  2. Are the data collection processes, including mode and duration of data collection and outcome measures used, acceptable to parents and HCPs?
  3. Is the intervention feasible to deliver in primary care practice, in terms fidelity of delivery and receipt of the intervention?
  4. Is the study feasible in terms of recruitment and retention procedures and data collection?
  5. What are the costs associated with the intervention and its implementation strategy?
02

Conditions studied

  • Pediatric Obesity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Child Obesity
  • Infant Feeding
  • Feasibility study
03

In context

Pediatric Obesity

1,117 studies on the registry are indexed under Pediatric Obesity; 189 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 103 across 862 interventional studies indexed under Pediatric Obesity.

Browse Pediatric Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

University College Cork is the lead sponsor of 116 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria (Health care professionals):

  • Involved in the delivery of routine infant vaccinations
  • Completed training to deliver the intervention.

Inclusion Criteria (Parents):

  • Parent of an infant ≤ 6 weeks of age at study recruitment.
  • Intends to attend a participating GP and/or PN in the primary care centre for child's vaccination visits.
  • Is over 18 years of age.
  • Can provide written informed consent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • n/a
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Infant feeding intervention

    The intervention will be delivered to parents by practice nurses and/or GPs in MPHC at each of the vaccination visits, prior to administration of the vaccination. These vaccination visits take place at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 13 months. This intervention consists of 1) verbally delivered pre-specified infant feeding messages, and 2) provision of additional infant-feeding resources including an information leaflet, a magnet, an infant bib and access to an informational website.

    Behavioral: Infant feeding

Interventions

  • BehavioralInfant feeding

    Verbally delivered pre-specified infant feeding message. The messages focus on appropriate milk feeding and establishing complementary feeding and solid food introduction in relation to timing and practical guidance around processes of feeding and provision of additional infant-feeding resources including information leaflet, a magnet, an infant bib and access to an informational website.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Parent intervention feedback

    Four-item measures of implementation outcomes including Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) will be used together to assess the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of the parent-level intervention (following intervention cessation). Scale values range from 1 to 5. 1 = completely disagree and 5 completely agree.

    Time frame: Tp3= at infant's 13 month vaccination visit.

  2. Healthcare professional intervention feedback

    Four-item measures of implementation outcomes including Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) will be used together to assess the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of the parent-level intervention (following intervention cessation). Scale values range from 1 to 5. 1 = completely disagree and 5 completely agree.

    Time frame: Tp3= at infant's 13 month vaccination visit.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intervention reach and recruitment

    Number of invitations sent to parents, acceptances to participate, and refusals

    Time frame: Tp1= baseline, prior to infant's 2-month vaccination visit; Tp2= by the infant's 6-month vaccination visit); Tp3= at infant's 13 month vaccination visit.

  2. Appropriateness of parent data collection processes and outcome measures

    Number of missing items self report questionnaires and follow-up rates

    Time frame: Tp1= baseline, prior to infant's 2-month vaccination visit; Tp2= by the infant's 6-month vaccination visit); Tp3= at infant's 13 month vaccination visit.

  3. Parent intervention fidelity

    Checklist assessing intervention components received by parent (e.g., 'Did you receive a leaflet about infant feeding?').

    Time frame: Tp3= at infant's 13 month vaccination visit.

  4. Healthcare professional intervention fidelity

    Checklist assessing intervention components delivered by HCPs (e.g., 'Did you provide parent with a leaflet about infant feeding?').

    Time frame: Tp3= at infant's 13 month vaccination visit.

  5. Estimate of resources and costs needed to deliver the intervention

    Resources in relation the intervention will be identified. Costs incurred as a consequence of the intervention and implementation strategy will be identified. This will include all time and resources expended, and costs borne by Healthcare Centre including the training and time spent by healthcare professionals and administrative staff involved in the study.

    Time frame: Tp3= at infant's 13 month vaccination visit.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mallow Primary Health Care Centre
    Cork, T12 VFP4, Ireland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Queally M, Doherty E, Finucane FM, O'Neill C. Low expectations: Do teachers underestimate the ability of overweight children or the children of overweight mothers? Econ Hum Biol. 2017 Nov;27(Pt A):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 28. PubMed 28486211 ↗
  • Black L, Matvienko-Sikar K, Kearney PM. The association between childcare arrangements and risk of overweight and obesity in childhood: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2017 Oct;18(10):1170-1190. doi: 10.1111/obr.12575. Epub 2017 Jul 4. PubMed 28677302 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 5, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04108572
Lead sponsor
University College Cork
Collaborators
National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland, University of Dublin, Trinity College
Responsible party
Patricia Kearney (Principle Investigator, University College Cork) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 30, 2019
Start date
Apr 11, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2020
Completion
Dec 31, 2020
Last update
Oct 5, 2021

Study contacts

Prof Patricia Kearney
principal investigator · University College Cork

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion