An interventional study of Zip-stitch(TM) in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, sponsored by ZSX Medical LLC. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-07.
Sponsored by ZSX Medical LLC · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Zip-stitch™ Vaginal Cuff Closure System. This will be primarily done by measuring the frequency of implant passing following system use. Also assessed will be relevant safety and efficacy endpoints as compared to a two-to-one reference group (V-LOC barbed suture).
This is a prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Zip-stitch™ System in maintaining vaginal cuff closure following laparoscopic hysterectomy. Participating subjects will be randomized and evaluated for implant passing, successful cuff closure, healing, adverse events, dyspareunia, and pain. Blinded follow-up will involve in-person visits at one week, six weeks, and six months. There will be an additional unblinded follow-up by telephone at 12 months post operatively.
ZSX Medical LLC is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Zip-stitch clips for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy
Device: Zip-stitch(TM)
Will not be comparative against the test article, but will be performed for reference and safety.
Device: Zip-stitch(TM)
The assigned intervention is used to close the cuff following colpotomy.
Primary Efficacy Endpoint - Number of Participants With Implant Passing
Frequency of implant passing following laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure within six weeks
Time frame: Six-weeks post-operative
Primary Safety Endpoint - Number of Participants With Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence
Frequency of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence following laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.
Time frame: Six-weeks post-operative
Number of Participants With Successful Vaginal Cuff Closure
Binary, visual surgeon cuff closure evaluation
Time frame: Performed at one week, six weeks, and six months after surgery; reported here at six weeks
Number of Participants With Vaginal Cuff Healing
Binary, visual surgeon cuff healing evaluation
Time frame: Performed at one week, six weeks, and six months after surgery; reported here at six weeks
Comparison of Number of Participants With Implant Passing - Test to Reference
Percentage of subjects experiencing implant passing will be compared between test and reference groups
Time frame: evaluated at six months post-operative
Percentage of Participants With Implant Passing Events Determined to Impact Patient Safety
Each reported implant passing event will be evaluated for association with adverse events. Compared as a percentage of patients in the test vs. reference groups.
Time frame: Evaluated after one week, six week, six month, and twelve month follow-up
Comparison of Incidence of Adverse Events - Test to Reference
Adverse events and serious adverse events will be tabulated for both the test and reference groups.
Time frame: Evaluated after one week, six week, six month, and twelve month follow-up; reported here for all time
Number of Participants With Non-increase in Dyspareunia at Follow-up
Non-increase in reported individual subject dyspareunia from baseline to follow-up will be compared (test versus reference group) using the relevant sexual discomfort module of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The FSFI is a validated metric of female sexual function, where lower scores indicate poor sexual function. Non-increase in sexual discomfort will be compared between test and control groups.
Time frame: Six-months post-operative and again at 12 months post-operative
Number of Participants With Non-increase in Pain at Follow-up
Non-increase in reported individual subject pain from baseline to follow-up will be compared (test versus reference group) using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates maximum possible pain.
Time frame: Six-months post-operative and again at 12 months post-operative; count is number of subjects with non-increase
After the second surgery, enrollment was stopped for reasons unrelated to the study design or test article. The study was not resumed, so enrollment was ended with two subjects.
| Milestone | Test Article - Zip-stitch(TM) Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 2 | 0 |
| As-treated analysis | 1 | 1 |
| Completed | 2 | 0 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
Frequency of implant passing following laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure within six weeks
| Participants | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - VICRYL Suture |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Efficacy Endpoint - Number of Participants With Implant Passing | 0 | 1 |
Frequency of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence following laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.
| Participants | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Safety Endpoint - Number of Participants With Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence | 0 | 0 |
Binary, visual surgeon cuff closure evaluation
| Participants | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Successful Vaginal Cuff Closure | 1 | 0 |
Binary, visual surgeon cuff healing evaluation
| Participants | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Vaginal Cuff Healing | 1 | 0 |
Percentage of subjects experiencing implant passing will be compared between test and reference groups
| Participants | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Number of Participants With Implant Passing - Test to Reference | 1 | 1 |
Each reported implant passing event will be evaluated for association with adverse events. Compared as a percentage of patients in the test vs. reference groups.
| Participants | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Implant Passing Events Determined to Impact Patient Safety | 0 | 0 |
Adverse events and serious adverse events will be tabulated for both the test and reference groups.
| Participants | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of Incidence of Adverse Events - Test to Reference | 1 | 0 |
Non-increase in reported individual subject dyspareunia from baseline to follow-up will be compared (test versus reference group) using the relevant sexual discomfort module of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The FSFI is a validated metric of female sexual function, where lower scores indicate poor sexual function. Non-increase in sexual discomfort will be compared between test and control groups.
| Participants | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Non-increase in Dyspareunia at Follow-up | 0 | 0 |
Non-increase in reported individual subject pain from baseline to follow-up will be compared (test versus reference group) using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates maximum possible pain.
| Participants | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Non-increase in Pain at Follow-up | 1 | 1 |
Collected over One year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | 0/1 (0%) | 0/1 (0%) | 1/1 (100%) |
| Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | 0/1 (0%) | 0/1 (0%) | 0/1 (0%) |
| Event | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture |
|---|---|---|
| Cuff cellulitisReproductive system and breast disorders | 1/1 | 0/1 |
Study was stopped after two subjects enrolled
| Age, Continuous(years) | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 43 ± 3 | — | 43 ± 3 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| White | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Height(inches) | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 64.5 ± 3.5 | — | 64.5 ± 3.5 |
| Weight(pounds) | Test Article - Zip-stitch Clips | Reference Group - Vicryl Suture | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 164.5 ± 39.5 | — | 164.5 ± 39.5 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.