CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04099537SPAATUpdated Feb 28, 2022

Skin Picking Approach Avoidance Task

An interventional study of Computerized cognitive training in Skin-Picking, sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-28.

Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2018, registered Mar 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pathological skin picking (PSP) is conceptualized as a behavioral addiction. Research has shown that behavioral addictions (e.g., problematic alcoholism or smoking) can be reduced using a cognitive retraining tool called approach-avoidance training (AAT). Participants will be randomly assigned to a single-session of AAT: (a) approach training, (b) avoidance training, or (c) placebo training and will be assessed at baseline, post-training (i.e., 30 minutes after training), and 2-week follow up. The investigators hypothesize that those in the approach training will show greater reduction in approach tendencies at post-treatment and 2-week follow up, compared to those in the approach training or placebo conditions. This study may produce data that will guide the development of a training program that focuses on the maladaptive action tendencies in skin picking symptoms.

Read the detailed description

Pathological Skin Picking (PSP) is one of many debilitating Body Focused Repetitive Behaviors (BFRBs) that involves repetitive picking to gain the gratification of relieving anxiety or tension. Thus, this behavior may cause infections, lesions, and scarring, resulting in psychosocial impairment or medical attention. Because of the habitual/compulsive nature of the disorder, researchers conceptualize this maladaptive coping mechanism as a behavioral addiction which may occur without conscious awareness. Therefore, it is important to identify the automatic motivational orientations behind BFRBs. There is compelling evidence to suggest that a novel technological behavior paradigm, called Approach Avoidance Training (AAT), can be used to assess and modify action tendencies (i.e., approach or avoidance) in behavioral addictions like PSP. This game-like task has the participant push (=avoid) or pull (=approach) a joystick based on a target and control stimulus presented on a computer screen. This push-pull paradigm is in response to the individual's inherent action tendencies.

The overarching goal is to determine effective principles of change in interventions for BFRBs. Therefore, assessing neurocognitive components using computer-based training programs can help identify the implicit processes underlying the disorder. The objective of the study is to examine the feasibility of using AAT to modify PSP action tendencies, and potentially improve PSP symptoms. The investigators predict that individuals with PSP will have a pathological approach tendency towards skin as measured by the Approach-Avoidance Assessment (AAA). Therefore, AAT will promote reduction of approach to skin stimuli. To retrain one's action tendencies the investigators will randomize participants to the following training conditions: Avoidance Training (AvT; avoidance of skin stimuli), Approach Training (ApT; approach skin stimuli), or Placebo Training (PT; equal approach/avoidance of skin stimuli). The investigators will also administer an eye-tracking task to assess visual gaze response to pictures of irregular skin and neutral stimuli to evaluate training-induced changes in action tendencies. Previous studies have shown the AAT's success in reducing action tendencies and symptoms in other addictions like problematic alcohol use and cigarette smoking Therefore, AAT may prove effective in modifying the behavioral addiction of PSP. Sixty adults with PSP will be randomly assigned to (a) approach training (b) avoidance training or (c) placebo training. All participants will then be sent a follow-up survey approximately two weeks after completion of the main study to determine changes in symptoms. This pilot study is expected to guide the development of an accessible, cost-efficient, and effective cognitive training programs for individuals with PSP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin-Picking

Keywords

  • skin picking
  • cognitive training
  • approach-avoidance
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. A current diagnosis of skin picking
  2. Moderate symptoms of skin picking a Skin Picking Severity Scale (SPS) score of ≥ 7
  3. Ages 18-60,
  4. Fluent English speakers.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Self-reported visual impairment that cannot be adjusted and will prevent participants from clearly recognizing words and pictures on computer screen
  2. A positive diagnosis of bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Approach cognitive training

    This training is a single session training. Each session lasts about 30 minutes where participants are to pull the joystick toward (approach) them when seeing skin stimuli on a computer screen.

    Behavioral: Computerized cognitive training

  • Experimental
    Avoidance cognitive training

    This training is a single session training. Each session lasts about 30 minutes where participants are to push the joystick away (avoidance) from them when seeing skin stimuli on a computer screen.

    Behavioral: Computerized cognitive training

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo cognitive training

    This training is a single session training. Each session lasts about 30 minutes where participants are to push and pull the joystick towards or away from them (no rule) when seeing skin stimuli on a computer screen.

    Behavioral: Computerized cognitive training

Interventions

  • BehavioralComputerized cognitive training

    Participants are trained to approach or avoid stimuli of skin using a joystick. Participants are to pull or push the joystick toward or away when skin stimuli are present. Thus, behaviorally, there may be an increase, decrease, or no change in approach tendencies towards skin.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Behavioral Approach Tendency After a Single Training Session

    This assessment evaluates behavioral approach (i.e., reaction time to avoid - reaction to approach) to irregular skin stimuli before and after training (i.e., the AAT). The investigators will measure reaction time to approach irregular skin stimuli before training and then measure changes in reaction time to approach irregular skin stimuli immediately after training (i.e., post-training; defined as 30 minutes after training). The investigators will then average the reaction time for each group, and then evaluate statistical differences between groups.

    Time frame: Pre-training, Post-training (30-minutes after training)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Urges to Pick After Training

    Evaluates urges to pick before and immediately after training (same-day post-training), using a behavioral approach task. Urges will be rated on a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no urges to pick and 100 indicates severe urges to pick. Participants will rate urges to pick for a total of 3 minutes and identify different areas where they feel the urge to pick. The investigators will then average the differences in urges within groups, and then evaluate statistical differences between groups.

    Time frame: Pre-training, Post-training (30-minutes after training)

  2. Changes in scores on the Skin Picking Scale-Revised (SPS-R).

    This 8-item scale measures skin picking severity (4 items) and impairment (4 items). The scale ranges from 0 to 32, where higher scores represent worse skin picking severity. Sub-scales ranges from 0 to 16, where the scores are summed to compute a total score.

    Time frame: Pre-training, 2 weeks (follow-up)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Psychology Clinic, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53211, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04099537
Lead sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Responsible party
Han Joo Lee (Professor, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 23, 2019
Start date
Jul 2, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 22, 2020
Completion
Jun 22, 2020
Last update
Feb 28, 2022

Study contacts

Han Joo Lee, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion