ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04095884Updated Jan 9, 2020

An Observational Study Designed to Elucidate the Pathways by Which Inflammation Contributes to Anaemia in Sick Rural African Children From 6 Months to 36 Months

An observational study in Iron Deficiency, Anaemia in Children, sponsored by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Status unknown at 1 site in Gambia. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 36 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-09.

Sponsored by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
6 Months to 36 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Investigator have previously shown that hepcidin is up-regulated even by low levels of inflammation and, according to our prior stable isotope studies, is predicted to block iron absorption. In this follow-up observational study, the investigator aim to characterise the relationship between infections, acute inflammation, hepcidin and iron iron deficiency anaemia in rural African children. The Investigator will study 200 sick children (6-36 months of age) living in the rural region of West Kiang.

The Investigator will:

  1. Recruit 50 sick febrile children in each of 4 categories; Upper Respiratory tract infections, Lower respiratory tract infections (pneumonia), Urinary tract infections, gastroenteritis.
  2. Assess iron absorption and its relationship to iron and anaemia status, inflammation, EPO, erythroferrone and hepcidin.
Read the detailed description

Aim 1: To test whether non-malarial infections increase hepcidin levels and for how long in sick children (note that the investigator exclude malaria because the investigator and others have previously examined the effect of malaria).

Hypothesis 1: On day 0, 3 and 7 of acute illness, hepcidin will be higher when compared to levels in well children. On Day 14 iron absorption and hepcidin levels will have returned to baseline.

Research Question 1: What affect do non-malarial infections (upper respiratory tract infections, lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections and gastroenteritis) have on hepcidin levels and how long does this effect last?

Aim 2: To retest our existing hepcidin threshold for discriminating iron absorbers from non-absorbers by repeating our prior ROC analysis based on a much larger sample.

Hypothesis: On day 0, 3 and 7 of acute illness, iron absorption will be lower. On Day 14, iron absorption will be equivalent to iron absorption in well children. Note that the Hepcidin levels and iron absorption data obtained in this study will be compared with the results obtained from similarly aged children in IDeA Study 1 (SCC 1664). Also note that The investigator anticipate that most of the children enrolled in this study will have a base-line level of anaemia (eg Hgb\<11g/dL).

Research Question: What is the relationship between hepcidin and oral iron absorption in acute illness and convalescence and how does this differ from the relationship in well children?

Aim 3: To examine EPO synthesis and EPO resistance in children with acute non-malarial infections?

Hypotheses:

  1. Children with acute non-malaria infections will have both acute and chronic anaemia of inflammation.
  2. EPO is increased during acute infection.

Research Question: Is there decreased EPO synthesis and/or increased EPO resistance in children with acute non-malarial infections living in rural Gambia?

Aim 4: To examine erythroferrone in children with acute non-malarial infections leaving in rural Gambia.

Hypothesis: First The investigator will conduct a hypothesis-free exploratory analysis to assess whether erythroferrone behaves as predicted based upon mouse models (ie up-regulated by stress erythropoiesis and inversely related to hepcidin). The investigator additionally hypothesize that there may be a vicious cycle initiated by inflammation and then perpetuated by the consequent low levels of (iron-restricted) erythropoiesis, leading to low erythroferrone and loss of hepcidin suppression.

Research Question: What is the relationship between erythroferrone, iron status, inflammation, hepcidin, EPO and CRP in anaemic and non-anaemic children living in rural Gambia? This is an observational study of 200 sick children who will be recruited at the Keneba clinic. Each child will be seen four times (at day 0, 3, 7 14).

200 subjects aged 6 -36m brought to Keneba clinic with an acute illness. 50 patients from each category: Upper respiratory tract infections (including ear, nose and throat infections), Lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections and gastroenteritis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Iron Deficiency, Anaemia in Children

Browse trials for

03

In context

Iron Deficiencies

386 studies on the registry are indexed under Iron Deficiencies; 80 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is close to the median of 200 across 77 observational studies indexed under Iron Deficiencies.

Browse Iron Deficiencies studies →

Lead sponsor

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine is the lead sponsor of 298 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 36 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

sick children with fever

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female children ages 6-36 months
  • Fever ( > 37.5C) and/or signs of illness.
  • Signed or fingerprinted or personally marked written obtained from their parent/guardian.
  • Parent/guardian plans for subject to reside in study site area and are able and willing to adhere to all protocol visits and procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Critically unwell requiring stabilisation and transfer i.e. scores 3 on initial assessment
  2. Sickle cell disease
  3. Evidence of hookworm infection by stool microscopy
  4. Administration of or other immune-modifying agents within 90 days prior to study IP administration (e.g., systemic at doses equivalent to ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/day of prednisone for more than 14 days; topical steroids including inhaled and intranasal steroids are not exclusionary).
  5. Administration of systemic antibiotic treatment within 3 days prior to study enrolment.
  6. Any history of or evidence for chronic (as per investigator assessment) disorder or disease (including, but not limited to, immunodeficiency, autoimmunity, malnutrition*, congenital abnormality, bleeding disorder, and pulmonary, cardiovascular, metabolic, neurologic, renal, or hepatic disease). * Other than the exclusionary clinical diagnosis of malnutrition for all subjects, in children 2 to 5 years of age, malnutrition is also defined as a weight-for-height Z-score of less than -3 as per WHO reference standards.
  7. Any history of , chronic or chronic infections.
  8. Any condition that in the opinion of the investigator might compromise the safety or well-being of the subject or compromise adherence to protocol procedures
  9. Participation in another MRC study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Urinary Tract Infection

    Inclusion criteria (one from the list below): 1. Positive leukocytes, positive nitrites on dipstick 2. Negative leukocytes, Positive nitrites on dipstick 3. Positive leukocytes, negative nitrites, plus bacteriuria on microscopy 4. Positive leukocytes, negative nitrities plus no bacteriuria, only pyuria on microscopy PLUS clinical features e.g. fever, pain on urination, offensive smelling urine. Exclusion criteria (one from the list below): 1. No evidence of UTI on dipstick

    Procedure: blood sampling

  • Upper respiratory tract infection

    Inclusion criteria (one from the list below):: 1. Evidence of nasal discharge AND/OR 2. Inflammation throat/ tonsils on direct examination AND/OR 3. Inflammation of middle or outer ear on direct examination 4. History of fever AND history of stridor/ barking cough 5. History of fever AND lymphadenopathy AND/ OR URTI symptoms i.e sore throat/ cough Exclusion criteria (one from the list below):: 1. Foreign body inserted in either nose/ ear 2. Traumatic perforation of ear drum 3. Allergic rhinitis i.e. good contact history 4. Evidence of LRTI

    Procedure: blood sampling

  • Lower respiratory tract infection

    Inclusion criteria (one from the list below): 1. Focal signs on auscultation of the chest i.e crepitations/ wheeze/ reduced air entry 2. Fever \> 38.5C AND chest recessions AND/OR raised respiratory rate 3. Radiological evidence of LRTI Exclusion criteria (one from the list below): 1. Positive malaria test OR suspicion of metabolic acidosis causing tachypnoea and fever

    Procedure: blood sampling

  • Diarrhoea/ gastroenteritis

    Inclusion criteria (one from the list below): 1. Abrupt onset of 3 or more loose/liquid stools/ day 2. Ova, cysts, parasites identified on stool microscopy PLUS symptomatic diarrhoea,and/ or fever and/or vomiting 3. Fever AND vomiting WITHOUT other source of fever i.e UTI/LRTI/URTI Exclusion criteria (one from the list below): 1. Normal breast milk stool 2. Neurological cause of vomiting

    Procedure: blood sampling

Interventions

  • Procedureblood sampling

    observational study and no intervention will be given. only blood samples collected and treated with iron supplements

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Serum hepcidin from baseline to day 14

    Time frame: Day 14

  2. Change in Clinical score of site and severity of infection and inflammation from baseline to day 14

    Time frame: Day 14

Secondary outcomes

  1. serum iron levels

    Increase in serum iron levels above baseline following an oral ferrous fumarate dose as a measure of iron absorption

    Time frame: Day 0, 3, 7 & 14

  2. Erythropoietin

    Time frame: Day 0, 3, 7 & 14

  3. Erythroferrone

    Time frame: Day 0, 3, 7 & 14

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Keneba MRC Unit
    West Kiang, Banjul 0000, Gambia
    Recruiting
    • Elizabeth Ledger, MBBCh · Contacteledger@mrc.gm · +220 4495442-6
    • Carla Cerami, MD · Principal investigator
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2023, 42 months after the start.

Of 24 observational studies under Iron Deficiencies, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 42 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 4, 2019
First posted
Sep 19, 2019
StartActual
Jul 17, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2023
CompletionEst.
Apr 2023
Last update
Jan 9, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04095884
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 19, 2019
Start date
Jul 17, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 9, 2020

Study contacts

Carla Cerami, MD
Contact
ccerami@mrc.gm
00220-4495442-6
Elizabeth Ledger, BMBCh
Contact
eledger@mrc.gm
+220-4495442-6

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion