ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04108117SORIUpdated Sep 11, 2023

Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes After Robotic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction

An observational study in Postoperative Complications, Recurrence and Breast Neoplasms, sponsored by Severance Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to female participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-11.

Sponsored by Severance Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
659
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Robotic mastectomy with immediate reconstruction was introduced by Toesca et al. in 2015. Since then, several studies have reported the safety and feasibility of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. However, most studies were conducted by single centers and had small samples. Furthermore, there is a lack of studies comparing surgical and oncologic outcomes between robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy. For this reason, this study evaluates surgical and oncologic outcomes of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction using international multi-center data.

Read the detailed description

This study is an international multi-center pooled analysis using prospective and retrospective studies to evaluate surgical and oncologic outcomes of robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction.

Raw data for robotic or conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy from Severance Hospital, Samsung Medical Center, the European Institute of Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, and Gustave Roussy is collected. Among them, Severance Hospital takes the lead at performing analysis from the data. Storage and disposal of patients' records are managed by each researcher. In the analysis process, although the collaborators can request records from Severance Hospital if necessary, they are only supposed to be provided computerized data which were originally clinical data from patients who already ended treatments. In this case, individual identifying data and medical records are not shown.

Clinicopathologic variables including operation times, hospital stay, medical history, smoking history, family history, BMI, menopausal status, specimen weight, TNM stage, grade, histological type, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, Ki 67, and perivascular involvement are analyzed.

Postoperative complications within 30 days are collected and classified by the Clavien-Dindo grade. Locoregional recurrence-free survival and local and systemic recurrences are examined. Patients whose data have been retrospective for at least one month are to be examined.

Patient's and surgeon's satisfaction using Breast Q is evaluated. Categorical variables are examined using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test if indicated.

Continuous variables are examined using the independent t-test or ANOVA if indicated.

The estimated sample size from the four institutions is about 300 cases for robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and matched cases for conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Propensity matching analysis is applied to reduce confounding factors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Complications
  • Recurrence
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Breast Cancer
  • BRCA1 Mutation
  • BRCA2 Mutation
  • Surgery
  • Surgery--Complications

Keywords

  • Robotic mastectomy
  • Breast neoplasms
  • Postoperative complications
  • Recurrence
  • Prognosis
  • Survivals
  • Nipple sparing mastectomy
  • Immediate reconstruction
03

In context

Postoperative Complications

1,332 studies on the registry are indexed under Postoperative Complications; 311 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 659 is above the median of 251 across 537 observational studies indexed under Postoperative Complications.

Browse Postoperative Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

Severance Hospital is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy between 2016 and 2020 at Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy between 2016 and 2020 at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Patients who underwent nipple sparing mastectomy between 2014 and 2019 at European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

Patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy between 2017 and 2019 at Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua City, Taiwan.

Patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy between 2015 and 2019 at Gustave Roussy, Paris, France.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women who underwent nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction
  • Women with early breast cancer
  • Women with germline BRCA 1/2 mutation or germline mutations in genetic susceptibility genes
  • Women with interstitial mastopathy
  • Women with risk-reducing mastectomy or contralateral mastectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients
  • Women with stage IV disease at diagnosis
  • Women who underwent previous breast cancer surgery
  • Women who received prior radiotherapy for the ipsilateral breast
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
659 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Robotic nipple sparing mastectomy group/RNSM

    Cases or Patients who underwent robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction are enrolled in this arm. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy should be performed using robotic surgical systems. Robotic surgical systems include da Vinci S,Si, X, Xi, and SP systems. Axillary or lateral incisions are used for this procedure. Immediate reconstruction includes tissue expander insertion, direct-to-implant, latissimus dorsi flap, transverse abdominis rectus muscle flap, or deep inferior epigastric perforators flap. Cases with robotic mastectomy without immediate reconstruction are excluded. The estimated sample size for this arm is 300 cases.

    Procedure: Robotic nipple sparing mastectomy

  • Conventional nipple sparing mastectomy group/CNSM

    Cases or Patients who underwent conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction are enrolled in this arm. Conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy should not be performed using robotic or endoscopic surgical systems. Axillary or lateral incisions that are similar to incisions in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy are not allowed. Other than axillary or lateral incisions can be performed for this procedure. Immediate reconstruction includes tissue expander insertion, direct-to-implant, latissimus dorsi flap, transverse abdominis rectus muscle flap, or deep inferior epigastric perforators flap. Cases with nipple-sparing mastectomy without immediate reconstruction are excluded. The estimated sample size for this arm is 300 cases.

Interventions

  • ProcedureRobotic nipple sparing mastectomy

    Robotic nipple sparing mastectomy means nipple sparing mastectomy performed using robotic surgical systems.

    Also known as: Robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy, Robot mastectomy, Robotic mastectomy, Hybrid robotic nipple sparing mastectomy, Robot-assisted nipple areolar complex and skin sparing mastectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative complication rates in 30 days

    Postoperative complication rates are calculated as total number of postoperative complication cases per total operation cases.

    Time frame: Postoperative 30 days

  2. Clavien-Dindo grade of postoperative complications

    Clavien-Dindo grade of postoperative complications is evaluated. The highest grade of postoperative complications are used for the analysis.

    Time frame: Postoperative 30 days

  3. Nipple necrosis rates

    Nipple necrosis rates are calculated as number of total nipple necrosis cases per total operation cases.

    Time frame: Postoperative 30 days

  4. Recurrence free survival (RFS)

    Events of RFS includes locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, and death. Contralateral breast cancer and second primary malignancy are considered to be censored data.

    Time frame: Postoperative 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operation times

    Mastectomy time or reconstruction time

    Time frame: Time during operation

  2. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS)

    In breast tumor recurrences (IBTR), regional recurrences including axillary, internal mammary, or supraclavicular lymph node recurrences, and death without any cause are events of locoregional recurrence-free survival. Five year LRFS is measured. Distant metastasis, contralateral breast cancer and second primary malignancy are considered to be censored data.

    Time frame: Postoperative 5 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Yonsei University College of Medicine
    Seoul, 120-752, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M, Bonanni B, Curigliano G, Rietjens M, Viale G, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast. 2017 Feb;31:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 2. PubMed 27810700 ↗
  • Park HS, Kim JH, Lee DW, Song SY, Park S, Kim SI, Ryu DH, Cho YU. Gasless Robot-Assisted Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Case Report. J Breast Cancer. 2018 Sep;21(3):334-338. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e45. Epub 2018 Sep 20. PubMed 30275863 ↗
  • Galimberti V, Morigi C, Bagnardi V, Corso G, Vicini E, Fontana SKR, Naninato P, Ratini S, Magnoni F, Toesca A, Kouloura A, Rietjens M, De Lorenzi F, Vingiani A, Veronesi P. Oncological Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Single-Center Experience of 1989 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;25(13):3849-3857. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6759-0. Epub 2018 Sep 17. PubMed 30225833 ↗
  • Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V, Manconi A, Intra M, Gentilini O, Sances D, Negri D, Veronesi G, Rietjens M, Zurrida S, Luini A, Veronesi U, Veronesi P. Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Implant: First Report of Surgical Technique. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):e28-e30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001397. No abstract available. PubMed 28692558 ↗
  • Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Nevola Teixeira LF. Reply to the letter to the editor "Robotic-assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A feasibility study on cadaveric models" by Sarfati B. et al. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Apr;70(4):558-560. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 23. No abstract available. PubMed 28153430 ↗
  • Lai HW, Wang CC, Lai YC, Chen CJ, Lin SL, Chen ST, Lin YJ, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. The learning curve of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: An analysis of consecutive 39 procedures with cumulative sum plot. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;45(2):125-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Oct 17. PubMed 30360987 ↗
  • Lai HW, Lin SL, Chen ST, Chen SL, Lin YL, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Gel Implant. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Jun 11;6(6):e1828. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001828. eCollection 2018 Jun. PubMed 30276055 ↗
  • Lai HW. Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Gel Implant. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jan;26(1):53-54. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6711-3. Epub 2018 Aug 25. No abstract available. PubMed 30145648 ↗
  • Lai HW, Lin SL, Chen ST, Lin YL, Chen DR, Pai SS, Kuo SJ. Robotic nipple sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with robotic latissimus dorsi flap harvest - Technique and preliminary results. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Oct;71(10):e59-e61. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 2. No abstract available. PubMed 30122600 ↗
  • Lai HW, Chen ST, Lin SL, Chen CJ, Lin YL, Pai SH, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Gel Implant: Technique, Preliminary Results and Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jan;26(1):42-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6704-2. Epub 2018 Aug 14. PubMed 30109537 ↗
  • Lai HW, Chen ST, Lin SL, Lin YL, Wu HK, Pai SH, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Technique for single axillary incision robotic assisted quadrantectomy and immediate partial breast reconstruction with robotic latissimus dorsi flap harvest for breast cancer: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(27):e11373. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011373. PubMed 29979425 ↗
  • Sarfati B, Struk S, Leymarie N, Honart JF, Alkhashnam H, Tran de Fremicourt K, Conversano A, Rimareix F, Simon M, Michiels S, Kolb F. Robotic Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;25(9):2579-2586. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6555-x. Epub 2018 Jun 29. PubMed 29959612 ↗
  • Sarfati B, Struk S, Leymarie N, Honart JF, Alkhashnam H, Kolb F, Rimareix F. Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: Surgical Technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Sep;142(3):624-627. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004703. PubMed 29879007 ↗
  • Sarfati B, Honart JF, Leymarie N, Rimareix F, Al Khashnam H, Kolb F. Robotic da Vinci Xi-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: First clinical report. Breast J. 2018 May;24(3):373-376. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12937. Epub 2017 Dec 18. PubMed 29251382 ↗
  • Sarfati B, Honart JF, Leymarie N, Kolb F, Rimareix F. Robotic-assisted Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A feasibility study on cadaveric models. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Nov;69(11):1571-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Sep 8. No abstract available. PubMed 27665275 ↗
  • Park HS, Lee J, Lai HW, Park JM, Ryu JM, Lee JE, Kim JY, Marrazzo E, De Scalzi AM, Corso G, Montemurro F, Gazzetta G, Pozzi G, Toesca A. Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic and Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction: International Multicenter Pooled Data Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(11):6646-6657. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11865-x. Epub 2022 May 18. PubMed 35583693 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — After completion of this study, IPD can be considered based on the decision of the study steering comittee.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2020 to primary completion in May 2022, 23 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 26, 2019
First posted
Sep 27, 2019
StartActual
May 14, 2020
Primary completionActual
May 4, 2022
CompletionActual
May 18, 2022
Last update
Sep 11, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04108117
Lead sponsor
Severance Hospital
Collaborators
European Institute of Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Samsung Medical Center
Responsible party
Hyung Seok Park, MD, PhD (Clinical Associate Professor, Severance Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 27, 2019
Start date
May 14, 2020
Primary completion
May 4, 2022
Completion
May 18, 2022
Last update
Sep 11, 2023

Study contacts

Hyung Seok Park, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Severance Hospital
Antonio Toesca, MD
principal investigator · European Institute of Oncology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion